skip to main content
10.1145/3489517.3530484acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Floorplanning with graph attention

Published:23 August 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Floorplanning has long been a critical physical design task with high computation complexity. Its key objective is to determine the initial locations of macros and standard cells with optimized wirelength for a given area constraint. This paper presents Flora, a graph attention-based floorplanner to learn an optimized mapping between circuit connectivity and physical wirelength, and produce a chip floorplan using efficient model inference. Flora has been integrated with two state-of-the-art mixed-size placers. Experimental studies using both academic benchmarks and industrial designs demonstrate that compared to state-of-the-art mixed-size placers alone, Flora improves placement runtime by 18%, with 2% wirelength reduction on average.

References

  1. Igor L.Markov Andrew Kahng, Jens Leinig and Jin Hu. 2011. VLSI Physical Design: From Graph Partitioning to Timing Closure. (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrew E. Caldwell, Andrew B. Kahng, and Igor L. Markov. 2000. Toward CAD-IP Reuse: The MARCO GSRC Bookshelf of Fundamental CAD Algorithms. IEEE Design & Test (2000), 72--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chin-Chih Chang, J. Cong, and Min Xie. 2003. Optimality and scalability study of existing placement algorithms. In Proceedings of the ASP-DAC Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference, 2003. 621--627.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. Cheng, A. B. Kahng, I. Kang, and L. Wang. 2019. RePlAce: Advancing Solution Quality and Routability Validation in Global Placement. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 38, 9 (2019), 1717--1730.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. G. Golub and C.V. Loan. 1983. Matrix computations. In Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ian Goodfellow, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville. 2016. Deep Learning. MIT Press. http://www.deeplearningbook.org.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jiaqi Gu, Zixuan Jiang, Yibo Lin, and David Z. Pan. 2020. DREAMPlace 3.0: Multi-Electrostatics Based Robust VLSI Placement with Region Constraints. In 2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference On Computer Aided Design (ICCAD). 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Andrew B. Kahng. 2000. Classical Floorplanning Harmful?. In Proceedings of the 2000 International Symposium on Physical Design (ISPD '00). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 207--213.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. K. Kiyota and K. Fujiyoshi. 2000. Simulated annealing search through general structure floorplans using sequence-pair. In 2000 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Vol. 3. 77--80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jingwei Lu. 2010. Fundamental Research on Electronic Design Automation in VLSI Design - Routability.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Lu, H. Zhuang, P. Chen, H. Chang, C. C. Chang, Y. C. Wong, L. Sha, D. Huang, Y. Luo, C. C. Teng, and C. K. Cheng. 2015. ePlace-MS: Electrostatics-Based Placement for Mixed-Size Circuits. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 34, 5 (2015), 685--698.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Igor L. Markov, Jin Hu, and Myung-Chul Kim. 2015. Progress and Challenges in VLSI Placement Research. Proc. IEEE 103, 11 (2015), 1985--2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Azalia Mirhoseini, Anna Goldie, Mustafa Yazgan, Joe Wenjie Jiang, Ebrahim Songhori, Shen Wang, Young-Joon Lee, Eric Johnson, Omkar Pathak, Azade Nazi, et al. 2021. A graph placement methodology for fast chip design. Nature 594, 7862 (2021), 207--212.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. H. Murata, K. Fujiyoshi, S. Nakatake, and Y. Kajitani. 1996. VLSI Module Placement Based on Rectangle-Packing by the Sequence-Pair. Trans. Comp.-Aided Des. Integ. Cir. Sys. 15, 12 (1996), 1518--1524.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Yangfeng Su, Fan Yang, and Xuan Zeng. 2012. AMOR: An Efficient Aggregating Based Model Order Reduction Method for Many-Terminal Interconnect Circuits. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Design Automation Conference. 295--300.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Petar Veličković, Guillem Cucurull, Arantxa Casanova, Adriana Romero, Pietro Lio, and Yoshua Bengio. 2018. Graph attention networks. In ICLR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    DAC '22: Proceedings of the 59th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
    July 2022
    1462 pages
    ISBN:9781450391429
    DOI:10.1145/3489517

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 23 August 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,770of5,499submissions,32%

    Upcoming Conference

    DAC '24
    61st ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
    June 23 - 27, 2024
    San Francisco , CA , USA

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader