research-article

It’s Touching: Understanding Touch-Affect Association in Shape-Change with Kinematic Features

Authors:

Oussama MetatlaAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Article No.: 428, Pages 1 - 18

https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502003

Published: 29 April 2022 Publication History

Abstract

With the proliferation of shape-change research in affective computing, there is a need to deepen understandings of affective responses to shape-change display. Little research has focused on affective reactions to tactile experiences in shape-change, particularly in the absence of visual information. It is also rare to study response to the shape-change as it unfolds, isolated from a final shape-change outcome. We report on two studies on touch-affect associations, using the crossmodal “Bouba-Kiki” paradigm, to understand affective responses to shape-change as it unfolds. We investigate experiences with a shape-change gadget, as it moves between rounded (“Bouba”) and spiky (“Kiki”) forms. We capture affective responses via the circumplex model, and use a motion analysis approach to understand the certainty of these responses. We find that touch-affect associations are influenced by both the size and the frequency of the shape-change and may be modality-dependent, and that certainty in affective associations is influenced by association-consistency.

References

[1]

Harini Alagarai Sampath, Bipin Indurkhya, Eunhwa Lee, and Yudong Bae. 2015. Towards multimodal affective feedback: Interaction between visual and haptic modalities. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2043–2052.

[2]

Jason Alexander, Anne Roudaut, Jürgen Steimle, Kasper Hornbæk, Miguel Bruns Alonso, Sean Follmer, and Timothy Merritt. 2018. Grand challenges in shape-changing interface research. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–14.

Digital Library

[3]

Mahdi Azmandian, Mark Hancock, Hrvoje Benko, Eyal Ofek, and Andrew D Wilson. 2016. Haptic retargeting: Dynamic repurposing of passive haptics for enhanced virtual reality experiences. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1968–1979.

Digital Library

[4]

Paul Bach-y Rita, Kurt A Kaczmarek, Mitchell E Tyler, Jorge Garcia-Lara, 1998. Form perception with a 49-point electrotactile stimulus array on the tongue: a technical note. Journal of rehabilitation research and development 35 (1998), 427–430.

[5]

Laura Barca and Giovanni Pezzulo. 2012. Unfolding Visual Lexical Decision in Time. PLOS ONE 7 (04 2012), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035932

[6]

Lisa Feldman Barrett and James A Russell. 1999. The structure of current affect: Controversies and emerging consensus. Current directions in psychological science 8, 1 (1999), 10–14.

[7]

Elisheva Ben-Artzi and Lawrence E Marks. 1995. Visual-auditory interaction in speeded classification: Role of stimulus difference. Perception & Psychophysics 57, 8 (1995), 1151–1162.

[8]

Margaret M Bradley and Peter J Lang. 1994. Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry 25, 1(1994), 49–59.

[9]

Andrew J Bremner, Serge Caparos, Jules Davidoff, Jan de Fockert, Karina J Linnell, and Charles Spence. 2013. “Bouba” and “Kiki” in Namibia? A remote culture make similar shape–sound matches, but different shape–taste matches to Westerners. Cognition 126, 2 (2013), 165–172.

[10]

Antonio Calcagnì, Luigi Lombardi, and Simone Sulpizio. 2017. Analyzing spatial data from mouse tracker methodology: An entropic approach. Behavior research methods 49, 6 (2017), 2012–2030.

[11]

Franceli L Cibrian, Oscar Peña, Deysi Ortega, and Monica Tentori. 2017. BendableSound: An elastic multisensory surface using touch-based interactions to assist children with severe autism during music therapy. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 107 (2017), 22–37.

Digital Library

[12]

Francis B Colavita. 1974. Human sensory dominance. Perception & Psychophysics 16, 2 (1974), 409–412.

[13]

Roddy Cowie, Ellen Douglas-Cowie, Nicolas Tsapatsoulis, George Votsis, Stefanos Kollias, Winfried Fellenz, and John G Taylor. 2001. Emotion recognition in human-computer interaction. IEEE Signal processing magazine 18, 1 (2001), 32–80.

[14]

Clare Cullen and Oussama Metatla. 2018. Multisensory storytelling: a co-design study with children with mixed visual abilities. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children. ACM, 557–562.

Digital Library

[15]

Rick Dale, Jennifer Roche, Kristy Snyder, and Ryan McCall. 2008. Exploring Action Dynamics as an Index of Paired-Associate Learning. PLOS ONE 3, 3 (03 2008), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001728

[16]

Donald Degraen, André Zenner, and Antonio Krüger. 2019. Enhancing texture perception in virtual reality using 3D-printed hair structures. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.

Digital Library

[17]

Nicholas D Duran, Rick Dale, and Danielle S McNamara. 2010. The action dynamics of overcoming the truth. Psychonomic bulletin & review 17, 4 (2010), 486–491.

[18]

Paul Ekman. 1992. An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & emotion 6, 3-4 (1992), 169–200.

[19]

Karla K Evans and Anne Treisman. 2009. Natural cross-modal mappings between visual and auditory features. Journal of vision 10, 1 (2009), 6–6.

[20]

Behnaz Farahi. 2020. Emotional Intelligence: Affective Computing in Architecture and Design. In Architectural Intelligence. Springer, 235–251.

[21]

Lisa Feldman Barrett and James A Russell. 1998. Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect.Journal of personality and social psychology 74, 4(1998), 967.

[22]

Feng Feng, Puhong Li, and Tony Stockman. 2021. Exploring crossmodal perceptual enhancement and integration in a sequence-reproducing task with cognitive priming. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 15, 1 (2021), 45–59.

[23]

Feng Feng and Tony Stockman. 2019. Augmented visuotactile feedback support sensorimotor synchronization skill for rehabilitation. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–6.

Digital Library

[24]

Daniel J Finnegan, Eamonn O’Neill, and Michael J Proulx. 2016. Compensating for distance compression in audiovisual virtual environments using incongruence. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 200–212.

Digital Library

[25]

Sean Follmer, Daniel Leithinger, Alex Olwal, Akimitsu Hogge, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2013. inFORM: dynamic physical affordances and constraints through shape and object actuation. In Uist, Vol. 13. 2501988–2502032.

[26]

Jonathan Freeman, Rick Dale, and Thomas Farmer. 2011. Hand in Motion Reveals Mind in Motion. Frontiers in Psychology 2 (2011), 59. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00059

[27]

Elia Gatti, Elena Calzolari, Emanuela Maggioni, and Marianna Obrist. 2018. Emotional ratings and skin conductance response to visual, auditory and haptic stimuli. Scientific data 5, 1 (2018), 1–12.

[28]

Michael J. Gill and Nick D. Ungson. 2018. How much blame does he truly deserve? Historicist narratives engender uncertainty about blameworthiness, facilitating motivated cognition in moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 77 (2018), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.008

[29]

Patrick Gomez and Brigitta Danuser. 2004. Affective and physiological responses to environmental noises and music. International Journal of psychophysiology 53, 2 (2004), 91–103.

[30]

David Hecht and Miriam Reiner. 2009. Sensory dominance in combinations of audio, visual and haptic stimuli. Experimental brain research 193, 2 (2009), 307–314.

[31]

Eric Hehman, Ryan M Stolier, and Jonathan B Freeman. 2015. Advanced mouse-tracking analytic techniques for enhancing psychological science. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 18, 3 (2015), 384–401.

[32]

Eve Hoggan, Andrew Crossan, Stephen A Brewster, and Topi Kaaresoja. 2009. Audio or tactile feedback: which modality when?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 2253–2256.

Digital Library

[33]

Yuhan Hu and Guy Hoffman. 2019. Using skin texture change to design emotion expression in social robots. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 2–10.

[34]

Alexandra Ion, Robert Kovacs, Oliver S Schneider, Pedro Lopes, and Patrick Baudisch. 2018. Metamaterial textures. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.

Digital Library

[35]

Leslie M Kay. 2011. Olfactory coding: random scents make sense. Current Biology 21, 22 (2011), R928–R929.

[36]

Wolfgang Köhler. 1967. Gestalt psychology. Psychologische Forschung 31, 1 (1967), XVIII–XXX.

