skip to main content
research-article

Recognizing Gaits Across Walking and Running Speeds

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 March 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

For decades, very few methods were proposed for cross-mode (i.e., walking vs. running) gait recognition. Thus, it remains largely unexplored regarding how to recognize persons by the way they walk and run. Existing cross-mode methods handle the walking-versus-running problem in two ways, either by exploring the generic mapping relation between walking and running modes or by extracting gait features which are non-/less vulnerable to the changes across these two modes. However, for the first approach, a mapping relation fit for one person may not be applicable to another person. There is no generic mapping relation given that walking and running are two highly self-related motions. The second approach does not give more attention to the disparity between walking and running modes, since mode labels are not involved in their feature learning processes. Distinct from these existing cross-mode methods, in our method, mode labels are used in the feature learning process, and a mode-invariant gait descriptor is hybridized for cross-mode gait recognition to handle this walking-versus-running problem. Further research is organized in this article to investigate the disparity between walking and running. Running is different from walking not only in the speed variances but also, more significantly, in prominent gesture/motion changes. According to these rationales, in our proposed method, we give more attention to the differences between walking and running modes, and a robust gait descriptor is developed to hybridize the mode-invariant spatial and temporal features. Two multi-task learning-based networks are proposed in this method to explore these mode-invariant features. Spatial features describe the body parts non-/less affected by mode changes, and temporal features depict the instinct motion relation of each person. Mode labels are also adopted in the training phase to guide the network to give more attention to the disparity across walking and running modes. In addition, relevant experiments on OU-ISIR Treadmill Dataset A have affirmed the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed method. A state-of-the-art result can be achieved by our proposed method on this dataset.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Nick Carey. 2005. Establishing Pedestrian Walking Speeds. https://www.westernite.org/datacollectionfund/2005/psu_ped_summary.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [2] TranSafety, Inc. 1997. Study Compares Older and Younger Pedestrian Walking Speeds. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walking.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [3] Chao Hanqing, He Yiwei, Zhang Junping, and Feng Jianfeng. 2018. Gaitset: Regarding gait as a set for cross-view gait recognition. arXiv:1811.06186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. [4] Chi Xu, Adachi Daisuke, Makihara Yasushi, Yagi Yasushi, and Lu Jianfeng. [n.d.]. Deformgait: Gait recognition under posture changes using deformation patterns between gait feature pairs. In IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB’20), Houston. IEEE, 110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. [5] Fan Chao, Peng Yunjie, Cao Chunshui, Liu Xu, Hou Saihui, Chi Jiannan, Huang Yongzhen, Li Qing, and He Zhiqiang. 2020. Gaitpart: Temporal part-based model for gait recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle. IEEE, 1422514233.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. [6] Feichtenhofer Christoph, Fan Haoqi, Malik Jitendra, and He Kaiming. 2019. Slowfast networks for video recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Seoul. IEEE, 62026211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. [7] Feng Yang, Li Yuncheng, and Luo Jiebo. 2016. Learning effective gait features using LSTM. In 23rd International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR’16), Cancun. IEEE, 325330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. [8] Guan Yu and Li Chang-Tsun. 2013. A robust speed-invariant gait recognition system for walker and runner identification. In International Conference on Biometrics (ICB’13), Madrid. IEEE, 18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. [9] Han Ju and Bhanu Bir. 2005. Individual recognition using gait energy image. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 28, 2 (2005), 316322.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. [10] Hermans Alexander, Beyer Lucas, and Leibe Bastian. 2017. In defense of the triplet loss for person re-identification. arXiv:1703.07737.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. [11] Huang Huaxi, Zhang Junjie, Zhang Jian, Wu Qiang, and Xu Jingsong. 2019. Compare more nuanced: Pairwise alignment bilinear network for few-shot fine-grained learning. arXiv:1904.03580.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. [12] Huang Yan, Wu Qiang, Xu Jingsong, and Zhong Yi. 2019. SBSGAN: Suppression of inter-domain background shift for person re-identification. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV’19), Seoul. IEEE, 9526–9535.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. [13] Huang Yan, Xu Jingsong, Wu Qiang, Zheng Zhedong, Zhang Zhaoxiang, and Zhang Jian. 2018. Multi-pseudo regularized label for generated data in person re-identification. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 28, 3 (2018), 13911403.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. [14] Kingma Diederik P. and Ba Jimmy. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv:1412.6980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. [15] Li Xiang, Makihara Yasushi, Xu Chi, Yagi Yasushi, and Ren Mingwu. 2020. Gait recognition via semi-supervised disentangled representation learning to identity and covariate features. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle. IEEE, 1330913319.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. [16] Liu Zongyi and Sarkar Sudeep. 2006. Improved gait recognition by gait dynamics normalization. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence6 (2006), 863876.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. [17] Makihara Yasushi, Fujihara Yusuke, and Yagi Yasushi. 2012. Can gait fluctuations improve gait recognition?. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR’12), Tsukuba. IEEE, 32763279.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. [18] Makihara Yasushi, Mannami Hidetoshi, Tsuji Akira, Hossain Md Altab, Sugiura Kazushige, Mori Atsushi, and Yagi Yasushi. 2012. The OU-ISIR gait database comprising the treadmill dataset. IPSJ Transactions on Computer Vision and Applications 4 (2012), 5362.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. [19] Makihara Yasushi, Matovski Darko S., Nixon Mark S., Carter John N., and Yagi Yasushi. 1999. Gait recognition: Databases, representations, and applications. Wiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering (1999), 115.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. [20] Mansur Al, Makihara Yasushi, Muramatsu Daigo, and Yagi Yasushi. 