skip to main content
10.1145/3491101.3519674acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

#facebookdown: Time to panic or detox? Understanding users’ reactions to social media outage

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 April 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Non-use, particularly involuntary non-use, is an under-researched topic in HCI research, even though it has become quite common nowadays due to frequent digital outages. How do users react to social media outage? Do they become anxious? Or, do they enjoy these brief episodes of social media detox? To answer these questions, we conducted a topic modeling analysis of 223,815 tweets that used the hashtag #facebookdown during the major Facebook outage on 10/4/2021. We uncovered 10 major themes of users’ reactions towards social media outage. Results showed that most users complained, mocked and showed desperation about the outage situation, and during the outage period, increased their quest for other social-media alternatives. Also, surprisingly, many users celebrated the detox from Facebook rather than wishing it to come back as soon as possible. Results offer design implications for practitioners who would like to better respond to future outages.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3491101.3519674-talk-video.mp4

mp4

125.7 MB

References

  1. Jamal Al-Menayes. 2015. Motivations for Using Social Media: An Exploratory Factor Analysis. International Journal of Psychological Studies 7, (February 2015). DOI:https://doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v7n1p43Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. R. Arun, V. Suresh, C. E. Veni Madhavan, and M. N. Narasimha Murthy. 2010. On Finding the Natural Number of Topics with Latent Dirichlet Allocation: Some Observations. In Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 391–402. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13657-3_43Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Eric P. S. Baumer and Jed R. Brubaker. 2017. Post-userism. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’17), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 6291–6303. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025740Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Eric P. S. Baumer, Shion Guha, Emily Quan, David Mimno, and Geri K. Gay. 2015. Missing Photos, Suffering Withdrawal, or Finding Freedom? How Experiences of Social Media Non-Use Influence the Likelihood of Reversion. Social Media + Society 1, 2 (July 2015), 2056305115614851. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115614851Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Brett A. Bumgarner. 2007. You have been poked: Exploring the uses and gratifications of Facebook among emerging adults. First Monday (2007). DOI:https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v12i11.2026Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Juan Cao, Tian Xia, Jintao Li, Yongdong Zhang, and Sheng Tang. 2009. A density-based method for adaptive LDA model selection. Neurocomputing 72, 7 (March 2009), 1775–1781. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2008.06.011Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Romain Deveaud, Eric SanJuan, and Patrice Bellot. 2014. Accurate and effective latent concept modeling for ad hoc information retrieval. Document numerique 17, 1 (June 2014), 61–84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Leon Festinger. 1962. Cognitive Dissonance. Scientific American 207, 4 (1962), 93–106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Sukeshini A. Grandhi, Linda Plotnick, and Starr Roxanne Hiltz. 2019. Do I Stay or Do I Go? Motivations and Decision Making in Social Media Non-use and Reversion. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, GROUP (December 2019), 235:1-235:27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3361116Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Elihu Katz, Jay G. Blumler, and Michael Gurevitch. 1973. Uses and Gratifications Research. The Public Opinion Quarterly 37, 4 (1973), 509–523.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Rachel M. Magee, Denise E. Agosto, and Andrea Forte. 2017. Four Factors that Regulate Teen Technology Use in Everyday Life. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW ’17), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 511–522. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998310Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Zizi Papacharissi and Andrew Mendelson. 2010. Toward a new(er) sociability: uses, gratifications, and social capital on Facebook. In Media Perspectives for the 21st Century. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Chang Sup Park. 2019. Examination of smartphone dependence: Functionally and existentially dependent behavior on the smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior 93, (April 2019), 123–128. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.022Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. John Raacke and Jennifer Bonds-Raacke. 2008. MySpace and Facebook: Applying the Uses and Gratifications Theory to Exploring Friend-Networking Sites. CyberPsychology & Behavior 11, 2 (April 2008), 169–174. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0056Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Neil Selwyn. 2003. Apart from technology: understanding people's non-use of information and communication technologies in everyday life. Technology in Society 25, 1 (January 2003), 99–116. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(02)00062-3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Andrew D. Smock, Nicole B. Ellison, Cliff Lampe, and Donghee Yvette Wohn. 2011. Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 6 (November 2011), 2322–2329. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.011Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 2021. Social media demographics to inform your brand's strategy in 2021. Sprout Social. Retrieved November 19, 2021 from https://sproutsocial.com/insights/new-social-media-demographics/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. S.  Shyam Sundar and Anthony M. Limperos. 2013. Uses and Grats 2.0: New Gratifications for New Media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 57, 4 (October 2013), 504–525. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2013.845827Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Wyatt, S. 2003. Non-Users Also Matter: The Construction of Users and Non-Users of the Internet. In Pinch and Oudshoorn (eds) How Users Matter, 67-79. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Xiaohui Yan, Jiafeng Guo, Yanyan Lan, and Xueqi Cheng. 2013. A biterm topic model for short texts. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web (WWW ’13), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1445–1456. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2488388.2488514Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Shuang-Hong Yang, Alek Kolcz, Andy Schlaikjer, and Pankaj Gupta. 2014. Large-scale high-precision topic modeling on twitter. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD ’14), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1907–1916. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2623330.2623336Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI EA '22: Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2022
    3066 pages
    ISBN:9781450391566
    DOI:10.1145/3491101

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 28 April 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • poster
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)58
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format