skip to main content
10.1145/3491101.3503563acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

A Case Study on User Experience Bootcamps with Teens to Co-Design Real-Time Online Safety Interventions

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 April 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

We conducted User Experience (UX) Bootcamps with teens (ages 13-17) to teach them important UX design skills and industry standard tools for co-designing effective online safety interventions or “nudges”. In the process, we asked teens to storyboard about their risky or uncomfortable experiences and design high-fidelity prototypes for online safety interventions that would help mitigate these negative experiences. In this case study, we present our methodology, feedback from teens, challenges, and lessons learned in conducting our UX Bootcamps for adolescent online safety. We recommend that future researchers who want to conduct similar research with teens to encourage group activities, balance teen autonomy with researcher assistance, and ensure teens’ privacy and well-being. Finally, we provide useful guidelines for conducting virtual training and research studies with teens.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3491101.3503563-video.mp4

mp4

151.6 MB

3491101.3503563-video-preview.mp4

mp4

22.6 MB

References

  1. Zainab Agha, Reza Ghaiumy Anaraky, Karla Badillo-Urquiola, Bridget McHugh, and Pamela Wisniewski. 2021. ‘Just-in-Time’ Parenting: A Two-Month Examination of the Bi-directional Influences Between Parental Mediation and Adolescent Online Risk Exposure. In HCI for Cybersecurity, Privacy and Trust (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77392-2_17Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Monica Anderson and Jingjing Jiang. Teens, Social Media & Technology 2018. 10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Zahra Ashktorab and Jessica Vitak. 2016. Designing Cyberbullying Mitigation and Prevention Solutions through Participatory Design With Teenagers. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’16), 3895–3905. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858548Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Karla Badillo-Urquiola, Zachary Shea, Zainab Agha, Irina Lediaeva, and Pamela Wisniewski. 2021. Conducting Risky Research with Teens: Co-designing for the Ethical Treatment and Protection of Adolescents. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW3: 231:1-231:46. https://doi.org/10.1145/3432930Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cristian Bravo-Lillo, Saranga Komanduri, Lorrie Faith Cranor, Robert W. Reeder, Manya Sleeper, Julie Downs, and Stuart Schechter. 2013. Your attention please: designing security-decision UIs to make genuine risks harder to ignore. In Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS ’13), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/2501604.2501610Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Eric Cardella, Bradley T. Ewing, and Ryan B. Williams. 2022. Green is Good—The Impact of Information Nudges on the Selection of Voluntary Green-Power Plans. The Energy Journal 43, 1. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.43.1.ecarGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Rikke Friis Dam and Teo Yu Siang. 5 Stages in the Design Thinking Process. The Interaction Design Foundation. Retrieved October 13, 2021 from https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-processGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Arianna Davis. 2020. Co-Designing “Teenovate”: An Intergenerational Online Safety Design Team. Honors Undergraduate Theses. Retrieved from https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses/847Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee B. Erickson, Pamela Wisniewski, Heng Xu, John M. Carroll, Mary Beth Rosson, and Daniel F. Perkins. 2016. The boundaries between: Parental involvement in a teen's online world. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67, 6: 1384–1403. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23450Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. World Leaders in Research-Based User Experience. The Definition of User Experience (UX). Nielsen Norman Group. Retrieved October 13, 2021 from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/definition-user-experience/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Mona Leigh Guha, Allison Druin, and Jerry Alan Fails. 2013. Cooperative Inquiry revisited: Reflections of the past and guidelines for the future of intergenerational co-design. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 1, 1: 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2012.08.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Heidi Hartikainen, Afsaneh Razi, and Pamela Wisniewski. 2021. ‘If You Care About Me, You'll Send Me a Pic’ - Examining the Role of Peer Pressure in Adolescent Sexting. In Companion Publication of the 2021 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 67–71. Retrieved December 15, 2021 from https://doi.org/10.1145/3462204.3481739Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Athina Ioannou, Iis Tussyadiah, Graham Miller, Shujun Li, and Mario Weick. 2021. Privacy nudges for disclosure of personal information: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE 16, 8: e0256822. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256822Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Seunghyun Kim, Afsaneh Razi, Gianluca Stringhini, Pamela J. Wisniewski, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2021. You Don't Know How I Feel: Insider-Outsider Perspective Gaps in Cyberbullying Risk Detection. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 15: 290–302.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kung Jin Lee, Wendy Roldan, Tian Qi Zhu, Harkiran Kaur Saluja, Sungmin Na, Britnie Chin, Yilin Zeng, Jin Ha Lee, and Jason Yip. 2021. The Show Must Go On: A Conceptual Model of Conducting Synchronous Participatory Design With Children Online. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–16. Retrieved December 15, 2021 from https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445715Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Sonia Livingstone, Leslie Haddon, Anke Görzig, and Kjartan Ólafsson. 2011. Risks and safety on the internet: the perspective of European children: full findings and policy implications from the EU Kids Online survey of 9-16 year olds and their parents in 25 countries. Retrieved February 2, 2021 from http://www.eukidsonline.net/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Hiroaki Masaki, Kengo Shibata, Shui Hoshino, Takahiro Ishihama, Nagayuki Saito, and Koji Yatani. 2020. Exploring Nudge Designs to Help Adolescent SNS Users Avoid Privacy and Safety Threats. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376666Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Bridget Christine McHugh, Pamela J. Wisniewski, Mary Beth Rosson, Heng Xu, and John M. Carroll. 2017. Most Teens Bounce Back: Using Diary Methods to Examine How Quickly Teens Recover from Episodic Online Risk Exposure. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW: 76:1-76:19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134711Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Brenna McNally, Priya Kumar, Chelsea Hordatt, Matthew Louis Mauriello, Shalmali Naik, Leyla Norooz, Alazandra Shorter, Evan Golub, and Allison Druin. 2018. Co-designing Mobile Online Safety Applications with Children. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’18), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174097Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Maria Teresa Moreira, Lesley A. Smith, and David Foxcroft. 2009. Social norms interventions to reduce alcohol misuse in University or College students. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006748.pub2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Afsaneh Razi, Karla Badillo-Urquiola, and Pamela J. Wisniewski. 2020. Let's Talk about Sext: How Adolescents Seek Support and Advice about Their Online Sexual Experiences. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376400Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Karen Renaud and Verena Zimmermann. 2019. Nudging folks towards stronger password choices: providing certainty is the key. Behavioural Public Policy 3, 2: 228–258. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2018.3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. C. Sunstein, Lucia Reisch, and Wencke Gwozdz. 2016. Beyond Carrots and Sticks: Europeans Support Health Nudges. Food Policy 69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.01.007Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein. 2008. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. J. Mitchell Vaterlaus, Troy E. Beckert, Sarah Tulane, and Clare V. Bird. 2014. “They Always Ask What I'm Doing and Who I'm Talking to”: Parental Mediation of Adolescent Interactive Technology Use. Marriage & Family Review 50, 8: 691–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2014.938795Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Pamela Wisniewski, Heng Xu, Mary Beth Rosson, Daniel F. Perkins, and John M. Carroll. 2016. Dear diary: Teens reflect on their weekly online risk experiences. In CHI 2016 - Proceedings, 34th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3919–3930. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858317Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 2021. Giving Young People a Safer, More Private Experience on Instagram. About Facebook. Retrieved September 15, 2021 from https://about.fb.com/news/2021/07/instagram-safe-and-private-for-young-people/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. AhaSlides - Live Polls, Quiz and Q&A with your audience for FREE. AhaSlides. Retrieved October 13, 2021 from https://ahaslides.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. What is Ideation? The Interaction Design Foundation. Retrieved October 13, 2021 from https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/ideationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Collaborate & Create Amazing Graphic Design for Free. Canva. Retrieved October 13, 2021 from https://www.canva.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. FigJam is an online whiteboard for teams to explore ideas together. Figma. Retrieved October 13, 2021 from https://www.figma.com/figjam/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Figma: the collaborative interface design tool. Figma. Retrieved October 13, 2021 from https://www.figma.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI EA '22: Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2022
    3066 pages
    ISBN:9781450391566
    DOI:10.1145/3491101

    Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 28 April 2022

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • extended-abstract
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format