skip to main content
10.1145/3489410.3489429acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageschi-greeceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Monitoring Maritime Industry 4.0 Systems through VR Environments

Published:25 November 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present a novel system aimed at replacing large-display information dashboards in industrial control rooms, with a flexible, dynamic and reconfigurable immersive virtual reality environment, which can afford high mobility without constraints, to remote engineers. In this context, we investigate the role of semantic and spatial cues for delivering event notifications within the control environment, and present empirical evidence from a controlled laboratory study, simulating a marine industrial environment. We find that spatial and semantic cues can both offer significant benefits to operator awareness and their combination can significantly improve the findability and response time to particular information in the extended information space surrounding the user.

References

  1. Shamel Addas and Alain Pinsonneault. 2015. The Many Faces of Information Technology Interruptions: A Taxonomy and Preliminary Investigation of Their Performance Effects. Information Systems Journal 25, 3 (2015), 231–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12064 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. SatriadiKadek Ananta, EnsBarrett, CordeilMaxime, CzaudernaTobias, and JennyBernhard. 2020. Maps Around Me. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (Nov. 2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3427329Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Christopher Andrews, Alex Endert, and Chris North. 2010. Space to Think: Large High-Resolution Displays for Sensemaking. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753336 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Joakim D. Bergroth, Hanna M. K. Koskinen, and Jari O. Laarni. 2018. Use of Immersive 3-D Virtual Reality Environments in Control Room Validations. Nuclear Technology 202, 2-3 (June 2018), 278–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2017.1420335Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Manousos Bouloukakis, Nikolaos Partarakis, Ioannis Drossis, Manos Kalaitzakis, and Constantine Stephanidis. 2019. Virtual Reality for Smart City Visualization and Monitoring. In Mediterranean Cities and Island Communities: Smart, Sustainable, Inclusive and Resilient, Anastasia Stratigea and Dimitris Kavroudakis (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99444-4_1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Steven Vanden Broucke and Nikos Deligiannis. 2019. Visualization of Real-Time Heterogeneous Smart City Data Using Virtual Reality. In 2019 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2). 685–690. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISC246665.2019.9071699Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Marco Cavallo, Mishal Dholakia, Matous Havlena, Kenneth Ocheltree, and Mark Podlaseck. 2019. Dataspace: A Reconfigurable Hybrid Reality Environment for Collaborative Information Analysis. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8797733Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Eunhee Chang, Hyun Taek Kim, and Byounghyun Yoo. 2020. Virtual Reality Sickness: A Review of Causes and Measurements. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 36, 17 (Oct. 2020), 1658–1682. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1778351Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Peter Cheng, Sharon Wood, and Richard Cox. 2007. Dimensions of Attentional Processing. In Proceedings of the UBIComp Workshop on Attention Management in Ubiquitous Computing Environments. Innsbruck, Austria.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Lorenzo Damiani, Melissa Demartini, Guido Guizzi, Roberto Revetria, and Flavio Tonelli. 2018. Augmented and Virtual Reality Applications in Industrial Systems: A Qualitative Review towards the Industry 4.0 Era. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51, 11 (Jan. 2018), 624–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.388Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Ícaro Aragão Fonseca and Henrique Murilo Gaspar. 2021. Challenges When Creating a Cohesive Digital Twin Ship: A Data Modelling Perspective. Ship Technology Research 68, 2 (May 2021), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/09377255.2020.1815140Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Emanuele Frontoni, Jelena Loncarski, Roberto Pierdicca, Michele Bernardini, and Michele Sasso. 2018. Cyber Physical Systems for Industry 4.0: Towards Real Time Virtual Reality in Smart Manufacturing. In Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and Computer Graphics(Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Lucio Tommaso De Paolis and Patrick Bourdot (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 422–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95282-6_31Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Norberto Martínez García, Mariano Azzur Hernández Contreras, Mariana Silva-Ortega, Verónica García Valenzuela, and Teresita de Jesús Olivares. 2020. Creation of Virtual Environment for Teaching Mechanical Maintenance on a Tug Ship. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Engineering Veracruz (ICEV). 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEV50249.2020.9289662Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Leandro Barbosa S. Gatto, Antônio Carlos A. Mól, Isaac J. A. Luquetti dos Santos, Carlos Alexandre F. Jorge, and Ana Paula Legey. 2013. Virtual Simulation of a Nuclear Power Plant’s Control Room as a Tool for Ergonomic Evaluation. Progress in Nuclear Energy 64 (April 2013), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2012.11.006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sarthak Ghosh, Lauren Winston, Nishant Panchal, Philippe Kimura-Thollander, Jeff Hotnog, Douglas Cheong, Gabriel Reyes, and Gregory D. Abowd. 2018. NotifiVR: Exploring Interruptions and Notifications in Virtual Reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 24, 4 (April 2018), 1447–1456. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2793698 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ioannis Giannopoulos, Andreas Komninos, and John Garofalakis. 2017. Natural Interaction with Large Map Interfaces in VR. In Proceedings of the 21st Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics(PCI 2017). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3139367.3139424 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ching-Yu Hsieh, Yi-Shyuan Chiang, Hung-Yu Chiu, and Yung-Ju Chang. 2020. Bridging the Virtual and Real Worlds: A Preliminary Study of Messaging Notifications in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376228 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Miao Hu, Xianzhuo Luo, Jiawen Chen, Young Choon Lee, Yipeng Zhou, and Di Wu. 2021. Virtual Reality: A Survey of Enabling Technologies and Its Applications in IoT. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 178 (March 2021), 102970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102970Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Shamsi T. Iqbal and Eric Horvitz. 2007. Disruption and Recovery of Computing Tasks: Field Study, Analysis, and Directions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 677–686. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240730 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. David Jones, Chris Snider, Aydin Nassehi, Jason Yon, and Ben Hicks. 2020. Characterising the Digital Twin: A Systematic Literature Review. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 29 (May 2020), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.02.002Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Vasiliki Liagkou, Dimitrios Salmas, and Chrysostomos Stylios. 2019. Realizing Virtual Reality Learning Environment for Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 79 (Jan. 2019), 712–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.025Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Christian Linn, Simon Bender, Joshua Prosser, Kevin Schmitt, and Dirk Werth. 2017. Virtual Remote Inspection — A New Concept for Virtual Reality Enhanced Real-Time Maintenance. In 2017 23rd International Conference on Virtual System Multimedia (VSMM). 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/VSMM.2017.8346304Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Lee Lisle. 2020. [DC]The Immersive Space to Think: Immersive Analytics for Multimedia Data. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW). 551–552. https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW50115.2020.00127Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Mark Mcgill, Aidan Kehoe, Euan Freeman, and Stephen Brewster. 2020. Expanding the Bounds of Seated Virtual Workspaces. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 27, 3 (May 2020), 13:1–13:40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3380959 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Leonardo Pavanatto, Chris North, Doug A. Bowman, Carmen Badea, and Richard Stoakley. 2021. Do We Still Need Physical Monitors? An Evaluation of the Usability of AR Virtual Monitors for Productivity Work. In 2021 IEEE Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 759–767. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR50410.2021.00103Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Patrick Reipschlager, Tamara Flemisch, and Raimund Dachselt. 2021. Personal Augmented Reality for Information Visualization on Large Interactive Displays. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 27, 2 (Feb. 2021), 1182–1192. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3030460Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Vasja Roblek, Maja Meško, and Alojz Krapež. 2016. A Complex View of Industry 4.0. SAGE Open 6, 2 (April 2016), 2158244016653987. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016653987Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Juan Jesús Roldán, Elena Crespo, Andrés Martín-Barrio, Elena Peña-Tapia, and Antonio Barrientos. 2019. A Training System for Industry 4.0 Operators in Complex Assemblies Based on Virtual Reality and Process Mining. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 59 (Oct. 2019), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.05.004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Rufat Rzayev, Sven Mayer, Christian Krauter, and Niels Henze. 2019. Notification in VR: The Effect of Notification Placement, Task and Environment. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play(CHI PLAY ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311350.3347190 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Muhammad Saleem, Hugo E. Valle, Stephen Brown, Veronica I. Winters, and Akhtar Mahmood. 2018. The Hiperwall Tiled-Display Wall System for Big-Data Research. Journal of Big Data 5, 1 (Oct. 2018), 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-018-0150-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Alper Sarikaya, Michael Correll, Lyn Bartram, Melanie Tory, and Danyel Fisher. 2019. What Do We Talk About When We Talk About Dashboards?IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25, 1 (Jan. 2019), 682–692. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2864903Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Ahm Shamsuzzoha, Rayko Toshev, Viet Vu Tuan, Timo Kankaanpaa, and Petri Helo. 2019. Digital Factory – Virtual Reality Environments for Industrial Training and Maintenance. Interactive Learning Environments 0, 0 (June 2019), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1628072Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Elaine C. Silva, Carla A. G. Sirqueira, and Fernanda G. S. Pinto. 2021. The Immersion in Virtual Reality of Control Room Activity. In Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021)(Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems), Nancy L. Black, W. Patrick Neumann, and Ian Noy(Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74608-7_11Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Daniel J Simons and Christopher F Chabris. 1999. Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events. Perception 28, 9 (Sept. 1999), 1059–1074. https://doi.org/10.1068/p281059Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Cheri Speier, Iris Vessey, and Joseph S. Valacich. 2003. The Effects of Interruptions, Task Complexity, and Information Presentation on Computer-Supported Decision-Making Performance. Decision Sciences 34, 4 (2003), 771–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5414.2003.02292.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Sławomir Konrad Tadeja, Yupu Lu, Pranay Seshadri, and Per Ola Kristensson. 2020. Digital Twin Assessments in Virtual Reality: An Explorational Study with Aeroengines. In 2020 IEEE Aerospace Conference. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO47225.2020.9172389Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Matt Whitlock, Stephen Smart, and Danielle Albers Szafir. 2020. Graphical Perception for Immersive Analytics. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 616–625. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR46266.2020.00084Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Yin Yang, Chen Shuai, and Gui Fan. 2019. The Technological Development and Prospect of Unmanned Surface Vessel. In 2019 IEEE 3rd Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IMCEC). 717–722. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCEC46724.2019.8983889Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Mohsen Zare, Maxime Larique, Sébastien Chevriau, and Jean-Claude Sagot. 2019. Application of Virtual Reality to Improve Physical Ergonomics in a Control Room of a Chemical Industry. In Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018)(Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing), Sebastiano Bagnara, Riccardo Tartaglia, Sara Albolino, Thomas Alexander, and Yushi Fujita(Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 296–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96077-7_31Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. André Zenner, Marco Speicher, Sören Klingner, Donald Degraen, Florian Daiber, and Antonio Krüger. 2018. Immersive Notification Framework: Adaptive & Plausible Notifications in Virtual Reality. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188505 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Monitoring Maritime Industry 4.0 Systems through VR Environments
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          CHI Greece 2021: CHI Greece 2021: 1st International Conference of the ACM Greek SIGCHI Chapter
          November 2021
          172 pages
          ISBN:9781450385787
          DOI:10.1145/3489410

          Copyright © 2021 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 25 November 2021

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader