skip to main content
10.1145/3491140.3528302acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesl-at-sConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Comparing MOOC Learners Engagement with Japanese Videos and Text to Speech Generated English Videos

Published:01 June 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

In recent years, massive open online courses (MOOCs) have been rapidly growing with learners from both English and non-English speaking countries. Nowadays, many MOOC developers provide transcripts in multiple languages to attract a broader range of learners. However, providing transcripts is ineffective for visually impaired learners and tends to divert learners' attention away from the overall content of the video lecture. Thus, aside from offering English transcripts, Japanese lecture videos in the Tokyo TechIntroduction to Electrical and Electronic Engineering MOOC were automatically dubbed into English with a computer-generated voice. To understand the effect of English-automatically dubbed videos on learners, the learners' interactions, video completion rate, and course completions were compared to the original course in Japanese. The results show that English automatically dubbed videos have an overall high learner engagement when compared to Japanese videos with English transcripts. Survey results on learners' satisfaction towards the English dubbed videos also showed higher positive responses. These results show the effectiveness of dubbing Japanese lectures into English using text-to-speech technology which has signification for MOOCs offered in various languages.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

L-at-S22-lswp127.mp4

mp4

22.9 MB

References

  1. Sasipa BOONYUBOL, Do Ngoc KHANH, Toru NAGAHAMA, and Jeffrey S. CROSS. 2021. W-04 Improving International Learners' Engagement in Japanese Online Engineering Courses by Adding Automatically English Dubbed Videos. JSEE Annual Conference International Session Proceedings, Vol. 2021 (2021), 18--23. https://doi.org/10.20549/jseeen.2021.0_18Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Xiaoyin CHE, Sheng LUO, Haojin YANG, and Christoph MEINEL. 2017. Automatic Lecture Subtitle Generation and How It Helps. In 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT). 34--38. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2017.11Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Marcello FEDERICO, Robert ENYEDI, Roberto BARRA-CHICOTE, Ritwik GIRI, Umut ISIK, Arvindh KRISHNASWAMY, and Hassan SAWAF. 2020. From Speech-to-Speech Translation to Automatic Dubbing. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2001.06785Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kate S. HONE and Ghada R. El Said. 2016. Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: A survey study. Computers & Education, Vol. 98 (2016), 157--168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.016Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. May Kristine JONSON CARLON, Anie Day DC. ASA, Nopphon KEERATIVORANAN, TORU Nagahama, and Jeffrey S. CROSS. 2021. Topic Modeling in MOOCs: What Was to Be Discussed, What the Instructor Discussed, and What the Learners Discussed. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology Education (TALE). 849--853. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE52509.2021.9678621Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Tokyo Tech Online Education Developement Office. 2021. edX Introduction to Electrical and Electronic Engineering MOOC. edX insights data unpublished.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Elisa PEREGO, David ORREGO Carmona, and Sara BOTTIROLI. 2016. An empirical take on the dubbing vs. subtitling debate: an eye movement study. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dhawal SHA. 2021. By the numbers: Moocs in 2021 - class central. https://www.classcentral.com/report/mooc-stats-2021/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Comparing MOOC Learners Engagement with Japanese Videos and Text to Speech Generated English Videos

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      L@S '22: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
      June 2022
      491 pages
      ISBN:9781450391580
      DOI:10.1145/3491140

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 June 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate117of440submissions,27%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader