skip to main content
10.1145/3488392.3488398acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesclihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Customer eXperience Evaluation Methodologies: A Literature Review

Published:22 November 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Despite the multiple evaluation approaches (methods, instruments, and tools) available to evaluate the Customer eXperience (CX), there is a dearth of CX evaluation methodologies. This research presents a review of 12 studies mainly related to methodologies and evaluation approaches within them that are used –or can be used as a reference– to evaluate the CX. We conduct a literature review of papers published on ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The review was based on the guidelines proposed by Kitchenham (2007) and shows that: (1) there is a lack of formal CX evaluation methodologies; (2) CX studies reviewed do not consider factors, such as touchpoints, channels, and dimensions; (3) CX studies reviewed do not validate their stages and do not provide sufficient detail for both stages and evaluation approaches within them; and (4) it is possible to use methodologies from other domains to fill the shortcomings found in CX studies reviewed.

References

  1. Christopher Meyer and Andre Schwager. 2007. Understanding Customer experience. Harvard business review, 85(2), 116-126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Peter C. Verhoef, Katherine N. Lemon, Ananthanarayanan Parasuraman, Anne Roggeveen, Michael Tsiros, and Leonard A. Schlesinger. 2009. Customer experience creation: Determinants, dynamics and management strategies. Journal of retailing, 85(1), 31-41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. ISO 9241-210. 2010. Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. International Organization for Standardization.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Virginica Rusu, Cristian Rusu, Federico Botella, Daniela Quiñones, Camila Bascur, and Virginia Zaraza Rusu. 2020. Customer eXperience: A Bridge Between Service Science and Human-Computer Interaction. In International Conference on Human Systems Engineering and Design: Future Trends and Applications. 385-390. Springer, Cham.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. James R. Lewis. 2014. Usability: lessons learned… and yet to be learned. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30(9), 663-684Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Barbara Kitchenham and Stuart Charters, S. 2007. Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Keele University and Durham University Joint Report.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jennifer Rowley. 1999. Measuring total customer experience in museums. International journal of contemporary Hospitality management, 11(6), 303-308.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Mark Hurst. 2003. Joining Strategy and Usability: the Customer Experience Methodology. New York: Creative Good Inc. (11)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Robert Johnston and Xiangyu Kong. 2011. The customer experience: a road‐map for improvement. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 21, 5-24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. María Consuelo Figueroa and Osvaldo Gonzáles. 2015. Propuesta metodológica para la evaluación de experiencia de usuario en dispositivos móviles tipo Smartphone. Thesis. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Camila Escudero and Angélica Gómez. 2017. Propuesta metodológica de evaluación de experiencia de usuario en agencias virtuales de viajes. Thesis. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Teresita de Jesús Álvarez Robles. 2019. Metodología para la evaluación de la experiencia del usuario de Sistemas de Software Interactivos para usuarios ciegos. Ph.D. Dissertation. Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, México.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Mohammed Abboodi. 2014. A Framework for Measuring and Analyzing Customer Satisfaction at Computer Service Company using Lean Six Sigma. Master Thesis. University of Central Florida, Florida, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Baqar Ali Zardari, Zahid Hussain, Aijaz Ahmed Arain, Wajid H. Rizvi, and Muhammad Saleem Vighio. 2020. QUEST e-learning portal: applying heuristic evaluation, usability testing and eye tracking. Universal Access in the Information Society, 1-13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kata Kapusy and Emma Lógó. 2020. User Experience Evaluation Methodology in the Onboarding Process: Snapchat Case Study. Ergonomics in Design, 1064804620962270.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jorge Abreu, Pedro Almeida, and Telmo Silva. 2015. A UX evaluation approach for second-screen applications. In Applications and Usability of Interactive TV. 105-120. Springer, Cham.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Rosalie Allison, Catherine Hayes, Cliodna A. McNulty, and Vicki Young. 2019. A comprehensive framework to evaluate websites: literature review and development of GoodWeb. JMIR formative research, 3(4), e14372.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mohammed Arif, Hani M. Aburas, Abdullah Al Kuwaiti, and Dennis Kulonda. 2010. Suggestion systems: a usability-based evaluation methodology. Engineering Sciences, 21(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Customer eXperience Evaluation Methodologies: A Literature Review
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      CLIHC '21: Proceedings of the X Latin American Conference on Human Computer Interaction
      November 2021
      87 pages
      ISBN:9781450384896
      DOI:10.1145/3488392

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 November 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate14of42submissions,33%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format