ABSTRACT
In this paper, we propose a novel method for academic assessment inspired by the decentralized applications made possible by blockchain technology. The proposed method applies to a wide range of academic material, including assignments, exams, academic papers, etc and tackles issues regarding potential personal bias and makes assessment possible without the need to rely on a few assessors. We examine the challenges and possibilities that arise with this method and further explore more general applications in areas such as education. In the experiments conducted for this research, poll results show generally positive views toward the fairness of this system compared to the traditional methods.
Supplemental Material
- Victoria Bellotti, Sara Cambridge, Karen Hoy, Patrick C. Shih, Lisa Renery Handalian, Kyungsik Han, and John M. Carroll. 2014. Towards community-centered support for peer-to-peer service exchange: rethinking the timebanking metaphor. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI’14, Toronto, ON, Canada - April 26 - May 01, 2014. 2975–2984. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557061Google ScholarDigital Library
- John M. Carroll and Victoria Bellotti. 2015. Creating Value Together: The Emerging Design Space of Peer-to-Peer Currency and Exchange. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, CSCW 2015, Vancouver, BC, Canada, March 14 - 18, 2015. 1500–1510. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675270Google Scholar
- Guang Chen, Bing Xu, Manli Lu, and Nian-Shing Chen. 2018. Exploring blockchain technology and its potential applications for education. Smart Learning Environments 5, 1 (2018), 1.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chris Elsden, Arthi Manohar, Jo Briggs, Mike Harding, Chris Speed, and John Vines. 2018. Making Sense of Blockchain Applications: A Typology for HCI. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2018, Montreal, QC, Canada, April 21-26, 2018. 458. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174032Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jennifer Ferreira, Mark J. Perry, and Sriram Subramanian. 2015. Spending Time with Money: From Shared Values to Social Connectivity. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, CSCW 2015, Vancouver, BC, Canada, March 14 - 18, 2015. 1222–1234. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675230Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wolfgang Gräther, Sabine Kolvenbach, Rudolf Ruland, Julian Schütte, Christof Torres, and Florian Wendland. 2018. Blockchain for education: lifelong learning passport. European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET).Google Scholar
- Marco Iansiti and Karim R Lakhani. 2017. The Truth About Blockchain Harvard Business Review. Harvard University, hbr. org/2017/01/the-truth-about-blockchain, accessed date: February 2 (2017), 2019.Google Scholar
- Muhammad Zahid Iqbal, Eleni Mangina, and Abraham G. Campbell. 2021. Exploring the Real-Time Touchless Hand Interaction and Intelligent Agents in Augmented Reality Learning Applications. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.23919/iLRN52045.2021.9459415Google Scholar
- Jofish Kaye, Janet Vertesi, Jennifer Ferreira, Barry A. T. Brown, and Mark J. Perry. 2014. #CHImoney: financial interactions, digital cash, capital exchange and mobile money. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI’14, Toronto, ON, Canada - April 26 - May 01, 2014, Extended Abstracts. 111–114. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2559221Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ahmed Kharrufa, Serdar Abaci, Emeline Brulé, Petr Slovák, Megan Venn-Wycherley, and Daniel Lambton-Howard. 2020. Evaluation of emerging educational technologies in the classroom. In Extended Abstracts Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC 2020, London, United Kingdom, June 17-24, 2020. 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/3397617.3398065Google ScholarDigital Library
- Airi Lampinen, Victoria Bellotti, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, Coye Cheshire, and Alexandra Samuel. 2015. Studying the ”Sharing Economy”: Perspectives to Peer-to-Peer Exchange. In 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, CSCW 2015, Vancouver, BC, Canada, March 14-18, 2015, Companion Volume. 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1145/2685553.2699339Google Scholar
- David R. Millen, Claudio S. Pinhanez, Jofish Kaye, Silvia Cristina Sardela Bianchi, and John Vines. 2015. Collaboration and Social Computing in Emerging Financial Services. In 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, CSCW 2015, Vancouver, BC, Canada, March 14-18, 2015, Companion Volume. 309–312. https://doi.org/10.1145/2685553.2685562Google Scholar
- Satoshi Nakamoto. 2008. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Decentralized Business Review(2008), 21260.Google Scholar
- Arvind Narayanan, Joseph Bonneau, Edward Felten, Andrew Miller, and Steven Goldfeder. 2019. Bitcoin and cryptocurrency technologies. Curso elaborado pela(2019).Google Scholar
- Mike Sharples and John Domingue. 2016. The blockchain and kudos: A distributed system for educational record, reputation and reward. Springer, 490–496.Google Scholar
- Patrick C. Shih, Victoria Bellotti, Kyungsik Han, and John M. Carroll. 2015. Unequal Time for Unequal Value: Implications of Differing Motivations for Participation in Timebanking. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2015, Seoul, Republic of Korea, April 18-23, 2015. 1075–1084. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702560Google ScholarDigital Library
- Antoine Van den beemt, Marieke Thurlings, and Myrthe Willems. 2019. Towards an understanding of social media use in the classroom: a literature review. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 29 (11 2019), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1695657Google Scholar
Recommendations
The Assessment of Learning Outcomes in Information Assurance Curriculum
InfoSecCD '13: Proceedings of the 2013 on InfoSecCD '13: Information Security Curriculum Development ConferenceWe present an overview of the design and conduct of learning outcomes assessment for an undergraduate information assurance curriculum. The described program of assessment provides for an evidence-based, decision-making process that can be used to ...
Formative computer based assessment in diagram based domains
This paper presents an approach to conducting formative assessment of student coursework within diagram-based domains using Computer Based Assessment (CBA) technology. Formative assessment is perceived as a resource-intensive assessment mode and its ...
An IT program assessment process
SIGITE '07: Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGITE conference on Information technology educationThis paper describes the assessment process designed and implemented for an undergraduate program in IT that was recently accredited by the Computing Accreditation Commission of ABET, Inc., under the general criteria for computing. It places special ...
Comments