skip to main content
10.1145/3490149.3502426acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Nature Jar: Design for Facilitating Nature Connectedness and Restoration in Home Scenario

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 February 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Over recent decades, rapid urbanization has made people further detached from nature. Researchers from a wide range of disciplines have demonstrated that the growing separateness from nature has adverse impacts on public health and environmental sustainability. Therefore, promoting nature connectedness has been viewed as a prominent and necessary aspiration. Since more and more people live in cities and spend most of their time indoors, urban landscapes and citizens' living environments play an increasingly important role in reconnecting to nature. Under these circumstances, the project aims to use design and technology to gently intervene in people's perceptive and behavioral transformations by encouraging them to notice, value, and have more contact with the nearby nature, as well as deliver nature's restorative effects. A prototype was developed after a cultural probes study, connecting the natural environment with the home space, the digital device with the tangible interaction, the real-life behaviors with the virtual effects.

References

  1. Barton, Jo, Rachel Bragg, Jules Pretty, Jo Roberts, and Carly Wood. 2016. “The Wilderness Expedition.” Journal of Experiential Education 39(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825915626933.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Boud David. 1985. Reflection: Turning experience into learning. Kogan Page.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Gaver Bill, Tony Dunne, and Elena Pacenti. 1999. Design: Cultural probes. Interactions, 6(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/291224.291235Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Gaver William, Andy Boucher, Michail Vanis, Andy Sheen, Dean Brown, Liliana Ovalle, Naho Matsuda, Amina Abbas-Nazari, and Robert Phillips. 2019. My Naturewatch Camera. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300532Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hartig Terry, Florian G. Kaiser, and Peter A. Bowler. 2001. Psychological Restoration in Nature as a Positive Motivation for Ecological Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 33(4), 590–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973142Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Kaplan Rachel and Stephen Kaplan. 1995. The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. Ulrich's.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Keniger Lucy, Kevin Gaston, Katherine Irvine, and Richard Fuller. 2013. What are the Benefits of Interacting with Nature? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(3), 913–935. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10030913Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Lee Richard M. and Steven B. Robbins. 1998. The relationship between social connectedness and anxiety, self-esteem, and social identity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(3), 338–345. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.45.3.338Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Lin Brenda B., Richard A. Fuller, Robert Bush, Kevin J. Gaston, and Danielle F. Shanahan. 2014. Opportunity or ORIENTATION? Who USES urban Parks and why. PLoS ONE, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087422Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Martin Leanne, Mathew P. White, Anne Hunt, Miles Richardson, Sabine Pahl, and Jim Burt. 2020. Nature contact, nature connectedness and associations with health, wellbeing and pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 68, 101389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101389Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Mayer F.Stephan and Cynthia McPherson Frantz. 2004. The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Mayer F. Stephan, Cynthia McPherson Frantz, Emma Bruehlman-Senecal, and Kyffin Dolliver. 2008. Why is nature beneficial? The Role of Connectedness to Nature. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 607–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508319745Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Miller James R. 2005. Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(8), 430–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.013Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Newman Lenore and Ann Dale. 2013. Celebrating the Mundane: Nature and the Built Environment. Environmental Values, 22(3), 401–413. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327113x13648087563827Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Nisbet Elizabeth K., John M. Zelenski, and Steven A. Murphy. 2008. The nature relatedness scale. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 715–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508318748Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Pyle Robert Michael. 1993. The thunder tree: lessons from an urban wildland. Oregon State University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Pyle Robert Michael. 2003. Nature matrix: reconnecting people and nature. Oryx, 37(2), 206–214. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0030605303000383Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Richardson Miles and David Sheffield. 2017. Three good things in nature: noticing nearby nature brings sustained increases in connection with nature. Psyecology, 8(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2016.1267136Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Schultz P. Wesley. 2002. Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. Psychology of Sustainable Development, 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0995-0_4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Sengers Phoebe, Kirsten Boehner, Shay David, and Joseph 'Jofish' Kaye. 2005. Reflective design. Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing between Sense and Sensibility - CC '05. https://doi.org/10.1145/1094562.1094569Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Soga Masashi and Kevin J Gaston. 2016. Extinction of experience: the loss of human-nature interactions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(2), 94–101. https://doi. org/10.1002/fee.1225Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Soga Masashi, Kevin J. Gaston, Tomoyo F. Koyanagi, Kiyo Kurisu, and Keisuke Hanaki. 2016. Urban residents' perceptions of neighbourhood nature: Does the extinction of experience matter? Biological Conservation, 203, 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.020Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Townsend Katharine C. and Benedict T. McWhirter. 2005. Connectedness: A Review of the Literature With Implications for Counseling, Assessment, and Research. Journal of Counseling & Development, 83(2), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2005.tb00596.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Ulrich Roger S., Robert F. Simons, Barbara D. Losito, Evelyn Fiorito, Mark A. Miles, and Michael Zelson. 1991. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80184-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Wilson Edward O. 1984. Biophilia. Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. World Health Organization. 2015. Health in 2015: from MDGs to SDGs. World Health Organization. Retrieved July 26, 2021, from https://www.who.int/data/gho/publications/mdgs-sdgs.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Zylstra Matthew J., Andrew T. Knight, Karen J. Esler, and Lesley L. Le Grange. 2014. Connectedness as a Core Conservation Concern: An Interdisciplinary Review of Theory and a Call for Practice. Springer Science Reviews, 2(1-2), 119–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40362-014-0021-3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Nature Jar: Design for Facilitating Nature Connectedness and Restoration in Home Scenario
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      TEI '22: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
      February 2022
      758 pages
      ISBN:9781450391474
      DOI:10.1145/3490149

      Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 February 2022

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format