[37]

Peter Lang and Margaret M Bradley. 2007. The International Affective Picture System (IAPS) in the study of emotion and attention. Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment 29 (2007), 70–73.

[38]

Peter J Lang. 1995. The emotion probe: Studies of motivation and attention.American psychologist 50, 5 (1995), 372.

[39]

Jung Min Lee, Jongsoo Baek, and Da Young Ju. 2018. Anthropomorphic Design: Emotional Perception for Deformable Object. Frontiers in psychology 9 (2018), 1829.

[40]

Anan Lin, Meike Scheller, Feng Feng, Michael J Proulx, and Oussama Metatla. 2021. Feeling Colours: Crossmodal Correspondences Between Tangible 3D Objects, Colours and Emotions. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.

Digital Library

[41]

Manuela M Marin, Bruno Gingras, and Joydeep Bhattacharya. 2012. Crossmodal transfer of arousal, but not pleasantness, from the musical to the visual domain.Emotion 12, 3 (2012), 618.

[42]

Daphne Maurer, Thanujeni Pathman, and Catherine J Mondloch. 2006. The shape of boubas: Sound–shape correspondences in toddlers and adults. Developmental science 9, 3 (2006), 316–322.

[43]

Oussama Metatla, Emanuela Maggioni, Clare Cullen, and Marianna Obrist. 2019. ” Like Popcorn” Crossmodal Correspondences Between Scents, 3D Shapes and Emotions in Children. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.

Digital Library

[44]

Marianna Obrist, Sriram Subramanian, Elia Gatti, Benjamin Long, and Thomas Carter. 2015. Emotions mediated through mid-air haptics. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2053–2062.

Digital Library

[45]

Andrew Ortony and Terence J Turner. 1990. What’s basic about basic emotions?Psychological review 97, 3 (1990), 315.

[46]

Sharon Oviatt, Björn Schuller, Philip Cohen, Daniel Sonntag, and Gerasimos Potamianos. 2017. The handbook of multimodal-multisensor interfaces, volume 1: Foundations, user modeling, and common modality combinations. Morgan & Claypool.

[47]

Cesare Valerio Parise and Charles Spence. 2009. ‘When birds of a feather flock together’: Synesthetic correspondences modulate audiovisual integration in non-synesthetes. PLoS One 4, 5 (2009), e5664.

[48]

Cesare V Parise and Charles Spence. 2012. Audiovisual crossmodal correspondences and sound symbolism: a study using the implicit association test. Experimental Brain Research 220, 3-4 (2012), 319–333.

[49]

Esben W Pedersen, Sriram Subramanian, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2014. Is my phone alive? A large-scale study of shape change in handheld devices using videos. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2579–2588.

Digital Library

[50]

Betina Piqueras-Fiszman, Jorge Alcaide, Elena Roura, and Charles Spence. 2012. Is it the plate or is it the food? Assessing the influence of the color (black or white) and shape of the plate on the perception of the food placed on it. Food Quality and Preference 24, 1 (2012), 205–208.

[51]

Isabel PS Qamar, Rainer Groh, David Holman, and Anne Roudaut. 2018. HCI meets material science: A literature review of morphing materials for the design of shape-changing interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–23.

Digital Library

[52]

Vilayanur S Ramachandran and Edward M Hubbard. 2003. Hearing colors, tasting shapes. Scientific American 288, 5 (2003), 52–59.

[53]

Nimesha Ranasinghe, Pravar Jain, Nguyen Thi Ngoc Tram, Koon Chuan Raymond Koh, David Tolley, Shienny Karwita, Lin Lien-Ya, Yan Liangkun, Kala Shamaiah, Chow Eason Wai Tung, 2018. Season traveller: Multisensory narration for enhancing the virtual reality experience. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.

Digital Library

[54]

Majken K Rasmussen, Esben W Pedersen, Marianne G Petersen, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2012. Shape-changing interfaces: a review of the design space and open research questions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 735–744.

Digital Library

[55]

Kyle Rector, Roger Vilardaga, Leo Lansky, Kellie Lu, Cynthia L Bennett, Richard E Ladner, and Julie A Kientz. 2017. Design and real-world evaluation of Eyes-Free Yoga: An exergame for blind and low-vision exercise. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 9, 4 (2017), 1–25.

Digital Library

[56]

Jaime Redondo, Isabel Fraga, Isabel Padrón, and Ana Piñeiro. 2008. Affective ratings of sound stimuli. Behavior Research Methods 40, 3 (2008), 784–790.

[57]

Luca Rinaldi, Emanuela Maggioni, Nadia Olivero, Angelo Maravita, and Luisa Girelli. 2018. Smelling the space around us: Odor pleasantness shifts visuospatial attention in humans.Emotion 18, 7 (2018), 971.

[58]

James A Russell. 1980. A circumplex model of affect.Journal of personality and social psychology 39, 6(1980), 1161.

[59]

Lisa Skedung, Martin Arvidsson, Jun Young Chung, Christopher M Stafford, Birgitta Berglund, and Mark W Rutland. 2013. Feeling small: exploring the tactile perception limits. Scientific reports 3, 1 (2013), 1–6.

[60]

Charles Spence. 2011. Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 73, 4 (2011), 971–995.

[61]

Charles Spence and Jon Driver. 1997. Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting. Perception & psychophysics 59, 1 (1997), 1–22.

[62]

Adam J Spiers and Aaron M Dollar. 2016. Design and evaluation of shape-changing haptic interfaces for pedestrian navigation assistance. IEEE transactions on haptics 10, 1 (2016), 17–28.

[63]

Michael J Spivey and Rick Dale. 2004. On the continuity of mind: toward a dynamical account of cognition.(2004).

[64]

Paul E. Stillman, Xi Shen, and Melissa J. Ferguson. 2018. How Mouse-tracking Can Advance Social Cognitive Theory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 22, 6 (2018), 531–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.03.012

[65]

Leland S Stone and Peter Thompson. 1992. Human speed perception is contrast dependent. Vision research 32, 8 (1992), 1535–1549.

[66]

Paul Strohmeier, Juan Pablo Carrascal, Bernard Cheng, Margaret Meban, and Roel Vertegaal. 2016. An evaluation of shape changes for conveying emotions. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3781–3792.

Digital Library

[67]

Haodan Tan, John Tiab, Selma Šabanović, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2016. Happy moves, sad grooves: using theories of biological motion and affect to design shape-changing interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 1282–1293.

Digital Library

[68]

Anna Vallgårda, Morten Winther, Nina Mørch, and Edit E Vizer. 2015. Temporal form in interaction design. International Journal of Design 9, 3 (2015).

[69]

Anke Van Oosterhout, Miguel Bruns Alonso, and Satu Jumisko-Pyykkö. 2018. Ripple thermostat: Affecting the emotional experience through interactive force feedback and shape change. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.

Digital Library

[70]

Anke van Oosterhout and Eve Hoggan. 2021. Deformation Techniques for Shape Changing Interfaces. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–7.

[71]

Takashi Yamauchi and Kunchen Xiao. 2017. Reading Emotion From Mouse Cursor Motions: Affective Computing Approach. Cognitive Science 42 (11 2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12557

[72]

Simin Yang, Courtney Nicole Reed, Elaine Chew, and Mathieu Barthet. 2021. Examining Emotion Perception Agreement in Live Music Performance. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing(2021).

Digital Library

[73]

Steve Yohanan and Karon E MacLean. 2011. Design and assessment of the haptic creature’s affect display. In 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 473–480.

Digital Library

Cited By

Feng FBennett DMekler E(2024)Smiles Summon the Warmth of Spring: A Design Framework for Thermal-Affective Interaction based in Chinese Cí PoetryProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661620(2802-2819)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661620
Zhou NDevleminck SGeurts L(2024)Tangible Affect: A Literature Review of Tangible Interactive Systems Addressing Human Core Affect, Emotions and MoodsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661608(424-440)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661608
Balaam MStåhl AÍvansdóttir GSigtryggsdóttir HHöök KZheng C(2024)Exploring the Somatic Possibilities of Shape Changing Car SeatsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661518(3354-3371)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661518
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

It’s Touching: Understanding Touch-Affect Association in Shape-Change with Kinematic Features
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Empirical studies in HCI
    2. Interaction devices
      1. Haptic devices

Recommendations

Tangible Affect: A Literature Review of Tangible Interactive Systems Addressing Human Core Affect, Emotions and Moods
DIS '24: Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference

Tangible user interfaces (TUIs) have been applied to assess, communicate, or regulate human core affect, emotions, or moods. Previous studies identified TUIs as an innovative way to serve people’s affective needs. This review examines the design and ...
A touch of affect: mediated social touch and affect
ICMI '12: Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Multimodal interaction

This position paper outlines the first stages in an ongoing PhD project on mediated social touch, and the effects mediated touch can have on someone's affective state. It is argued that touch is a profound communication channel for humans, and that ...
The Role of Affect and Emotion in HCI
Affect and Emotion in Human-Computer Interaction

Affect and emotion play an important role in our everyday lives: they are present whatever we do, wherever we are, wherever we go, without us being aware of them for much of the time. When it comes to interaction, be it with humans, technology, or ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2022

10459 pages

ISBN:9781450391573

DOI:10.1145/3491102

Editors:
Simone Barbosa
PUC-Rio, Brazil
,
Cliff Lampe
University of Michigan, USA
,
Caroline Appert
Université Paris-Saclay, France
,
David A. Shamma
Toyota Research Institute, USA
,
Steven Drucker
Microsoft Research, USA
,
Julie Williamson
University of Glasgow, UK
,
Koji Yatani
University of Tokyo, Japan

Copyright © 2022 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 29 April 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

EPSRC

Conference

CHI '22

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '22: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 29 - May 5, 2022

LA, New Orleans, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

10
Total Citations
View Citations
761
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)201
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)18

Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Feng FBennett DMekler E(2024)Smiles Summon the Warmth of Spring: A Design Framework for Thermal-Affective Interaction based in Chinese Cí PoetryProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661620(2802-2819)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661620
Zhou NDevleminck SGeurts L(2024)Tangible Affect: A Literature Review of Tangible Interactive Systems Addressing Human Core Affect, Emotions and MoodsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661608(424-440)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661608
Balaam MStåhl AÍvansdóttir GSigtryggsdóttir HHöök KZheng C(2024)Exploring the Somatic Possibilities of Shape Changing Car SeatsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661518(3354-3371)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661518
Neto IHu YCorreia FRocha FHoffman GNicolau HPaiva A(2024)Conveying Emotions through Shape-changing to Children with and without Visual ImpairmentProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642525(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642525
Steer CSauvé KJain ALawal OProulx MJicol CAlexander J(2024)Squishy, Yet Satisfying: Exploring Deformable Shapes' Cross-Modal Correspondences with Colours and EmotionsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3641952(1-20)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3641952
Neto IHu YCorreia FRocha FNogueira JBuckmayer KHoffman GNicolau HPaiva AGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)"I'm Not Touching You. It's The Robot!": Inclusion Through A Touch-Based Robot Among Mixed-Visual Ability ChildrenProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634992(511-521)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610977.3634992
Johnson TPatel DYang HCivici UFernandes Minori AYao L(2023)FlexTure: Designing Configurable and Dynamic Surface FeaturesProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563657.3595995(580-593)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3563657.3595995
Farrall ATaylor JAinsworth BAlexander J(2023)Manifesting Breath: Empirical Evidence for the Integration of Shape-changing Biofeedback-based Artefacts within Digital Mental Health InterventionsProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581188(1-14)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3581188
Albarrak LMetatla ORoudaut A(2023)Using Virtual Reality and Co-Design to Study the Design of Large-scale Shape-Changing InterfacesProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581144(1-17)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3581144
Steer CDinca TJicol CProulx MAlexander J(2023)Feel the Force, See the Force: Exploring Visual-tactile Associations of Deformable Surfaces with Colours and ShapesProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580830(1-13)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3580830

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten