Irene Zanardi
ABSTRACT
Multisensory environments (MSE) are thought to promote relaxing experiences and learning opportunities for children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD), especially autistic kids. However, there seems to be a lack of proposals tailored to school with relaxing goals that address autistic kids’ anxiety, while answering support teachers’ needs. This paper presents Hoomie, a small relaxing multisensory space. A qualitative study with eleven NDD students and their support teachers was conducted to understand what elements should be taken into consideration to allow as much flexibility as possible to children and teachers, in order to be accessible for the kids with sensory processing dysfunction and adoptable in teachers’ routines. Findings suggest that by providing a wide range of possibilities in a few touchpoints, a small multisensory space can keep motivating the children’s interaction, while flexibility in activity management, activity parameters, and work method can answer teachers’ needs for adoptable tools.
- Dawn Adams, Kate Simpson, and Deb Keen. 2018. School-related anxiety symptomatology in a community sample of primary-school-aged children on the autism spectrum. Journal of school psychology 70 (2018), 64–73.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Dimitris Anastasiou, James M Kauffman, and Santo Di Nuovo. 2015. Inclusive education in Italy: description and reflections on full inclusion. European Journal of Special Needs Education 30, 4 (2015), 429–443.Google ScholarCross Ref
- American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (fifth ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing, Washington, DC, 50–59.Google Scholar
- Sarah H Baum, Ryan A Stevenson, and Mark T Wallace. 2015. Behavioral, perceptual, and neural alterations in sensory and multisensory function in autism spectrum disorder. Progress in neurobiology 134 (2015), 140–160.Google Scholar
- Olga Bogdashina. 2016. Sensory perceptual issues in autism and asperger syndrome: different sensory experiences-different perceptual worlds. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London, UK.Google Scholar
- Betsy H Botts, Patti A Hershfeldt, and Robyn J Christensen-Sandfort. 2008. Snoezelen®: Empirical review of product representation. Focus on autism and other developmental disabilities 23, 3(2008), 138–147.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Carmen Carpio De Los Pinos and Inmaculada Barroso López. 2021. The Influence of Music on the Behaviour of Persons with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Low Cognitive Functioning: A Systematic Observational Study. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education (2021), 1–18.Google Scholar
- Joyce Davidson. 2010. ‘It cuts both ways’: A relational approach to access and accommodation for autism. Social science & medicine 70, 2 (2010), 305–312.Google Scholar
- Fred D Davis. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly 35, 8 (1989), 319–340.Google Scholar
- Cristina Devecchi, Filippo Dettori, Mary Doveston, Paul Sedgwick, and Johnston Jament. 2012. Inclusive classrooms in Italy and England: The role of support teachers and teaching assistants. European journal of special needs education 27, 2 (2012), 171–184.Google Scholar
- Mirko Gelsomini. 2018. Empowering interactive technologies for children with neuro-developmental disorders and their caregivers. Ph.D. Dissertation. Politecnico di Milano.Google Scholar
- Mirko Gelsomini, Giulia Cosentino, Micol Spitale, 2019. Magika, a multisensory environment for play, education and inclusion. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 1–6.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mirko Gelsomini, Annalisa Rotondaro, Giulia Cosentino, Mattia Gianotti, Fabiano Riccardi, and Franca Garzotto. 2018. On the Effects of a Nomadic Multisensory Solution for Children’s Playful Learning. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 189–201.Google Scholar
- Neil Humphrey and Sarah Lewis. 2008. Make me normal’ The views and experiences of pupils on the autistic spectrum in mainstream secondary schools. Autism 12, 1 (2008), 23–46.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Julie A Kientz, Gillian R Hayes, Matthew S Goodwin, Mirko Gelsomini, and Gregory D Abowd. 2019. Interactive Technologies and Autism. Synthesis Lectures on Assistive, Rehabilitative, and Health-Preserving Technologies 9, 1 (2019), i–229.Google Scholar
- Clayton Lewis and Donald A Norman. 1995. Designing for error. In Readings in human–computer interaction. Elsevier, San Francisco, CA, 686–697.Google Scholar
- Nikola Marangunić and Andrina Granić. 2015. Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal access in the information society 14, 1 (2015), 81–95.Google Scholar
- Kamila Markram and Henry Markram. 2010. The intense world theory–a unifying theory of the neurobiology of autism. Frontiers in human neuroscience 4 (2010), 224.Google Scholar
- Italian National Institute of Statistics ISTAT. 2021. L’Inclusione Scolastica degli Alunni Con Disabilità. https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/251409 Accessed: 2022-01-10.Google Scholar
- Narcís Parés, Anna Carreras, Jaume Durany, Jaume Ferrer, Pere Freixa, David Gómez, 2004. MEDIATE: An interactive multisensory environment for children with severe autism and no verbal communication. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation, Vol. 81. EPFL, Lausanne, CH, 98–99.Google Scholar
- Amon Rapp, Federica Cena, Romina Castaldo, Roberto Keller, and Maurizio Tirassa. 2018. Designing technology for spatial needs: Routines, control and social competences of people with autism. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 120 (2018), 49–65.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Melissa D Thye, Haley M Bednarz, Abbey J Herringshaw, Emma B Sartin, and Rajesh K Kana. 2018. The impact of atypical sensory processing on social impairments in autism spectrum disorder. Developmental cognitive neuroscience 29 (2018), 151–167.Google Scholar
- Scott D Tomchek and Winnie Dunn. 2007. Sensory processing in children with and without autism: a comparative study using the short sensory profile. American Journal of occupational therapy 61, 2 (2007), 190–200.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Hoomie Sweet Home: A Qualitative Study on the Small Multisensory Space ”Hoomie” for Inclusion of Autistic Kids in a Primary School
Recommendations
Interactive Multisensory Environments for Primary School Children
CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsInteractive Multi-Sensory Environments (iMSEs) are room-sized interactive installations equipped with digitally enriched physical materials and ambient embedded devices. These items can sense users' presence, gestures, movements, and manipulation, and ...
Comparing cyberbullying perpetration on social media between primary and secondary school students
This study aims to explore factors associated with cyberbullying perpetration on social media among children and adolescents in Singapore, based on the theory of reasoned action and the parental mediation theory. More specifically, the relationships ...
Comments