skip to main content
10.1145/3491102.3517580acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Strategies for Fostering a Genuine Feeling of Connection in Technologically Mediated Systems

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 April 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Human connection is essential for our personal well-being and a building block for a well-functioning society. There is a prominent interest in the potential of technology for mediating social connection, with a wealth of systems designed to foster the feeling of connection between strangers, friends, and family. By surveying this design landscape we present a transitional definition of mediated genuine connection and nine design strategies embodied within 50 design artifacts: affective self-disclosure, reflection on unity, shared embodied experience, transcendent emotions, embodied metaphors, interpersonal distance, touch, provocations, and play. In addition to drawing on design practice-based knowledge we also identify underlying psychological theories that can inform these strategies. We discuss design considerations pertaining to sensory modalities, vulnerability–comfort trade-offs, consent, situatedness in context, supporting diverse relationships, reciprocity, attention directedness, pursuing generalized knowledge, and questions of ethics. We hope to inspire and enrich designers’ understanding of the possibilities of technology to better support a mediated genuine feeling of connection.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3491102.3517580-talk-video.mp4

mp4

97.5 MB

References

  1. Joshua M Ackerman, Christopher C Nocera, and John A Bargh. 2010. Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Science 328, 5986 (2010), 1712–1715.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Peter Andersen, Jillian Gannon, and Jessica Kalchik. 2013. Proxemic and haptic interaction: the closeness continuum. In Nonverbal communication. De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin, Chapter Chapter 11, 295–330.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Michael Argyle and Janet Dean. 1965. Eye-Contact, Distance and Affiliation. Sociometry 28, 3 (1965), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786027 Publisher: [American Sociological Association, Sage Publications, Inc.].Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Arthur Aron and Elaine N Aron. 1997. Self-expansion motivation and including other in the self. In Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, 251–270.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Arthur Aron, Elaine N Aron, and Christina Norman. 2004. Self-expansion Model of Motivation and Cognition in Close Relationships and Beyond.In Self and social identity, M. B. Brewer & M. Hewstone (Ed.). Blackwell Publishing, New York, 99–123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Philip J Auter and Donald M Davis. 1991. When characters speak directly to viewers: Breaking the fourth wall in television. Journalism Quarterly 68, 1-2 (1991), 165–171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Lisa Feldman Barrett. 2006. Are emotions natural kinds?Perspectives on psychological science 1, 1 (2006), 28–58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Lisa Feldman Barrett, Batja Mesquita, Kevin N Ochsner, and James J Gross. 2007. The experience of emotion. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58(2007), 373–403.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Lisa Feldman Barrett and Christiana Westlin. 2021. Navigating the science of emotion. In Emotion measurement. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 39–84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jennifer A Bartz, Jamil Zaki, Niall Bolger, and Kevin N Ochsner. 2011. Social effects of oxytocin in humans: context and person matter. Trends in cognitive sciences 15, 7 (2011), 301–309.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Roy F Baumeister and Mark R Leary. 1995. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.Psychological bulletin 117, 3 (1995), 497.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. BeAnotherLab. 2012. The Machine to be Another. Retrieved September 8, 2021 from http://beanotherlab.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Gabriella Giannachi, Brendan Walker, Joe Marshall, and Tom Rodden. 2012. Uncomfortable interactions. In Proceedings of the sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’12). 2005–2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Philippe Bertrand, Jérôme Guegan, Léonore Robieux, Cade Andrew McCall, and Franck Zenasni. 2018. Learning empathy through virtual reality: multiple strategies for training empathy-related abilities using body ownership illusions in embodied virtual reality. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5 (2018), 26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Frank Biocca, Chad Harms, and Judee K Burgoon. 2003. Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators & virtual environments 12, 5(2003), 456–480.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Paul Bloom. 2017. Empathy and its discontents. Trends in cognitive sciences 21, 1 (2017), 24–31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. John Bowlby. 1978. Attachment theory and its therapeutic implications.Adolescent psychiatry(1978).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Marilynn B Brewer. 1979. In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis.Psychological bulletin 86, 2 (1979), 307.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Brené Brown. 2012. Daring greatly: How the courage to be vulnerable transforms the way we live, love, parent, and lead. Penguin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Sophia Brueckner. 2018. Empathy amulet: a wearable to connect with strangers. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 248–253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Kathleen Glascott Burriss and Ling-Ling Tsao. 2002. Review of research: How much do we know about the importance of play in child development?Childhood Education 78, 4 (2002), 230–233.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. David Byrne. 2017. Eliminating the human. MIT Technol. Rev. 120, 5 (2017), 8–10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. John T Cacioppo and Louise C Hawkley. 2009. Perceived social isolation and cognition. Trends in cognitive sciences 13, 10 (2009), 447–454.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Stephanie Cacioppo and John T Cacioppo. 2012. Decoding the invisible forces of social connections. Frontiers in integrative neuroscience 6 (2012), 51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. T. Nikki Cesare Schotzko. 2020. A year (in five months) of living dangerously: hidden intimacies in Zoom exigencies. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media 16, 3 (Sept. 2020), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794713.2020.1827206Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Adrian David Cheok. 2010. Huggy pajama: A remote interactive touch and hugging system. In Art and technology of entertainment computing and communication. Springer, 161–194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Alice Chirico, Francesco Ferrise, Lorenzo Cordella, and Andrea Gaggioli. 2018. Designing awe in virtual reality: An experimental study. Frontiers in psychology 8 (2018), 2351.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Anna Ciaunica, Luke McEllin, Julian Kiverstein, Vittorio Gallese, Jakob Hohwy, and Mateusz Woźniak. 2022. Zoomed out: digital media use and depersonalization experiences during the COVID-19 lockdown. Scientific Reports 12, 1 (March 2022), 3888. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07657-8 Number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Emma EA Cohen, Robin Ejsmond-Frey, Nicola Knight, and Robin IM Dunbar. 2010. Rowers’ high: behavioural synchrony is correlated with elevated pain thresholds. Biology letters 6, 1 (2010), 106–108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. John W Creswell and J David Creswell. 2017. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and Mihaly Csikzentmihaly. 1990. Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Vol. 1990. Harper & Row New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Antonio R Damasio. 1994. Descartes’ error: Emotion, rationality and the human brain. New York: Putnam 352(1994).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Martin Davies. 2011. Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: what are the differences and do they matter?Higher education 62, 3 (2011), 279–301.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Frederique de Vignemont and Tania Singer. 2006. The empathic brain: how, when and why?Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10, 10 (Oct. 2006), 435–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Emilie Delaherche, Mohamed Chetouani, Ammar Mahdhaoui, Catherine Saint-Georges, Sylvie Viaux, and David Cohen. 2012. Interpersonal synchrony: A survey of evaluation methods across disciplines. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 3, 3 (2012), 349–365.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. John Desnoyers-Stewart. 2018. Transcending Perception. Ph.D. Dissertation. Faculty of Media, Art, and Performance, University of Regina.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. John Desnoyers-Stewart, Ekaterina R. Stepanova, and Bernhard E. Riecke. 2022. Methods for Investigating Social Connection in Technologically Mediated Experiences. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) (2022). (in preparation).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. John Desnoyers-Stewart, Ekaterina R Stepanova, Bernhard E Riecke, and Patrick Pennefather. 2020. Body RemiXer: extending bodies to stimulate social connection in an immersive installation. Leonardo 53, 4 (2020), 394–400.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Ed Diener and Martin EP Seligman. 2002. Very happy people. Psychological science 13, 1 (2002), 81–84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Suzanne Dikker, Sean Montgomery, and Suzan Tunca. 2019. Using synchrony-based neurofeedback in search of human connectedness. In Brain Art. Springer, 161–206.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Donald G Dutton and Arthur P Aron. 1974. Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety.Journal of personality and social psychology 30, 4(1974), 510.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Ryan J Dwyer, Kostadin Kushlev, and Elizabeth W Dunn. 2018. Smartphone use undermines enjoyment of face-to-face social interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 78 (2018), 233–239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Abdallah El Ali, Xingyu Yang, Swamy Ananthanarayan, Thomas Röggla, Jack Jansen, Jess Hartcher-O’Brien, Kaspar Jansen, and Pablo Cesar. 2020. ThermalWear: Exploring Wearable On-chest Thermal Displays to Augment Voice Messages with Affect. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Michiel van Elk, M. Andrea Arciniegas Gomez, Wietske van der Zwaag, Hein T. van Schie, and Disa Sauter. 2019. The neural correlates of the awe experience: Reduced default mode network activity during feelings of awe. Human Brain Mapping 40, 12 (2019), 3561–3574. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24616Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Nicholas Epley and Juliana Schroeder. 2014. Mistakenly seeking solitude.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143, 5 (2014), 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Sara Eriksson, Åsa Unander-Scharin, Vincent Trichon, Carl Unander-Scharin, Hedvig Kjellström, and Kristina Höök. 2019. Dancing with drones: Crafting novel artistic expressions through intercorporeality. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. John Desnoyers-Stewart et al.2020. Body RemiXer [online]. Retrieved September 8, 2021 from http://ispace.iat.sfu.ca/project/body-remixer/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Milou A Feijt, Joyce HDM Westerink, Yvonne AW De Kort, and Wijnand A IJsselsteijn. 2021. Sharing biosignals: An analysis of the experiential and communication properties of interpersonal psychophysiology. Human–Computer Interaction(2021), 1–30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Lawrence K Frank. 1958. Tactile communication. ETC: a Review of General Semantics(1958), 31–79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Jérémy Frey, May Grabli, Ronit Slyper, and Jessica R Cauchard. 2018. Breeze: Sharing biofeedback through wearable technologies. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Thomas Fuchs. 2016. Intercorporeality and interaffectivity. Intercorporeality: Emerging socialities in interaction (2016), 194–209.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Shaun Gallagher, Bruce Janz, Lauren Reinerman, Jörg Trempler, and Patricia Bockelman. 2015. A neurophenomenology of awe and wonder: Towards a non-reductionist cognitive science. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Vittorio Gallese. 2007. Before and below ‘theory of mind’: embodied simulation and the neural correlates of social cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 362, 1480 (2007), 659–669.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Liridona Gashi, Sveinung Sandberg, and Willy Pedersen. 2021. Making “bad trips” good: How users of psychedelics narratively transform challenging trips into valuable experiences. International Journal of Drug Policy 87 (2021), 102997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Renaud Gervais, Jérémy Frey, Alexis Gay, Fabien Lotte, and Martin Hachet. 2016. Tobe: Tangible out-of-body experience. In Proceedings of the TEI’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. 227–235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. David R Glowacki, Mark D Wonnacott, Rachel Freire, Becca R Glowacki, Ella M Gale, James E Pike, Tiu de Haan, Mike Chatziapostolou, and Oussama Metatla. 2020. Isness: using multi-person VR to design peak mystical type experiences comparable to psychedelics. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Daniel Gooch and Leon Watts. 2012. YourGloves, hothands and hotmits: devices to hold hands at a distance. In Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 157–166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Amie M Gordon, Jennifer E Stellar, Craig L Anderson, Galen D McNeil, Daniel Loew, and Dacher Keltner. 2017. The dark side of the sublime: Distinguishing a threat-based variant of awe.Journal of personality and social psychology 113, 2(2017), 310.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Colin M Gray, Yubo Kou, Bryan Battles, Joseph Hoggatt, and Austin L Toombs. 2018. The dark (patterns) side of UX design. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Roland R Griffiths, Matthew W Johnson, William A Richards, Brian D Richards, Robert Jesse, Katherine A MacLean, Frederick S Barrett, Mary P Cosimano, and Maggie A Klinedinst. 2018. Psilocybin-occasioned mystical-type experience in combination with meditation and other spiritual practices produces enduring positive changes in psychological functioning and in trait measures of prosocial attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Psychopharmacology 32, 1 (2018), 49–69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Jens Emil Grønbæk, Mille Skovhus Knudsen, Kenton O’Hara, Peter Gall Krogh, Jo Vermeulen, and Marianne Graves Petersen. 2020. Proxemics beyond proximity: Designing for flexible social interaction through cross-device interaction. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Antal Haans and Wijnand IJsselsteijn. 2006. Mediated social touch: a review of current research and future directions. Virtual Reality 9, 2-3 (2006), 149–159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Edward Twitchell Hall. 1966. The hidden dimension. Vol. 609. Doubleday, Garden City, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Donna Haraway. 2006. A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late 20th century. In The international handbook of virtual learning environments. Springer, 117–158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Ido Hartogsohn. 2016. Set and setting, psychedelics and the placebo response: an extra-pharmacological perspective on psychopharmacology. Journal of Psychopharmacology 30, 12 (2016), 1259–1267.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Marc Hassenzahl, Stephanie Heidecker, Kai Eckoldt, Sarah Diefenbach, and Uwe Hillmann. 2012. All you need is love: Current strategies of mediating intimate relationships through technology. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 19, 4(2012), 1–19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Louise C Hawkley and John T Cacioppo. 2010. Loneliness matters: A theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Annals of behavioral medicine 40, 2 (2010), 218–227.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Jeppe Hein. 2005. Modified Social Benches 1-10. Retrieved September 8, 2021 from https://www.jeppehein.net/project_id.php?path=works&id=126Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Annabell Ho, Jeff Hancock, and Adam S Miner. 2018. Psychological, relational, and emotional effects of self-disclosure after conversations with a chatbot. Journal of Communication 68, 4 (2018), 712–733.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Mads Hobye and Jonas Löwgren. 2011. Touching a stranger: Designing for engaging experience in embodied interaction. International Journal of Design 5, 3 (2011), 31–48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Katie Hoemann, Zulqarnain Khan, Mallory J Feldman, Catie Nielson, Madeleine Devlin, Jennifer Dy, Lisa Feldman Barrett, Jolie B Wormwood, and Karen S Quigley. 2020. Context-aware experience sampling reveals the scale of variation in affective experience. Scientific reports 10, 1 (2020), 1–16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Kristina Höök. 2018. Designing with the body: Somaesthetic interaction design. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Noura Howell, Greg Niemeyer, and Kimiko Ryokai. 2019. Life-affirming biosensing in public: Sounding heartbeats on a red bench. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Cendri A Hutcherson, Emma M Seppala, and James J Gross. 2015. The neural correlates of social connection. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 15, 1(2015), 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Don Ihde. 2009. Postphenomenology and technoscience: The Peking university lectures. Suny Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Tristen K Inagaki and Lauren P Ross. 2020. A body-to-mind perspective on social connection: Physical warmth potentiates brain activity to close others and subsequent feelings of social connection.Emotion (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Katherine Isbister, Suzanne Kirkpatrick, Syed Salahuddin, Raybit Tang, Gang Cao, Xiaofeng Chen, and Elena Márquez Segura. 2016. Yamove! A movement synchrony game that choreographs social interaction.Human technology 12, 1 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Valerie J Janesick. 2015. ” Stretching” exercises for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Joris H Janssen, Jeremy N Bailenson, Wijnand A IJsselsteijn, and Joyce HDM Westerink. 2010. Intimate heartbeats: Opportunities for affective communication technology. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 1, 2 (2010), 72–80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Joris H Janssen, Wijnand A Ijsselsteijn, and Joyce HDM Westerink. 2014. How affective technologies can influence intimate interactions and improve social connectedness. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 72, 1 (2014), 33–43.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Simo Järvelä, Benjamin Cowley, Mikko Salminen, Giulio Jacucci, Juho Hamari, and Niklas Ravaja. 2021. Augmented Virtual Reality Meditation: Shared Dyadic Biofeedback Increases Social Presence Via Respiratory Synchrony. ACM Transactions on Social Computing 4, 2 (2021), 1–19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Daniel Kahneman, Alan B Krueger, David A Schkade, Norbert Schwarz, and Arthur A Stone. 2004. A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science 306, 5702 (2004), 1776–1780.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. Joseph ‘Jofish’ Kaye, Mariah K Levitt, Jeffrey Nevins, Jessica Golden, and Vanessa Schmidt. 2005. Communicating intimacy one bit at a time. In CHI’05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. 1529–1532.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Dacher Keltner and Alan Cowen. 2021. A taxonomy of positive emotions. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 39 (2021), 216–221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  85. Dacher Keltner and Jonathan Haidt. 2003. Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition and emotion 17, 2 (2003), 297–314.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Matthew A Killingsworth and Daniel T Gilbert. 2010. A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science 330, 6006 (2010), 932–932.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. Alexandra Kitson, Alice Chirico, Andrea Gaggioli, and Bernhard E. Riecke. 2020. A Review on Research and Evaluation Methods for Investigating Self-transcendence. Frontiers in Psychology(2020). Research Topic: Towards a Science of Complex Experiences.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Alexandra Kitson, Mirjana Prpa, and Bernhard E Riecke. 2018. Immersive interactive technologies for positive change: a scoping review and design considerations. Frontiers in psychology 9 (2018), 1354.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Alexandra Kitson, Ekaterina R Stepanova, Ivan A Aguilar, Natasha Wainwright, and Bernhard E Riecke. 2020. Designing Mind (set) and Setting for Profound Emotional Experiences in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 655–668.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. Martijn JL Kors, Gabriele Ferri, Erik D Van Der Spek, Cas Ketel, and Ben AM Schouten. 2016. A breathtaking journey. On the design of an empathy-arousing mixed-reality game. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. 91–104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. Zoltán Kövecses. 2000. Universality in the Conceptualization of Emotions. In Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling, Raymond W. Jr. Gibbs (Ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 380–396. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.023Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  92. Kostadin Kushlev, Ryan Dwyer, and Elizabeth W Dunn. 2019. The social price of constant connectivity: Smartphones impose subtle costs on well-being. Current Directions in Psychological Science 28, 4 (2019), 347–352.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. Simon Lacey, Randall Stilla, and Krish Sathian. 2012. Metaphorically feeling: comprehending textural metaphors activates somatosensory cortex. Brain and language 120, 3 (2012), 416–421.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. George Lakoff and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. Michael Larkin, Virginia Eatough, and Mike Osborn. 2011. Interpretative phenomenological analysis and embodied, active, situated cognition. Theory & Psychology 21, 3 (2011), 318–337.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  96. Jacques Launay, Bronwyn Tarr, and Robin IM Dunbar. 2016. Synchrony as an adaptive mechanism for large-scale human social bonding. Ethology 122, 10 (2016), 779–789.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  97. Jean-Philippe Laurenceau, Lisa Feldman Barrett, and Paula R Pietromonaco. 1998. Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges.Journal of personality and social psychology 74, 5(1998), 1238.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Geneviève L Lavigne, Robert J Vallerand, and Laurence Crevier-Braud. 2011. The fundamental need to belong: On the distinction between growth and deficit-reduction orientations. Personality and social psychology bulletin 37, 9 (2011), 1185–1201.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  99. Richard M Lee and Steven B Robbins. 1995. Measuring belongingness: The social connectedness and the social assurance scales.Journal of counseling psychology 42, 2 (1995), 232.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. Yi-Chieh Lee, Naomi Yamashita, Yun Huang, and Wai Fu. 2020. ” I Hear You, I Feel You”: Encouraging Deep Self-disclosure through a Chatbot. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  101. Nicholas Leigh-Hunt, David Bagguley, Kristin Bash, Victoria Turner, Stephen Turnbull, N Valtorta, and Woody Caan. 2017. An overview of systematic reviews on the public health consequences of social isolation and loneliness. Public health 152(2017), 157–171.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. Jeff Levin and Lea Steele. 2005. The transcendent experience: conceptual, theoretical, and epidemiologic perspectives. Explore 1, 2 (2005), 89–101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  103. Mark Levine, Amy Prosser, David Evans, and Stephen Reicher. 2005. Identity and emergency intervention: How social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Personality and social psychology bulletin 31, 4 (2005), 443–453.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. Hong Li, Jonna Häkkilä, and Kaisa Väänänen. 2018. Review of unconventional user interfaces for emotional communication between long-distance partners. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  105. Jing-Jing Li, Kai Dou, Yu-Jie Wang, and Yan-Gang Nie. 2019. Why awe promotes prosocial behaviors? The mediating effects of future time perspective and self-transcendence meaning of life. Frontiers in psychology 10 (2019), 1140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  106. Fannie Liu, Mario Esparza, Maria Pavlovskaia, Geoff Kaufman, Laura Dabbish, and Andrés Monroy-Hernández. 2019. Animo: Sharing biosignals on a smartwatch for lightweight social connection. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 3, 1 (2019), 1–19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  107. Fannie Liu, Chunjong Park, Yu Jiang Tham, Tsung-Yu Tsai, Laura Dabbish, Geoff Kaufman, and Andrés Monroy-Hernández. 2021. Significant Otter: Understanding the Role of Biosignals in Communication. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 334, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445200Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  108. Joan Llobera, Bernhard Spanlang, Giulio Ruffini, and Mel Slater. 2010. Proxemics with Multiple Dynamic Characters in an Immersive Virtual Environment. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 8, 1, Article 3 (Nov. 2010), 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1857893.1857896Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  109. Matthew Lombard and Matthew T Jones. 2015. Defining presence. In Immersed in Media. Springer, 13–34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  110. Gilad Lotan and Christian Croft. 2007. Impulse. In CHI’07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1983–1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  111. Rafael Lozano-Hemmer. 2019. Remote Pulse. Retrieved September 8, 2021 from https://www.lozano-hemmer.com/remote_pulse.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. Ewa Lux, Marc T. P. Adam, Verena Dorner, Sina Helming, Michael T. Knierim, and Christof Weinhardt. 2018. Live Biofeedback as a User Interface Design Element: A Review of the Literature. Communications of the Association for Information Systems (2018), 257–296. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04318Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  113. Neha Mahajan and Karen Wynn. 2012. Origins of “Us” versus “Them”: Prelinguistic infants prefer similar others. Cognition 124, 2 (Aug. 2012), 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  114. Kerry L. Marsh, Michael J. Richardson, and R. C. Schmidt. 2009. Social Connection Through Joint Action and Interpersonal Coordination. Topics in Cognitive Science 1, 2 (April 2009), 320–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01022.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  115. Joe Marshall and Paul Tennent. 2017. Touchomatic: Interpersonal Touch Gaming In The Wild. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, Edinburgh United Kingdom, 417–428. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064727Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  116. Helena M. Mentis, Jarmo Laaksolahti, and Kristina Höök. 2014. My Self and You: Tension in Bodily Sharing of Experience. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 21, 4 (Aug. 2014), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/2617945Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  117. Maurice Merleau-Ponty. 1964. Signs. Northwestern University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  118. Raphaël Millière, Robin L. Carhart-Harris, Leor Roseman, Fynn-Mathis Trautwein, and Aviva Berkovich-Ohana. 2018. Psychedelics, Meditation, and Self-Consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology 9 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01475 Publisher: Frontiers.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  119. Hyeryung Christine Min and Tek-Jin Nam. 2014. Biosignal sharing for affective connectedness. ACM, 2191–2196. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2581345Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  120. Kate E. Min, Peggy J. Liu, and Soo Kim. 2018. Sharing Extraordinary Experiences Fosters Feelings of Closeness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 44, 1 (Jan. 2018), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217733077Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  121. Robb Mitchell and Laurens Boer. 2017. Move Closer: Towards Design Patterns To Support Initiating Social Encounters. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2781–2787. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3053230Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  122. Jelena Mladenović, Jérémy Frey, and Jessica R. Cauchard. 2018. DiÅ¡imo: Anchoring Our Breath. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’18. ACM Press, Montreal QC, Canada, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3186517Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  123. Stuart Moran, Nils Jäger, Holger Schnädelbach, and Kevin Glover. 2016. ExoPranayama: a biofeedback-driven actuated environment for supporting yoga breathing practices. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 20, 2 (Jan. 2016), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-016-0910-3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  124. Katherine Moriwaki. 2002. Recoil. Retrieved September 8, 2021 from http://www.kakirine.com/?p=14Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  125. Nima Motamedi. 2007. Keep in touch: a tactile-vision intimate interface. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction. 21–22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  126. Florian Mueller, Sophie Stellmach, Saul Greenberg, Andreas Dippon, Susanne Boll, Jayden Garner, Rohit Khot, Amani Naseem, and David Altimira. 2014. Proxemics play: understanding proxemics for designing digital play experiences. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems. ACM, Vancouver BC Canada, 533–542. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598532Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  127. Florian ’Floyd’ Mueller, Frank Vetere, Martin R. Gibbs, Jesper Kjeldskov, Sonja Pedell, and Steve Howard. 2005. Hug over a Distance. In CHI ’05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1673–1676. https://doi.org/10.1145/1056808.1056994Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  128. Craig D. Murray and Judith Sixsmith. 1999. The Corporeal Body in Virtual Reality. Ethos 27, 3 (1999), 315–343. https://www.jstor.org/stable/640592 Publisher: [American Anthropological Association, Wiley].Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  129. Rebecca Nowland, Elizabeth A. Necka, and John T. Cacioppo. 2018. Loneliness and Social Internet Use: Pathways to Reconnection in a Digital World?Perspectives on Psychological Science 13, 1 (Jan. 2018), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617713052Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  130. Claudia Núñez Pacheco and Lian Loke. 2020. Getting into someone else’s soul: communicating embodied experience. Digital Creativity 31, 4 (Oct. 2020), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2020.1835987Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  131. Catherine S Oh, Jeremy N Bailenson, and Gregory F Welch. 2018. A systematic review of social presence: Definition, antecedents, and implications. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5 (2018), 114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  132. Thomas Olsson, Pradthana Jarusriboonchai, Pawel Woźniak, Susanna Paasovaara, Kaisa Väänänen, and Andrés Lucero. 2020. Technologies for Enhancing Collocated Social Interaction: Review of Design Solutions and Approaches. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 29, 1 (April 2020), 29–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-019-09345-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  133. Beste Özcan and Valerio Sperati. 2020. Lokahi: The Wearable Body Pillow to Foster an Intimate Interaction Between Two Users Through Their Heartbeat Awareness. In HCI International 2020 Late Breaking Posters(Communications in Computer and Information Science), Constantine Stephanidis, Margherita Antona, and Stavroula Ntoa (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 421–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60703-6_54Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  134. Susanna Paasovaara, Andrés Lucero, and Thomas Olsson. 2016. Outlining the design space of playful interactions between nearby strangers. In Proceedings of the 20th International Academic Mindtrek Conference. ACM, Tampere Finland, 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1145/2994310.2994344Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  135. Maria-Paola Paladino, Mara Mazzurega, Francesco Pavani, and Thomas W. Schubert. 2010. Synchronous Multisensory Stimulation Blurs Self-Other Boundaries. Psychological Science 21, 9 (Sept. 2010), 1202–1207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610379234Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  136. Maja Petric. 2018. We are all Made of Light. Retrieved September 8, 2021 from https://www.majapetric.com/waamol1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  137. Sydney Pratte, Anthony Tang, and Lora Oehlberg. 2021. Evoking Empathy: A Framework for Describing Empathy Tools. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(Salzburg, Austria) (TEI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 25, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3430524.3440644Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  138. Sara Price, Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze, Carey Jewitt, Nikoleta Yiannoutsou, Katerina Fotopoulou, Svetlana Dajic, Juspreet Virdee, Yixin Zhao, Douglas Atkinson, and Frederik Brudy. 2022. The making of meaning through dyadic haptic affective touch. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 29, 3(2022), 1–42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  139. René Proyer. 2013. The well-being of playful adults: Adult playfulness, subjective well-being, physical well-being, and the pursuit of enjoyable activities. The European Journal of Humour Research 1, 1 (March 2013), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2013.1.1.proyer Number: 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  140. Mirjana Prpa, Ekaterina R. Stepanova, Thecla Schiphorst, Bernhard E. Riecke, and Philippe Pasquier. 2020. Inhaling and Exhaling: How Technologies Can Perceptually Extend Our Breath Awareness. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi-org.proxy.lib.sfu.ca/10.1145/3313831.3376183Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  141. María Puig de la Bellacasa. 2017. Matters of care: speculative ethics in more than human worlds. OCLC: 1078220020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  142. Chao Ying Qin, Jun-Ho Choi, Marios Constantinides, Luca Maria Aiello, and Daniele Quercia. 2020. Having a Heart Time? A Wearable-based Biofeedback System. In 22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, Oldenburg Germany, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3406324.3410539Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  143. Denise Quesnel, Ekaterina R Stepanova, Ivan A Aguilar, Patrick Pennefather, and Bernhard E Riecke. 2018. Creating AWE: artistic and scientific practices in research-based design for exploring a profound immersive installation. In 2018 IEEE Games, Entertainment, Media Conference (GEM). IEEE, 1–207.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  144. Matthew Ratcliffe. 2008. Touch and Situatedness. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16, 3 (July 2008), 299–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672550802110827Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  145. Johan Redstrom. 2017. Making Design Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  146. Harry T. Reis and Shaver, Phillip. 1988. Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In Relationships, Well-Being and Behaviour. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203732496-5 Pages: 113-143 Publication Title: Relationships, Well-Being and Behaviour.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  147. Harry T. Reis, Kennon M. Sheldon, Shelly L. Gable, Joseph Roscoe, and Richard M. Ryan. 2000. Daily Well-Being: The Role of Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26, 4 (April 2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200266002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  148. Miriam Rennung and Anja S. Göritz. 2016. Prosocial consequences of interpersonal synchrony: A meta-analysis. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 224, 3 (2016), 168–189. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000252Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  149. Raquel Breejon Robinson, Elizabeth Reid, Ansgar E. Depping, Regan Mandryk, James Collin Fey, and Katherine Isbister. 2019. ’In the Same Boat’,: A Game of Mirroring Emotions for Enhancing Social Play. ACM, INT011. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3313268Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  150. Raquel Breejon Robinson, Elizabeth Reid, James Collin Fey, Ansgar E Depping, Katherine Isbister, and Regan L Mandryk. 2020. Designing and Evaluating’In the Same Boat’, A Game of Embodied Synchronization for Enhancing Social Play. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  151. Richard M Ryan and Edward L Deci. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.American psychologist 55, 1 (2000), 68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  152. M. Salminen, S. Járvelá, A. Ruonala, V. Harjunen, G. Jacucci, J. Hamari, and N. Ravaja. 2019. Evoking Physiological Synchrony and Empathy Using Social VR with Biofeedback. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing(2019), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2019.2958657 Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  153. Robert M. Sapolsky. 2017. Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst. Penguin. Google-Books-ID: sJKoDAAAQBAJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  154. Robert M. Sapolsky. 2018. Doubled-Edged Swords in the Biology of Conflict. Frontiers in Psychology 9 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02625 Publisher: Frontiers.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  155. Betty Sargeant, Justin Dwyer, and Florian ’Floyd’ Mueller. 2020. Designing for Virtual Touch: A Real-Time Co-Created Online Art Experience. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM, Virtual Event Canada, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1145/3383668.3419936Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  156. Thecla Schiphorst. 2005. exhale: (breath between bodies). In SIGGRAPH ’05 Emerging technologies. ACM, Los Angeles, CA, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  157. Thecla Schiphorst. 2006. Breath, skin and clothing: Using wearable technologies as an interface into ourselves. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media 2, 2 (Jan. 2006), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1386/padm.2.2.171_1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  158. Thecla Schiphorst and Kristina Andersen. 2004. Between Bodies: using Experience Modeling to Create Gestural Protocols for Physiological Data Transfer. Vienna, Austria, 8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  159. Thecla Schiphorst, Frank Nack, Michiel KauwATjoe, Simon de Bakker, Stock, Lora Aroyo, Angel Perez Rosillio, Hielke Schut, and Norm Jaffe. 2007. PillowTalk: can we afford intimacy?. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction(TEI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/1226969.1226975Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  160. Raymond Scupin. 1997. The KJ method: A technique for analyzing data derived from Japanese ethnology. Human organization 56, 2 (1997), 233–237.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  161. Samarth Singhal, Carman Neustaedter, Yee Loong Ooi, Alissa N. Antle, and Brendan Matkin. 2017. Flex-N-Feel: The Design and Evaluation of Emotive Gloves for Couples to Support Touch Over Distance. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing(CSCW ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998247Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  162. Petr Slovák, Joris Janssen, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2012. Understanding heart rate sharing: towards unpacking physiosocial space. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 859–868.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  163. Meehae Song, Tamiko Tadeo, Ioana Sandor, Servet Ulas, and Steve DiPaola. 2019. BioFlockVR: exploring visual entrainment through amorphous nature phenomena in bio-responsive multi-immersant VR interactives. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Image and Graphics Processing - ICIGP ’19. ACM Press, Singapore, Singapore, 150–154. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313950.3313978Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  164. Dominic Spohr. 2017. Fake news and ideological polarization: Filter bubbles and selective exposure on social media. Business Information Review 34, 3 (Sept. 2017), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382117722446Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  165. Jaakko Stenros, Janne Paavilainen, and Frans Mäyrä. 2009. The many faces of sociability and social play in games. In Proceedings of the 13th International MindTrek Conference: Everyday Life in the Ubiquitous Era on - MindTrek ’09. ACM Press, Tampere, Finland, 82. https://doi.org/10.1145/1621841.1621857Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  166. Ekaterina R Stepanova, John Desnoyers-Stewart, Philippe Pasquier, and Bernhard E Riecke. 2020. JeL: Breathing Together to Connect with Others and Nature. In ACM DIS. ACM, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 1–14. https://youtu.be/vwb4jX4x-c4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  167. Ekaterina R. Stepanova, Denise Quesnel, and Bernhard E. Riecke. 2019. Understanding AWE: Can a Virtual Journey, Inspired by the Overview Effect, Lead to an Increased Sense of Interconnectedness?Frontiers in Digital Humanities 6 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fdigh.2019.00009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  168. Erik Stolterman. 2008. The nature of design practice and implications for interaction design research. International Journal of Design 2, 1 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  169. Anna Ståhl, Martin Jonsson, Johanna Mercurio, Anna Karlsson, Kristina Höök, and Eva-Carin Banka Johnson. 2016. The Soma Mat and Breathing Light. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 305–308. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2889464Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  170. Xiaotian Sun and Kiyoshi Tomimatsu. 2017. Breath Is to Be Perceived - Breathing Signal Sharing Involved in Remote Emotional Communication. In Distributed, Ambient and Pervasive Interactions(Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Norbert Streitz and Panos Markopoulos (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, 472–481.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  171. Henri Tajfel. 1970. Experiments in Intergroup Discrimination. Scientific American 223, 5 (1970), 96–103. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24927662 Publisher: Scientific American, a division of Nature America, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  172. Shogo Tanaka. 2015. Intercorporeality as a theory of social cognition. Theory & Psychology 25, 4 (Aug. 2015), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354315583035Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  173. Bronwyn Tarr, Jacques Launay, and Robin I. M. Dunbar. 2014. Music and social bonding: “self-other” merging and neurohormonal mechanisms. Frontiers in Psychology 5 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01096Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  174. Alex S Taylor. 2009. Machine intelligence. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2109–2118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  175. Nađa Terzimehić, Renate Häuslschmid, Heinrich Hussmann, and m.c. schraefel. 2019. A Review & Analysis of Mindfulness Research in HCI: Framing Current Lines of Research and Future Opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300687Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  176. National Theatre. 2020. Draw Me Closer. Retrieved September 8, 2021 from https://www.nationaltheatre.org.uk/immersive/projects/draw-me-closeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  177. Alison Tonkin and Julia Whitaker. 2021. Play and playfulness for health and wellbeing: A panacea for mitigating the impact of coronavirus (COVID 19). Social Sciences & Humanities Open 4, 1 (Jan. 2021), 100142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100142Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  178. Sonja Utz. 2015. The function of self-disclosure on social network sites: Not only intimate, but also positive and entertaining self-disclosures increase the feeling of connection. Computers in Human Behavior 45 (April 2015), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.076Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  179. Josca van Houwelingen-Snippe, Thomas J. L. van Rompay, and Somaya Ben Allouch. 2020. Feeling Connected after Experiencing Digital Nature: A Survey Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, 18 (Jan. 2020), 6879. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186879 Number: 18 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  180. Julia Werner, Reto Wettach, and Eva Hornecker. 2008. United-pulse: feeling your partner’s pulse. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services. 535–538.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  181. Mary E. Wheeler and Susan T. Fiske. 2005. Controlling Racial Prejudice: Social-Cognitive Goals Affect Amygdala and Stereotype Activation. Psychological Science 16, 1 (Jan. 2005), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00780.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  182. Brenda K. Wiederhold. 2020. Connecting Through Technology During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: Avoiding “Zoom Fatigue”. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 23, 7 (July 2020), 437–438. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.29188.bkwGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  183. Valtteri Wikström, Tommi Makkonen, and Katri Saarikivi. 2017. SynKin: A Game for Intentionally Synchronizing Biosignals. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, Denver, Colorado, USA, 3005–3011. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3053195Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  184. L. E. Williams and J. A. Bargh. 2008. Experiencing Physical Warmth Promotes Interpersonal Warmth. Science 322, 5901 (Oct. 2008), 606–607. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1162548Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  185. Harry Robert Wilson. 2020. New ways of seeing, feeling, being: intimate encounters in virtual reality performance. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media 16, 2 (May 2020), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794713.2020.1770531Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  186. R Michael Winters, Bruce N Walker, and Grace Leslie. 2021. Can You Hear My Heartbeat?: Hearing an Expressive Biosignal Elicits Empathy. (2021), 11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  187. Ludwig Wittgenstein. 1968. Philosophical investigations. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  188. Claes Wohlin. 2014. Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on evaluation and assessment in software engineering. 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  189. David Bryce Yaden, Jonathan Haidt, Ralph W. Hood, David R. Vago, and Andrew B. Newberg. 2017. The varieties of self-transcendent experience.Review of General Psychology 21, 2 (2017), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000102Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  190. Farnaz Zangouei, Mohammad Ali Babazadeh, Kristina Höok, Tim Tijs, Gert-Jan de Vries, and Joyce Westerink. 2010. How to Stay in the Emotional Rollercoaster: Lessons Learnt from Designing EmRoll. 10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Strategies for Fostering a Genuine Feeling of Connection in Technologically Mediated Systems

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          April 2022
          10459 pages
          ISBN:9781450391573
          DOI:10.1145/3491102

          Copyright © 2022 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 28 April 2022

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

          Upcoming Conference

          CHI '24
          CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 11 - 16, 2024
          Honolulu , HI , USA

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format