skip to main content
10.1145/3491101.3516386acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Who Owns the Future of Work?

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 April 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

This submission is intended to start a critical conversation about the ”Future of Work.” I expose the ideological commitments of major funders of research into this area, such as the NSF and private think tanks, because they shape narratives on work and worker organizing as well as the course of technology development more broadly. In the research itself, workers may be invited to participate in computing research, but they seldom determine the goals of projects nor do they own the results. Ultimately, while government agencies and nonprofit organizations claim to seek improved conditions for workers, the knowledge and technologies produced through this research serve primarily to undermine the power of working class people and their unions.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3491101.3516386-talk-video.mp4

mp4

290.7 MB

References

  1. Alex Ahmed. 2020. We Will Not Be Pacified Through Participation. Tech Otherwise (15 10 2020). https://doi.org/10.21428/93b2c832.e4aa9a47 https://techotherwise.pubpub.org/pub/qanxilt9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. John M. Ashbrook. 1980. A critique of NSF. Society 17, 6 (1980), 12–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03180772Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Jennifer Bamberg. 2021. Warmed By Burn Barrels, Pelted By Sleet, Striking Workers Have More Resolve Than John Deere. https://inthesetimes.com/article/moline-illinois-uaw-strike-john-deere-tentative-agreement. Accessed: 2021-12-10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Wolmet Barendregt, Christoph Becker, EunJeong Cheon, Andrew Clement, Pedro Reynolds-Cuéllar, Douglas Schuler, and Lucy Suchman. 2021. Defund Big Tech, Refund Community. Tech Otherwise (5 2 2021). https://doi.org/10.21428/93b2c832.e0100a3f https://techotherwise.pubpub.org/pub/dakcci1r.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Rebecca Bellan. 2021. Uber CEO calls Massachusetts gig economy ballot measure the ‘right answer’. https://techcrunch.com/2021/08/04/uber-ceo-calls-massachusetts-gig-economy-ballot-measure-the-right-answer/. Accessed: 2021-12-10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jeremy Brecher. 1997. Strike!South End Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, pp. 244–248.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Scott Cummings. 1984. The Political Economy of Social Science Funding. Sociological Inquiry 54, 2 (apr 1984), 154–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1984.tb00054.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. National Science Foundation. 2016. Ten Big Ideas for Future NSF Investment. https://www.nsf.gov/news/mmg/mmg_disp.jsp?med_id=81537. Accessed: 2021-12-10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. National Science Foundation. 2021. Future of Work at the Human-Technology Frontier: Core Research (FW-HTF). https://beta.nsf.gov/funding/opportunities/future-work-human-technology-frontier-core-research-fw-htf. Accessed: 2021-12-09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Nicolle R. Fuller. n.d.. The Future of Work. https://sayostudio.com/portfolio/the-future-of-work/. Accessed: 2021-12-09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Toni Gilpin. 2020. The Long Deep Grudge: A Story of Big Capital, Radical Labor, and Class War in the American Heartland. Haymarket Books, Chicago, IL, USA, pp. 125–145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Critical Platform Studies Group, Lilly Irani, Niloufar Salehi, Joyojeet Pal, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, Elizabeth Churchill, and Sneha Narayan. 2019. Patron or Poison? Industry Funding of HCI Research. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing(Austin, TX, USA) (CSCW ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 111–115. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311957.3358610Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lilly Irani. 2019. Chasing Innovation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, pp. 148–150.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Elisabeth Jacobs. 2021. A Call for Innovation in the Labor Movement: A Q&A with David Rolf. https://www.workrisenetwork.org/working-knowledge/call-innovation-labor-movement-qa-david-rolf. Accessed: 2021-12-10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. @jjotatoes. 2021. Nypd absolutely harassed and intimidated us today, shame on columbia!! #CopsOffCampus #ACAB. Twitter, https://twitter.com/jjotatoes/status/1468745936033701893?s=20. Accessed: 2021-12-10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Edward Ongweso Jr.2020. Uber and Lyft’s Shameless Propaganda Is Trying to Steal Protections From Drivers. https://www.vice.com/en/article/jgxy4x/uber-and-lyfts-shameless-propaganda-is-trying-to-steal-protections-from-drivers. Accessed: 2021-12-10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Andrew Kun and Orit Shaer. 2021. Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work (CHIWORK). https://www.chiwork.org/. Accessed: 2021-12-09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Sarah Launius and Geoffrey Alan Boyce. 2021. More than Metaphor: Settler Colonialism, Frontier Logic, and the Continuities of Racialized Dispossession in a Southwest U.S. City. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 111, 1(2021), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1750940Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. WorkRise Network. 2021. Our Funders. https://www.workrisenetwork.org/about-workrise#our-funders. Accessed: 2021-12-09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. David Rolf, Dara Khosrowshahi, and Nick Hanauer. 2018. Building a portable benefits system for today’s world. https://www.uber.com/newsroom/building-portable-benefits-system-todays-world/. Accessed: 2021-12-10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Michael Sainato. 2021. Columbia University threatens graduate workers with replacement if they continue strike. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/dec/09/columbia-university-student-worker-strike. Accessed: 2021-12-10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Michael Sainato. 2021. Protesters against Line 3 tar sands pipeline face arrests and rubber bullets. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/aug/10/protesters-line-3-minnesota-oil-gas-pipeline. Accessed: 2021-12-10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Devansh Saxena, Erhardt Graeff, Shion Guha, EunJeong Cheon, Pedro Reynolds-Cuéllar, Dawn Walker, Christoph Becker, and Kenneth R. Fleischmann. 2020. Collective Organizing and Social Responsibility at CSCW. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 503–509. https://doi.org/10.1145/3406865.3418593Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Nima Shirazi and Adam Johnson. 2021. Episode 150: How Economic Jargon and Cliches Make Cruel, Anti-Poor Policies Sound Sterile and Science-y (Part I). https://citationsneeded.libsyn.com/episode-150-how-economic-jargon-and-cliches-make-cruel-anti-poor-policies-sound-sterile-and-science-y-part-i. Accessed: 2021-12-09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI EA '22: Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2022
    3066 pages
    ISBN:9781450391566
    DOI:10.1145/3491101

    Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 28 April 2022

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • extended-abstract
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI '24
    CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    May 11 - 16, 2024
    Honolulu , HI , USA
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)101
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format