skip to main content
10.1145/3491102.3501890acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

HeadWind: Enhancing Teleportation Experience in VR by Simulating Air Drag during Rapid Motion

Published:29 April 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Teleportation, which instantly moves users from their current location to the target location, has become the most popular locomotion technique in VR games. It enables fast navigation with reduced VR sickness but results in significantly reduced immersion. We present HeadWind, a novel approach to improve the experience of teleportation by simulating the haptic sensation of air drag when rapidly moving through the air in real life. Specifically, HeadWind modulates bursts of compressed air to the face and uses multiple nozzles to provide directional cues. To design the wearable device and to model airflow speed and duration for teleportation, we conducted three formative studies and a design session. User experience evaluation with 24 participants showed that HeadWind significantly improved realism, immersion, and enjoyment of teleportation in VR (p<.01) with large effect sizes (r>0.5), and was preferred by 96% of participants.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3491102.3501890-video-figure.mp4

mp4

61.6 MB

3491102.3501890-video-preview.mp4

mp4

36.9 MB

References

  1. Anthropometry. [n.d.]. Chapter 2-Definition and applicability of anthropometric data. http://personal.cityu.edu.hk/meachan/Online%20Anthropometry/Chapter2/Ch2.htm [Online; accessed 26-July-2021].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Niels H. Bakker, Peter O. Passenier, and Peter J. Werkhoven. 2003. Effects of Head-Slaved Navigation and the Use of Teleports on Spatial Orientation in Virtual Environments. Human Factors 45, 1 (2003), 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.45.1.160.27234 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.45.1.160.27234PMID: 12916588.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Jiwan Bhandari, Paul MacNeilage, and Eelke Folmer. 2018. Teleportation without Spatial Disorientation Using Optical Flow Cues. In Proceedings of the 44th Graphics Interface Conference (Toronto, Canada) (GI ’18). Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society, Waterloo, CAN, 162–167. https://doi.org/10.20380/GI2018.22Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Costas Boletsis and Jarl Erik Cedergren. 2019. VR Locomotion in the New Era of Virtual Reality: An Empirical Comparison of Prevalent Techniques. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction 2019 (01 Apr 2019), 7420781. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7420781Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Doug A. Bowman, David Koller, and Larry F. Hodges. 1997. Travel in Immersive Virtual Environments: An Evaluation of Viewpoint Motion Control Techniques. In Proceedings of the 1997 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (VRAIS ’97)(VRAIS ’97). IEEE Computer Society, USA, 45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Sylvain Cardin, Daniel Thalmann, and Frederic Vexo. 2007. Head Mounted Wind. In In proceeding of the 20th annual conference on Computer Animation and Social Agents (CASA2007). 101–108. https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/104359Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Polona Caserman, Augusto Garcia-Agundez, Alvar Gámez Zerban, and Stefan Göbel. 2021. Cybersickness in current-generation virtual reality head-mounted displays: systematic review and outlook. Virtual Reality (10 Apr 2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-021-00513-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. NOAA/NWS Storm Prediction Center. 2021. Beaufort Wind Scale. https://www.spc.noaa.gov/faq/tornado/beaufort.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jeremy Clifton and Stephen Palmisano. 2020. Effects of steering locomotion and teleporting on cybersickness and presence in HMD-based virtual reality. Virtual Reality 24, 3 (01 Sep 2020), 453–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00407-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ping-Hsuan Han, Chiao-En Hsieh, Yang-Sheng Chen, Jui-Chun Hsiao, Kong-Chang Lee, Sheng-Fu Ko, Kuan-Wen Chen, Chien-Hsing Chou, and Yi-Ping Hung. 2017. AoEs: Enhancing Teleportation Experience in Immersive Environment with Mid-Air Haptics. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2017 Emerging Technologies (Los Angeles, California) (SIGGRAPH ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 3, 2 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3084822.3084823Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Seongkook Heo, Christina Chung, Geehyuk Lee, and Daniel Wigdor. 2018. Thor’s Hammer: An Ungrounded Force Feedback Device Utilizing Propeller-Induced Propulsive Force. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kenichi Ito, Yuki Ban, and Shin’ichi Warisawa. 2019. AlteredWind: Manipulating Perceived Direction of the Wind by Cross-Modal Presentation of Visual, Audio and Wind Stimuli. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2019 Emerging Technologies(Brisbane, QLD, Australia) (SA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3355049.3360525Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Shi-Hong Liu, Pai-Chien Yen, Yi-Hsuan Mao, Yu-Hsin Lin, Erick Chandra, and Mike Y. Chen. 2020. HeadBlaster: A Wearable Approach to Simulating Motion Perception Using Head-Mounted Air Propulsion Jets. ACM Trans. Graph. 39, 4, Article 84 (jul 2020), 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386569.3392482Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Shi-Hong Liu, Neng-Hao Yu, Liwei Chan, Yi-Hao Peng, Wei-Zen Sun, and Mike Y. Chen. 2019. PhantomLegs: Reducing Virtual Reality Sickness Using Head-Worn Haptic Devices. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 817–826. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8798158Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. MetaCritic. 2020. Best All-time PC Video Games - Metacritic. https://www.metacritic.com/browse/games/score/metascore/all/pc/filtered?sort=descGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Taeyong Moon and Gerard J. Kim. 2004. Design and Evaluation of a Wind Display for Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (Hong Kong) (VRST ’04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1145/1077534.1077558Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Oculus. 2021. User Interface Components. https://developer.oculus.com/resources/hands-design-ui/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Yi-Hao Peng, Carolyn Yu, Shi-Hong Liu, Chung-Wei Wang, Paul Taele, Neng-Hao Yu, and Mike Y. Chen. 2020. WalkingVibe: Reducing Virtual Reality Sickness and Improving Realism While Walking in VR Using Unobtrusive Head-Mounted Vibrotactile Feedback. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376847Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Nimesha Ranasinghe, Pravar Jain, Shienny Karwita, David Tolley, and Ellen Yi-Luen Do. 2017. Ambiotherm: Enhancing Sense of Presence in Virtual Reality by Simulating Real-World Environmental Conditions. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1731–1742. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025723Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Max Rheiner. 2014. Birdly an Attempt to Fly. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2014 Emerging Technologies(Vancouver, Canada) (SIGGRAPH ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 3, 1 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2614066.2614101Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Michael Rietzler, Katrin Plaumann, Taras Kränzle, Marcel Erath, Alexander Stahl, and Enrico Rukzio. 2017. VaiR: Simulating 3D Airflows in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 5669–5677. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3026009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Rajinder Sodhi, Ivan Poupyrev, Matthew Glisson, and Ali Israr. 2013. AIREAL: Interactive Tactile Experiences in Free Air. ACM Trans. Graph. 32, 4, Article 134 (July 2013), 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2461912.2462007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Valve Software. 2021. Open VR SDK. https://github.com/ValveSoftware/openvrGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Yuriko Suzuki and Minoru Kobayashi. 2003. Arrayed air jet based haptic display: Implementing an untethered interface. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 16th annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and. 1–2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Y. Suzuki and M. Kobayashi. 2005. Air jet driven force feedback in virtual reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 25, 1 (2005), 44–47. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2005.1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Yuriko Suzuki, Minoru Kobayashi, and Satoshi Ishibashi. 2002. Design of Force Feedback Utilizing Air Pressure toward Untethered Human Interface. In CHI ’02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) (CHI EA ’02). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 808–809. https://doi.org/10.1145/506443.506608Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. City of Copenhagen Traffic Department. 2013. Bicycle statistics. https://web.archive.org/web/20131212093813http://subsite.kk.dk/sitecore/content/Subsites/CityOfCopenhagen/SubsiteFrontpage/LivingInCopenhagen/CityAndTraffic/CityOfCyclists/CycleStatistics.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Tanh Quang Tran, Holger Regenbrecht, and Minh-Triet Tran. 2019. Am I Moving Along a Curve? A Study on Bicycle Traveling-In-Place Techniques in Virtual Environments. In INTERACT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Mohamed Yassine Tsalamlal, Paul Issartel, Nizar Ouarti, and Mehdi Ammi. 2014. HAIR: HAptic feedback with a mobile AIR jet. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). 2699–2706. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2014.6907246Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Valve. 2020. Half-Life: Alyx - Locomotion Deep Dive. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TX58AbJq-xoGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. S. Vlahović, M. Suznjevic, and L. S. Kapov. 2018. Subjective Assessment of Different Locomotion Techniques in Virtual Reality Environments. In 2018 Tenth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX). IEEE, Cagliari, Italy, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2018.8463433Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Yu-Wei Wang, Yu-Hsin Lin, Pin-Sung Ku, Yōko Miyatake, Yi-Hsuan Mao, Po Yu Chen, Chun-Miao Tseng, and Mike Y. Chen. 2021. JetController: High-Speed Ungrounded 3-DoF Force Feedback Controllers Using Air Propulsion Jets. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445549Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Séamas Weech, Jae Moon, and Nikolaus F. Troje. 2018. Influence of bone-conducted vibration on simulator sickness in virtual reality. PLOS ONE 13, 3 (03 2018), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194137Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Alexander Wilberz, Dominik Leschtschow, Christina Trepkowski, Jens Maiero, Ernst Kruijff, and Bernhard Riecke. 2020. FaceHaptics: Robot Arm Based Versatile Facial Haptics for Immersive Environments. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376481Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Bob G. Witmer, Christian J. Jerome, and Michael J. Singer. 2005. The Factor Structure of the Presence Questionnaire. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 14, 3 (June 2005), 298–312. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474605323384654Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Dennis Wolf, Katja Rogers, Christoph Kunder, and Enrico Rukzio. 2020. JumpVR: Jump-Based Locomotion Augmentation for Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376243Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. D. Yi, K. Chang, Y. Tai, I. Chen, and Y. Hung. 2020. Elastic-Move: Passive Force Feedback Devices for Virtual Reality Locomotion. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW). IEEE, Atlanta, GA, USA, 766–767. https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW50115.2020.00234Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. HeadWind: Enhancing Teleportation Experience in VR by Simulating Air Drag during Rapid Motion

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2022
      10459 pages
      ISBN:9781450391573
      DOI:10.1145/3491102

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 April 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format