skip to main content
10.1145/3491101.3519745acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Supporting Anaesthetists during ‘Red Blanket’ Trauma Surgery: An Analysis of Work Practices and Requirements for a Head-Worn Display Support System

Published: 28 April 2022 Publication History

Abstract

‘Red blanket’ (RB) processes accelerate the surgical treatment of patients who have suffered severe trauma. Although the rapid start of surgery has positive effects on patient outcomes, the short time available to prepare for a case and the limited information available at the outset of care can be challenging for physicians. To support the lead of an RB team in making the right clinical decisions quickly, this work proposes a head-worn display (HWD) based information system. HWD could be valuable in RB settings, because they provide information in a continuous and hands-free manner, potentially allowing physicians to access case relevant data while treating the patient. Through an interview study with seven anaesthetists, we studied work practices of RB team leads and identified user requirements for the HWD based support system. We discuss opportunities and challenges for HWDs in RB settings and provide a detailed description of the developed HWD application.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Materials (3491101.3519745-supplemental-materials.zip)

References

[1]
ATLS Subcommittee, American College of Surgeons’ Committee on Trauma, and International ATLS working group. 2013. Advanced trauma life support (ATLS®): the ninth edition. The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 74, 5: 1363–1366. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31828b82f5
[2]
Michael Bernhard, Torben K. Becker, Tim Nowe, Marko Mohorovicic, Marcus Sikinger, Thorsten Brenner, Goetz M. Richter, Boris Radeleff, Peter-Jürgen Meeder, Markus W. Büchler, Bernd W. Böttiger, Eike Martin, and André Gries. 2007. Introduction of a treatment algorithm can improve the early management of emergency patients in the resuscitation room. Resuscitation 73, 3: 362–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.09.014
[3]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2: 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[4]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2021. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology 18, 3: 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
[5]
Ozan Cakmakci and Jannick Rolland. 2006. Head-Worn Displays: A Review. Journal of Display Technology 2, 3: 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1109/jdt.2006.879846
[6]
John R. Clarke, Stanley Z. Trooskin, Prashant J. Doshi, Lloyd Greenwald, and Charles J. Mode. 2002. Time to Laparotomy for Intra-abdominal Bleeding from Trauma Does Affect Survival for Delays Up to 90 Minutes. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 52, 3: 420–425.
[7]
Giana H Davidson, Ronald V Maier, Saman Arbabi, Adam B Goldin, and Frederick P Rivara. 2012. Impact of Operative Intervention Delay on Pediatric Trauma Outcomes. The journal of trauma and acute care surgery 73, 1: 162–167. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31825699b4
[8]
Thomas J. Davidson and Penelope M. Sanderson. 2021. A Review of the Effects of Head-Worn Displays on Teamwork for Emergency Response. Ergonomics 0, ja: 1–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2021.1968041
[9]
Bryn Dougherty and M. Sherif Badawy. 2017. Using Google Glass in Nonsurgical Medical Settings: Systematic Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 5, 10: e159. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8671
[10]
Mark Fitzgerald, Peter Cameron, Colin Mackenzie, Nathan Farrow, Pamela Scicluna, Robert Gocentas, Adam Bystrzycki, Geraldine Lee, O'Reilly Gerard, Nick Andrianopoulos, Linas Dziukas, D. Jamie Cooper, Andrew Silvers, Alfredo Mori, Angela Murray, Susan Smith, Yan Xiao, Dion Stub, Frank T. McDermott, and Jeffrey V. Rosenfeld. 2011. Trauma Resuscitation Errors and Computer-Assisted Decision Support. Archives of Surgery 146, 2: 218–225. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2010.333
[11]
Tobias Grundgeiger, Felix Hahn, Thomas Wurmb, and Oliver Happel. 2020. A Cognitive Aid to Support In-hospital Resuscitation Teams: An Experimental Evaluation in a Medical Simulation. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 64, 1: 669–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181320641153
[12]
Swathi Jagannath, Aleksandra Sarcevic, and Andrea Forte. 2018. “We Are Not Entirely Replacing Paper”: Understanding Paper Persistence in Emergency Medical Settings. In Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW ’18), 249–252. https://doi.org/10.1145/3272973.3274067
[13]
Sara Klueber, Erik Wolf, Tobias Grundgeiger, Birgit Brecknell, Ismail Mohamed, and Penelope Sanderson. 2019. Supporting multiple patient monitoring with head-worn displays and spearcons. Applied Ergonomics 78: 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.01.009
[14]
Jeremias Kuge, Tobias Grundgeiger, Paul Schlosser, Penelope Sanderson, and Oliver Happel. 2021. Design and Evaluation of a Head-Worn Display Application for Multi-Patient Monitoring. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021, 879–890. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462011
[15]
Diana S. Kusunoki and Aleksandra Sarcevic. 2015. Designing for Temporal Awareness: The Role of Temporality in Time-Critical Medical Teamwork. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW ’15), 1465–1476. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675279
[16]
C. M. Lamb, P. MacGoey, A. P. Navarro, and A. J. Brooks. 2014. Damage control surgery in the era of damage control resuscitation. British Journal of Anaesthesia 113, 2: 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeu233
[17]
M. F. Rotondo, C. W. Schwab, M. D. McGonigal, GR 3rd Phillips, T. M. Fruchterman, D. R. Kauder, B. A. Latenser, and P. A. Angood. 1993. “Damage control”: an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury. The Journal of trauma 35, 3: 375–383.
[18]
Aleksandra Sarcevic. 2010. “Who's scribing?”: documenting patient encounter during trauma resuscitation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’10), 1899–1908. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753611
[19]
Aleksandra Sarcevic and Randall S. Burd. 2008. “What's the Story?” Information Needs of Trauma Teams. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings 2008: 641–645.
[20]
Aleksandra Sarcevic, Ivan Marsic, Michael E. Lesk, and Randall S. Burd. 2008. Transactive memory in trauma resuscitation. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW ’08), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1145/1460563.1460597
[21]
Paul D. Schlosser, Tobias Grundgeiger, Penelope M. Sanderson, and Oliver Happel. 2019. An exploratory clinical evaluation of a head-worn display based multiple-patient monitoring application: impact on supervising anesthesiologists’ situation awareness. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 33, 6: 1119–1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00265-4
[22]
Paul D. Schlosser, Ben Matthews, and Penelope M. Sanderson. 2021. Head-worn displays for healthcare and industry workers: A review of applications and design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 154: 102628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102628
[23]
Paul Schlosser, Tobias Grundgeiger, and Oliver Happel. 2018. Multiple Patient Monitoring in the Operating Room using a Head-Mounted Display. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188460
[24]
Arnvør á Torkilsheyggi and Morten Hertzum. 2015. Visible but Unseen? A Workplace Study of Blood-Test Icons on Electronic Emergency-Department Whiteboards. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW ’15), 798–807. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675228
[25]
Nancy J. Wei, Bryn Dougherty, Aundria Myers, and Sherif M. Badawy. 2018. Using Google Glass in Surgical Settings: Systematic Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 6, 3: e54. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.9409
[26]
Leslie Wu, Jesse Cirimele, Jonathan Bassen, Kristen Leach, Stuart Card, Larry Chu, Kyle Harrison, and Scott Klemmer. 2013. Head-mounted and multi-surface displays support emergency medical teams. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work companion (CSCW ’13), 279–282. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441955.2442020

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Supervising Multiple Operating Rooms Using a Head-Worn display: A Longitudinal Evaluation of the Experience of Supervising Anesthesiologists and Their Co-WorkersProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581180(1-18)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI EA '22: Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 2022
3066 pages
ISBN:9781450391566
DOI:10.1145/3491101
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 April 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. anaesthesia
  2. head-worn display
  3. red blanket
  4. trauma

Qualifiers

  • Poster
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

CHI '22
Sponsor:
CHI '22: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 29 - May 5, 2022
LA, New Orleans, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025
ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 26 - May 1, 2025
Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 22 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Supervising Multiple Operating Rooms Using a Head-Worn display: A Longitudinal Evaluation of the Experience of Supervising Anesthesiologists and Their Co-WorkersProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581180(1-18)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media