skip to main content
10.1145/3491140.3528306acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesl-at-sConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Adding a Demographic Lens to Cluster Analysis of Participants in Entry-level Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)

Published: 01 June 2022 Publication History

Abstract

This paper provides insight into how underrepresented learners are engaging with entry-level MOOCs, leveraging cluster analysis [19] on previously unexamined data from entry-level MOOCs produced by a major research university in the United States (USA) [29]. From an initial sample of more than 260,000 learners, a subset of data from more than 29,000 participants who submitted an assignment for a grade in one of nine entry-level MOOCs is analysed. Manhattan Distance [37, 27] and Gower Distance [5, 11] measures are computed based on engagement and achievement data, and clusters are derived from application of the CLARA and PAM algorithms [35]. The clusters are enriched by demographic data, with a particular focus on education level, as well as by approximated socioeconomic status derived from the American Community Survey. Results indicate that, in the courses analysed, learners without a college degree are more likely to be high-performing compared to college-educated learners; additionally, learners from approximated lower socioeconomic backgrounds are no less likely to be successful than learners from approximated middle and higher socioeconomic backgrounds in the USA. These findings are noteworthy insofar as they indicate that, while MOOCs have struggled to improve access to learning broadly speaking, there are possibilities for more inclusive outcomes.

Supplemental Material

MP4 File
Mike Meaney and Tom Fikes present an overview of their L@S 22 work in progress paper titled, Adding a Demographic Lens to Cluster Analysis of Participants in Entry-level Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). They explore how non-college educated learners use entry-level MOOCs, utilizing conventional methods like Manhattan distance and a partitioning algorithm, alongside more novel methods with mixed variable measurements like Gower distance. The clusters are enriched by demographic data, with a particular focus on education level, as well as by approximated socioeconomic status. Results indicate that, in the courses analyzed, learners without a college degree are more likely to be high-performing compared to college-educated learners; additionally, learners from approximated lower socioeconomic backgrounds are no less likely to be successful than learners from approximated middle and higher socioeconomic backgrounds in the USA.

References

[1]
Raj Chetty, John Friedman, Emmanuel Saez, Nicholas Turner, and Danny Yagan. 2017. Mobility report cards: The role of colleges in intergenerational mobility (No. w23618). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23618.
[2]
Malika Charrad, Nadia Ghazzali, Veronique Boiteau, and Azam Niknafs. 2014. NbClust: An R Package for Determining the Relevant Number of Clusters in a Data Set. Journal of statistical software, 61(6), 1--36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v061.i06.
[3]
Ruiqi Deng, Pierre Benckendorff, and Deanne Gannaway. 2017. Understanding Learning and Teaching in MOOCs from the Perspectives of Students and Instructors: A Review of Literature from 2014 to 2016. In 5th European MOOCs Stakeholders Summit, EMOOCs 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--59044--8_20.
[4]
Matt Dowle, Arun Srinivasan, Jan Gorecki, Michael Chirico, Pasha Stetsenko, Tom Short., ... and Ben Schwen. 2021. data.table: Extension of 'data.frame'. https://cran.r-project.org/package=data.table.
[5]
Daniel Ebbert and Stephan Dutke. 2020. Patterns in students' usage of lecture recordings: a cluster analysis of self-report data. Research in Learning Technology, 28. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2258.
[6]
Deborah Engle, Chris Mankoff, and Jennifer Carbrey. 2015. Coursera's introductory human physiology course: Factors that characterize successful completion of a MOOC. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(2), 46--68. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i2.2010.
[7]
Marcella Escobari, Ian Seyal, and Michael Meaney. 2019. Realism about Reskilling: Upgrading the Career Prospects of America's Low-Wage Workers. Workforce of the Future Initiative. Center for Universal Education at The Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/research/realism-about-reskilling/
[8]
Rebecca Ferguson and Doug Clow. 2015. Examining engagement: analysing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses (MOOCs). In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 51--58). https://doi.org/10.1145/2723576.2723606.
[9]
Joshua Gardner and Christopher Brooks. 2018. Student success prediction in MOOCs. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 28(2), 127--203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-018--9203-z.
[10]
Daniela Ganelin and Isaac Chuang. 2019. IP Geolocation underestimates regressive economic patterns in MOOC usage. In Proceedings of the 2019 11th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers (pp. 268--272). https://doi.org/10.1145/3369255.3369301.
[11]
John Gower. 1971. A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics, 857--871. https://doi.org/10.2307/2528823.
[12]
John Hansen and Justin Reich. 2015. Democratizing education? Examining access and usage patterns in massive open online courses. Science, 350(6265), 1245--1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab3782.
[13]
Kenneth Holstein and Shayan Doroudi. 2019. Fairness and equity in learning analytics systems (FairLAK). In Companion Proceedings of the Ninth International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference (LAK 2019). https://www.solaresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/LAK19_Companion_Proceedings.pdf.
[14]
Srecko Joksimovi?, Oleksandra Poquet, Vitomir Kovanovi?, Nia Dowell, Caitlin Mills, Dragan Ga?evi?, ... and Christopher Brooks. 2018. How do we model learning at scale? A systematic review of research on MOOCs. Review of Educational Research, 88(1), 43--86. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317740335.
[15]
Srecko Joksimovic, Vitomir Kovanovic, and Shan Dawson. 2019. The journey of learning analytics. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 6, 27--63. https://www.herdsa.org.au/herdsa-review-higher-education-vol-6/37--63.
[16]
Katy Jordan. 2014. Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1), 133--160. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1651.
[17]
Alboukadel Kassambara. 2017. Practical guide to cluster analysis in R: Unsupervised machine learning (Vol. 1). Sthda. http://www.datanovia.com/en/wp-content/uploads/dn-tutorials/book-preview/clustering_en_preview.pdf.
[18]
Alboukadel Kassambara and Fabian Mundt. 2017. Package 'factoextra'. Extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses, 76. https://cran.microsoft.com/snapshot/2016--11--30/web/packages/factoextra/factoextra.pdf
[19]
Leonard Kaufman and Peter Rousseeuw. 2009. Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis (Vol. 344). John Wiley & Sons.
[20]
Rene Kizilcec, Chris Piech, and Emily Schneider. 2013. Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 170--179). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2460296.2460330.
[21]
Rene Kizilcec and Sherif Halawa. 2015. Attrition and achievement gaps in online learning. In Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale (pp. 57--66). https://doi.org/10.1145/2724660.2724680.
[22]
Rene Kizilcec and Emily Schneider. 2015. Motivation as a lens to understand online learners: Toward data-driven design with the OLEI scale. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 22(2), 1--24. https://doi.org/10.1145/2699735.
[23]
Rene Kizilcec and Christopher Brooks. 2017. Diverse big data and randomized field experiments in MOOCs. Handbook of Learning Analytics, 211--222. https://doi.org/10.18608/hla17.018.
[24]
Vitomir Kovanovic, Srecko Joksimovi?, Dragan Gacevis, James Owers, Ann-Marie Scott, and Amy Woodgate. 2016. Profiling MOOC course returners: how does student behaviour change between two course enrollments?. In Proceedings of the third (2016) ACM conference on learning@ scale (pp. 269--272). https://doi.org/10.1145/2876034.2893431.
[25]
Dimitrios Kravvaris, Katia Kermanidis, and Georgios Ntanis. 2016. How MOOCs link with social media. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(2), 461--487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0219--2.
[26]
Qiujie Li and Rachel Baker. 2018. The different relationships between engagement and outcomes across participant subgroups in massive open online courses. Computers & Education, 127, 41--65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.005.
[27]
Richa Loohach and Kanwal Garg. 2012. Effect of distance functions on k-means clustering algorithm. Int. J. Comput. Appl., 49(6), 7--9. https://doi.org/10.5120/7629-0698.
[28]
Martin Maechler, Peter Rousseeuw, ?, and Keefe Murphy. 2022. Finding Groups in Data'': Cluster Analysis Extended Rousseeuw et. R package version, 2(0). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/cluster/index.html.
[29]
Michael Meaney. 2021. Essays on the Design of Inclusive Learning in Massive Open Online Courses, and Implications for Educational Futures. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.76128.
[30]
Michael Meaney and Tom Fikes. 2019. Early-adopter Iteration Bias and Research-praxis Bias in Virtual Learning Environments. Companion Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Tempe, Arizona (LAK'19). https://www.solaresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/LAK19_Companion_Proceedings.pdf.
[31]
R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
[32]
Justin Reich and Jose Ruipérez-Valiente. 2019. The MOOC pivot. Science, 363(6423), 130--131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav7958.
[33]
Matthias Rohs and Mario Ganz. 2015. MOOCs and the claim of education for all: A disillusion by empirical data. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6), 1--19. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2033.
[34]
Fredrik Savje. 2021. Distances. GitHub, Inc. https://github.com/fsavje/distances
[35]
Erich Schubert and Peter Rousseeuw. 2019. Faster k-medoids clustering: improving the PAM, CLARA, and CLARANS algorithms. In International conference on similarity search and applications (pp. 171--187). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3-030--32047--8_16.
[36]
Robert Tibshirani, Guenther Walther, and Trevor Hastie. 2001. Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 63(2), 411--423. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467--9868.00293.
[37]
Ryan Tibshirani. 2013. Clustering 1: K-means, k-medoids. R. Tibshirani, Data Mining, 36--462/36--662. https://www.stat.cmu.edu/~ryantibs/datamining/lectures/04-clus1.pdf
[38]
Oscar Torres-Reyna. 2012. Getting started in Logit and ordered logit regression. Princeton University, http://dss.princeton.edu/training/Logit.pdf
[39]
Yuan Wang, Tom Fikes, and Patrick Pettyjohn. 2018. Open Scale Courses: Exploring Access and Opportunity for Less-Educated Learners. In 2018 Learning With MOOCS (LWMOOCS) (pp. 102--105). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/LWMOOCS.2018.8534667.
[40]
Hadley Wickham. 2017. The tidyverse. R package ver, 1(1), 1. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/tidyverse/index.html

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Visions of a Discipline: Analyzing Introductory AI Courses on YouTubeProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency10.1145/3630106.3659045(2400-2420)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
  • (2024)A Broad Collection of Datasets for Educational Research Training and ApplicationLearning Analytics Methods and Tutorials10.1007/978-3-031-54464-4_2(17-66)Online publication date: 19-Feb-2024

Index Terms

  1. Adding a Demographic Lens to Cluster Analysis of Participants in Entry-level Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      L@S '22: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
      June 2022
      491 pages
      ISBN:9781450391580
      DOI:10.1145/3491140
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 01 June 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. inclusive education
      2. learning analytics
      3. learning design
      4. massive open online courses (MOOCs)

      Qualifiers

      • Short-paper

      Conference

      L@S '22
      L@S '22: Ninth (2022) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
      June 1 - 3, 2022
      NY, New York City, USA

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 117 of 440 submissions, 27%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Visions of a Discipline: Analyzing Introductory AI Courses on YouTubeProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency10.1145/3630106.3659045(2400-2420)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
      • (2024)A Broad Collection of Datasets for Educational Research Training and ApplicationLearning Analytics Methods and Tutorials10.1007/978-3-031-54464-4_2(17-66)Online publication date: 19-Feb-2024

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media