skip to main content
10.1145/3488466.3488471acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicdteConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Relationship Between Online Education Pre-school Teachers’ Personality Traits and Job Satisfaction During the COVID-19: The Mediation of Emotional Labour

Published:08 January 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Online education is an important way to teach students in COVID-19. Online education pre-school teachers as high emotional workers, coupled with the influence of COVID-19, their different emotional labour strategies will have different effects on job satisfaction. Our study investigated the relationship between personality traits, emotional labour and job satisfaction during the COVID-19. A questionnaire survey was administered to 450 pre-school teachers that they worked online at home in China using the Personality Trait Inventory, Emotional Labour Scale and Job Satisfaction Inventory. The results showed that the COVID-19 significantly impacted pre-school teachers' personality traits and emotional labour. First, the Big Five Personalities were significant influences on the emotional labour of pre-school teachers, with openness and agreeableness being strong predictors of surface acting, agreeableness, conscientiousness, openness, and extraversion being effective predictors of deep acting, and agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness being effective predictors of natural expression. Among them, the most common type of emotional labour for pre-school teachers was deep acting. Secondly, the greatest influence on job satisfaction was openness and agreeableness in the Big Five Personality dimensions. Their effect sizes on job satisfaction were 0.246 and 0.223, respectively. Nervousness was not significantly related to job satisfaction of pre-school teachers. Finally, the Mediation of deep acting and natural expression were more significant between different personality dimensions and job satisfaction of pre-school teachers.

References

  1. McCrae Robert and Costa Paul. 1997. Personality trait structures as a human universal. Am. Psychol. 52, 5 (June 1997), 509-516. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.52.5.509.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Costa Paul and McCrae Robert. 1992. Neo-pi-r professional manual: revised neo personality and neo five-factor inventory. psychological assessment resources. Psychol. Assessment 4, (January 1992), 26-42. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007640925819.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Judge Timothy, Heller Daniel, and Mount Michael. 2002. Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: a meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 87, 3 (June 2002), 530-541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.530.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Judge Timothy and Bono Joyce. 2001. Relationship of core self-evaluations traits self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control and emotional stability with job satisfaction and job performance: a meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 86, 1 (February 2001), 80-92. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrick Murray and Mount Michael. 1991. The Big Five Personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Pers. Psychol. 44, 1 (March 1991), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570. 1991. Tb 00688.x.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Randolph Kristen and Dahling Jason. 2013. Interactive effects of proactive personality and display rules on emotional labour in organizations. J Appl Soc Psychol 43, 12 (October 2013), 2350–2359. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Wang Wen and Zhao Wu. 2011. Job Satisfaction of University Teachers in Xi'an–Based on NEO-PI-R. J Xidian Univ. 21, 6 (March 2011), 8-16. https://doi.org/10.16719/j. cnki.1671 -6981.2011.02.044.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Furnham Adrian, Petrides K., and Jackson Chris. 2002. Do personality factors predict job satisfaction? Pers. Indiv. Differ. 87, 3 (December 2002), 1325-1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00016-8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Michel Jesse, Kotrba Lindsey, and Deuling Jacqueline. 2011. Antecedents of work–family conflict: A meta‐analytic review. J. Organ Behav. 32, 5 (June 2011), 689-725. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.695.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Weiss Howard and Cropanzano Russell. 1996. Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes, and consequences of affective experiences at work. Res. Organ. Behav. (January 1996), 1–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/030639689603700317.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Grandey Alicia. 2000. Emotional regulation in the workplace: a new way to conceptualize emotional labour. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 5, 1(February 2000), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Totterdell Peter and Holman David. 2003. Emotion regulation in customer service roles: testing a model of emotional labour. J Occup. Health Psych. 8, 1 (January 2003), 55-73. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.8.1.55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Diefendorff James, Croyle Meredith, and Gosserand Robin. 2005. The dimensionality and antecedents of emotional labour strategies. J. Vocat. Behav. 66, 2, (April 2005), 339-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.02.001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Huiting Zeng. 2011. The Study on Relationship among Nurse's Personality Trait, Emotional Labour and Job Burnout. MA Thesis, MPA department, Jinan University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Morris and Feldman. 1996. The dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of emotional labour. Acad. Manage. Rev. 21, 4 (October 1996), 986. https://doi.org/10.2307/259161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Grandey. 2000. Emotion regulation in the workplace: A new way to conceptualize emotional labour. J. Occup. Health Psych. 5, 1 (January 2000), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-8998.5.1.95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson Hazel-Anne and Spector Paul. 2007. Service with a smile: do emotional intelligence, gender, and autonomy moderate the emotional labour process? J. Occup. Health Psych. 12, 4 (October 2007), 319-333. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.4.319.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hu Jun Cheng and Yang Lin Feng. 2009. Emotional Labour Requirement and Emotional Exhaustion: A Mediator Analysis of Emotional Strategy. Psychol. Sci. 32, 2 (January 2009), 423-426. https://doi.org/10.16719/j. cnki.1671 -6981.2009.02.044.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICDTE '21: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Digital Technology in Education
    September 2021
    187 pages
    ISBN:9781450384995
    DOI:10.1145/3488466

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 8 January 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format