skip to main content
10.1145/3490355.3490518acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageschinese-chiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

AR-Poetry: Enhancing Children’s Motivation in Learning Classical Chinese Poetry via Interactive Augmented Reality

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 February 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Classical Chinese poetry education is vital for children in cultivating their cultural and aesthetic competences, but it can be tedious and challenging without appropriate learning materials. Considering the great potential of augmented reality (AR) with its playful interaction and immersive 3D environment, in this paper, we focus on landscape poetry and present a tablet AR application, AR-Poetry, which aims to make it motivational and enjoyable for children to learn classical Chinese poetry. We utilized the ARCS model for instruction to enhance the motivational feature of AR-Poetry. Besides, we concluded with four intuitive yet reasonable interaction modes to maximize the connection between the contents and the interaction process, as well as to fulfill the features of AR. We believe that AR-Poetry could be a useful supplement to school education and hope that our work could attract more attention to cross-cultural discussion in the field of human-computer interaction.

References

  1. Effie Lai-Chong Law and Matthias Heintz. 2021. Augmented reality applications for K-12 education: A systematic review from the usability and user experience perspective. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction (May 2021), 100321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100321Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Jingya Li, E. Spek, Jun Hu, and L. Feijs. 2018. See Me Roar: On the Over-Positive, Cross-Cultural Response on an AR Game for Math Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02762-9_7 Pages: 54-65 Publication Title: Serious Games. 4th Joint International Conference, JCSG 2018. Proceedings: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS 11243) INSPEC:18234707.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Jia Zhang, Yao-Ting Sung, Huei-Tse Hou, and Kuo-En Chang. 2014. The development and evaluation of an augmented reality-based armillary sphere for astronomical observation instruction. Computers & Education 73 (April 2014), 178–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Fabio Zünd, Mattia Ryffel, Stéphane Magnenat, Alessia Marra, Maurizio Nitti, Mubbasir Kapadia, Gioacchino Noris, Kenny Mitchell, Markus Gross, and Robert W. Sumner. 2015. Augmented creativity: bridging the real and virtual worlds to enhance creative play. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2015 Mobile Graphics and Interactive Applications. ACM, Kobe Japan, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818427.2818460Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. 2011. Yi wu jiao yu yu wen ke cheng biao zhun: 2011 nian ban[ Chinese curriculum standards for compulsory education: 2011 Edition]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A26/s8001/201112/t20111228_167340.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. John M. Keller. 2010. Motivational Design for Learning and Performance. Springer US, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1250-3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Mark Billinghurst, Hirokazu Kato, and Ivan Poupyrev. 2001. The MagicBook: a transitional AR interface. Computers & Graphics 25, 5 (2001), 745–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0097-8493(01)00117-0 Mixed realities - beyond conventions.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hamiyet Burson and Rabia Meryem Yilmaz. 2019. Effect of augmented reality applications on secondary school students’ reading comprehension and learning permanency. Computers in Human Behavior 95 (June 2019), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.035 WOS:000463310300014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jing Zhao, Lei Guo, Shirong Zheng, Shuming Li, and Jiahong Zhu. 2018. Design and Development of Mobile Interactive Picture Books. In Applied Sciences in Graphic Communication and Packaging, Pengfei Zhao, Yun Ouyang, Min Xu, Li Yang, and Yuhui Ren (Eds.). Springer Singapore, Singapore, 353–360.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dan Liu and Jin Wan Park. 2019. A Study on the Design and Presentation of Virtual Contents in AR Picture Books. Pages: 16-20 Publication Title: 2019 Ieee 2nd International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering Technology (ccet) WOS:000545638300004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Chor-Kheng Lim, Ming-Chih Huang, and Fang-Yu Chen. 2018. Application AR in field experience education: development of teaching aids in chinese literature and taoyuan local culture. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers - ICETC ’18. ACM Press, Tokyo, Japan, 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290511.3290578Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Zheng Chen and Zhong Wang. 2021. Efficacy of Romantic Poetry: Chinese Classical Poetry Education Project Based on Augmented Reality Technology for Elementary School Students. In Advances in Usability, User Experience, Wearable and Assistive Technology, Tareq Z. Ahram and Christianne S. Falcão (Eds.). Vol. 275. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80091-8_25 Series Title: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Yusuf Islam Bolat. 2021. Does the ARCS motivational model affect students’ achievement and motivation? A meta‐analysis. Review of Education 9, 1 (Feb. 2021), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3231Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Jorge Bacca, Silvia Baldiris, Ramon Fabregat, and Kinshuk. 2019. Framework for designing motivational augmented reality applications in vocational education and training. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 35, 3(2019), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4182 WOS:000472479300009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Yuh-Shihng Chang, Kuo-Jui Hu, Cheng-Wei Chiang, and Artur Lugmayr. 2020. Applying Mobile Augmented Reality (AR) to Teach Interior Design Students in Layout Plans: Evaluation of Learning Effectiveness Based on the ARCS Model of Learning Motivation Theory. Sensors 20, 1 (Jan. 2020), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20010105 WOS:000510493100105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Su-Ju Lu, Ying-Chieh Liu, Po-Ju Chen, and Mu-Rong Hsieh. 2020. Evaluation of AR embedded physical puzzle game on students’ learning achievement and motivation on elementary natural science. Interactive Learning Environments 28, 4 (May 2020), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1541908 WOS:000587880700006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. P. E. Parrish. 2009. Aesthetic Principles for Instructional Design. Educational Technology Research & Development 57, 4(2009), 511–528.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Blender Online Community. 2018. Blender - a 3D modelling and rendering package. Blender Foundation, Stichting Blender Foundation, Amsterdam. http://www.blender.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Nicole Loorbach, Oscar Peters, Joyce Karreman, and Michaël Steehouder. 2015. Validation of the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS) in a self-directed instructional setting aimed at working with technology: Validation of the IMMS. British Journal of Educational Technology 46, 1 (Jan. 2015), 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12138Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. AR-Poetry: Enhancing Children’s Motivation in Learning Classical Chinese Poetry via Interactive Augmented Reality
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            Chinese CHI '21: Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium of Chinese CHI
            October 2021
            166 pages
            ISBN:9781450386951
            DOI:10.1145/3490355

            Copyright © 2021 Owner/Author

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 7 February 2022

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • poster
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate17of40submissions,43%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format