skip to main content
10.1145/3491102.3501944acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding Emotion Changes in Mobile Experience Sampling

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 April 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Mobile experience sampling methods (ESMs) are widely used to measure users’ affective states by randomly sending self-report requests. However, this random probing can interrupt users and adversely influence users’ emotional states by inducing disturbance and stress. This work aims to understand how ESMs themselves may compromise the validity of ESM responses and what contextual factors contribute to changes in emotions when users respond to ESMs. Towards this goal, we analyze 2,227 samples of the mobile ESM data collected from 78 participants. Our results show ESM interruptions positively or negatively affected users’ emotional states in at least 38% of ESMs, and the changes in emotions are closely related to the contexts users were in prior to ESMs. Finally, we discuss the implications of using the ESM and possible considerations for mitigating the variability in emotional responses in the context of mobile data collection for affective computing.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3491102.3501944-talk-video.mp4

mp4

77 MB

References

  1. Erik M Altmann and J Gregory Trafton. 2002. Memory for goals: An activation-based model. Cognitive science 26, 1 (2002), 39–83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Brian P Bailey and Shamsi T Iqbal. 2008. Understanding changes in mental workload during execution of goal-directed tasks and its application for interruption management. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 14, 4(2008), 1–28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Brian P Bailey and Joseph A Konstan. 2006. On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state. Computers in human behavior 22, 4 (2006), 685–708.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Brian P Bailey, Joseph A Konstan, and John V Carlis. 2001. The Effects of Interruptions on Task Performance, Annoyance, and Anxiety in the User Interface.. In Interact, Vol. 1. 593–601.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Daniel J Beal. 2015. ESM 2.0: State of the art and future potential of experience sampling methods in organizational research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 2, 1(2015), 383–407.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Andrey Bogomolov, Bruno Lepri, Michela Ferron, Fabio Pianesi, and Alex Sandy Pentland. 2014. Daily Stress Recognition from Mobile Phone Data, Weather Conditions and Individual Traits. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Multimedia. ACM, 477–486.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Margaret M Bradley and Peter J Lang. 1994. Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry 25, 1(1994), 49–59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Narae Cha, Auk Kim, Cheul Young Park, Soowon Kang, Mingyu Park, Jae-Gil Lee, Sangsu Lee, and Uichin Lee. 2020. Hello There! Is Now a Good Time to Talk? Opportune Moments for Proactive Interactions with Smart Speakers. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4, 3 (2020), 1–28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Yawen Chan, Suzanne Ho-wai So, Arthur Dun Ping Mak, Kewin Tien Ho Siah, Wai Chan, and Justin C. Y. Wu. 2019. The temporal relationship of daily life stress, emotions, and bowel symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome—Diarrhea subtype: A smartphone-based experience sampling study. Neurogastroenterology & Motility 31, 3 (2019), e13514.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Tamlin Conner Christensen, Lisa Feldman Barrett, Eliza Bliss-Moreau, Kirsten Lebo, and Cynthia Kaschub. 2003. A practical guide to experience-sampling procedures. Journal of Happiness Studies 4, 1 (2003), 53–78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Matteo Ciman and Katarzyna Wac. 2016. Individuals’ stress assessment using human-smartphone interaction analysis. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 9, 1 (2016), 51–65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Jacob Cohen. 2013. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sheldon Cohen. 1988. Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States.The Social Psychology of Health(1988).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Sheldon Cohen, Tom Kamarck, and Robin Mermelstein. 1983. A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of health and social behavior(1983), 385–396.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Christian Collet, Evelyne Vernet-Maury, Georges Delhomme, and André Dittmar. 1997. Autonomic nervous system response patterns specificity to basic emotions. Journal of the autonomic nervous system 62, 1-2 (1997), 45–57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Sunny Consolvo and Miriam Walker. 2003. Using the experience sampling method to evaluate ubicomp applications. IEEE Pervasive Computing 2, 2 (2003), 24–31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, Reed Larson, and Suzanne Prescott. 1977. The ecology of adolescent activity and experience. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 6, 3 (1977), 281–294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Paco Developers. 2018. PACO - Apps on Google Play. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.pacoapp.paco&hl=enGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kari M Eddington, Chris J Burgin, Paul J Silvia, Niloofar Fallah, Catherine Majestic, and Thomas R Kwapil. 2017. The effects of psychotherapy for major depressive disorder on daily mood and functioning: a longitudinal experience sampling study. Cognitive therapy and research 41, 2 (2017), 266–277.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Gudrun Eisele, Hugo Vachon, Ginette Lafit, Peter Kuppens, Marlies Houben, Inez Myin-Germeys, and Wolfgang Viechtbauer. 2020. The effects of sampling frequency and questionnaire length on perceived burden, compliance, and careless responding in experience sampling data in a student population. Assessment (2020), 1073191120957102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Gudrun Eisele, Hugo Vachon, Inez Myin-Germeys, and Wolfgang Viechtbauer. 2021. Reported affect changes as a function of response delay: Findings from a pooled dataset of nine experience sampling studies. Frontiers in psychology 12 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Paul Ekman. [n.d.]. Expression and the nature of emotion. Approaches to emotion 3, 19 ([n. d.]), 344.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Anja Exler, Andrea Schankin, Christoph Klebsattel, and Michael Beigl. 2016. A wearable system for mood assessment considering smartphone features and data from mobile ECGs. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct. ACM, 1153–1161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Surjya Ghosh, Niloy Ganguly, Bivas Mitra, and Pradipta De. 2019. Designing an experience sampling method for smartphone based emotion detection. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing(2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Joyce Ho and Stephen S Intille. 2005. Using context-aware computing to reduce the perceived burden of interruptions from mobile devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 909–918.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Victoria Hollis, Artie Konrad, Aaron Springer, Matthew Antoun, Christopher Antoun, Rob Martin, and Steve Whittaker. 2017. What does all this data mean for my future mood? Actionable analytics and targeted reflection for emotional well-being. Human–Computer Interaction 32, 5-6 (2017), 208–267.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Victoria Hollis, Artie Konrad, and Steve Whittaker. 2015. Change of heart: emotion tracking to promote behavior change. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. 2643–2652.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Karen Holtzblatt and Hugh Beyer. 1997. Contextual design: defining customer-centered systems. Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Karen Hovsepian, Mustafa al’Absi, Emre Ertin, Thomas Kamarck, Motohiro Nakajima, and Santosh Kumar. 2015. cStress: towards a gold standard for continuous stress assessment in the mobile environment. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 493–504.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Heming Jiang, Mikko Siponen, and Aggeliki Tsohou. 2021. Personal use of technology at work: a literature review and a theoretical model for understanding how it affects employee job performance. European Journal of Information Systems(2021), 1–15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Oliver P John, Eileen M Donahue, and Robert L Kentle. 1991. Big five inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1991).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Daniel Kahneman, Alan B Krueger, David A Schkade, Norbert Schwarz, and Arthur A Stone. 2004. A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science 306, 5702 (2004), 1776–1780.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Nicky Kern and Bernt Schiele. 2003. Context-aware notification for wearable computing. In Seventh IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, 2003. Proceedings. IEEE, 223–230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Auk Kim, Woohyeok Choi, Jungmi Park, Kyeyoon Kim, and Uichin Lee. 2018. Interrupting Drivers for Interactions: Predicting Opportune Moments for In-Vehicle Proactive Auditory-Verbal Tasks. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2, 4, Article 175 (dec 2018), 28 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Auk Kim, Jung-Mi Park, and Uichin Lee. 2020. Interruptibility for in-vehicle multitasking: influence of voice task demands and adaptive behaviors. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4, 1 (2020), 1–22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Jonghwa Kim and Elisabeth André. 2008. Emotion recognition based on physiological changes in music listening. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 30, 12(2008), 2067–2083.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Ji-Hyeon Kim, Bok-Hwan Kim, and Moon-Sun Ha. 2011. Validation of a Korean version of the Big Five Inventory. Journal of Human Understanding and Counseling 32, 1(2011), 47–65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Zachary D King, Judith Moskowitz, Begum Egilmez, Shibo Zhang, Lida Zhang, Michael Bass, John Rogers, Roozbeh Ghaffari, Laurie Wakschlag, and Nabil Alshurafa. 2019. micro-Stress EMA: A Passive Sensing Framework for Detecting in-the-wild Stress in Pregnant Mothers. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 3, 3 (2019), 91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Predrag Klasnja, Beverly L Harrison, Louis LeGrand, Anthony LaMarca, Jon Froehlich, and Scott E Hudson. 2008. Using wearable sensors and real time inference to understand human recall of routine activities. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing. 154–163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Sander Koelstra, Christian Muhl, Mohammad Soleymani, Jong-Seok Lee, Ashkan Yazdani, Touradj Ebrahimi, Thierry Pun, Anton Nijholt, and Ioannis Patras. 2011. Deap: A database for emotion analysis; using physiological signals. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 3, 1 (2011), 18–31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Peter Kuppens, Zita Oravecz, and Francis Tuerlinckx. 2010. Feelings change: accounting for individual differences in the temporal dynamics of affect. Journal of personality and social psychology 99, 6(2010), 1042.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Hosub Lee, Young Sang Choi, Sunjae Lee, and IP Park. 2012. Towards unobtrusive emotion recognition for affective social communication. In 2012 IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC). IEEE, 260–264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Hao-Ping Lee, Kuan-Yin Chen, Chih-Heng Lin, Chia-Yu Chen, Yu-Lin Chung, Yung-Ju Chang, and Chien-Ru Sun. 2019. Does who matter? Studying the impact of relationship characteristics on receptivity to mobile IM messages. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Robert LiKamWa, Yunxin Liu, Nicholas D Lane, and Lin Zhong. 2013. Moodscope: Building a mood sensor from smartphone usage patterns. In Proceeding of the 11th annual international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services. ACM, 389–402.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Geoffrey R Loftus. 1978. On interpretation of interactions. Memory & Cognition 6, 3 (1978), 312–319.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Gloria Mark, Daniela Gudith, and Ulrich Klocke. 2008. The cost of interrupted work: more speed and stress. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 107–110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Gloria Mark, Yiran Wang, and Melissa Niiya. 2014. Stress and multitasking in everyday college life: an empirical study of online activity. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 41–50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Gerald Matthews, Dylan M Jones, and A Graham Chamberlain. 1990. Refining the measurement of mood: The UWIST mood adjective checklist. British journal of psychology 81, 1 (1990), 17–42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Abhinav Mehrotra, Mirco Musolesi, Robert Hendley, and Veljko Pejovic. 2015. Designing content-driven intelligent notification mechanisms for mobile applications. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 813–824.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Abhinav Mehrotra, Veljko Pejovic, Jo Vermeulen, Robert Hendley, and Mirco Musolesi. 2016. My Phone and Me: Understanding People’s Receptivity to Mobile Notifications. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1021–1032.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Abhinav Mehrotra, Fani Tsapeli, Robert Hendley, and Mirco Musolesi. 2017. MyTraces: Investigating Correlation and Causation between Users’ Emotional States and Mobile Phone Interaction. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 3 (2017), 83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Christopher A Monk, J Gregory Trafton, and Deborah A Boehm-Davis. 2008. The effect of interruption duration and demand on resuming suspended goals.Journal of experimental psychology: Applied 14, 4 (2008), 299.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Inez Myin-Germeys, Machteld Marcelis, Lydia Krabbendam, Philippe Delespaul, and Jim van Os. 2005. Subtle Fluctuations in Psychotic Phenomena as Functional States of Abnormal Dopamine Reactivity in Individuals at Risk. Biological Psychiatry 58, 2 (2005), 105–110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. I. Myin-Germeys, F. Peeters, R. Havermans, N. A. Nicolson, M. W. DeVries, P. Delespaul, and J. Van Os. 2003. Emotional reactivity to daily life stress in psychosis and affective disorder: an experience sampling study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 107, 2 (2003), 124–131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Inez Myin-Germeys, Jim van Os, Joseph E. Schwartz, Arthur A. Stone, and Philippe A. Delespaul. 2001. Emotional Reactivity to Daily Life Stress in Psychosis. Archives of General Psychiatry 58, 12 (12 2001), 1137–1144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Mikio Obuchi, Wataru Sasaki, Tadashi Okoshi, Jin Nakazawa, and Hideyuki Tokuda. 2016. Investigating interruptibility at activity breakpoints using smartphone activity recognition API. In Proc. of the 2016 ACM Intern. Joint Conf. on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct. 1602–1607.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Simon Ollander, Christelle Godin, Aurélie Campagne, and Sylvie Charbonnier. 2016. A comparison of wearable and stationary sensors for stress detection. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). IEEE, 004362–004366.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Cheul Young Park. 2020. Toolbox for Emotion Analysis using Physiological signals (TEAP) in Python. https://github.com/cheulyop/PyTEAP.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Martin Pielot, Bruno Cardoso, Kleomenis Katevas, Joan Serrà, Aleksandar Matic, and Nuria Oliver. 2017. Beyond Interruptibility: Predicting Opportune Moments to Engage Mobile Phone Users. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 3, Article 91 (Sept. 2017), 25 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3130956Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. John P Pollak, Phil Adams, and Geri Gay. 2011. PAM: a photographic affect meter for frequent, in situ measurement of affect. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 725–734.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Ho-Kyeong Ra, Jungmo Ahn, Hee Jung Yoon, Dukyong Yoon, Sang Hyuk Son, and JeongGil Ko. 2017. I am a” smart” watch, smart enough to know the accuracy of my own heart rate sensor. In Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications. 49–54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. James A Russell. 1980. A circumplex model of affect.Journal of personality and social psychology 39, 6(1980), 1161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Sohrab Saeb, Mi Zhang, Christopher J Karr, Stephen M Schueller, Marya E Corden, Konrad P Kording, and David C Mohr. 2015. Mobile phone sensor correlates of depressive symptom severity in daily-life behavior: an exploratory study. Journal of medical Internet research 17, 7 (2015), e175.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Dario D Salvucci, Niels A Taatgen, and Jelmer P Borst. 2009. Toward a unified theory of the multitasking continuum: From concurrent performance to task switching, interruption, and resumption. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1819–1828.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Akane Sano and Rosalind W Picard. 2013. Stress recognition using wearable sensors and mobile phones. In 2013 Humaine association conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction. IEEE, 671–676.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Ulrich Schimmack and Reisenzein Rainer. 2002. Experiencing activation: Energetic arousal and tense arousal are not mixtures of valence and activation.Emotion 2, 4 (2002), 412.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Philip Schmidt, Attila Reiss, Robert Dürichen, and Kristof Van Laerhoven. 2018. Labelling Affective States” in the Wild” Practical Guidelines and Lessons Learned. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Joint Conference and 2018 International Symposium on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Wearable Computers. 654–659.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Maude Schneider, Thomas Vaessen, Esther DA van Duin, Zuzana Kasanova, Wolfgang Viechtbauer, Ulrich Reininghaus, Claudia Vingerhoets, Jan Booij, Ann Swillen, Jacob AS Vorstman, 2020. Affective and psychotic reactivity to daily-life stress in adults with 22q11DS: a study using the experience sampling method. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders 12, 1 (2020), 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Christie Scollon, Chu Kim-Prieto, and Ed Diener. 2003. Experience Sampling: Promises and Pitfalls, Strengths and Weaknesses. Journal of Happiness Studies 4, 1 (2003), 5–34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Saya Shacham. 1983. A shortened version of the Profile of Mood States.Journal of personality assessment(1983).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. D Siewiorek, A Smailagic, J Furukawa, A Krause, N Moraveji, K Reiger, J Shaffer, and Fei Lung Wong. 2003. SenSay: a context-aware mobile phone. In Seventh IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, 2003. Proceedings. IEEE, 248–249.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Rolf Steyer, Peter Schwenkmezger, Peter Notz, and Michael Eid. 1997. Der Mehrdimensionale Befindlichkeitsfragebogen MDBF [Multidimensional mood questionnaire]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe(1997).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Arthur A Stone and Saul Shiffman. 1994. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in behavorial medicine.Annals of Behavioral Medicine(1994).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Yoshihiko Suhara, Yinzhan Xu, and Alex’Sandy’ Pentland. 2017. Deepmood: Forecasting depressed mood based on self-reported histories via recurrent neural networks. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 715–724.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. T. and Brian P. Bailey. 2005. Investigating the Effectiveness of Mental Workload as a Predictor of Opportune Moments for Interruption(CHI EA ’05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4. https://doi.org/10.1145/1056808.1056948Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Shelley E Taylor, William T Welch, Heejung S Kim, and David K Sherman. 2007. Cultural differences in the impact of social support on psychological and biological stress responses. Psychological science 18, 9 (2007), 831–837.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Robert E Thayer. 1990. The biopsychology of mood and arousal. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Artem Timoshenko and John R Hauser. 2019. Identifying customer needs from user-generated content. Marketing Science 38, 1 (2019), 1–20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Peter Totterdell and Simon Folkard. 1992. In situ repeated measures of affect and cognitive performance facilitated by use of a hand-held computer. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 24, 4 (1992), 545–553.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. William Trochim and James Donnelly. 2008. Research methods knowledge base. Donnelly. Mason, OH: Cenage Learning(2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Endel Tulving and Daniel L Schacter. 1990. Priming and human memory systems. Science 247, 4940 (1990), 301–306.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Endel Tulving and Donald M Thomson. 1973. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological review 80, 5 (1973), 352.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Liam D Turner, Stuart M Allen, and Roger M Whitaker. 2015. Interruptibility prediction for ubiquitous systems: conventions and new directions from a growing field. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing. 801–812.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Niels van Berkel, Denzil Ferreira, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2018. The Experience Sampling Method on Mobile Devices. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 50, 6 (2018), 93.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Niels van Berkel, Jorge Goncalves, Lauri Lovén, Denzil Ferreira, Simo Hosio, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2019. Effect of experience sampling schedules on response rate and recall accuracy of objective self-reports. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 125 (2019), 118–128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Ruud Van Winkel, Cécile Henquet, Araceli Rosa, Sergi Papiol, Lourdes Faňanás, Marc De Hert, Jozef Peuskens, Jim van Os, and Inez Myin-Germeys. 2008. Evidence that the COMTVal158Met polymorphism moderates sensitivity to stress in psychosis: An experience-sampling study. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics 147B, 1(2008), 10–17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. Rui Wang, Fanglin Chen, Zhenyu Chen, Tianxing Li, Gabriella Harari, Stefanie Tignor, Xia Zhou, Dror Ben-Zeev, and Andrew T Campbell. 2014. StudentLife: assessing mental health, academic performance and behavioral trends of college students using smartphones. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing. 3–14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. David Watson, Lee Anna Clark, and Auke Tellegen. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.Journal of personality and social psychology 54, 6(1988), 1063.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Mario Wenzel, Zarah Rowland, and Thomas Kubiak. 2021. Like clouds in a windy sky: Mindfulness training reduces negative affect reactivity in daily life in a randomized controlled trial. Stress and Health 37, 2 (2021), 232–242.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  90. Ladd Wheeler and Harry T Reis. 1991. Self-recording of everyday life events: Origins, types, and uses. Journal of personality 59, 3 (1991), 339–354.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  91. Raf Widdershoven, Marieke Wichers, Peter Kuppens, Jessica Hartmann, Claudia Menne-Lothmann, Claudia Simons, and Jojanneke Bastiaansen. 2019. Effect of self-monitoring through experience sampling on emotion differentiation in depression. Journal of Affective Disorders(2019), 71–77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Peter Wilhelm and Dominik Schoebi. 2007. Assessing mood in daily life. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 23, 4(2007), 258–267.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. Fengpeng Yuan, Xianyi Gao, and Janne Lindqvist. 2017. How busy are you? Predicting the interruptibility intensity of mobile users. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 5346–5360.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  94. Vincent W Zheng, Yu Zheng, Xing Xie, and Qiang Yang. 2010. Collaborative location and activity recommendations with GPS history data. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web. 1029–1038.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  95. Manuela Züger and Thomas Fritz. 2015. Interruptibility of software developers and its prediction using psycho-physiological sensors. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2981–2990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Understanding Emotion Changes in Mobile Experience Sampling

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2022
        10459 pages
        ISBN:9781450391573
        DOI:10.1145/3491102

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 29 April 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format