skip to main content
10.1145/3491101.3519682acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

A Blockchain Approach to Academic Assessment

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 April 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we propose a novel method for academic assessment inspired by the decentralized applications made possible by blockchain technology. The proposed method applies to a wide range of academic material, including assignments, exams, academic papers, etc and tackles issues regarding potential personal bias and makes assessment possible without the need to rely on a few assessors. We examine the challenges and possibilities that arise with this method and further explore more general applications in areas such as education. In the experiments conducted for this research, poll results show generally positive views toward the fairness of this system compared to the traditional methods.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3491101.3519682-video-preview.mp4

mp4

5.9 MB

References

  1. Victoria Bellotti, Sara Cambridge, Karen Hoy, Patrick C. Shih, Lisa Renery Handalian, Kyungsik Han, and John M. Carroll. 2014. Towards community-centered support for peer-to-peer service exchange: rethinking the timebanking metaphor. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI’14, Toronto, ON, Canada - April 26 - May 01, 2014. 2975–2984. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557061Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. John M. Carroll and Victoria Bellotti. 2015. Creating Value Together: The Emerging Design Space of Peer-to-Peer Currency and Exchange. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, CSCW 2015, Vancouver, BC, Canada, March 14 - 18, 2015. 1500–1510. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675270Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Guang Chen, Bing Xu, Manli Lu, and Nian-Shing Chen. 2018. Exploring blockchain technology and its potential applications for education. Smart Learning Environments 5, 1 (2018), 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Chris Elsden, Arthi Manohar, Jo Briggs, Mike Harding, Chris Speed, and John Vines. 2018. Making Sense of Blockchain Applications: A Typology for HCI. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2018, Montreal, QC, Canada, April 21-26, 2018. 458. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174032Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Jennifer Ferreira, Mark J. Perry, and Sriram Subramanian. 2015. Spending Time with Money: From Shared Values to Social Connectivity. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, CSCW 2015, Vancouver, BC, Canada, March 14 - 18, 2015. 1222–1234. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675230Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Wolfgang Gräther, Sabine Kolvenbach, Rudolf Ruland, Julian Schütte, Christof Torres, and Florian Wendland. 2018. Blockchain for education: lifelong learning passport. European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Marco Iansiti and Karim R Lakhani. 2017. The Truth About Blockchain Harvard Business Review. Harvard University, hbr. org/2017/01/the-truth-about-blockchain, accessed date: February 2 (2017), 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Muhammad Zahid Iqbal, Eleni Mangina, and Abraham G. Campbell. 2021. Exploring the Real-Time Touchless Hand Interaction and Intelligent Agents in Augmented Reality Learning Applications. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.23919/iLRN52045.2021.9459415Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jofish Kaye, Janet Vertesi, Jennifer Ferreira, Barry A. T. Brown, and Mark J. Perry. 2014. #CHImoney: financial interactions, digital cash, capital exchange and mobile money. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI’14, Toronto, ON, Canada - April 26 - May 01, 2014, Extended Abstracts. 111–114. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2559221Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ahmed Kharrufa, Serdar Abaci, Emeline Brulé, Petr Slovák, Megan Venn-Wycherley, and Daniel Lambton-Howard. 2020. Evaluation of emerging educational technologies in the classroom. In Extended Abstracts Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC 2020, London, United Kingdom, June 17-24, 2020. 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/3397617.3398065Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Airi Lampinen, Victoria Bellotti, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, Coye Cheshire, and Alexandra Samuel. 2015. Studying the ”Sharing Economy”: Perspectives to Peer-to-Peer Exchange. In 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, CSCW 2015, Vancouver, BC, Canada, March 14-18, 2015, Companion Volume. 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1145/2685553.2699339Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. David R. Millen, Claudio S. Pinhanez, Jofish Kaye, Silvia Cristina Sardela Bianchi, and John Vines. 2015. Collaboration and Social Computing in Emerging Financial Services. In 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, CSCW 2015, Vancouver, BC, Canada, March 14-18, 2015, Companion Volume. 309–312. https://doi.org/10.1145/2685553.2685562Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Satoshi Nakamoto. 2008. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Decentralized Business Review(2008), 21260.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Arvind Narayanan, Joseph Bonneau, Edward Felten, Andrew Miller, and Steven Goldfeder. 2019. Bitcoin and cryptocurrency technologies. Curso elaborado pela(2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mike Sharples and John Domingue. 2016. The blockchain and kudos: A distributed system for educational record, reputation and reward. Springer, 490–496.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Patrick C. Shih, Victoria Bellotti, Kyungsik Han, and John M. Carroll. 2015. Unequal Time for Unequal Value: Implications of Differing Motivations for Participation in Timebanking. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2015, Seoul, Republic of Korea, April 18-23, 2015. 1075–1084. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702560Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Antoine Van den beemt, Marieke Thurlings, and Myrthe Willems. 2019. Towards an understanding of social media use in the classroom: a literature review. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 29 (11 2019), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1695657Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI EA '22: Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2022
    3066 pages
    ISBN:9781450391566
    DOI:10.1145/3491101

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 28 April 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • poster
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format