skip to main content
10.1145/3491101.3519645acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

VR-Surv: a VR-Based Privacy Preserving Surveillance System

Published:28 April 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The recent advances in smart city infrastructure have provided support for a higher adoption of surveillance cameras as a mainstream crime prevention measure. However, a consequent massive deployment raises concerns about privacy issues among citizens. In this paper, we present VR-Surv, a VR-based privacy aware surveillance system for large scale urban environments. Our concept is based on conveying the semantics of the scene uniquely, without revealing the identity of the individuals or the contextual details that might violate the privacy of the entities present in the surveillance area. For this, we create a virtual replica of the areas of interest, in real-time, through the combination of procedurally generated environments and markerless motion capture models. The results of our preliminary evaluation revealed that our system successfully conceals privacy-sensitive data, while preserving the semantics of the scene. Furthermore, participants in our user study expressed higher acceptance to being surveilled through the proposed system.

References

  1. Kunjal Ahir, Kajal Govani, Rutvik Gajera, and Manan Shah. 2020. Application on virtual reality for enhanced education learning, military training and sports. Augmented Human Research 5, 1 (2020), 1–9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Julia Beck, Mattia Rainoldi, and Roman Egger. 2019. Virtual reality in tourism: A state-of-the-art review. Tourism Review 74, 3 (2019), 586–612.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Aniket Bera, Tanmay Randhavane, and Dinesh Manocha. 2019. Improving Socially-aware Multi-channel Human Emotion Prediction for Robot Navigation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops. IEEE, Long Beach, CA, USA, 21–27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. F. Biljecki, H. Ledoux, and J. Stoter. 2016. Generation of multi-LOD 3D city models in CityGML with the procedural modelling engine Random3Dcity. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences IV-4/W1(2016), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-4-W1-51-2016Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Francesco Bonchi, Yücel Saygin, Vassilios S Verykios, Maurizio Atzori, Aris Gkoulalas-Divanis, Selim Volkan Kaya, and Erkay Sava. 2008. Privacy in spatiotemporal data mining., 297–333 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Daniel J. Butler, Justin Huang, Franziska Roesner, and Maya Cakmak. 2015. The Privacy-Utility Tradeoff for Remotely Teleoperated Robots. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction(Portland, Oregon, USA) (HRI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696484Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Yu Cheng, Bo Yang, Bo Wang, and Robby T Tan. 2020. 3d human pose estimation using spatio-temporal networks with explicit occlusion training. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 34. AAAI Press, New York, NY, USA, 10631–10638.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Chao Dong, Chen Change Loy, Kaiming He, and Xiaoou Tang. 2015. Image super-resolution using deep convolutional networks. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 38, 2(2015), 295–307.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Chao Dong, Chen Change Loy, and Xiaoou Tang. 2016. Accelerating the Super-Resolution Convolutional Neural Network. In Computer Vision – ECCV 2016, Bastian Leibe, Jiri Matas, Nicu Sebe, and Max Welling (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 391–407.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Kimberly Dylla, Bernard Frischer, Pascal Müller, Andreas Ulmer, and Simon Haegler. 2008. Rome reborn 2.0: A case study of virtual city reconstruction using procedural modeling techniques. Computer Graphics World 16, 6 (2008), 62–66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Zekeriya Erkin, Martin Franz, Jorge Guajardo, Stefan Katzenbeisser, Inald Lagendijk, and Tomas Toft. 2009. Privacy-preserving face recognition. In International symposium on privacy enhancing technologies symposium. Springer, Seattle, WA, USA, 235–253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Alem Fitwi, Yu Chen, Sencun Zhu, Erik Blasch, and Genshe Chen. 2021. Privacy-preserving surveillance as an edge service based on lightweight video protection schemes using face de-identification and window masking. Electronics 10, 3 (2021), 236.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Gerhard Gröger, Thomas H Kolbe, Claus Nagel, and Karl-Heinz Häfele. 2012. OGC city geography markup language (CityGML) encoding standard.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Mir Rayat Imtiaz Hossain and James J Little. 2018. Exploiting temporal information for 3d human pose estimation. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). Springer, Munich, Germany, 68–84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jie Huang, Anmin Huang, and Liming Wang. 2020. Intelligent Video Surveillance of Tourist Attractions Based on Virtual Reality Technology. IEEE Access 8(2020), 159220–159233. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3020637Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Pirazh Khorramshahi, Neehar Peri, Amit Kumar, Anshul Shah, and Rama Chellappa. 2019. Attention Driven Vehicle Re-identification and Unsupervised Anomaly Detection for Traffic Understanding.. In CVPR Workshops. Computer Vision Foundation / IEEE, Long Beach, CA, USA, 239–246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jiefeng Li, Can Wang, Hao Zhu, Yihuan Mao, Hao-Shu Fang, and Cewu Lu. 2019. Crowdpose: Efficient crowded scenes pose estimation and a new benchmark. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Computer Vision Foundation / IEEE, Long Beach, CA, USA, 10863–10872.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Peilun Li, Guozhen Li, Zhangxi Yan, Youzeng Li, Meiqi Lu, Pengfei Xu, Yang Gu, Bing Bai, Yifei Zhang, and DiDi Chuxing. 2019. Spatio-temporal Consistency and Hierarchical Matching for Multi-Target Multi-Camera Vehicle Tracking.. In CVPR Workshops. Computer Vision Foundation / IEEE, Long Beach, CA, USA, 222–230.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Pei Li, Loreto Prieto, Domingo Mery, and Patrick J. Flynn. 2019. On Low-Resolution Face Recognition in the Wild: Comparisons and New Techniques. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 14, 8 (2019), 2000–2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Aristid Lindenmayer. 