skip to main content
10.1145/3490700.3490718acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicacsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Fast Ship Detection in Remote Sensing Images Based on Multi-Attention Mechanism

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 January 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the continuous development of deep learning in computer vision, object detection technology is constantly employed for processing remote sensing images. Especially, ship detection has become a significant and challenging task due to complex environmental factors (strong waves, clouds interference, etc.) and object issues (orientation, scale variety, density, etc.). Current detection methods pay more attention to the detection accuracy while ignoring the detection speed. In contrast with accuracy, detection speed is more important in some cases such as marine rescue and vessel tracking. Aiming at addressing these problems, we propose an enhanced YOLOv4(C-YOLOv4) which contains the feature fusion attention module (FAM) with a channel correlation loss(C-loss). C-loss is proposed to constrain the relations between object classes and channels while maintaining the intra-class and the inter-class separability. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, comprehensive experiments are conducted on a public dataset HRSC2016. According to the experimental results, our proposed approach outperforms the baselines.

References

  1. Fan Y , Wen Q , Wang W , Quantifying Disaster Physical Damage Using Remote Sensing Data—A Technical Work Flow and Case Study of the 2014 Ludian Earthquake in China[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2017, 8(4):1-18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Martinuzzi S , Gould W A , OMR González. Land development, land use, and urban sprawl in Puerto Rico integrating remote sensing and population census data[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2007, 79(3):288-297.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Durieux L , Lagabrielle E , Nelson A . A method for monitoring building construction in urban sprawl areas using object-based analysis of Spot 5 images and existing GIS data[J]. Isprs Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 2008, 63(4):399-408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Chen C , He C , Hu C , A Deep Neural Network Based on an Attention Mechanism for SAR Ship Detection in Multiscale and Complex Scenarios[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, PP(99):1-1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jiexiong, Tang, Chenwei, Compressed-Domain Ship Detection on Spaceborne Optical Image Using Deep Neural Network and Extreme Learning Machine.[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience & Remote Sensing, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Nie, T.; He, B.; Bi, G.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, W. A Method of Ship Detection under Complex Background. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2017, 6, 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6060159Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Chen L , Shi W , Fan C , A Novel Coarse-to-Fine Method of Ship Detection in Optical Remote Sensing Images Based on a Deep Residual Dense Network[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(19):3115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Wang W , Fu Y , Feng D , Remote sensing ship detection technology based on DoG preprocessing and shape features[C]// 2017 3rd IEEE International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC). IEEE, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Nie, T.; He, B.; Bi, G.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, W. A method of ship detection under complex background. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2017, 6,159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Feng Y , Xu Q , Bo L . Ship Detection From Optical Satellite Images Based on Saliency Segmentation and Structure-LBP Feature[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2017, 14(5):602-606. [1] Feng Y , Xu Q , Bo L . Ship Detection From Optical Satellite Images Based on Saliency Segmentation and Structure-LBP Feature[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2017, 14(5):602-606.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Qi S , Ma J , Lin J , Unsupervised Ship Detection Based on Saliency and S-HOG Descriptor From Optical Satellite Images[J]. IEEE Geoscience & Remote Sensing Letters, 2015, 12(7):1451-1455.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. A Novel Algorithm for Ship Detection Based on Dynamic Fusion Model of Multi-feature and Support Vector Machine[C]// 2011 Sixth International Conference on Image and Graphics. IEEE, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Xu J , Sun X , Zhang D , Automatic Detection of Inshore Ships in High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images Using Robust Invariant Generalized Hough Transform[J]. IEEE Geoscience & Remote Sensing Letters, 2014, 11(12):2070-2074.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G.E. (2012). ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Communications of the ACM, 60, 84 - 90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Huang G , Liu Z , Laurens V , Densely Connected Convolutional Networks[J]. IEEE Computer Society, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Simonyan K , Zisserman A . Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition[J]. Computer Science, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Lin H , Shi Z , Zou Z . Fully Convolutional Network With Task Partitioning for Inshore Ship Detection in Optical Remote Sensing Images[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2017:1-5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Yuan Y , Jiang Z , Zhang H , Ship detection in optical remote sensing images based on deep convolutional neural networks[J]. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 2017, 11(4):1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu W , Ma L , Chen H . Arbitrary-Oriented Ship Detection Framework in Optical Remote-Sensing Images[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2018:1-5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang Z , Y Zhou, Wang F , SDGH-Net: Ship Detection in Optical Remote Sensing Images Based on Gaussian Heatmap Regression[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(3):499.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Girshick, R.; Donahue, J.; Darrell, T.; Malik, J. Rich Feature Hierarchies for Accurate Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation. In Proceedings of the CVPR, Columbus, OH, USA, 24–27 June 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Girshick, R. Fast r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Santiago, Chile, 11–18 December 2015; pp. 1440–1448Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Ren S , He K , Girshick R , Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, 2017, 39(6):1137-1149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Liu W , Anguelov D , Erhan D , SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector[J]. European Conference on Computer Vision, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Redmon J , Divvala S , Girshick R , You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection[J]. IEEE, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Redmon J , Farhadi A . YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Stronger[C]// IEEE Conference on Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 2017:6517-6525.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Redmon J , Farhadi A . YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement[J]. arXiv e-prints, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Bochkovskiy A , Wang C Y , Liao H . YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detection[J]. 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Lin T Y , Goyal P , Girshick R , Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, 2017, PP(99):2999-3007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Law H , Deng J . CornerNet: Detecting Objects as Paired Keypoints[J]. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2020, 128(3):642-656.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Zhou X , Wang D , P Krhenbühl. Objects as Points[J]. 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Tian Z , Shen C , Chen H , FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detection[C]// 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). IEEE, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Yao, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, D.; Cai, B. Ship detection in optical remote sensing images based on deep convolutional neural networks. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 2017, 11, 042611.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Yang, X.; Sun, H.; Fu, K.; Yang, J.; Sun, X.; Yan, M.; Guo, Z. Automatic ship detection in remote sensing images from google earth of complex scenes based on multiscale rotation dense feature pyramid networks. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Guo, H.Y.; Yang, X.; Wang, N.N.; Song, B.; Gao, X.B. A rotational libra R-CNN method for ship detection. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2020, 58, 5772–5781.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Tang, G.; Liu, S.; Fujino, I.; Claramunt, C.; Wang, Y.; Men, S. H-YOLO: A single-shot ship detection approach based on region of interest preselected network. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 4192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Yang X , Liu Q , Yan J , R3Det: Refined Single-Stage Detector with Feature Refinement for Rotating Object[J]. 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Nina W , Condori W , Machaca V , Small Ship Detection on Optical Satellite Imagery with YOLO and YOLT[M]. 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Etten A V . You Only Look Twice: Rapid Multi-Scale Object Detection In Satellite Imagery[J]. 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Liu S , Qi L , Qin H , Path Aggregation Network for Instance Segmentation[C]// 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Li Y , Chen Y , Wang N , Scale-Aware Trident Networks for Object Detection[C]// 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). IEEE, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. F Yu, Koltun V . Multi-Scale Context Aggregation by Dilated Convolutions[J]. 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Liu, Z.; Yuan, L.; Weng, L.; Yang, Y. A high resolution optical satellite image dataset for ship recognition and some new baselines. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Pattern Recognition Application and Methods (ICPRAM 2017), Porto, Portugal, 24–26 February 2017; pp. 324–331.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Tan, M.; Le, Q.V. Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1905.11946.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICACS '21: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Systems
    September 2021
    139 pages
    ISBN:9781450385084
    DOI:10.1145/3490700

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 5 January 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format