skip to main content
10.1145/3488392.3488397acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesclihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Intelligent Approaches in the Software Development Process: a Systematic Literature Mapping

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 November 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Accessibility in computing, when well applied, allows for the inclusion of users and the breaking of barriers in the interaction process. However, approaches to support accessibility validation are commonly unknown or ignored. The objective of this work is to understand accessibility issues considered in the software development process. This research has carried out an initial literature systematic mapping. The result indicates that there are gaps in the use of smart approaches to assess accessibility during the software development process.

References

  1. K. Abernethy, J. Kelly, A. Sobel, J.D. Kiper, and J. Powell. 2000. Technology transfer issues for formal methods of software specification. In Thirteenth Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training. 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEE.2000.827014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Muhammad Bakhsh and Amjad Mehmood. 2012. Web Accessibility for Disabled: A Case Study of Government Websites in Pakistan. In 2012 10th International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology. 342–347. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIT.2012.68Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa, Bruno Santana da Silva, Milene Selbach Silveira, Isabela Gasparini, Ticianne Darin, and Gabriel Diniz Junqueira Barbosa. 2021. Interação Humano-Computador e Experiência do Usuário. Autopublicação.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Diego Buchinger, Gustavo Cavalcanti, and Marcelo Hounsell. 2014. Mecanismos de busca acadêmica: uma análise quantitativa. Revista Brasileira de Computação Aplicada 6, 1 (abr. 2014), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.5335/rbca.2014.3452Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Jaganmohan Chandrasekaran, Laleh Sh. Ghandehari, Yu Lei, Raghu Kacker, and D. Richard Kuhn. 2016. Evaluating the Effectiveness of BEN in Localizing Different Types of Software Fault. In 2016 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW). 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTW.2016.44Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Tatiany Xavier de Godoi, Laura Sánchez García, and Natasha Malveira Costa Valentim. 2020. Evaluating a Usability, User Experience and Accessibility Checklist for Assistive Technologies for Deaf People in a Context of Mobile Applications. In Proceedings of the 19th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Diamantina, Brazil) (IHC ’20). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 14, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3424953.3426631Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ana Luiza Dias, Renata Pontin de Mattos Fortes, Paulo Cesar Masiero, and Rudinei Goularte. 2010. Uma revisão sistemática sobre a inserção de acessibilidade nas fases de desenvolvimento da engenharia de software em sistemas Web. In Simpósio Brasileiro de Bancos de Dados. SBC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Laura Fathauer and Dhananjai M. Rao. 2019. Accessibility in an educational software system: Experiences and Design Tips. In 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028402Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Andre Pimenta Freire, Rudinei Goularte, and Renata Pontin de Mattos Fortes. 2007. Techniques for Developing More Accessible Web Applications: A Survey towards a Process Classification. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM International Conference on Design of Communication (El Paso, Texas, USA) (SIGDOC ’07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1145/1297144.1297177Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Teresa D. Gilbertson and Colin H. C. Machin. 2012. Guidelines, Icons and Marketable Skills: An Accessibility Evaluation of 100 Web Development Company Homepages. In Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (Lyon, France) (W4A ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 17, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207016.2207024Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Asharul Islam Khan, Zuhoor Al-Khanjari, and Mohamed Sarrab. 2017. Crowd Sourced Evaluation Process for Mobile Learning Application Quality. In 2017 Second International Conference on Information Systems Engineering (ICISE). 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISE.2017.17Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Barbara Kitchenham, O. Pearl Brereton, David Budgen, Mark Turner, John Bailey, and Stephen Linkman. 2009. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology 51, 1 (2009), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009 Special Section - Most Cited Articles in 2002 and Regular Research Papers.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Zui Young Lim, Jia Min Chua, Kaiting Yang, Wei Shin Tan, and Yinn Chai. 2020. Web Accessibility Testing for Singapore Government E-Services. In Proceedings of the 17th International Web for All Conference (Taipei, Taiwan) (W4A ’20). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 22, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371300.3383353Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ke Mao, Ye Yang, Qing Wang, Yue Jia, and Mark Harman. 2015. Developer Recommendation for Crowdsourced Software Development Tasks. In 2015 IEEE Symposium on Service-Oriented System Engineering. 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1109/SOSE.2015.46Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Lai Xing Ng, Jamie Ng, Keith T. W. Tang, Liyuan Li, Mark Rice, and Marcus Wan. 2019. Using Visual Intelligence to Automate Maintenance Task Guidance and Monitoring on a Head-Mounted Display. In Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Robotics and Artificial Intelligence (Singapore, Singapore) (ICRAI ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373724.3373727Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Débora Maria Barroso Paiva, André Pimenta Freire, and Renata Pontin de Mattos Fortes. 2021. Accessibility and Software Engineering Processes: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Systems and Software 171 (2021), 110819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.110819Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Sandra Souza Rodrigues and Renata Pontin de Mattos Fortes. 2019. Uma revisão sobre acessibilidade no desenvolvimento de Internet das Coisas: oportunidades e tendências. Revista de Sistemas e Computação-RSC 9, 1(2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Víctor Romero-Chacón, Harry Muir-Camacho, Jonnathan Rodríguez-González, Annia Gómez-Blanco, and Mario Chacón-Rivas. 2019. Adapting SCRUM Methodology to Develop Accessible Web Sites. In 2019 International Conference on Inclusive Technologies and Education (CONTIE). 112–1124. https://doi.org/10.1109/CONTIE49246.2019.00029Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Stuart Russell and Peter Norvig. 2002. Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Flávia de Souza Santos, André de Lima Salgado, and Renata Pontin de Mattos Fortes. 2018. Um Mapeamento Sistemático sobre Acessibilidade e Usabilidade no Desenvolvimento de Jogos Digitais para Idosos. iSys - Revista Brasileira de Sistemas de Informação 11, 2 (jun. 2018), 63–90. http://seer.unirio.br/isys/article/view/6957Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Cynthia C. Shelly and Mike Barta. 2010. Application of Traditional Software Testing Methodologies to Web Accessibility. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Cross Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A) (Raleigh, North Carolina) (W4A ’10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 11, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1805986.1806002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Silvia Rodríguez Vázquez. 2013. Localizing Accessibility of Text Alternatives for Visual Content in Multilingual Websites. SIGACCESS Access. Comput.105 (Jan. 2013), 34–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/2444800.2444807Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Silvia Rodríguez Vázquez. 2015. Unlocking the Potential of Web Localizers as Contributors to Image Accessibility: What Do Evaluation Tools Have to Offer?. In Proceedings of the 12th International Web for All Conference (Florence, Italy) (W4A ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 17, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2745555.2746662Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Willian Massami Watanabe, Ana Luiza Dias, and Renata Pontin De Mattos Fortes. 2015. Fona: Quantitative Metric to Measure Focus Navigation on Rich Internet Applications. ACM Trans. Web 9, 4, Article 20 (Sept. 2015), 28 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2812812Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. J. Zhang, D. Zage, and W. Zage. 2003. Improving project planning/tracking for student software engineering projects through SOPPTS. In Proceedings 16th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, 2003. (CSEE T 2003).185–192. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEE.2003.1191376Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Intelligent Approaches in the Software Development Process: a Systematic Literature Mapping
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          CLIHC '21: Proceedings of the X Latin American Conference on Human Computer Interaction
          November 2021
          87 pages
          ISBN:9781450384896
          DOI:10.1145/3488392

          Copyright © 2021 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 22 November 2021

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate14of42submissions,33%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format