skip to main content
10.1145/3487923.3487935acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicartiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Automated Personal Carbon Footprint Calculator for Estimating Carbon Emissions from Transportation Use

Published:09 December 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Transportation is one of the biggest menaces to the planet, releasing several million tons of gases into the atmosphere on an annual basis. The growing use of transportation has expanded the concentration and release of these gases, which affect the environment in a number of ways such as depletion of the ozone layer, air pollution and more seriously, global warming and climate change. Among the different modes, road transportation is a significant contributor of greenhouse gas as it ejects dangerous gases directly into the atmosphere, and these emissions are predicted to increase drastically over the years. As such, it is essential to track and monitor emissions from transportation activities in an attempt to reduce the global emissions of greenhouse gases, through carbon footprint calculators. However, most of these calculators do not solely focus on transportation and the ones that do, require a substantial amount of effort and manual input. this paper investigates acceptance of an automated personal transportation-based carbon footprint calculator and its accuracy in monitoring and reducing carbon emissions. As part of this study, a mobile application called TCTracker was implemented using Global Positioning System (GPS) functionality and built-in artificial intelligence (AI) features. The acceptance of the tool was evaluated using the Technology Acceptance Model whereby involving forty users to evaluate four constructs notably, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, perceived enjoyment, and intention to use. Among these constructs, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness had the highest scores, to also depict the acceptance of the tool, while also sustaining interest in carbon footprint tracking.

References

  1. J. Hu, R. Wood, A. Tukker, and B. Boonman H.and de Boer. 2019. Global transport emissions in the swedish carbon footprint. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 210--220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. S. Wang and G. Mengpin. 2019. Everything you need to know about the fastest-growing source of global emissions: transport. https://www.wri.org/blog/2019/10/everythmg-you-need-know-about-fastest-growing-source-global-emissions-transport.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. G. Santos. 2017. Road transport and co2 emissions: what are the challenges? Transport Policy, 59, 71--74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. N. Arnell and S. Gosling. 2016. The impacts of climate change on river flood risk at the global scale. Climatic Change, 134, 3, 387--401.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. X. Wu, Y. Lu, S. Zhou, L. Chen, and B. Xu. 2016. Impact of climate change on human infectious diseases: empirical evidence and human adaptation. Environment international, 86, 14--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Carbon Trust. 2019. Carbon footprinting. an introduction for organizations. http://www.carbontrust.co.uk/publications/publicationdetail.htm?productid=CTV033.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. C Pertsova. 2007. Ecological economics research trends. Nova Science Publishers, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Scott H Matthews, Chris T Hendrickson, and Christopher L. Weber. 2008. The importance of carbon footprint estimation boundaries. Environmental Science & Technology, 42, 16, 5839--5842.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. D Pandey, M Agrawal, and J Pandey. 2010. Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 178, 1-4, 135--160.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. G. Bekaroo, D. Roopowa, and C. Bokhoree. 2019. Mobile-based carbon footprint calculation: insights from a usability study. In IEEE 2019 Conference on Next Generation Computing Applications (NextComp). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. G. Bekaroo, D. Roopowa, A. Zakari, and D. Niemeier. 2021. Calculating carbon emissions from personal travelling: insights from a top-down analysis of key calculators. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 7, 8853--8872.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Carbonocero. 2018. Carbonocero. (2018).http://www.carbonocero.org/nosotros.php.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Co2carma. 2018. About us - carbon carma. https://www.co2carma.com/about-us/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 32BitsCo. 2017. Car co2 tracker. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.tracker.carco2tracker&hl=en_AU.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Green Engineering Tips. 2018. Google play. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.co2.automobile&hl=en_US&gl=US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. L. Chapman. 2007. Transport and climate change: a review. Journal of Transport Geography, 15, 5, 354--367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. D. Berry and D. Belmont. 1951. Distribution of vehicle speeds and travel times. In Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Think Metric. 2021. Speed. https://thinkmetric.uk/basics/speed/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. ShrinkThatFootprint. 2017. Calculate your carbon footprint. http://shrinkthatfootprint.com/calculate-your-carbon-footprint.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. EPA. 2016. Basic information of air emissions factors and quantificatio. https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-factors-and-quantification/basic-information-air-emissions-factors-and-quantification#About\%20Emissions\%20Factors.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Eastern Research Group. 2013. Recommended Procedures for Development of Emissions Factors and Use of the Web-FIRE Database. Technical report. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, North Carolina.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Fred D. Davis. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 3, 320.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Mahmood Jasim Alsamydai. 2014. Adaptation of the technology acceptance model (tam) to the use of mobile banking services. International Review of Management and Business Research, 3, 4, 2018--2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. P. Legris, J. Ingham, and P. Collerette. 2003. Why do people use information technology? a critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & management, 40, 3, 191--204.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. B.H. Wixom and P.A. Todd. 2005. A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information systems research, 16, 1, 85--102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Priyanka Surendran. 2012. Technology acceptance model: a survey of literature. International Journal of Business and Social Research, 2, 4, 175--178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Fred D. Davis, Richard P. Bagozzi, and Paul R. Warshaw. 1992. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. I Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 14, 1111--1132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. G. Bekaroo, R. Sungkur, P. Ramsamy, A. Okolo, and W. Moedeen. 2018. Enhancing awareness on green consumption of electronic devices: the application of augmented reality. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 30, 279--291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Raj Raghunathan. 2012. Familiarity breeds enjoyment. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/sapient-nature/201201/familiarity-breeds-enjoyment.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An Automated Personal Carbon Footprint Calculator for Estimating Carbon Emissions from Transportation Use

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      icARTi '21: Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and its Applications
      December 2021
      125 pages
      ISBN:9781450385756
      DOI:10.1145/3487923

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 December 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      icARTi '21 Paper Acceptance Rate16of37submissions,43%Overall Acceptance Rate16of37submissions,43%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader