skip to main content
10.1145/3491102.3517683acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

“A Second Voice”: Investigating Opportunities and Challenges for Interactive Voice Assistants to Support Home Health Aides

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 April 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Home health aides are a vulnerable group of frontline caregivers who provide personal and medically-oriented care in patients’ homes. Their work is difficult and unpredictable, involving a mix of physical and emotional labor as they adapt to patients’ changing needs. Our paper presents an exploratory, qualitative study with 32 participants, that investigates design opportunities for Interactive Voice Assistants (IVAs) to support aides’ essential care work. We explore challenges and opportunities for IVAs to (1) fill gaps in aides’ access to information and care coordination, (2) assist with decision making and task completion, (3) advocate on behalf of aides, and (4) provide emotional support. We then discuss key implications of our work, including how materiality may impact perceived ownership and usage of IVAs, the need to carefully consider tensions around surveillance, accountability, data collection, and reporting, and the challenges of centering aides as essential workers in complex home health care contexts.

References

  1. Alaa A Abd-alrazaq, Mohannad Alajlani, Ali Abdallah Alalwan, Bridgette M Bewick, Peter Gardner, and Mowafa Househ. 2019. An overview of the features of chatbots in mental health: A scoping review. International Journal of Medical Informatics (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Noura Abdi, Xiao Zhan, Kopo M. Ramokapane, and Jose Such. 2021. Privacy Norms for Smart Home Personal Assistants. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 558, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445122Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Alison Ashley, Sandra S Butler, and Nancy Fishwick. 2010. Home-care-aides voices from the field: Job experiences of personal support specialists—The Maine Home Care Worker Retention Study. Home healthcare nurse 28, 7 (2010), 399.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. João Balsa, Pedro Neves, Isa Félix, Mara Pereira Guerreiro, Pedro Alves, Maria Beatriz Carmo, Diogo Marques, António Dias, Adriana Henriques, and Ana Paula Cláudio. 2019. Intelligent Virtual Assistant for Promoting Behaviour Change in Older People with T2D. In EPIA Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Springer, 372–383.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Diane Brannon, Teta Barry, Peter Kemper, Andrea Schreiner, and Joe Vasey. 2007. Job perceptions and intent to leave among direct care workers: evidence from the better jobs better care demonstrations. The Gerontologist 47, 6 (2007), 820–829.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. V Braun and V Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bureau of Labor Statistics USDoL. 2016. Home Health Aides and Personal Care Aides. Retrieved Dec 24, 2018 from https://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/home-health-aides-and-personal-care-aides.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Vinton G. Cerf. 2018. Unintended Consequences. Commun. ACM 61, 3 (feb 2018), 7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3184402Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Yunan Chen, Victor Ngo, and Sun Young Park. 2013. Caring for Caregivers: Designing for Integrality. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (San Antonio, Texas, USA) (CSCW ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441789Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Simon Coghlan, Jenny Waycott, Amanda Lazar, and Barbara Barbosa Neves. 2021. Dignity, Autonomy, and Style of Company: Dimensions Older Adults Consider for Robot Companions. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1(2021), 1–25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Sasha Costanza-Chock. 2018. Design Justice: towards an intersectional feminist framework for design theory and practice. DRS2018: Catalyst 2(2018). https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2018.679Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Andrea Cuadra, Oluseye Bankole, and Michael Sobolev. 2021. Planning Habit: Daily Planning Prompts with Alexa. In International Conference on Persuasive Technology. Springer, 73–87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Scott Davidoff, Min Kyung Lee, Anind K Dey, and John Zimmerman. 2007. Rapidly exploring application design through speed dating. In International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. Springer, 429–446.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Kerstin Denecke, Mauro Tschanz, Tim Lucas Dorner, and Richard May. 2019. Intelligent conversational agents in healthcare: Hype or hope?Studies in health technology and informatics 259 (2019), 77–84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Margaret A Denton, Işk Urla Zeytinoğlu, and Sharon Davies. 2002. Working in clients’ homes: the impact on the mental health and well-being of visiting home care workers. Home health care services quarterly 21, 1 (2002), 1–27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Janette S Dill and John Cagle. 2010. Caregiving in a patient’s place of residence: Turnover of direct care workers in home care and hospice agencies. Journal of Aging and Health 22, 6 (2010), 713–733.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Lynn Dombrowski, Ellie Harmon, and Sarah Fox. 2016. Social justice-oriented interaction design: Outlining key design strategies and commitments. In DIS 2016 - Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Fuse. ACM, 656–671. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901861Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Katherine Easton, Stephen Potter, Remi Bec, Matthew Bennion, Heidi Christensen, Cheryl Grindell, Bahman Mirheidari, Scott Weich, Luc de Witte, Dan Wolstenholme, 2019. Co-designing and testing the acceptability of a virtual agent to support self-management for individuals living with physical and mental comorbidities. Journal of Medical Internet Research(2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Anna C Faul, Tara J Schapmire, Joseph D’Ambrosio, Dennis Feaster, C Shawn Oak, and Amanda Farley. 2010. Promoting sustainability in frontline home care aides: Understanding factors affecting job retention in the home care workforce. Home Health Care Management & Practice 22, 6 (2010), 408–416.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Geraldine Foley and Virpi Timonen. 2015. Using Grounded Theory Method to Capture and Analyze Health Care Experiences. Health Serv. Res. 50, 4 (2015), 1195–1210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Myfanwy Franks. 2002. Feminisms and cross-ideological feminist social research: Standpoint, situatedness and positionality–developing cross-ideological feminist research. Journal of International Women’s Studies 3, 2 (2002), 38–50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Emily Franzosa, Emma K Tsui, and Sherry Baron. 2018. Home health aides’ perceptions of quality care: goals, challenges, and implications for a rapidly changing industry. New Solutions: A journal of environmental and occupational health policy 27, 4(2018), 629–647.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Emily Franzosa, Emma K Tsui, and Sherry Baron. 2019. “Who’s caring for us?”: Understanding and addressing the effects of emotional labor on home health aides’ well-being. The Gerontologist 59, 6 (2019), 1055–1064.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Hannah Gaffney, Warren Mansell, and Sara Tai. 2019. Conversational Agents in the Treatment of Mental Health Problems: Mixed-Method Systematic Review. JMIR Mental Health 6, 10 (2019), e14166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Erin R Giovannetti, Jennifer L Wolff, Qian-Li Xue, Carlos O Weiss, Bruce Leff, Chad Boult, Travonia Hughes, and Cynthia M Boyd. 2012. Difficulty assisting with health care tasks among caregivers of multimorbid older adults. Journal of general internal medicine 27, 1 (2012), 37–44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Mary L Gray and Siddharth Suri. 2019. Ghost work: How to stop Silicon Valley from building a new global underclass. Eamon Dolan Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Jennifer A Gray-Stanley and Naoko Muramatsu. 2011. Work stress, burnout, and social and personal resources among direct care workers. Research in developmental disabilities 32, 3 (2011), 1065–1074.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Stephanie Greer, Danielle Ramo, Yin-Juei Chang, Michael Fu, Judith Moskowitz, and Jana Haritatos. 2019. Use of the Chatbot ”Vivibot” to Deliver Positive Psychology Skills and Promote Well-Being Among Young People After Cancer Treatment: Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 7, 10 (2019), e15018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. David Griol and Zoraida Callejas. 2019. Mobile Conversational Agents for stroke rehabilitation therapy. In 2019 IEEE 32nd International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS). IEEE, 513–518.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Heidi Hartmann and Jeffrey Hayes. 2017. The growing need for home care workers: Improving a low-paid, female-dominated occupation and the conditions of its immigrant workers. Public Policy & Aging Report 27, 3 (2017), 88–95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Kirstie Hawkey, Kori M. Inkpen, Kenneth Rockwood, Michael McAllister, and Jacob Slonim. 2005. Requirements Gathering with Alzheimer’s Patients and Caregivers. In Proceedings of the 7th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility(Baltimore, MD, USA) (Assets ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1145/1090785.1090812Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Kerm Henriksen, Anjali Joseph, and Teresa Zayas-Cabán. 2009. The human factors of home health care: a conceptual model for examining safety and quality concerns. Journal of Patient Safety 5, 4 (2009), 229–236.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Danula Hettiachchi, Niels van Berkel, Tilman Dingler, Fraser Allison, Vassilis Kostakos, and Jorge Goncalves. 2019. Enabling creative crowd work through smart speakers. In Workshop on Designing Crowd-powered Creativity Support Systems (CHI’19 Workshop). 1–5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Sarah J Hewko, Sarah L Cooper, Hanhmi Huynh, Trish L Spiwek, Heather L Carleton, Shawna Reid, and Greta G Cummings. 2015. Invisible no more: a scoping review of the health care aide workforce literature. BMC nursing 14, 1 (2015), 38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Annabell Ho, Jeff Hancock, and Adam S Miner. 2018. Psychological, relational, and emotional effects of self-disclosure after conversations with a chatbot. Journal of Communication 68, 4 (2018), 712–733.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Candace Howes. 2015. Home Care: The Fastest Growing Low-Wage Industry. In New Labor Forum, Vol. 24. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 98–105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Matthew B Hoy. 2018. Alexa, Siri, Cortana, and more: an introduction to voice assistants. Medical reference services quarterly 37, 1 (2018), 81–88.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Institute PHC. 2013. America’s Direct Care Workforce. Retrieved Dec 24, 2018 from https://phinational.org/wp-content/uploads/legacy/phi-facts-3.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Patrick Kenny, Thomas Parsons, Jonathan Gratch, and Albert Rizzo. 2008. Virtual humans for assisted health care. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. 1–4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Liliana Laranjo, Adam G Dunn, Huong Ly Tong, Ahmet Baki Kocaballi, Jessica Chen, Rabia Bashir, Didi Surian, Blanca Gallego, Farah Magrabi, Annie Y S Lau, and Enrico Coiera. 2018. Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 25, 9 (07 2018), 1248–1258. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy072 arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/jamia/article-pdf/25/9/1248/25643433/ocy072.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. David R Large, Gary Burnett, Ben Anyasodo, and Lee Skrypchuk. 2016. Assessing cognitive demand during natural language interactions with a digital driving assistant. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications. 67–74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Sharon A Levine and Patricia P Barry. 2003. Home care. In Geriatric Medicine. Springer, 121–131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Calvin A Liang, Sean A Munson, and Julie A Kientz. 2021. Embracing Four Tensions in Human-Computer Interaction Research with Marginalized People. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 28, 2(2021), 1–47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Leah A Lievrouw. 2014. Materiality and media in communication and technology studies: An unfinished project. Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (2014), 21–51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Xin Yao Lin, Herman Saksono, Elizabeth Stowell, Margie E. Lachman, Carmen Castaneda-Sceppa, and Andrea G. Parker. 2020. Go&Grow: An Evaluation of a Pervasive Social Exergame for Caregivers of Loved Ones with Dementia. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW2, Article 151 (oct 2020), 28 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3415222Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Gale M Lucas, Albert Rizzo, Jonathan Gratch, Stefan Scherer, Giota Stratou, Jill Boberg, and Louis-Philippe Morency. 2017. Reporting Mental Health Symptoms: Breaking Down Barriers to Care with Virtual Human Interviewers. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 4 (2017), 51. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2017.00051Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Michal Luria, Guy Hoffman, and Oren Zuckerman. 2017. Comparing social robot, screen and voice interfaces for smart-home control. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 580–628.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Patrícia Macedo, Carla Pereira, Pedro Mota, Daniela Silva, Ana Frade, and Rui Neves Madeira. 2019. Conversational Agent in mHealth to empower people managing the Parkinson’s Disease. Procedia Computer Science 160 (2019), 402–408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Pia Markkanen, Margaret Quinn, Catherine Galligan, Stephanie Chalupka, Letitia Davis, and Angela Laramie. 2007. There’s no place like home: a qualitative study of the working conditions of home health care providers. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 49, 3 (2007), 327–337.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Thanassis Mavropoulos, Georgios Meditskos, Spyridon Symeonidis, Eleni Kamateri, Maria Rousi, Dimitris Tzimikas, Lefteris Papageorgiou, Christos Eleftheriadis, George Adamopoulos, Stefanos Vrochidis, 2019. A Context-Aware Conversational Agent in the Rehabilitation Domain. Future Internet 11, 11 (2019), 231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Deirdre McCaughey, Gwen McGhan, Jungyoon Kim, Diane Brannon, Hannes Leroy, and Rita Jablonski. 2012. Workforce implications of injury among home health workers: evidence from the National Home Health Aide Survey. The Gerontologist 52, 4 (2012), 493–505.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Brian J McNely. 2013. Visual research methods and communication design. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM international conference on Design of communication. 123–132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Adam S Miner, Arnold Milstein, and Jefferey T Hancock. 2017. Talking to machines about personal mental health problems. Jama 318, 13 (2017), 1217–1218.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Katherine O’Brien, Anna Liggett, Vanessa Ramirez-Zohfeld, Priya Sunkara, and Lee A Lindquist. 2020. Voice-Controlled Intelligent Personal Assistants to Support Aging in Place. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 68, 1 (2020), 176–179.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Institute of Medicine. 2008. Retooling for an Aging America: Building the Health Care Workforce. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/12089Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Fabian Okeke, Emily Tseng, Benedetta Piantella, Mikaela Brown, Harveen Kaur, Madeline R Sterling, and Nicola Dell. 2019. Technology, home health care, and heart failure: A qualitative analysis with multiple stakeholders. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies. 122–133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Stefan Olafsson, Teresa O’Leary, and Timothy Bickmore. 2019. Coerced Change-talk with Conversational Agents Promotes Confidence in Behavior Change. In Proceedings of the 13th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. 31–40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Juanan Pereira and Óscar Díaz. 2019. Using health chatbots for behavior change: a mapping study. Journal of Medical Systems 43, 5 (2019), 135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. PHI. 2018. U.S. Home Care Workers: Key Facts. Retrieved Dec 24, 2018 from https://phinational.org/wp-content/uploads/legacy/phi-home-care-workers-key-facts.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Anthony Poon, Vaidehi Hussain, Ariel C Avgar, and Nicola Dell. 2021. Computer-Mediated Peer Support Needs of Home Care Workers: Emotional Labor & the Politics of Professionalism. (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. François Portet, Michel Vacher, Caroline Golanski, Camille Roux, and Brigitte Meillon. 2013. Design and evaluation of a smart home voice interface for the elderly: acceptability and objection aspects. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17, 1 (2013), 127–144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Alisha Pradhan, Leah Findlater, and Amanda Lazar. 2019. ” Phantom Friend” or” Just a Box with Information” Personification and Ontological Categorization of Smart Speaker-based Voice Assistants by Older Adults. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW(2019), 1–21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Alisha Pradhan, Amanda Lazar, and Leah Findlater. 2020. Use of intelligent voice assistants by older adults with low technology use. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 27, 4(2020), 1–27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Donald Redfoot, Lynn Feinberg, and Ari N Houser. 2013. The aging of the baby boom and the growing care gap: A look at future declines in the availability of family caregivers. AARP Public Policy Institute Washington, DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Ari Schlesinger, W Keith Edwards, and Rebecca E Grinter. 2017. Intersectional HCI: Engaging identity through gender, race, and class. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 5412–5427.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Mark Schurgin, Mark Schlager, Laura Vardoulakis, Laura R Pina, and Lauren Wilcox. 2021. Isolation in Coordination: Challenges of Caregivers in the USA. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, Article 652, 14 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Emre Sezgin, Lisa Militello, Yungui Huang, and Simon Lin. 2019. A Scoping Review of Patient-Facing, Behavioral Health Interventions with Voice Assistant Technology Targeting Self-management and Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors. Behavioral Health Interventions with Voice Assistant Technology Targeting Self-management and Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors (April 1, 2019) (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Ji Youn Shin and Sung Won Choi. 2020. Online interventions geared toward increasing resilience and reducing distress in family caregivers. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care 14, 1 (2020), 60–66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. C. Estelle Smith, Zachary Levonian, Haiwei Ma, Robert Giaquinto, Gemma Lein-Mcdonough, Zixuan Li, Susan O’conner-Von, and Svetlana Yarosh. 2020. ”I Cannot Do All of This Alone”: Exploring Instrumental and Prayer Support in Online Health Communities. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 27, 5, Article 38 (aug 2020), 41 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3402855Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Madeline R Sterling, Nicola Dell, Benedetta Piantella, Jacklyn Cho, Harveen Kaur, Emily Tseng, Fabian Okeke, Mikaela Brown, Peggy BK Leung, Ariel F Silva, 2020. Understanding the Workflow of Home Health Care for Patients with Heart Failure: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of General Internal Medicine(2020), 1–9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Madeline R Sterling, Nicola Dell, Emily Tseng, Fabian Okeke, Jacklyn Cho, Benedetta Piantella, and Jonathan N Tobin. 2020. Home care workers caring for adults with heart failure need better access to training and technology: A role for implementation science. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 4, 3 (2020), 224–228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Madeline R Sterling, Amy L Shaw, Peggy BK Leung, Monika M Safford, Christine D Jones, Emma K Tsui, and Diana Delgado. 2018. Home care workers in heart failure: a systematic review. Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare 11 (2018), 481.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Madeline R Sterling, Ariel F Silva, Peggy BK Leung, Amy L Shaw, Emma K Tsui, Christine D Jones, Laura Robbins, Yanira Escamilla, Ann Lee, Faith Wiggins, Frances Sadler, Martin F Shapiro, Mary E Charlson, Lisa M Kern, and Monika M Safford. 2018. “It’s Like They Forget That the Word ’Health’ Is in ’Home Health Aide”’: Understanding the Perspectives of Home Care Workers Who Care for Adults With Heart Failure. Journal of the American Heart Association 7, 23 (2018), e010134. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1161/JAHA.118.010134Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Madeline R Sterling, Emily Tseng, Anthony Poon, Jacklyn Cho, Ariel C Avgar, Lisa M Kern, Claire K Ankuda, and Nicola Dell. 2020. Experiences of home health care workers in New York City during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a qualitative analysis. JAMA internal medicine 180, 11 (2020), 1453–1459.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Robyn Stone, Janet P Sutton, Natasha Bryant, Annelise Adams, and Marie Squillace. 2013. The home health workforce: A distinction between worker categories. Home health care services quarterly 32, 4 (2013), 218–233.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Kevin M Storer, Tejinder K Judge, and Stacy M Branham. 2020. ”All in the Same Boat”: Tradeoffs of Voice Assistant Ownership for Mixed-Visual-Ability Families. In ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Elizabeth Stowell, Yixuan Zhang, Carmen Castaneda-Sceppa, Margie Lachman, and Andrea G. Parker. 2019. Caring for Alzheimer’s Disease Caregivers: A Qualitative Study Investigating Opportunities for Exergame Innovation. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 130 (nov 2019), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359232Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. George Terzopoulos and Maya Satratzemi. 2020. Voice Assistants and Smart Speakers in Everyday Life and in Education. Informatics in Education 19, 3 (2020), 473–490.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Matthieu Tixier, Gérald Gaglio, and Myriam Lewkowicz. 2009. Translating Social Support Practices into Online Services for Family Caregivers. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA) (GROUP ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1145/1531674.1531685Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Emily Tseng, Fabian Okeke, Madeline Sterling, , and Nicola Dell. 2020. ”We can learn. Why not?”: Challenges and Opportunities in Designing for Equity for Home Health Aides. In ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Emily Tseng, Fabian Okeke, Madeline Sterling, and Nicola Dell. 2020. ” We can learn. Why not?” Designing Technologies to Engender Equity for Home Health Aides. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Aditya Nrusimha Vaidyam, Hannah Wisniewski, John David Halamka, Matcheri S Kashavan, and John Blake Torous. 2019. Chatbots and conversational agents in mental health: a review of the psychiatric landscape. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 64, 7 (2019), 456–464.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. GK Vincent and VA Velkoff. 2010. The next four decades: The older population in the United States: 2010 to 2050: US Department of Commerce. Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Francesco Vona, Emanuele Torelli, Eleonora Beccaluva, and Franca Garzotto. 2020. Exploring the Potential of Speech-based Virtual Assistants in Mixed Reality Applications for People with Cognitive Disabilities. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces. 1–9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Brad Wipfli, Ryan Olson, Robert R Wright, Layla Garrigues, and Joanne Lees. 2012. Characterizing hazards and injuries among home care workers. Home Healthcare Now 30, 7 (2012), 387–393.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  86. Erin L Woodhead, Lynn Northrop, and Barry Edelstein. 2016. Stress, social support, and burnout among long-term care nursing staff. Journal of applied gerontology 35, 1 (2016), 84–105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. Despoina Xanthopoulou, Arnold B Bakker, Maureen F Dollard, Evangelia Demerouti, Wilmar B Schaufeli, Toon W Taris, and Paul JG Schreurs. 2007. When do job demands particularly predict burnout?Journal of managerial psychology(2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Naomi Yamashita, Hideaki Kuzuoka, Keiji Hirata, and Takashi Kudo. 2013. Understanding the Conflicting Demands of Family Caregivers Caring for Depressed Family Members. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2637–2646. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481365Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. Naomi Yamashita, Hideaki Kuzuoka, Keiji Hirata, Takashi Kudo, Eiji Aramaki, and Kazuki Hattori. 2017. Changing Moods: How Manual Tracking by Family Caregivers Improves Caring and Family Communication. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025843Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. Naomi Yamashita, Hideaki Kuzuoka, Takashi Kudo, Keiji Hirata, Eiji Aramaki, and Kazuki Hattori. 2018. How Information Sharing about Care Recipients by Family Caregivers Impacts Family Communication. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173796Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. Samuel Yang, Jennifer Lee, Emre Sezgin, Jeffrey Bridge, and Simon Lin. 2021. Clinical advice by voice assistants on postpartum depression: cross-sectional investigation using Apple Siri, Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, and Microsoft Cortana. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 9, 1 (2021), e24045.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Serena Zheng, Noah Apthorpe, Marshini Chetty, and Nick Feamster. 2018. User Perceptions of Smart Home IoT Privacy. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 200 (Nov. 2018), 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274469Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  93. Tamara Zubatiy, Kayci L Vickers, Niharika Mathur, and Elizabeth D Mynatt. 2021. Empowering Dyads of Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment And Their Care Partners Using Conversational Agents. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. “A Second Voice”: Investigating Opportunities and Challenges for Interactive Voice Assistants to Support Home Health Aides

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2022
      10459 pages
      ISBN:9781450391573
      DOI:10.1145/3491102

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 April 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format