poster

Expert Evaluation of Haptic Virtual Reality User Interfaces for Medical Landmarking

Authors:

Roope RaisamoAuthors Info & Claims

CHI EA '22: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts

Article No.: 219, Pages 1 - 7

https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519671

Published: 28 April 2022 Publication History

CHI EA '22: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts

Expert Evaluation of Haptic Virtual Reality User Interfaces for Medical Landmarking

Pages 1 - 7

Abstract
Supplementary Material
References

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) models have widely been used in medical diagnosis and planning tasks. Haptic virtual reality (VR) interfaces implemented by using VR equipment and haptic devices have previously been proposed for these medical 3D manipulation tasks. They have been found to be faster and more accurate in a medical marking task with novel users, compared with the traditional 2D interaction technique that uses a mouse and a 2D display. In this study, we recruited medical experts who do the medical landmarking task as part of their daily work to examine the performance of haptic VR interfaces and to investigate experts’ user experience. There were no statistically significant differences between the haptic user interfaces and the mouse-based 2D interface in terms of task completion time and marking accuracy. Based on experts’ subjective data, haptic VR interfaces showed great potential for medical work because of the natural input methods and haptic feedback.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (3491101.3519671-talk-video.mp4)

Talk Video

Download
179.00 MB

References

[1]

3DSystems 2020. How to Buy Haptics. 3DSystems. Retrieved Oct 19, 2020 from https://www.3dsystems.com/how-to-buy/haptics

[2]

Ragnar Bade, Felix Ritter, and Bernhard Preim. 2005. Usability Comparison of Mouse-Based Interaction Techniques for Predictable 3d Rotation. In Smart Graphics, Andreas Butz, Brian Fisher, Antonio Krüger, and Patrick Olivier (Eds.). Springer, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/11536482_12

[3]

Lonni Besançon, Paul Issartel, Mehdi Ammi, and Tobias Isenberg. 2017. Mouse, Tactile, and Tangible Input for 3D Manipulation. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4727–4740. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025863

Digital Library

[4]

W Bholsithi, W Tharanon, K Chintakanon, R Komolpis, and C Sinthanayothin. 2009. 3D vs. 2D cephalometric analysis comparisons with repeated measurements from 20 Thai males and 20 Thai females. Biomedical imaging and intervention journal 5, 4 (2009), e21.

[5]

Doug Bowman, Ernst Kruijff, Joseph J LaViola Jr, and Ivan P Poupyrev. 2004. 3D User Interfaces, Theory and Practice. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston, MA.

[6]

Michael Chen, S. Joy Mountford, and Abigail Sellen. 1988. A Study in Interactive 3-D Rotation Using 2-D Control Devices. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques(SIGGRAPH ’88). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1145/54852.378497

Digital Library

[7]

Luigi Gallo, Aniello Minutolo, and Giuseppe De Pietro. 2010. A user interface for VR-ready 3D medical imaging by off-the-shelf input devices. Computers in Biology and Medicine 40, 3 (2010), 350–358.

Digital Library

[8]

Ken Hinckley, Joe Tullio, Randy Pausch, Dennis Proffitt, and Neal Kassell. 1997. Usability Analysis of 3D Rotation Techniques. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Banff, Alberta, Canada) (UIST ’97). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/263407.263408

Digital Library

[9]

Akitoshi Katsumata, Masami Fujishita, Masahito Maeda, Yoshiko Ariji, Eiichiro Ariji, and Robert P. Langlais. 2005. 3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology 99, 2(2005), 212 – 220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.06.072

[10]

Katherine Kula and Ahmed Ghoneima. 2018. Cephalometry in Orthodontics: 2D and 3D. Quintessence Publishing Company, Incorporated, New Malden, England.

[11]

Zhenxing Li, Maria Kiiveri, Jussi Rantala, and Roope Raisamo. 2020. Evaluation of haptic virtual reality user interfaces for medical marking on 3D models. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 147, 102561(2020), 102561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102561

Digital Library

[12]

Claudia Lindner, Ching-Wei Wang, Cheng-Ta Huang, Chung-Hsing Li, Sheng-Wei Chang, and Tim F Cootes. 2016. Fully Automatic System for Accurate Localisation and Analysis of Cephalometric Landmarks in Lateral Cephalograms. Scientific reports 6(2016), 33581. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33581

[13]

Hugo I Medellín-Castillo, Eder H Govea-Valladares, CN Pérez-Guerrero, J Gil-Valladares, Theodore Lim, and James M Ritchie. 2016. The evaluation of a novel haptic-enabled virtual reality approach for computer-aided cephalometry. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 130 (2016), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.03.014

Digital Library

[14]

Raphaël Olszewski, Francis Zech, Guy Cosnard, Vincent Nicolas, Benoit Macq, and Hervé Reychler. 2007. Three-dimensional computed tomography cephalometric craniofacial analysis: experimental validation in vitro. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 36, 9(2007), 828 – 833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2007.05.022

[15]

Ken Shoemake. 1992. ARCBALL: a User Interface for Specifying Three-Dimensional Orientation Using a Mouse. In Proceedings of Graphics interface’92 (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) (GI ’92). Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 151–156. https://doi.org/10.20380/GI1992.18

[16]

Steam 2020. SteamVR. Steam. Retrieved Oct 19, 2020 from https://store.steampowered.com/app/250820/SteamVR/

[17]

David Sutton. 1993. Textbook of Radiology and Imaging. Churchill Livingstone Inc., New York, NY.

[18]

GR Swennen and F Schutyser. 2007. Three-dimensional virtual approach to diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillo-facial deformity. Distraction osteogenesis of the facial skeleton 6 (2007), 55–79.

[19]

Unity 2020. Unity Software. Unity. Retrieved Oct 19, 2020 from https://unity.com/

[20]

Unity 2020. Unity Haptic plugin. Unity. Retrieved Oct 19, 2020 from https://assetstore.unity.com/packages/essentials/tutorial-projects/unity-5-haptic-plugin-for-geomagic-openhaptics-3-3-hlapi-hdapi-34393

[21]

O.J.C. van Vlijmen, T. Maal, S.J. Bergé, E.M. Bronkhorst, C. Katsaros, and A.M. Kuijpers-Jagtman. 2010. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 39, 2(2010), 156 – 160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2009.11.017

[22]

HTC 2020. HTC Vive VR. HTC. Retrieved Oct 19, 2020 from https://www.vive.com/eu/

[23]

Lingyun Yu, Pjotr Svetachov, Petra Isenberg, Maarten H Everts, and Tobias Isenberg. 2010. FI3D: Direct-Touch Interaction for the Exploration of 3D Scientific Visualization Spaces. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 16, 6(2010), 1613–1622. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2010.157

Digital Library

Cited By

Zhang YKeighrey CMurray N(2024)A VR Intervention to Develop Social Skills in Children with ASD: An Expert EvaluationProceedings of the 2024 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences10.1145/3639701.3656322(30-40)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3639701.3656322
Van Damme STack JVan Wallendael GDe Turck FVega M(2023)Are we ready for Haptic Interactivity in VR? An Experimental Comparison of Different Interaction Methods in Virtual Reality Training2023 15th International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)10.1109/QoMEX58391.2023.10178453(294-299)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX58391.2023.10178453

Recommendations

Evaluation of haptic virtual reality user interfaces for medical marking on 3D models
Highlights
- Two haptic VR interfaces are proposed to interact with volumetric medical images for improving current computer-aided medical diagnosis and planning.
- Compared with the traditional 2D interface using a screen-based 2D display and a ...
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) visualization has been widely used in computer-aided medical diagnosis and planning. To interact with 3D models, current user interfaces in medical systems mainly rely on the traditional 2D interaction techniques by ...
Envisioning Haptic Design for Immersive Virtual Environments
DIS' 20 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference

Current techniques for haptics in immersive virtual environments (IVEs) allow users to perceive materials while exploring virtual surfaces. However, these experiences are usually restricted to the properties defined during the design phase of the IVE. ...
A Preliminary Study on Full-Body Haptic Stimulation on Modulating Self-motion Perception in Virtual Reality
Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and Computer Graphics
Abstract
We introduce a novel experimental system to explore the role of vibrotactile haptic feedback in Virtual Reality (VR) to induce the self-motion illusion. Self-motion (also called vection) has been mostly studied through visual and auditory stimuli ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI EA '22: Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2022

3066 pages

ISBN:9781450391566

DOI:10.1145/3491101

Editors:
Simone Barbosa
PUC-Rio, Brazil
,
Cliff Lampe
University of Michigan, USA
,
Caroline Appert
Université Paris-Saclay, France
,
David A. Shamma
Toyota Research Institute, USA

Copyright © 2022 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 April 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Poster
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Business Finland

Conference

CHI '22

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '22: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 29 - May 5, 2022

LA, New Orleans, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
264
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)37
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

Reflects downloads up to 27 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Zhang YKeighrey CMurray N(2024)A VR Intervention to Develop Social Skills in Children with ASD: An Expert EvaluationProceedings of the 2024 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences10.1145/3639701.3656322(30-40)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3639701.3656322
Van Damme STack JVan Wallendael GDe Turck FVega M(2023)Are we ready for Haptic Interactivity in VR? An Experimental Comparison of Different Interaction Methods in Virtual Reality Training2023 15th International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)10.1109/QoMEX58391.2023.10178453(294-299)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX58391.2023.10178453

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten