skip to main content
10.1145/3491102.3517724acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

SpinOcchio: Understanding Haptic-Visual Congruency of Skin-Slip in VR with a Dynamic Grip Controller

Published:29 April 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper’s goal is to understand the haptic-visual congruency perception of skin-slip on the fingertips given visual cues in Virtual Reality (VR). We developed SpinOcchio (Spin for the spinning mechanism used, Occhio for the Italian word “eye”), a handheld haptic controller capable of rendering the thickness and slipping of a virtual object pinched between two fingers. This is achieved using a mechanism with spinning and pivoting disks that apply a tangential skin-slip movement to the fingertips. With SpinOcchio, we determined the baseline haptic discrimination threshold for skin-slip, and, using these results, we tested how haptic realism of motion and thickness is perceived with varying visual cues in VR. Surprisingly, the results show that in all cases, visual cues dominate over haptic perception. Based on these results, we suggest applications that leverage skin-slip and grip interaction, contributing further to realistic experiences in VR.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3491102.3517724-video-figure.mp4

mp4

85.7 MB

3491102.3517724-talk-video.mp4

mp4

263.8 MB

3491102.3517724-video-preview.mp4

mp4

57.4 MB

References

  1. Mahdi Azmandian, Mark Hancock, Hrvoje Benko, Eyal Ofek, and Andrew D Wilson. 2016. Haptic retargeting: Dynamic repurposing of passive haptics for enhanced virtual reality experiences. In Proceedings of the 2016 chi conference on human factors in computing systems. 1968–1979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Joshua H Bacon and Linda Shaw. 1982. Effect of conflict awareness on visual dominance. Perceptual and motor skills 54, 1 (1982), 263–267.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hrvoje Benko, Christian Holz, Mike Sinclair, and Eyal Ofek. 2016. Normaltouch and texturetouch: High-fidelity 3d haptic shape rendering on handheld virtual reality controllers. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 717–728.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Katja Biermann, Frank Schmitz, Otto W Witte, Jürgen Konczak, Hans-Joachim Freund, and Alfons Schnitzler. 1998. Interaction of finger representation in the human first somatosensory cortex: a neuromagnetic study. Neuroscience letters 251, 1 (1998), 13–16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Frank Biocca, Jin Kim, and Yung Choi. 2001. Visual touch in virtual environments: An exploratory study of presence, multimodal interfaces, and cross-modal sensory illusions. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 10, 3(2001), 247–265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Daniel KY Chen, Jean-Baptiste Chossat, and Peter B Shull. 2019. Haptivec: Presenting haptic feedback vectors in handheld controllers using embedded tactile pin arrays. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Inrak Choi, Heather Culbertson, Mark R Miller, Alex Olwal, and Sean Follmer. 2017. Grabity: A wearable haptic interface for simulating weight and grasping in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 119–130.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Inrak Choi, Elliot W Hawkes, David L Christensen, Christopher J Ploch, and Sean Follmer. 2016. Wolverine: A wearable haptic interface for grasping in virtual reality. In 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 986–993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Inrak Choi, Eyal Ofek, Hrvoje Benko, Mike Sinclair, and Christian Holz. 2018. Claw: A multifunctional handheld haptic controller for grasping, touching, and triggering in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Massimiliano Di Luca and Arash Mahnan. 2019. Perceptual limits of visual-haptic simultaneity in virtual reality interactions. In 2019 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC). IEEE, 67–72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Marc O Ernst and Martin S Banks. 2002. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415, 6870 (2002), 429–433.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Cathy Fang, Yang Zhang, Matthew Dworman, and Chris Harrison. 2020. Wireality: Enabling complex tangible geometries in virtual reality with worn multi-string haptics. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Sandra G Hart and Lowell E Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in psychology. Vol. 52. Elsevier, 139–183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Seongkook Heo, Jaeyeon Lee, and Daniel Wigdor. 2019. PseudoBend: Producing haptic illusions of stretching, bending, and twisting using grain vibrations. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 803–813.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. James M Hillis, Marc O Ernst, Martin S Banks, and Michael S Landy. 2002. Combining sensory information: mandatory fusion within, but not between, senses. Science 298, 5598 (2002), 1627–1630.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Colin Ho, Jonathan Kim, Sachin Patil, and Ken Goldberg. 2015. The slip-pad: a haptic display using interleaved belts to simulate lateral and rotational slip. In 2015 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC). IEEE, 189–195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Lynette A Jones and Hong Z Tan. 2012. Application of psychophysical techniques to haptic research. IEEE transactions on haptics 6, 3 (2012), 268–284.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Amanda L Kaas, Hanneke I van Mier, Johan Lataster, Mirella Fingal, and Alexander T Sack. 2007. The effect of visuo-haptic congruency on haptic spatial matching. Experimental brain research 183, 1 (2007), 75–85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Mirela Kahrimanovic, Wouter M Bergmann Tiest, and Astrid ML Kappers. 2009. Context effects in haptic perception of roughness. Experimental brain research 194, 2 (2009), 287–297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Tanja Kassuba, Corinna Klinge, Cordula Hölig, Brigitte Röder, and Hartwig R Siebner. 2013. Vision holds a greater share in visuo-haptic object recognition than touch. Neuroimage 65(2013), 59–68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Hwan Kim, HyeonBeom Yi, Hyein Lee, and Woohun Lee. 2018. Hapcube: A wearable tactile device to provide tangential and normal pseudo-force feedback on a fingertip. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Robert Kovacs, Eyal Ofek, Mar Gonzalez Franco, Alexa Fay Siu, Sebastian Marwecki, Christian Holz, and Mike Sinclair. 2020. Haptic pivot: On-demand handhelds in vr. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 1046–1059.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Susan J Lederman. 1981. The perception of surface roughness by active and passive touch. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 18, 5 (1981), 253–255.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Susan J Lederman and Lynette A Jones. 2011. Tactile and haptic illusions. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 4, 4 (2011), 273–294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Jo-Yu Lo, Da-Yuan Huang, Chen-Kuo Sun, Chu-En Hou, and Bing-Yu Chen. 2018. RollingStone: Using single slip taxel for enhancing active finger exploration with a virtual reality controller. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 839–851.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Victor Rodrigo Mercado, Maud Marchal, and Anatole Lécuyer. 2019. Entropia: towards infinite surface haptic displays in virtual reality using encountered-type rotating props. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Kouta Minamizawa, Souichiro Fukamachi, Hiroyuki Kajimoto, Naoki Kawakami, and Susumu Tachi. 2007. Gravity grabber: wearable haptic display to present virtual mass sensation. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 emerging technologies. 8–es.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Roderick P Power. 1980. The dominance of touch by vision: Sometimes incomplete. Perception 9, 4 (1980), 457–466.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Roderick P Power and Anne Graham. 1976. Dominance of touch by vision: generalization of the hypothesis to a tactually experienced population. Perception 5, 2 (1976), 161–166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. William Provancher. 2014. Creating greater VR immersion by emulating force feedback with ungrounded tactile feedback. IQT Quarterly 6, 2 (2014), 18–21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. William R Provancher and Nicholas D Sylvester. 2009. Fingerpad skin stretch increases the perception of virtual friction. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 2, 4 (2009), 212–223.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Irvin Rock and Jack Victor. 1964. Vision and touch: An experimentally created conflict between the two senses. Science (1964), 594–596.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Neung Ryu, Hye-Young Jo, Michel Pahud, Mike Sinclair, and Andrea Bianchi. 2021. GamesBond: Bimanual Haptic Illusion of Physically Connected Objects for Immersive VR Using Grip Deformation. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Ali Sengül, Michiel van Elk, Olaf Blanke, and Hannes Bleuler. 2018. Congruent visuo-tactile feedback facilitates the extension of peripersonal space. In International Conference on Human Haptic Sensing and Touch Enabled Computer Applications. Springer, 673–684.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Mike Sinclair, Eyal Ofek, Mar Gonzalez-Franco, and Christian Holz. 2019. Capstancrunch: A haptic vr controller with user-supplied force feedback. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology. 815–829.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Hsin-Ruey Tsai, Ching-Wen Hung, Tzu-Chun Wu, and Bing-Yu Chen. 2020. Elastoscillation: 3d multilevel force feedback for damped oscillation on vr controllers. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Chi Wang, Da-Yuan Huang, Shuo-wen Hsu, Chu-En Hou, Yeu-Luen Chiu, Ruei-Che Chang, Jo-Yu Lo, and Bing-Yu Chen. 2019. Masque: Exploring lateral skin stretch feedback on the face with head-mounted displays. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 439–451.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Chi Wang, Da-Yuan Huang, Shuo-Wen Hsu, Cheng-Lung Lin, Yeu-Luen Chiu, Chu-En Hou, and Bing-Yu Chen. 2020. Gaiters: exploring skin stretch feedback on legs for enhancing virtual reality experiences. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Eric Whitmire, Hrvoje Benko, Christian Holz, Eyal Ofek, and Mike Sinclair. 2018. Haptic revolver: Touch, shear, texture, and shape rendering on a reconfigurable virtual reality controller. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Shunki Yamashita, Ryota Ishida, Arihide Takahashi, Hsueh-Han Wu, Hironori Mitake, and Shoichi Hasegawa. 2018. Gum-gum shooting: Inducing a sense of arm elongation via forearm skin-stretch and the change in the center of gravity. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2018 Emerging Technologies. 1–2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Vibol Yem, Mai Shibahara, Katsunari Sato, and Hiroyuki Kajimoto. 2016. Expression of 2DOF fingertip traction with 1DOF lateral skin stretch. In International AsiaHaptics conference. Springer, 21–25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Shigeo Yoshida, Yuqian Sun, and Hideaki Kuzuoka. 2020. Pocopo: Handheld pin-based shape display for haptic rendering in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. SpinOcchio: Understanding Haptic-Visual Congruency of Skin-Slip in VR with a Dynamic Grip Controller

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            April 2022
            10459 pages
            ISBN:9781450391573
            DOI:10.1145/3491102

            Copyright © 2022 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 29 April 2022

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

            Upcoming Conference

            CHI '24
            CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            May 11 - 16, 2024
            Honolulu , HI , USA

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format