skip to main content
10.1145/3491396.3506502acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiceaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Prediction of Biochemical Oxygen Demand Based on VIP-PSO-Elman Model in Wastewater Treatment

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 January 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) is one of the principal indicators to evaluate wastewater effluent qualities. Establishing an effective prediction model is one of important way to monitor sewage water quality properly. However, due to the nonlinearity, time-varying and large delay of sewage treatment process, the traditional back-propagation neural network (BPNN) and Elman neural network (ElmanNN) models are often prone to fall into local optimization, then resulting in poor prediction accuracy when dealing with high-dimension and complex data structure. Therefore, this paper proposes a VIP-PSO-Elman model. In the proposed model, the partial least square (PLS) method is able to extract hidden information by variable importance projection (VIP) and then used for variable selection. Finally, the PSO algorithm is implemented to optimize Elman network connection weights and thresholds to achieve the global optimal solution. The proposed model was validated by a data set from University of California database (UCI). The results showed that the model has good performance in root mean square error (RMSE) and correlation coefficient (R).

References

  1. Li Y. J., Sun J. Z., et al. A microbial electrode based on the co-electrodeposition of carboxyl graphene and Au nanoparticles for BOD rapid detection[J]. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2017, 3(15):86--94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Huang D. P., Liu Y. Q., Li Y. Soft sensor research and its application in wastewater treatment[J]. CIESC Journal, 62, 01 (2011), 7--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Li C.W. Prediction of effluent total nitrogen in wastewater treatment plant based on BP neural network model [D]. Huazhong University of science and technology, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Yang M. Y., Zhou F. Q., Li J. Soft sensing model for city wastewater treatment process parameter based on Elman neural network. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), S1 (2006), 119--123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. C. Zhou, L.Y. Ding, R. He. PSO-based Elman neural network model for predictive control of air chamber pressure in slurry shield tunneling under Yangtze River[J]. Automation in Construction, 2013, 36(15):208--217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. L. Eriksson, E. Johansson, N. Kettaneh-Wold, S. Wold, Multi- and Megavariate Data Analysis[M]. Principles and Applications, Umetrics Academy, Umeå, Sweden, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. GOSSELIN R, RODRIGUE D, DUCHESNE C. A Bootstrap-VIP approach for selecting wavelength intervals in spectral imaging applications[J]. Chemometrics & Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2010, 100(1): 12--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. II-Gyo Chong and Chi-Hyuck Jun. Performance of some variable selection methods when multicollinearity is present[J]. Chemometrics & Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2004, 78(1):103--112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Wu Wei., Xu Dongpo., Li Zhengxue. Convergence of Gradient Method for Elman Networks[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2008 (09): 1117--1123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Wang D., Tan D., Liu L. Particle swarm optimization algorithm: An overview[J]. Soft Computing, 2017, 22(2):387--408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Bonyadi Mohammad Reza, Michalewicz Zbigniew. Particle Swarm Optimization for Single Objective Continuous Space Problems: A Review.[J]. Evolutionary computation, 2017, 25(1): 1--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Shi Y, Eberhart R. A modified particle swarm optimizer [C]. IEEE World Conf on Computational Intelligence. Piscataway: IEEE Press, 1998: 69--73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Hu J. X., Zeng J. C. Selection on Inertia Weight of Particle Swarm Optimization [J]. Computer Engineering, 2007 (11): 193--195.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Shi Y, Eberhart R C. Empirical study of particle swarm optimization[C]. Congress on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu Y. Q., Li Y., Sun Z. H., Huang D. P. Research on Fault Diagnosis of Wastewater Treatment Process Based on Factor Analysis[J]. Control engineering, 2015, 22 (03): 447--451.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lin J. Q, Sun F. S, Li Y. C, et al Prediction of aircraft cabin energy consumption based on ipso Elman neural network [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41 (07): 234--243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Pluhacek M, Senkerik R, Davendra D, et al. On the behavior and performance of chaos driven PSO algorithm with inertia weight [J]. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 2013, 66(2).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Gonzalo e, Fernandezulna J Martinez ja.a Handbook of particle swarm optimization [J].Journal of bioinformatics & intelligent control, 2012 1 (1): 3--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Prediction of Biochemical Oxygen Demand Based on VIP-PSO-Elman Model in Wastewater Treatment

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ACM ICEA '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Conference on Intelligent Computing and its Emerging Applications
      December 2021
      241 pages
      ISBN:9781450391603
      DOI:10.1145/3491396

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 January 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader