skip to main content
research-article

Roadrunner+: An Autonomous Intersection Management Cooperating with Connected Autonomous Vehicles and Pedestrians with Spillback Considered

Published: 23 November 2021 Publication History

Abstract

The recent emergence of Connected Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) enables the Autonomous Intersection Management (AIM) system, replacing traffic signals and human driving operations for improved safety and road efficiency. When CAVs approach an intersection, AIM schedules their intersection usage in a collision-free manner while minimizing their waiting times. In practice, however, there are pedestrian road-crossing requests and spillback problems, a blockage caused by the congestion of the downstream intersection when the traffic load exceeds the road capacity. As a result, collisions occur when CAVs ignore pedestrians or are forced to the congested road. In this article, we present a cooperative AIM system, named Roadrunner+, which simultaneously considers CAVs, pedestrians, and upstream/downstream intersections for spillback handling, collision avoidance, and efficient CAV controls. The performance of Roadrunner+ is evaluated with the SUMO microscopic simulator. Our experimental results show that Roadrunner+ has 15.16% higher throughput than other AIM systems and 102.53% higher throughput than traditional traffic signals. Roadrunner+ also reduces 75.62% traveling delay compared to other AIM systems. Moreover, the results show that CAVs in Roadrunner+ save up to 7.64% in fuel consumption, and all the collisions caused by spillback are prevented in Roadrunner+.

References

[1]
Edward Andert, Mohammad Khayatian, and Aviral Shrivastava. 2017. Crossroads: Time-sensitive autonomous intersection management technique. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Design Automation Conference. 1–6.
[2]
Michael Behrisch, Laura Bieker, Jakob Erdmann, and Daniel Krajzewicz. 2011. SUMO–simulation of urban mobility: An overview. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Advances in System Simulation. ThinkMind.
[3]
Luis Conde Bento, Ricardo Parafita, and Urbano Nunes. 2012. Intelligent traffic management at intersections supported by V2V and V2I communications. In Proceedings of the 15th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. IEEE, 1495–1502.
[4]
Dustin Carlino, Stephen D. Boyles, and Peter Stone. 2013. Auction-based autonomous intersection management. In Proceedings of the 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. IEEE, 529–534.
[5]
Rongsheng Chen, Jeffrey Hu, Michael W. Levin, and David Rey. 2020. Stability-based analysis of autonomous intersection management with pedestrians. Transport. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 114 (2020), 463–483.
[6]
Simiao Chen, Michael Kuhn, Klaus Prettner, and David E. Bloom. 2019. The global macroeconomic burden of road injuries: Estimates and projections for 166 countries. Lancet Planet Health 3, 9 (2019), e390–e398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30170-6
[7]
Myungwhan Choi, Areeya Rubenecia, and Hyo Hyun Choi. 2019. Reservation-based traffic management for autonomous intersection crossing. Int. J. Distrib. Sensor Netw. 15, 12 (2019), 1550147719895956.
[8]
Kurt Dresner and Peter Stone. 2004. Multiagent traffic management: A reservation-based intersection control mechanism. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. 530–537.
[9]
Kurt Dresner and Peter Stone. 2006. Human-usable and emergency vehicle-aware control policies for autonomous intersection management. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Agents in Traffic and Transportation.
[10]
Kurt Dresner and Peter Stone. 2008. A multiagent approach to autonomous intersection management. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 31 (2008), 591–656.
[11]
M. Elhadef. 2015. An adaptable inVANETs-based intersection traffic control algorithm. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing. 2387–2392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CIT/IUCC/DASC/PICOM.2015.352
[12]
Daniel J. Fagnant and Kara Kockelman. 2015. Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transport. Res. Part A: Polic. Pract. 77 (2015), 167–181.
[13]
S. Alireza Fayazi, Ardalan Vahidi, and Andre Luckow. 2017. Optimal scheduling of autonomous vehicle arrivals at intelligent intersections via MILP. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference. IEEE, 4920–4925.
[14]
Federal Highway Administration. 2019. Intersection Safety. Retrieved from https://cms7.fhwa.dot.gov/research/research-programs/safety/intersection-safety.
[15]
Basilio Filocamo, Javier Alonso Ruiz, and Miguel Angel Sotelo. 2020. Efficient management of road intersections for automated vehicles—The FRFP system applied to the various types of intersections and roundabouts. Appl. Sci. 10, 1 (2020), 316.
[16]
Mehmet Ali Guney and Ioannis A. Raptis. 2020. Scheduling-based optimization for motion coordination of autonomous vehicles at multilane intersections. Journal of Robotics 2020 (2020).
[17]
Stefan Hausberger. 2009. Emission factors from the model PHEM for the HBEFA version 3. Report Nr. I-20/2009 Haus-Em 33/08/679. Retrieved from https://www.hbefa.net/e/documents/HBEFA_31_Docu_hot_emissionfactors_PC_LCV_HDV.pdf.
[18]
John L. Hennessy and David A. Patterson. 2011. Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach. Elsevier.
[19]
Qiu Jin, Guoyuan Wu, Kanok Boriboonsomsin, and Matthew Barth. 2012. Advanced intersection management for connected vehicles using a multi-agent systems approach. In Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. IEEE, 932–937.
[20]
Qiu Jin, Guoyuan Wu, Kanok Boriboonsomsin, and Matthew Barth. 2012. Multi-agent intersection management for connected vehicles using an optimal scheduling approach. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo. IEEE, 185–190.
[21]
Qiu Jin, Guoyuan Wu, Kanok Boriboonsomsin, and Matthew Barth. 2013. Platoon-based multi-agent intersection management for connected vehicle. In Proceedings of the 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. IEEE, 1462–1467.
[22]
Mohammad Khayatian, Yingyan Lou, Mohammadreza Mehrabian, and Aviral Shirvastava. 2019. Crossroads+ a time-aware approach for intersection management of connected autonomous vehicles. ACM Trans. Cyber-Phys. Syst. 4, 2 (2019), 1–28.
[23]
Mohammad Khayatian, Mohammadreza Mehrabian, Edward Andert, Rachel Dedinsky, Sarthake Choudhary, Yingyan Lou, and Aviral Shirvastava. 2020. A survey on intersection management of connected autonomous vehicles. ACM Trans. Cyber-phys. Syst. 4, 4 (2020), 1–27.
[24]
Mohammad Khayatian, Mohammadreza Mehrabian, and Aviral Shrivastava. 2018. RIM: Robust intersection management for connected autonomous vehicles. In Proceedings of the IEEE Real-time Systems Symposium. IEEE, 35–44.
[25]
John Khoury and Joud Khoury. 2014. Passive, decentralized, and fully autonomous intersection access control. In Proceedings of the 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. IEEE, 3028–3033.
[26]
Bing Liu, Qing Shi, Zhuoyue Song, and Abdelkader El Kamel. 2019. Trajectory planning for autonomous intersection management of connected vehicles. Simul. Model. Pract. Theor. 90 (2019), 16–30.
[27]
Qiang Lu and Kyoung-Dae Kim. 2018. A mixed integer programming approach for autonomous and connected intersection crossing traffic control. In Proceedings of the IEEE 88th Vehicular Technology Conference. IEEE, 1–6.
[28]
Nikola Mitrovic, Igor Dakic, and Aleksandar Stevanovic. 2020. Combined alternate-direction lane assignment and reservation-based intersection control. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 21, 4 (2020), 1779–1789. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2019.2943521
[29]
World Health Organization et al. 2018. Global Status Report on Road Safety 2018: Summary. Technical Report. World Health Organization.
[30]
Jianglin Qiao, Dongmo Zhang, and Dave de Jonge. 2018. Virtual roundabout protocol for autonomous vehicles. In Proceedings of the Australasian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Springer, 773–782.
[31]
Qualcomm. [n.d.]. Connecting Vehicles to Everything with C-V2X. Retrieved from https://www.qualcomm.com/invention/5g/cellular-v2x.
[32]
Matthew J. Saltzman. 2002. COIN-OR: An open-source library for optimization. In Programming Languages and Systems in Computational Economics and Finance. Springer, 3–32.
[33]
David Schrank, Bill Eisele, and Tim Lomax. 2019. 2019 Urban Mobility Report. Texas Transportation Institute. Retrieved from https://static.tti.tamu.edu/tti.tamu.edu/documents/mobility-report-2019.pdf.
[34]
Mingyu Wang, Zijian Wang, Shreyasha Paudel, and Mac Schwager. 2018. Safe distributed lane change maneuvers for multiple autonomous vehicles using buffered input cells. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 4678–4684.
[35]
Michael I.-C. Wang, Jiacheng Wang, Charles H.-P. Wen, and H. Jonathan Chao. 2020. Roadrunner: Autonomous intersection management with dynamic lane assignment. In Proceedings of the IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. IEEE, 1–7.
[36]
Pin Wang, Ching-Yao Chan, and Arnaud de La Fortelle. 2018. A reinforcement learning based approach for automated lane change maneuvers. In Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. IEEE, 1379–1384.
[37]
Jia Wu, Abdeljalil Abbas-Turki, and Abdellah El Moudni. 2012. Cooperative driving: An ant colony system for autonomous intersection management. Appl. Intell. 37, 2 (2012), 207–222.
[38]
Yuanyuan Wu, Haipeng Chen, and Feng Zhu. 2019. DCL-AIM: Decentralized coordination learning of autonomous intersection management for connected and automated vehicles. Transport. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 103 (2019), 246–260.
[39]
Kaidi Yang, S. Ilgin Guler, and Monica Menendez. 2016. Isolated intersection control for various levels of vehicle technology: Conventional, connected, and automated vehicles. Transport. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 72 (2016), 109–129.
[40]
Feng Zhu and Satish V. Ukkusuri. 2015. A linear programming formulation for autonomous intersection control within a dynamic traffic assignment and connected vehicle environment. Transport. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 55 (2015), 363–378.
[41]
Ismail H. Zohdy and Hesham A. Rakha. 2016. Intersection management via vehicle connectivity: The intersection cooperative adaptive cruise control system concept. J. Intell. Transport. Syst. 20, 1 (2016), 17–32.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Impact assessment of cooperative intelligent transport systems (C-ITS): a structured literature reviewEuropean Transport Research Review10.1186/s12544-024-00702-917:1Online publication date: 4-Mar-2025
  • (2024)Synergizing Autonomous and Traditional Vehicles: A Systematic Review of Advances and Challenges in Traffic Flow Management With Signalized IntersectionsIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1109/TITS.2024.345047125:12(19203-19217)Online publication date: Dec-2024
  • (2024)Vehicle Sequencing at Signal-Free Intersections: Analytical Performance Guarantees Based on PDMP FormulationIEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology10.1109/TCST.2024.338758832:6(2023-2036)Online publication date: Nov-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Roadrunner+: An Autonomous Intersection Management Cooperating with Connected Autonomous Vehicles and Pedestrians with Spillback Considered

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems
    ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems  Volume 6, Issue 1
    January 2022
    246 pages
    ISSN:2378-962X
    EISSN:2378-9638
    DOI:10.1145/3492453
    • Editor:
    • Chenyang Lu
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Journal Family

    Publication History

    Published: 23 November 2021
    Accepted: 01 September 2021
    Revised: 01 September 2021
    Received: 01 February 2021
    Published in TCPS Volume 6, Issue 1

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Connected autonomous vehicles
    2. autonomous intersection management
    3. spillback
    4. pedestrian
    5. cooperation

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Refereed

    Funding Sources

    • Center for Open Intelligent Connectivity
    • The Featured Areas Research Center Program
    • Higher Education Sprout Project
    • Ministry of Education (MOE)

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)132
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
    Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2025)Impact assessment of cooperative intelligent transport systems (C-ITS): a structured literature reviewEuropean Transport Research Review10.1186/s12544-024-00702-917:1Online publication date: 4-Mar-2025
    • (2024)Synergizing Autonomous and Traditional Vehicles: A Systematic Review of Advances and Challenges in Traffic Flow Management With Signalized IntersectionsIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1109/TITS.2024.345047125:12(19203-19217)Online publication date: Dec-2024
    • (2024)Vehicle Sequencing at Signal-Free Intersections: Analytical Performance Guarantees Based on PDMP FormulationIEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology10.1109/TCST.2024.338758832:6(2023-2036)Online publication date: Nov-2024
    • (2024)Assessing the impact of communication delays for Autonomous Intersection Management systemsVehicular Communications10.1016/j.vehcom.2024.10082949:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2024
    • (2023)Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach for V2X Managed Intersections of Connected VehiclesIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1109/TITS.2023.325386724:7(7178-7189)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2023
    • (2023)Shockvertising, Malware, and a Lack of Accountability: Exploring Consumer Risks of Virtual Reality Advertisements and Marketing ExperiencesIEEE Security and Privacy10.1109/MSEC.2023.333210522:1(43-52)Online publication date: 8-Dec-2023
    • (2023)Android malware detection based on sensitive patternsTelecommunications Systems10.1007/s11235-022-00983-282:4(435-449)Online publication date: 20-Feb-2023
    • (2023)Cybersecurity for autonomous vehicles against malware attacks in smart-citiesCluster Computing10.1007/s10586-023-04114-727:3(3363-3378)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2023

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    Full Text

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media