1968. Mathematical models for cellular interactions in development I. Filaments with one-sided inputs. Journal of theoretical biology 18, 3 (1968), 280–299.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Dushyant Mehta, Helge Rhodin, Dan Casas, Oleksandr Sotnychenko, Weipeng Xu, and Christian Theobalt. 2016. Monocular 3d human pose estimation using transfer learning and improved cnn supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.09813 1, 3 (2016), 5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Nobuhiro Miyazaki, Kentaro Tsuji, Mingxie Zheng, Moyuri Nakashima, Yuji Matsuda, and Eigo Segawa. 2015. Privacy-conscious human detection using low-resolution video. In 2015 3rd IAPR Asian Conference on Pattern Recognition (ACPR). IEEE, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 326–330. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACPR.2015.7486519Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Alejandro Newell, Kaiyu Yang, and Jia Deng. 2016. Stacked hourglass networks for human pose estimation. In European conference on computer vision. Springer, Springer, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 483–499.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Vitaly Petrov, Sergey Andreev, Mario Gerla, and Yevgeni Koucheryavy. 2018. Breaking the Limits in Urban Video Monitoring: Massive Crowd Sourced Surveillance over Vehicles. IEEE Wireless Communications 25, 5 (2018), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2018.1700415Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Faisal Qureshi and Demetri Terzopoulos. 2008. Smart Camera Networks in Virtual Reality. Proc. IEEE 96, 10 (2008), 1640–1656. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2008.928932Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Faisal Z. Qureshi and Demetri Terzopoulos. 2007. Surveillance in Virtual Reality: System Design and Multi-Camera Control. In 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE Computer Society, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2007.383071Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Qasim Mahmood Rajpoot and Christian Damsgaard Jensen. 2014. Security and privacy in video surveillance: requirements and challenges. In IFIP international information security conference. Springer, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 169–184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Brian A Reaves. 2015. Local police departments, 2013: Equipment and technology. Technical Report. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Wenzhe Shi, Jose Caballero, Ferenc Huszár, Johannes Totz, Andrew P. Aitken, Rob Bishop, Daniel Rueckert, and Zehan Wang. 2016. Real-Time Single Image and Video Super-Resolution Using an Efficient Sub-Pixel Convolutional Neural Network. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE Computer Society, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 1874–1883. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.207Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Ruben M Smelik, Tim Tutenel, Rafael Bidarra, and Bedrich Benes. 2014. A survey on procedural modelling for virtual worlds. Computer Graphics Forum 33, 6 (2014), 31–50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Zheng Tang, Milind Naphade, Ming-Yu Liu, Xiaodong Yang, Stan Birchfield, Shuo Wang, Ratnesh Kumar, David Anastasiu, and Jenq-Neng Hwang. 2019. Cityflow: A city-scale benchmark for multi-target multi-camera vehicle tracking and re-identification. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Computer Vision Foundation / IEEE, Long Beach, CA, USA, 8797–8806.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Demetri Terzopoulos. 2003. Perceptive Agents and Systems in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (Osaka, Japan) (VRST ’03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1145/1008653.1008655Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Felix Tschirschwitz, Christian Richerzhagen, Heinz-Jürgen Przybilla, and Thomas P Kersten. 2019. Duisburg 1566: transferring a historic 3d city model from google earth into a virtual reality application. PFG–Journal of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Geoinformation Science 87, 1 (2019), 47–56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Jos P Van Leeuwen, Klaske Hermans, Antti Jylhä, Arnold Jan Quanjer, and Hanke Nijman. 2018. Effectiveness of virtual reality in participatory urban planning: A case study. In Proceedings of the 4th Media Architecture Biennale Conference. ACM, Beijing, China, 128–136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Eric van Rees. 2014. Esri cityengine 2013. GeoInformatics 17, 2 (2014), 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Thomas Winkler, Ádám Erdélyi, and Bernhard Rinner. 2014. TrustEYE.M4: Protecting the sensor — Not the camera. In 2014 11th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS). IEEE Computer Society, Seoul, South Korea, 159–164. https://doi.org/10.1109/AVSS.2014.6918661Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Ryo Yonetani, Vishnu Naresh Boddeti, Kris M Kitani, and Yoichi Sato. 2017. Privacy-preserving visual learning using doubly permuted homomorphic encryption. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE Computer Society, Venice, Italy, 2040–2050.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Erfan Zangeneh, Mohammad Rahmati, and Yalda Mohsenzadeh. 2020. Low resolution face recognition using a two-branch deep convolutional neural network architecture. Expert Systems with Applications 139 (2020), 112854.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Xingyi Zhou, Qixing Huang, Xiao Sun, Xiangyang Xue, and Yichen Wei. 2017. Towards 3d human pose estimation in the wild: a weakly-supervised approach. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE Computer Society, Venice, Italy, 398–407.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. VR-Surv: a VR-Based Privacy Preserving Surveillance System
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI EA '22: Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          April 2022
          3066 pages
          ISBN:9781450391566
          DOI:10.1145/3491101

          Copyright © 2022 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 28 April 2022

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • poster
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

          CHI '24
          CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 11 - 16, 2024
          Honolulu , HI , USA

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format