Ofir Sadka
ABSTRACT
Opening-encounters are an integral element of social interaction and are essential for social relationships. Specifically, opening-encounters between strangers form a complex social context and often involve awkwardness and tension. We explored whether augmenting everyday objects with autonomous capabilities can facilitate an opening-encounter between strangers. A pair of robotic bar-stools were designed to rotate participants sitting on them. We evaluated the opening-encounter experience in three conditions: bar-stools rotating participants towards one another; bar-stools rotating participants away from one another; and bar-stools with no rotation. Our initial findings indicate that rotating participants towards each other led to positive encounters, encouraged social interaction, and increased interpersonal communication. The other two conditions were less likely to initiate social interactions. This preliminary study highlights the potential of facilitating positive opening-encounters using autonomous furniture that are perceived as a natural part of the interaction, without altering its human-human nature.
Supplemental Material
- Lucy Anderson-Bashan, Benny Megidish, Hadas Erel, Iddo Wald, Guy Hoffman, Oren Zuckerman, and Andrey Grishko. 2018. The greeting machine: an abstract robotic object for opening encounters. In 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 595–602.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Richard E Boyatzis. 1998. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. sage.Google Scholar
- Judee K Burgoon and Jerold L Hale. 1987. Validation and measurement of the fundamental themes of relational communication. Communications Monographs 54, 1 (1987), 19–41.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Judee K Burgoon and Randall J Koper. 1984. Nonverbal and relational communication associated with reticence. Human Communication Research 10, 4 (1984), 601–626.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hadas Erel, Denis Trayman, Chen Levy, Adi Manor, Mario Mikulincer, and Oren Zuckerman. 2021. Enhancing Emotional Support: The Effect of a Robotic Object on Human–Human Support Quality. International Journal of Social Robotics(2021), 1–20.Google Scholar
- Jodi Forlizzi. 2007. How robotic products become social products: an ethnographic study of cleaning in the home. In 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 129–136.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anne Galletta. 2013. Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond. New York University Press.Google Scholar
- Erik Grönvall, Sofie Kinch, Marianne Graves Petersen, and Majken K Rasmussen. 2014. Causing commotion with a shape-changing bench: experiencing shape-changing interfaces in use. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2559–2568.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Guy Hoffman, Oren Zuckerman, Gilad Hirschberger, Michal Luria, and Tal Shani-Sherman. 2015. Design and evaluation of a peripheral robotic conversation companion. In 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 3–10.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wendy Ju and Leila Takayama. 2009. Approachability: How people interpret automatic door movement as gesture. International Journal of Design 3, 2 (2009).Google Scholar
- Malte Jung and Pamela Hinds. 2018. Robots in the wild: A time for more robust theories of human-robot interaction., 5 pages.Google Scholar
- Malte F Jung, Dominic DiFranzo, Solace Shen, Brett Stoll, Houston Claure, and Austin Lawrence. 2020. Robot-Assisted Tower Construction—A Method to Study the Impact of a Robot’s Allocation Behavior on Interpersonal Dynamics and Collaboration in Groups. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI) 10, 1 (2020), 1–23.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Adam Kendon. 1990. Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Vol. 7. CUP Archive.Google Scholar
- Heather Knight, Timothy Lee, Brittany Hallawell, and Wendy Ju. 2017. I get it already! the influence of chairbot motion gestures on bystander response. In 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 443–448.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Philip Manning and George Ray. 1993. Shyness, self-confidence, and social interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly(1993), 178–192.Google Scholar
- Robb Mitchell and Thomas Olsson. 2019. Facilitating the first move: Exploring inspirational design patterns for aiding initiation of social encounters. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Communities & Technologies-Transforming Communities. 283–294.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bilge Mutlu, Takayuki Kanda, Jodi Forlizzi, Jessica Hodgins, and Hiroshi Ishiguro. 2012. Conversational gaze mechanisms for humanlike robots. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 1, 2(2012), 1–33.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Erhan Oztop, David W Franklin, Thierry Chaminade, and Gordon Cheng. 2005. Human–humanoid interaction: is a humanoid robot perceived as a human?International Journal of Humanoid Robotics 2, 04 (2005), 537–559.Google Scholar
- Oskar Palinko, Kohei Ogawa, Yuichiro Yoshikawa, and Hiroshi Ishiguro. 2018. How should a robot interrupt a conversation between multiple humans. In International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, 149–159.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Laurel D Riek. 2012. Wizard of oz studies in hri: a systematic review and new reporting guidelines. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 1, 1 (2012), 119–136.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Danielle Rifinski, Hadas Erel, Adi Feiner, Guy Hoffman, and Oren Zuckerman. 2021. Human-human-robot interaction: robotic object’s responsive gestures improve interpersonal evaluation in human interaction. Human–Computer Interaction 36, 4 (2021), 333–359.Google Scholar
- Deborah Schiffrin. 1977. Opening encounters. American sociological review(1977), 679–691.Google Scholar
- David Sirkin, Brian Mok, Stephen Yang, and Wendy Ju. 2015. Mechanical ottoman: how robotic furniture offers and withdraws support. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 11–18.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kazuki Takashima, Yusuke Asari, Hitomi Yokoyama, Ehud Sharlin, and Yoshifumi Kitamura. 2015. MovemenTable: The design of moving interactive tabletops. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 296–314.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Leila Takayama. 2012. Perspectives on agency interacting with and through personal robots. In Human-computer interaction: the agency perspective. Springer, 195–214.Google Scholar
- Yuichiro Takeuchi and Jean You. 2014. Whirlstools: kinetic furniture with adaptive affordance. In CHI’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1885–1890.Google Scholar
- Hamish Tennent, Solace Shen, and Malte Jung. 2019. Micbot: A peripheral robotic object to shape conversational dynamics and team performance. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 133–142.Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
Humorous Robotic Behavior as a New Approach to Mitigating Social Awkwardness
CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsSocial awkwardness is a frequent challenge to healthy social interactions and can dramatically impact how people feel, communicate and behave. It is known that humor can invoke positive feelings and enable people to modify perspective of a situation. We ...
All it Takes is a Slight Rotation: Robotic Bar-stools Enhance Intimacy in Couples’ Conflict
CHI EA '23: Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsCouples’ ability to manage conflicts is fundamental in the discourse of romantic relationships. A supportive environment for conflict management highly depends on non-verbal communication cues. We explored the possibility to facilitate positive non-...
Designing Non-Verbal Humorous Gestures for a Non-Humanoid Robot
CHI EA '22: Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsHumor has various positive implications for our daily lives, and it has shown to improve human-robot interaction as well. To date, humor has been applied to robots that mimic human behavior thus missing out on improving interactions with the non-...
Comments