Viva Sarah Press
ABSTRACT
Humor has various positive implications for our daily lives, and it has shown to improve human-robot interaction as well. To date, humor has been applied to robots that mimic human behavior thus missing out on improving interactions with the non-humanoid robots continually being deployed to our daily lives. In this work, we conducted an initial evaluation of the far-out possibility to create non-verbal humorous behavior for a robot with no human features. The robot’s humorous gestures were designed by a clown therapist, animator, and HRI expert. The initial evaluation compared participants’ responses to humorous and non-humorous robotic gestures. Our study indicates it is possible for a simple non-humanoid robot to communicate a humorous experience through gestures alone, provided the movements are carefully balanced to bring about this good humor encounter. This study’s gesture design insights can serve as first steps toward leveraging humorous behaviors in non-humanoid robots to enhance HRI.
Supplemental Material
- Millicent H Abel. 2002. Humor, stress, and coping strategies. (2002).Google Scholar
- Sabarish Babu, Stephen Schmugge, Tiffany Barnes, and Larry F Hodges. 2006. “What would you like to talk about?” an evaluation of social conversations with a virtual receptionist. In International Workshop on Intelligent Virtual Agents. Springer, 169–180.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lucile Bechade, Guillaume Dubuisson Duplessis, and Laurence Devillers. 2016. Empirical study of humor support in social human-robot interaction. In International Conference on Distributed, Ambient, and Pervasive Interactions. Springer, 305–316.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Henri Bergson, Cloudesley Shovell Henry Brereton, and Fred Rothwell. 1914. Laughter: An essay on the meaning of the comic. Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Kim Binsted, Anton Nijholt, Oliviero Stock, Carlo Strapparava, G Ritchie, R Manurung, H Pain, Annalu Waller, and D O’Mara. 2006. Computational humor. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21, 2 (2006), 59–69.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Richard E Boyatzis. 1998. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. sage.Google Scholar
- What Social Robots Can, Should Do J Seibt, 2016. A generic scale for assessment of attitudes towards social robots: The ASOR-5. What Social Robots Can and Should Do: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2016/TRANSOR 2016 290(2016), 45.Google Scholar
- Arnie Cann and Chantal Collette. 2014. Sense of Humor, Stable Affect, and Psychological Well-Being. Europe’s Journal of Psychology 10, 3 (Aug. 2014), 464–479. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v10i3.746Google Scholar
- Noël Carroll. 2006. Philosophizing through the Moving Image: The Case of” Serene Velocity”. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64, 1 (2006), 173–185.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Noël Carroll. 2014. Humour: A very short introduction. OUP Oxford.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Antony J. Chapman. 1983. Humor and Laughter in Social Interaction and some Implications for Humor Research. Springer New York, New York, NY, 135–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5572-7_7Google Scholar
- Laurence Devillers. 2021. Human–Robot Interactions and Affective Computing: The Ethical Implications. In Robotics, AI, and Humanity. Springer, Cham, 205–211.Google Scholar
- Laurence Devillers, Sophie Rosset, Guillaume Dubuisson Duplessis, Mohamed A Sehili, Lucile Béchade, Agnes Delaborde, Clément Gossart, Vincent Letard, Fan Yang, Yücel Yemez, 2015. Multimodal data collection of human-robot humorous interactions in the joker project. In 2015 international conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction (ACII). IEEE, 348–354.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Merriam Webster Dictionary. 2016. Merriam webster dictionary and thesaurus. Retrieved from: www. merriam-webster. com(2016).Google Scholar
- Pawel Dybala, Michal Ptaszynski, Rafal Rzepka, and Kenji Araki. 2009. Humoroids: conversational agents that induce positive emotions with humor. In AAMAS’09 Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Vol. 2. ACM, 1171–1172.Google Scholar
- Barbara L Fredrickson, Michele M Tugade, Christian E Waugh, and Gregory R Larkin. 2003. What good are positive emotions in crisis? A prospective study of resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001.Journal of personality and social psychology 84, 2(2003), 365.Google Scholar
- G Gibbs. 2008. Analysing qualitative data (Qualitative research kit). Retrieved from (2008).Google Scholar
- Gillian Hatcher, William Ion, Ross MacLachlan, Andrew Wodehouse, Marion Sheridan, Barbara Simpson, 2016. Humour processes for creative engineering design. In DS 84: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2016 14th International Design Conference. 1025–1034.Google Scholar
- Guy Hoffman, Oren Zuckerman, Gilad Hirschberger, Michal Luria, and Tal Shani-Sherman. 2015. Design and Evaluation of a Peripheral Robotic Conversation Companion. In 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). 3–10.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Johanna S Hunsaker. 1988. It’s no joke: Using humor in the classroom. The Clearing House 61, 6 (1988), 285–286.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kleomenis Katevas, Patrick GT Healey, and Matthew Tobias Harris. 2014. Robot stand-up: engineering a comic performance. In Proceedings of the workshop on humanoid robots and creativity at the IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots humanoids (Madrid). Citeseer.Google Scholar
- Philipp Kulms, Stefan Kopp, and Nicole C. Krämer. 2014. Let’s Be Serious and Have a Laugh: Can Humor Support Cooperation with a Virtual Agent?. In Intelligent Virtual Agents, Timothy Bickmore, Stacy Marsella, and Candace Sidner (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 250–259.Google Scholar
- H.M. Lefcourt and R.A. Martin. 2012. Humor and Life Stress: Antidote to Adversity. Springer New York. https://books.google.co.il/books?id=8s0hBAAAQBAJGoogle Scholar
- Geke DS Ludden, Barry M Kudrowitz, Hendrik NJ Schifferstein, and Paul Hekkert. 2012. Surprise and humor in product design. Humor 25, 3 (2012), 285–309.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rod A Martin. 2010. Approaches to the sense of humor: A historical review. In The sense of humor. De Gruyter Mouton, 15–60.Google Scholar
- Rod A Martin, Patricia Puhlik-Doris, Gwen Larsen, Jeanette Gray, and Kelly Weir. 2003. Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of research in personality 37, 1 (2003), 48–75.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Matthew McKeague. 2021. Comedy comes in threes: developing a conceptual framework for the comic triple humour technique. Comedy Studies 12, 2 (2021), 174–185.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peter E McKenna, Mei Yii Lim, Ayan Ghosh, Ruth Aylett, Frank Broz, and Gnanathusharan Rajendran. 2017. Do you think I approve of that? Designing facial expressions for a robot. In International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, 188–197.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Benny Megidish. 2017. Butter Robotics. https://butter-robotics.web.app/Google Scholar
- Benny Megidish, Oren Zuckerman, and Guy Hoffman. 2017. Animating mechanisms: A pipeline for authoring robot gestures. In Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 45–45.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Isabelle M Menne, Benjamin P Lange, and Dagmar C Unz. 2018. My humorous robot: effects of a robot telling jokes on perceived intelligence and liking. In Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 193–194.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nicole Mirnig, Susanne Stadler, Gerald Stollnberger, Manuel Giuliani, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2016. Robot humor: How self-irony and Schadenfreude influence people’s rating of robot likability. In 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745106Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nicole Mirnig, Gerald Stollnberger, Manuel Giuliani, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2017. Elements of humor: How humans perceive verbal and non-verbal aspects of humorous robot behavior. In Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 211–212.Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Morkes, Hadyn K Kernal, and Clifford Nass. 1998. Humor in task-oriented computer-mediated communication and human-computer interaction. In CHI 98 Conference Summary on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 215–216.Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Morkes, Hadyn K Kernal, and Clifford Nass. 1999. Effects of humor in task-oriented human-computer interaction and computer-mediated communication: A direct test of SRCT theory. Human-Computer Interaction 14, 4 (1999), 395–435.Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Morreall. 1986. The philosophy of laughter and humor. (1986).Google Scholar
- John Morreall. 1991. Humor and work. (1991).Google Scholar
- John Morreall. 2009. Humor as cognitive play. (2009).Google Scholar
- M. Mulder and Anton Nijholt. 2002. Humour Research: State of the Art. (11 2002).Google Scholar
- Michael Nagenborg. 2020. Urban robotics and responsible urban innovation. Ethics and Information Technology 22, 4 (2020), 345–355.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clifford Nass, Jonathan Steuer, and Ellen R Tauber. 1994. Computers are social actors. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 72–78.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Austin Lee Nichols and Jon K Maner. 2008. The good-subject effect: Investigating participant demand characteristics. The Journal of general psychology 135, 2 (2008), 151–166.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andreea Niculescu, Betsy van Dijk, Anton Nijholt, Haizhou Li, and Swee Lan See. 2013. Making social robots more attractive: the effects of voice pitch, humor and empathy. International journal of social robotics 5, 2 (2013), 171–191.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andreea Niculescu, Betsy Van Dijk, Anton Nijholt, Dilip Kumar Limbu, Swee Lan See, and Alvin Hong Yee Wong. 2010. Socializing with Olivia, the youngest robot receptionist outside the lab. In International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, 50–62.Google Scholar
- Andreea I Niculescu. 2021. Brief Considerations on the Phenomenon of Humor in HCI. In Asian CHI Symposium 2021. 152–156.Google Scholar
- Antinus Nijholt. 2003. Humor and embodied conversational agents. Centre for Telematics and Information Technology, University of Twente.Google Scholar
- Anton Nijholt. 2018. From word play to world play: introducing humor in human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the 36th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. 1–8.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anton Nijholt. 2018. Robotic stand-up comedy: State-of-the-art. In International conference on distributed, ambient, and pervasive interactions. Springer, 391–410.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anton Nijholt, Andreea I Niculescu, Alessandro Valitutti, and Rafael E Banchs. 2017. Humor in human-computer interaction: a short survey. In Adjunct conference proceedings interact. 527–530.Google Scholar
- Neal R Norrick. 2004. Non-verbal humor and joke performance. (2004).Google Scholar
- Neal R Norrick and Delia Chiaro. 2009. Humor in interaction. Vol. 182. John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
- Raquel Oliveira, Patricia Arriaga, Minja Axelsson, and Ana Paiva. 2021. Humor–Robot interaction: a scoping review of the literature and future directions. International Journal of Social Robotics 13, 6 (2021), 1369–1383.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Raymond Opdenakker. 2006. Advantages and disadvantages of four interview techniques in qualitative research. In Forum qualitative sozialforschung/forum: Qualitative social research, Vol. 7.Google Scholar
- Christophe Panichelli, Adelin Albert, Anne-Françoise Donneau, Salvatore D’Amore, Jean-Marc Triffaux, and Marc Ansseau. 2018. Humor associated with positive outcomes in individual psychotherapy. American journal of psychotherapy 71, 3 (2018), 95–103.Google Scholar
- Rosalind W Picard. 2000. Affective computing. MIT press.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Joseph Polimeni and Jeffrey P Reiss. 2006. The first joke: Exploring the evolutionary origins of humor. Evolutionary psychology 4, 1 (2006), 147470490600400129.Google Scholar
- Walter Schneider, Amy Eschman, and Anthony Zuccolotto. 2002. E-Prime reference guide. Psychology Software Tools, Incorporated.Google Scholar
- Brett Stoll, Malte F Jung, and Susan R Fussell. 2018. Keeping it light: perceptions of humor styles in robot-mediated conflict. In Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 247–248.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Janani Swaminathan, Jane Akintoye, Marlena R Fraune, and Heather Knight. 2021. Robots That Run their Own Human Experiments: Exploring Relational Humor with Multi-Robot Comedy. In 2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 1262–1268.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Moonyoung Tae and Joonhwan Lee. 2020. The Effect of Robot’s Ice-Breaking Humor on Likeability and Future Contact Intentions. In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Cambridge, United Kingdom) (HRI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 462–464. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371382.3378267Google ScholarDigital Library
- Benedict T.C. Tay, Sock Ching Low, Kwang Hee Ko, and Taezoon Park. 2016. Types of Humor That Robots Can Play. Comput. Hum. Behav. 60, C (July 2016), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.042Google Scholar
- Stanislav Treger, Susan Sprecher, and Ralph Erber. 2013. Laughing and liking: Exploring the interpersonal effects of humor use in initial social interactions. European Journal of Social Psychology 43, 6 (2013), 532–543.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Raskin Victor. 1985. Semantic mechanisms of humor. Dordrecht: D. Reidel(1985).Google Scholar
- John Vilk and Naomi T Fitter. 2020. Comedians in cafes getting data: evaluating timing and adaptivity in real-world robot comedy performance. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-Robot Interaction. 223–231.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cornelia Wendt and Guy Berg. 2009. Nonverbal humor as a new dimension of HRI. RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication(2009), 183–188.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yeonsu Yu and Tek-Jin Nam. 2014. Let’s giggle! design principles for humorous products. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems. 275–284.Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
Humorous Robotic Behavior as a New Approach to Mitigating Social Awkwardness
CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsSocial awkwardness is a frequent challenge to healthy social interactions and can dramatically impact how people feel, communicate and behave. It is known that humor can invoke positive feelings and enable people to modify perspective of a situation. We ...
My Humorous Robot: Effects of a Robot Telling Jokes on Perceived Intelligence and Liking
HRI '18: Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot InteractionResearch suggests, interpersonal competences such as having a sense of humor can help establish sociality in human-robot interaction. This study tested the effect of different types of jokes told by either a human or a robot (NAO) on the perceived ...
Designing Social Interactions with a Humorous Robot Photographer
HRI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot InteractionThis paper describes our efforts to explore the design space of social interactions for a robot portrait photographer. Our human-centered design process involved professional and amateur photographers to better understand the social dimensions of ...
Comments