skip to main content
10.1145/3491102.3502139acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

The Normal Natural Troubles of Virtual Reality in Mixed-Reality Performances

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 April 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Performing with technology is a complex and challenging task. Artists who use novel technologies, such as Virtual Reality, have to develop strategies of monitoring, maintenance, and recovery from errors with as minimal impact on the ongoing performance as possible. In this paper we draw on two case studies of mixed-reality performances and document strategies of Stage Managing VR Performance, Choreographing for Cables, Consistency & Charging, Improvising Interventions, and Priming Participants. We discuss how these practices expose areas ripe with potential for tool development, and how they can also be used to inform the design of interaction with other technologies, such as the Internet of Things.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3491102.3502139-talk-video.mp4

mp4

262 MB

References

  1. Louise Barkhuus and Chiara Rossitto. 2016. Acting with Technology: Rehearsing for Mixed-Media Live Performances. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 864–875. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858344Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Steve Benford and Gabriella Giannachi. 2011. Performing Mixed Reality. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Andy Crabtree, Martin Flintham, Brendan Walker, Joe Marshall, Boriana Koleva, Stefan Rennick Egglestone, Gabriella Giannachi, Matt Adams, Nick Tandavanitj, and Ju Row Farr. 2013. Performance-Led Research in the Wild. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 20, 3 (July 2013), 14:1–14:22. https://doi.org/10.1145/2491500.2491502Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Gabriella Giannachi, Brendan Walker, Joe Marshall, and Tom Rodden. 2012. Uncomfortable Interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2005–2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Andy Crabtree, Steve Benford, Tom Rodden, Tom Rodden, Chris Greenhalgh, Martin Flintham, Rob Anastasi, Adam Drozd, Matt Adams, Ju Row-Farr, Nick Tandavanitj, Anthony Steed, and Anthony Steed. 2004. Orchestrating a Mixed Reality Game ’on the Ground’. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 391–398. https://doi.org/10.1145/985692.985742Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Emily Dao, Andreea Muresan, Kasper Hornbæk, and Jarrod Knibbe. 2021. Bad Breakdowns, Useful Seams, and Face Slapping: Analysis of VR Fails on YouTube. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445435Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Nima Dehghani. 2016. Decompensation. http://www.nimadehghani.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Arnulf Deppermann. 2013. Multimodal Interaction from a Conversation Analytic Perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 46, 1 (Jan. 2013), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Paul Dourish and Graham Button. 1998. On ”Technomethodology”: Foundational Relationships Between Ethnomethodology and System Design. Human–Computer Interaction 13, 4 (Dec. 1998), 395–432. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1304_2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Paul Duguid. 2012. On Rereading Suchman and Situated Action. Le Libellio d’Aegis 8, 2 (2012), 3–11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Mustafa Emirbayer and Douglas W. Maynard. 2011. Pragmatism and Ethnomethodology. Qualitative Sociology; New York 34, 1 (March 2011), 221–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-010-9183-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Sheena Erete and Jennifer O. Burrell. 2017. Empowered Participation: How Citizens Use Technology in Local Governance. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2307–2319.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Sara Eriksson, Åsa Unander-Scharin, Vincent Trichon, Carl Unander-Scharin, Hedvig Kjellström, and Kristina Höök. 2019. Dancing With Drones: Crafting Novel Artistic Expressions Through Intercorporeality. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 617:1–617:12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300847Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Sarah Fdili Alaoui. 2019. Making an Interactive Dance Piece: Tensions in Integrating Technology in Art. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1195–1208. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322289Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Blanca Li Company (Film Addict - Calentito). 2020. Blanca Li. Event. Le Bal de Paris de Blanca Li. https://www.blancali.com/en/event/146/Le-Bal-de-Paris.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Diana Freed, Jackeline Palmer, Diana Minchala, Karen Levy, Thomas Ristenpart, and Nicola Dell. 2018. “A Stalker’s Paradise”: How Intimate Partner Abusers Exploit Technology. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Harold Garfinkel. 1991. Studies in Ethnomethodology(1 edition ed.). Polity, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. David Geerts, Evert van Beek, and Fernanda Chocron Miranda. 2019. Viewers’ Visions of the Future. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video(TVX ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1145/3317697.3323356Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Rebecca E. Grinter, W. Keith Edwards, Mark W. Newman, and Nicolas Ducheneaut. 2005. The Work to Make a Home Network Work. In ECSCW 2005, Hans Gellersen, Kjeld Schmidt, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, and Wendy Mackay (Eds.). Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 469–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4023-7_24Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Jan Gugenheimer, Evgeny Stemasov, Julian Frommel, and Enrico Rukzio. 2017. ShareVR: Enabling Co-Located Experiences for Virtual Reality Between HMD and Non-HMD Users. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4021–4033. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025683Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Giulio Iacucci, Carlo Iacucci, and Kari Kuutti. 2002. Imagining and Experiencing in Design, the Role of Performances. In Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction(NordiCHI ’02). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1145/572020.572040Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Etsuko Ichihara. 2014. 最高の求愛体験をあなたに。SRxSIxMS. http://etsuko-ichihara.com/works/最高の求愛体験をあなたに。srxsixms/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Alejandro G. Iñárritu. 2017. Carne y Arena. https://carne-y-arena.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Rachel Jacobs, Steve Benford, and Ewa Luger. 2015. Behind The Scenes at HCI’s Turn to the Arts. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732513Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Marie Jourdren. 2018. The Horrifically Real Virtuality. https://www.labiennale.org/en/cinema/2018/lineup/venice-virtual-reality/horrifically-real-virtuality.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Marie Jourdren and Mathias Chelebourg. 2017. Alice, the Virtual Reality Play. https://futureofstorytelling.org/project/alice-the-virtual-reality-play.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Shunichi Kasahara and Jun Rekimoto. 2014. JackIn: Integrating First-Person View with out-of-Body Vision Generation for Human-Human Augmentation. In Proceedings of the 5th Augmented Human International Conference (Kobe, Japan) (AH ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 46, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2582051.2582097Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Jarrod Knibbe, Jonas Schjerlund, Mathias Petraeus, and Kasper Hornb\a ek. 2018. The Dream Is Collapsing: The Experience of Exiting VR. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 483:1–483:13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174057Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Boriana Koleva, Ian Taylor, Steve Benford, Mike Fraser, Chris Greenhalgh, Holger Schnädelbach, Dirk vom Lehn, Christian Heath, Ju Row-Farr, and Matt Adams. 2001. Orchestrating a Mixed Reality Performance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Seattle, Washington, USA, 38–45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Veronika Krauß, Alexander Boden, Leif Oppermann, and René Reiners. 2021. Current Practices, Challenges, and Design Implications for Collaborative AR/VR Application Development. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445335Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Andreas Kunz, Markus Zank, Morten Fjeld, and Thomas Nescher. 2016. Real Walking in Virtual Environments for Factory Planning and Evaluation. Procedia CIRP 44 (Jan. 2016), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.086Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Eric Laurier. 2014. The Graphic Transcript: Poaching Comic Book Grammar for Inscribing the Visual, Spatial and Temporal Aspects of Action. Geography Compass 8, 4 (2014), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12123Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Corinne Linder. 2018. The Ordinary Circus Girl » Program • Biennale Internationale Des Arts Du Cirque • BIAC. https://www.biennale-cirque.com/en/program/the-ordinary-circus-girl-248.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Marie-G. Losseau and Yann Deval. 2020. Atlas. https://www.atlas-experience.xyz/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Tiffany Marques, Mário Vairinhos, and Pedro Almeida. 2019. How VR 360o Impacts the Immersion of the Viewer of Suspense AV Content. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video(TVX ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1145/3317697.3325120Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Tupac MARTIR. 2019. Cosmos Within Us - Memory Is All We Are. https://www.a-bahn.com/projects/cosmos-within-us.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Sebastian Marwecki and Patrick Baudisch. 2018. Scenograph: Fitting Real-Walking VR Experiences into Various Tracking Volumes. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology(UIST ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 511–520. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242587.3242648Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. John McCarthy and Peter Wright. 2004. Technology As Experience. interactions 11, 5 (Sept. 2004), 42–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/1015530.1015549Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Mark McGill, Daniel Boland, Roderick Murray-Smith, and Stephen Brewster. 2015. A Dose of Reality: Overcoming Usability Challenges in VR Head-Mounted Displays. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2143–2152. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702382Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Joshua McVeigh-Schultz, Max Kreminski, Keshav Prasad, Perry Hoberman, and Scott S. Fisher. 2018. Immersive Design Fiction: Using VR to Prototype Speculative Interfaces and Interaction Rituals Within a Virtual Storyworld. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 817–829. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196793Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Elisa D. Mekler and Kasper Hornbæk. 2019. A Framework for the Experience of Meaning in Human-Computer Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Paul Milgram and Fumio Kishino. 1994. A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays. IEICE Trans. Information Systems vol. E77-D, no. 12 (Dec. 1994), 1321–1329.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Michael Charles Neumann. 2020. The Trip. http://www.michaelcharlesneumann.com/the-trip/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Erika Shehan Poole, Marshini Chetty, Rebecca E. Grinter, and W. Keith Edwards. 2008. More than Meets the Eye: Transforming the User Experience of Home Network Management. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems(DIS ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, Cape Town, South Africa, 455–464. https://doi.org/10.1145/1394445.1394494Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Erika Shehan Poole, Marshini Chetty, Tom Morgan, Rebecca E. Grinter, and W. Keith Edwards. 2009. Computer Help at Home: Methods and Motivations for Informal Technical Support. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, Boston, MA, USA, 739–748. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518816Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Asreen Rostami. 2020. Interweaving Technology : Understanding the Design and Experience of Interactive Performances. Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Asreen Rostami, Emma Bexell, and Stefan Stanisic. 2018. The Shared Individual. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Stockholm, Sweden) (TEI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 511–516. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173225.3173299Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Asreen Rostami, Donald McMillan, Elena Márquez Segura, Chiara Rossitto, and Louise Barkhuus. 2017. Bio-Sensed and Embodied Participation in Interactive Performance. In Proceedings of the TEI ’17: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3024969.3024998Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Asreen Rostami, Chiara Rossitto, Louise Barkhuus, Jonathan Hook, Jarmo Laaksolahti, Robyn Taylor, Donald McMillan, Jocelyn Spence, and Julie Williamson. 2017. Design Fiction for Mixed-Reality Performances. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 498–505. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3027080Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Asreen Rostami, Chiara Rossitto, and Annika Waern. 2018. Frictional Realities: Enabling Immersion in Mixed-Reality Performances. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video(TVX ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210825.3210827Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Neelima Sailaja, Andy Crabtree, James Colley, Adrian Gradinar, Paul Coulton, Ian Forrester, Lianne Kerlin, and Phil Stenton. 2019. The Living Room of the Future. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video(TVX ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1145/3317697.3323360Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Sara Pérez Seijo. 2017. Immersive Journalism: From Audience to First-Person Experience of News. In Media and Metamedia Management. Springer, Cham, 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46068-0_14Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Marco Speicher, Christoph Rosenberg, Donald Degraen, Florian Daiber, and Antonio Krúger. 2019. Exploring Visual Guidance in 360-Degree Videos. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video(TVX ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3317697.3323350Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Lucy A. Suchman. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication.Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, US.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Keisuke Suzuki, Sohei Wakisaka, and Naotaka Fujii. 2012. Substitutional Reality System: A Novel Experimental Platform for Experiencing Alternative Reality. Scientific Reports 2, 1 (June 2012), 459. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00459Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Leila Takayama, Caroline Pantofaru, David Robson, Bianca Soto, and Michael Barry. 2012. Making Technology Homey: Finding Sources of Satisfaction and Meaning in Home Automation. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing(UbiComp ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 511–520. https://doi.org/10.1145/2370216.2370292Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Jordan Tannahill. 2017. Draw Me Close. https://www.nationaltheatre.org.uk/immersive/projects/draw-me-close.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Robyn Taylor, Guy Schofield, John Shearer, Jayne Wallace, Peter Wright, Pierre Boulanger, and Patrick Olivier. 2011. Designing from Within: Humanaquarium. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1855–1864. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979211Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Robyn Taylor, Jocelyn Spence, Brendan Walker, Bettina Nissen, and Peter Wright. 2017. Performing Research: Four Contributions to HCI. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4825–4837. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025751Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Jakob Tholander, Chiara Rossitto, Asreen Rostami, Yoshio Ishiguro, Takashi Miyaki, and Jun Rekimoto. 2021. Design in Action: Unpacking the Artists’ Role in Performance-Led Research. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445056Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Peter Tolmie, Andy Crabtree, Tom Rodden, Chris Greenhalgh, and Steve Benford. 2007. Making the Home Network at Home: Digital Housekeeping. In ECSCW 2007, Liam J. Bannon, Ina Wagner, Carl Gutwin, Richard H. R. Harper, and Kjeld Schmidt (Eds.). Springer, London, 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-031-5_18Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Kami Vaniea and Yasmeen Rashidi. 2016. Tales of Software Updates: The Process of Updating Software. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, San Jose, California, USA, 3215–3226. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858303Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Khrystyna Vasylevska and Hannes Kaufmann. 2017. Compressing VR: Fitting Large Virtual Environments within Limited Physical Space. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 37, 5 (Jan. 2017), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2017.3621226Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Mirjam Vosmeer and Ben Schouten. 2017. Project Orpheus A Research Study into 360° Cinematic VR. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video(TVX ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1145/3077548.3077559Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Julie R. Williamson, Mark McGill, and Khari Outram. 2019. PlaneVR: Social Acceptability of Virtual Reality for Aeroplane Passengers. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300310Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Rayoung Yang and Mark W. Newman. 2013. Learning from a Learning Thermostat: Lessons for Intelligent Systems for the Home. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing(UbiComp ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, Zurich, Switzerland, 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1145/2493432.2493489Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The Normal Natural Troubles of Virtual Reality in Mixed-Reality Performances

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            April 2022
            10459 pages
            ISBN:9781450391573
            DOI:10.1145/3491102

            Copyright © 2022 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 28 April 2022

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

            Upcoming Conference

            CHI '24
            CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            May 11 - 16, 2024
            Honolulu , HI , USA

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format