skip to main content
10.1145/3491101.3519743acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Variapsody: Creating Three Interactive Music Listening Experiences that Use Diversified Positive Emotion Regulation Strategies to Promote Subjective Well-being

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 April 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Over the past decade, initiatives to design for subjective well-being have gained increased attention and momentum in design research. These initiatives often draw from positive psychology to explore ways of making Positive Psychology Interventions (PPIs) more effective through technology. This paper explores how a mix of tangible and digital technology can realize activity-focused, diverse Emotion Regulation (ER) for its users. We propose that ER strategies can serve as a principle for designing technology that encourages users to savor, modify, reassess, or commemorate their experiences. By centering the design around music listening experiences, the paper explores how users can be supported to lower motivation hurdles that get in the way of frequent engagement with a PPI by developing three exploratory prototypes and reflecting on the development processes. Variapsody, a music listening device, integrates three features, each deploying a different set of ER strategies that make the experience more enjoyable and meaningful. Variapsody's regulatory diversity offers users the choice of how to approach music listening and expands their repertoire of ER strategies. The first feature, Reaction Tile, inscribes users’ reactions to music onto a tangible, domino-sized tile to encourage them to savor the music. The second is Monofilter, which purposefully muffles the salience of background music while working on a cognitively demanding task. Vibelist is the third feature that helps users capture and revisit the context of music listening experiences in a digital collage. The paper discusses the lessons learned and future research opportunities.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3491101.3519743-talk-video.mp4

mp4

207.3 MB

References

  1. Allison a Appleton and Laura D Kubzansky. 2014. Emotion regulation and cardiovascular disease risk. Handbook of emotion regulation (2nd ed.), 596-612. The Guilford Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Linda Bolier and Katherina Martin Abello. 2014. Online Positive Psychological Interventions: State of the Art and Future Directions . In The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Positive Psychological Interventions, 286 - 309. Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118315927.ch16Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Linda Bolier, Merel Haverman, Gerben J. Westerhof, Heleen Riper, Filip Smit, and Ernst Bohlmeijer. 2013. Positive psychology interventions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Public Health 13, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-119Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Fred B. Bryant. 2003. Savoring Beliefs Inventory (SBI): A scale for measuring beliefs about savouring. Journal of Mental Health 12, 2, 175-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963823031000103489Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Fred B. Bryant and Joseph Veroff. 2017. Savoring: A new model of positive experience. Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315088426Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Nikos L.D. Chatzisarantis, Martin S. Hagger, Stuart J.H. Biddle, Brett Smith, and John C.K. Wang. 2003. A Meta-Analysis of Perceived Locus of Causality in Exercise, Sport, and Physical Education Contexts. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 25, 3, 284-306. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.25.3.284Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Pieter M. A. Desmet and Maria C. Sääksjärvi. 2016. Form Matters: Design Creativity in Positive Psychological Interventions. Psychology of Well-Being 6, 1, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13612-016-0043-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Pieter M.A. Desmet and Anna E. Pohlmeyer. 2013. Positive design: An introduction to design for subjective well-being. International Journal of Design 7, 3, 1-15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ed Diener, Derrick Wirtz, William Tov, Chu Kim-Prieto, Dong won Choi, Shigehiro Oishi, and Robert Biswas-Diener. 2010. New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research 97, 2, 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Barbara L. Fredrickson. 2013. Positive Emotions Broaden and Build. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00001-2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. James J. Gross. 1998. The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. James J. Gross and Oliver P. John. 2003. Individual Differences in Two Emotion Regulation Processes: Implications for Affect, Relationships, and Well-Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85, 2, 348-362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Luke Harrison and Psyche Loui. 2014. Thrills, chills, frissons, and skin orgasms: Toward an integrative model of transcendent psychophysiological experiences in music. Frontiers in Psychology 5, JUL. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00790Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Marc Hassenzahl. 2010. Experience Design: Technology for All the Right Reasons. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 3, 1. https://doi.org/10.2200/s00261ed1v01y201003hci008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Lauren Istvandity. 2017. Combining music and reminiscence therapy interventions for wellbeing in elderly populations: A systematic review. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice 28, 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2017.03.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Petr Janata, Stefan T. Tomic, and Sonja K. Rakowski. 2007. Characterisation of music-evoked autobiographical memories. Memory 15, 8, 845–860. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210701734593Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Matthias Laschke, Sarah Diefenbach, Thies Schneider, and Marc Hassenzahl. 2014. Keymoment: initiating behavior change through friendly friction. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (NordiCHI '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 853–858. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2639189.2670179Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Sonja Lyubomirsky and Heidi S. Lepper. 1999. A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research 46, 2, 137-155. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006824100041Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Johan Y.Y. Ng, Nikos Ntoumanis, Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani, Edward L. Deci, Richard M. Ryan, Joan L. Duda, and Geoffrey C. Williams. 2012. Self-Determination Theory Applied to Health Contexts: A Meta-Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7, 4, 325-340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612447309Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. William Odom, Richard Banks, Abigail Durrant, David Kirk, and James Pierce. 2012. Slow technology: critical reflection and future directions. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 816–817. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318088Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. William T. Odom, Abigail J. Sellen, Richard Banks, David S. Kirk, Tim Regan, Mark Selby, Jodi L. Forlizzi, and John Zimmerman. 2014. Designing for slowness, anticipation and re-visitation: a long term field study of the photobox. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1961–1970. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557178Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Acacia C. Parks, Matthew D. della Porta, Russell S. Pierce, Ran Zilca, and Sonja Lyubomirsky. 2012. Pursuing happiness in everyday life: The characteristics and behaviors of online happiness seekers. Emotion 12, 6, 1222. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028587Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. William Pavot, E. Diener, C. Randall Colvin, and Ed Sandvik. 1991. Further Validation of the Satisfaction With Life Scale; Evidence for the Cross-Method Convergence of Well-Being Measures. Journal of Personality Assessment 57, 1, 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5701_17Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Ann Petermans and Rebecca Cain (eds.). 2019. Design for wellbeing: An applied approach. Routledge, New York. ISBN 9781032176529Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Dorian Peters, Rafael A. Calvo, and Richard M. Ryan. 2018. Designing for motivation, engagement and wellbeing in digital experience. Frontiers in Psychology 9, MAY, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00797Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Jordi Quoidbach, Elizabeth v. Berry, Michel Hansenne, and Moïra Mikolajczak. 2010. Positive emotion regulation and well-being: Comparing the impact of eight savoring and dampening strategies. Personality and Individual Differences 49, 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.048Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Jordi Quoidbach, Moïra Mikolajczak, and James J. Gross. 2015. Positive interventions: An emotion regulation perspective. Psychological Bulletin 141, 3. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038648Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Ronda Ringfort-Felner, Matthias Laschke, Shadan Sadeghian, and Marc Hassenzahl. 2022. Kiro: A Design Fiction to Explore Social Conversation with Voice Assistants. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, GROUP, Article 33 (January 2022), 21 pages. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3492852Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Richard M. Ryan and Edward L. Deci. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55, 1. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Valorie N. Salimpoor, Mitchel Benovoy, Gregory Longo, Jeremy R. Cooperstock, and Robert J. Zatorre. 2009. The rewarding aspects of music listening are related to degree of emotional arousal. PLoS ONE 4, 10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007487Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Thomas Schäfer, Peter Sedlmeier, Christine Städtler, and David Huron. 2013. The psychological functions of music listening. Frontiers in Psychology 4, AUG. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00511Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Stephen M. Schueller and Acacia C. Parks. 2014. The Science of Self-Help. European Psychologist 19, 2. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000181Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Javier Tibau, Michael Stewart, Steve Harrison, and Deborah Tatar. 2019. FamilySong: Designing to Enable Music for Connection and Culture in Internationally Distributed Families. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 785–798. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322279Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Javier Tibau, Michael Stewart, Steve Harrison, and Deborah Tatar. 2019. FamilySong: A Design for Managing Synchronous Intergenerational Remote Music Sharing. In Companion Publication of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2019 Companion (DIS '19 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 61–64. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3301019.3325159Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Jung Kyoon Yoon, Shuran Li, and Yu Hao. 2021. Design-Mediated Positive Emotion Regulation: The Development of an Interactive Device that Supports Daily Practice of Positive Mental Time Traveling. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1948685Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Bin Yu, Pengcheng An, Sjoerd Hendriks, Ning Zhang, Loe Feijs, Min Li, and Jun Hu. 2021. ViBreathe: Heart Rate Variability Enhanced Respiration Training for Workaday Stress Management via an Eyes-Free Tangible Interface. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 37, 16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1898827Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI EA '22: Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2022
    3066 pages
    ISBN:9781450391566
    DOI:10.1145/3491101

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 28 April 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • poster
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format