2014. Cross-view gait recognition using view-dependent discriminative analysis. In IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics, Clearwater. IEEE, 18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. [21] Shiraga Kohei, Makihara Yasushi, Muramatsu Daigo, Echigo Tomio, and Yagi Yasushi. 2016. Geinet: View-invariant gait recognition using a convolutional neural network. In International Conference on Biometrics (ICB’16), Halmstad. IEEE, 18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. [22] Simonyan Karen and Zisserman Andrew. 2014. Two-stream convolutional networks for action recognition in videos. arXiv:1406.2199.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. [23] Sun Ke, Xiao Bin, Liu Dong, and Wang Jingdong. 2019. Deep high-resolution representation learning for human pose estimation. arXiv:1902.09212.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. [24] Sundaresan Aravind, Chowdhury Amit Roy, and Chellappa Rama. 2003. A hidden Markov model based framework for recognition of humans from gait sequences. In Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No. 03CH37429), Vol. 2, Barcelona. IEEE, II–93.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. [25] Takemura Noriko, Makihara Yasushi, Muramatsu Daigo, Echigo Tomio, and Yagi Yasushi. 2017. On input/output architectures for convolutional neural network-based cross-view gait recognition. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 29 (2019), 2708–2719.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. [26] Tran Du, Wang Heng, Torresani Lorenzo, Ray Jamie, LeCun Yann, and Paluri Manohar. 2018. A closer look at spatiotemporal convolutions for action recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 64506459.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. [27] Wang Heng, Kläser Alexander, Schmid Cordelia, and Liu Cheng-Lin. 2011. Action recognition by dense trajectories. In CVPR’11, Colorado Springs. IEEE, 31693176.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. [28] Wang Yitong, Gong Dihong, Zhou Zheng, Ji Xing, Wang Hao, Li Zhifeng, Liu Wei, and Zhang Tong. 2018. Orthogonal deep features decomposition for age-invariant face recognition. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV’18), Munich. 738753.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. [29] Winter David A.. 2009. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. [30] Wolf Thomas, Babaee Mohammadreza, and Rigoll Gerhard. 2016. Multi-view gait recognition using 3D convolutional neural networks. In IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP’16), Phoenix. IEEE, 41654169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. [31] Wu Zifeng, Huang Yongzhen, and Wang Liang. 2015. Learning representative deep features for image set analysis. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 17, 11 (2015), 19601968.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. [32] Wu Zifeng, Huang Yongzhen, Wang Liang, Wang Xiaogang, and Tan Tieniu. 2016. A comprehensive study on cross-view gait based human identification with deep cnns. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 39, 2 (2016), 209226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. [33] Xu Chi, Makihara Yasushi, Li Xiang, Yagi Yasushi, and Lu Jianfeng. 2019. Speed-invariant gait recognition using single-support gait energy image. Multimedia Tools and Applications (2019), 128.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. [34] Xu Chi, Makihara Yasushi, Li Xiang, Yagi Yasushi, and Lu Jianfeng. 2020. Cross-view gait recognition using pairwise spatial transformer networks. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 31 (2021), 260–274.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. [35] Yam ChewYean, Nixon Mark S., and Carter John N.. 2001. Extended model-based automatic gait recognition of walking and running. In International Conference on Audio-and Video-based Biometric Person Authentication, Halmstad. Springer, 278283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. [36] Yam ChewYean, Nixon Mark S, and Carter John N. 2002. Gait recognition by walking and running: A model-based approach.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. [37] Yam ChewYean, Nixon Mark S., and Carter John N.. 2002. On the relationship of human walking and running: Automatic person identification by gait. In Object Recognition Supported by User Interaction for Service Robots, Vol. 1. IEEE, 287290.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. [38] Yang Ke, Dou Yong, Lv Shaohe, Zhang Fei, and Lv Qi. 2016. Relative distance features for gait recognition with Kinect. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 39 (2016), 209217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. [39] Yao Lingxiang, Kusakunniran Worapan, Wu Qiang, Zhang Jian, and Tang Zhenmin. 2017. Robust gait recognition under unconstrained environments using hybrid descriptions. In International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA’17), Sydney. IEEE, 17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. [40] Yao Lingxiang, Kusakunniran Worapan, Wu Qiang, Zhang Jian, and Tang Zhenmin. 2018. Robust CNN-based gait verification and identification using skeleton gait energy image. In Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA’18), Canberra. IEEE, 17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. [41] Yao Lingxiang, Kusakunniran Worapan, Wu Qiang, Zhang Jian, Tang Zhenmin, and Yang Wankou. 2021. Robust gait recognition using hybrid descriptors based on skeleton gait energy image. Pattern Recognition Letters 150 (2021), 289–296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. [42] Zhang Cheng, Liu Wu, Ma Huadong, and Fu Huiyuan. 2016. Siamese neural network based gait recognition for human identification. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP’16), Shanghai. IEEE, 28322836.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. [43] Zhang Peng, Wu Qiang, and Xu Jingsong. 2019. VT-GAN: View transformation GAN for gait recognition across views. In International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN’1), Budapest. IEEE, 18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. [44] Zhang Yuqi, Huang Yongzhen, Yu Shiqi, and Wang Liang. 2019. Cross-view gait recognition by discriminative feature learning. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 29 (2019), 10011015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Recognizing Gaits Across Walking and Running Speeds

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications
            ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications  Volume 18, Issue 3
            August 2022
            478 pages
            ISSN:1551-6857
            EISSN:1551-6865
            DOI:10.1145/3505208
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 4 March 2022
            • Accepted: 1 September 2021
            • Revised: 1 August 2021
            • Received: 1 February 2021
            Published in tomm Volume 18, Issue 3

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Refereed
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)82
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          Full Text

          View this article in Full Text.

          View Full Text

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format