skip to main content
10.1145/3491101.3519667acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Should Siri be a Source or Medium for Ads? The Role of Source Orientation and User Motivations in User Responses to Persuasive Content from Voice Assistants

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 April 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

As demonstrated by users’ resistance to ads on Google Home in 2017, persuasive communications from voice assistants (VAs) can be seen as inappropriate. But, they may be better received if the VAs are not the sources but mere media for ads, as happens with radio. User motives may play a role as well, with those who use VAs primarily for information resenting ads more than those who see their VAs as social companions. To test such propositions, we conducted a scenario-based user study (N = 264) in which Siri acted as either a source of ads or as a medium for delivering ads by a human spokesperson. Findings suggest that for informationally motivated users, Siri as ad source causes reactance via lowered sense of control over the interaction. On the other hand, for those with social motives, it increases social presence and positively affects user experience of the interaction.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3491101.3519667-talk-video.mp4

mp4

29.6 MB

References

  1. Peter Adams. 2019. Ad Age: Amazon courts Colgate, L'Oréal and Lululemon for “audio ads” test. Retrieved Jan 7, 2021 from https://www.mobilemarketer.com/news/ad-age-amazon-courts-colgate-loreal-and-lululemon-for-audio-ads-test/559526/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Sophie C. Boerman and Eva A. van Reijmersdal. 2019. Disclosing influencer marketing on YouTube to children: The moderating role of para-social relationship. Frontiers in Psychology 10, 1-15, Article 3042. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03042Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jack W. Brehm. 1966. A Theory of Psychological Reactance. Academic Press. New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Sharon S. Brehm and Jack W. Brehm. 1981. Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control. Academic Press. New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Eugene Cho, Maria D. Molina, and Jinping Wang. 2019. The effects of modality, device, and task differences on human-likeness in virtual assistant interaction. CyberPsy, Behavior, & Social Networking 22, 8, 515-520. http://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0571Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Douglas A. Ferguson, Clark F. Greer, and Michael E. Reardon. 2007. Uses and gratifications of MP3 players by college students: Are iPods more popular than radio? J. of Radio Studies 14, 2, 102–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10955040701583197Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Nathalie Fleck, Géraldine Michel, and Valérie Zeitoun. 2014. Brand personification through the use of spokespeople: An exploratory study of ordinary employees, CEOs, and celebrities featured in advertising. Psychology & Marketing 31, 1, 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20677Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. David Gefen and Detmar S. Straub. 2003. Managing user trust in B2B e-services. e-Service Journal 2, 2, 7-24. https://doi.org/10.2979/esj.2003.2.2.7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Andrew F. Hayes. 2017. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd Ed). The Guilford Press. New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Heejun Lee and Chang-Hoan Cho. 2020. Uses and gratifications of smart speakers: modelling the effectiveness of smart speaker advertising, International J. of Advertising 39, 7, 1150–1171. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2020.1765657Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Scott B. MacKenzie and Richard J. Lutz. 1989. An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. J. of Marketing 53, 2, 48–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251413Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Sampada Marathe and S. Shyam Sundar. 2011. What drives customization? Control or identity? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, 781–790. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979056Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Nass, C., Steuer, J., & Tauber, E. R. 1994. Computers are social actors. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '94). ACM, New York, 72–78. https://10.1145/191666.191703Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Christi Olson and Kelli Kemery. 2019. Voice report: Consumer adoption of voice technology and digital assistants. Retrieved Jan 7, 2021 from https://about.ads.microsoft.com/en-us/insights/2019-voice-reportGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Rik Pieters, Michel Wedel and Rajeev Batra. 2010. The stopping power of advertising: Measures and effects of visual complexity. J. of Marketing 74, 5, 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.5.048Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Tracie Powell. 2013. Native ads aren't as clear as outlets think. Retrieved Jan 7, 2021 from https://archives.cjr.org/behind_the_news/ftc_workshop_on_sponsored_cont.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Amanda Purington, Jessie G. Taft, Shruti Sannon, Natalya N. Bazarova, and Samuel H. Taylor. 2017. “Alexa is my new BFF”: Social roles, user satisfaction, and personification of the Amazon Echo. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ‘17). ACM, New York, 2853–2859, https://10.1145/3027063.3053246Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Byron Reeves and Clifford Nass. 1996. The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media like Real People and Places. CSLI Publications. Stanford, CA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Marc-André Reinhard, Matthias Messner, and Siegfried Ludwig Sporer. 2006. Explicit persuasive intent and its impact on success at persuasion: The determining roles of attractiveness and likeableness. J. of Consumer Psychology 16, 3, 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1603_7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. S. Shyam Sundar. 2009. The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. 72–100. In M. J. Metzger, A. J. Flanagin (eds.), Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility. The MIT Press. Cambridge, MA. doi:10.1162/dmal.9780262562324.073Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. S. Shyam Sundar and Clifford Nass. 2000. Source orientation in human-computer interaction: Programmer, networker, or independent social actor. Communication Research 27, 6, 683–703. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365000027006001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Matthew Thomson, Deborah J. MacInnis, and C. Whan Park. 2005. The ties that bind: Measuring the strength of consumers’ emotional attachments to brands. J. of Consumer Psychology 15, 1, 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1501_10Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Ellen van Oost and Darren Reed. 2010. Towards a sociological understanding of robots as companions. 11–18. In: Lamers M.H., Verbeek F.J. (eds.), Human-Robot Personal Relationships (HRPR 2010): Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 59. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19385-9_2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Elaine Walster and Leon Festinger. 1962. The effectiveness of “overheard” persuasive communications. J of Abnormal and Social Psychology 65, 6, 395-402. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041172Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Jackie Wattles. 2017. Google Home confuses users with apparent ad for 'Beauty and the Beast'. Retrieved Jan 7, 2021 from https://money.cnn.com/2017/03/16/technology/google-home-beauty-and-the-beast-ad/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI EA '22: Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2022
    3066 pages
    ISBN:9781450391566
    DOI:10.1145/3491101

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 28 April 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • poster
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)52
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format