skip to main content
research-article

Considering the Artifact Ecology when Supporting the Evolution of Practices - Analyzing the Parallel Journeys of Two Teleconsultation Software in a General Hospital

Published:14 January 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The growing use of teleconsultation, especially since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, changes physicians' work at the hospital. In this paper, we set out to study how physicians have integrated teleconsultation into their healthcare practices. Moreover, we are interested in how teleconsultation software contributes to developing new medical practices and how the design of teleconsultation software can better support them. Based on 16 months of fieldwork in a general hospital that offers two different teleconsultation software, we have investigated teleconsultation practices through interviews and observations involving ten physicians doing teleconsultation and a telemedicine secretary. Unlike the existing informal remote care by phone, we observe that teleconsultation supports new formal healthcare practices, particularly for patient care management and inter-organizational cooperation. While analyzing the integration of teleconsultation in physicians' practices, we highlight that both pieces of software do not support those practices on equal terms according to their design. We argue that teleconsultation software design can limit the spread of these new healthcare practices and that the artifact ecology of physicians should be considered during the design process.

References

  1. Pols J. Care at a Distance. In: On the Closeness of Technology. Amsterdam University Press, https://www.oapen.org/download?type=document&docid=413032 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Koch S. Home telehealth-Current state and future trends. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2006; 75: 565--576.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Legifrance. Décret n° 2010--1229 du 19 octobre 2010 relatif à la télémédecine, https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000022932449/ (2010, accessed 5 May 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Grossman SN, Han SC, Balcer LJ, et al. Rapid implementation of virtual neurology in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Neurology 2020; 94: 1077--1087.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Rossitto C, Bogdan C, Severinson-Eklundh K. Understanding Constellations of Technologies in Use in a Collaborative Nomadic Setting. Comput Supported Coop Work 2014; 23: 137--161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bardram JE, Bossen C. Mobility Work: The Spatial Dimension of Collaboration at a Hospital. Comput Supported Coop Work 2005; 14: 131--160.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Islind AS, Snis UL, Lindroth T, et al. The Virtual Clinic: Two-sided Affordances in Consultation Practice. Comput Supported Coop Work 2019; 28: 435--468.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Esterle L, Mathieu-Fritz A. Teleconsultation in geriatrics: impact on professional practice. International journal of medical informatics 2013; 82: 684--695.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Larsen SB, Bardram JE. Competence articulation: alignment of competences and responsibilities in synchronous telemedical collaboration. In: Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual CHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '08. Florence, Italy: ACM Press, p. 553.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Nicolini D. The work to make telemedicine work: A social and articulative view. Social Science & Medicine 2006; 62: 2754--2767.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen J, Ou L, Hollis SJ. A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13: 211.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ding B, Liu W, Tsai S-B, et al. Effect of Patient Participation on Nurse and Patient Outcomes in Inpatient Healthcare. Int J Environ Res Public Health; 16. Epub ahead of print April 2019. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16081344.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Andersen TO, Bansler JP, Kensing F, et al. Aligning Concerns in Telecare: Three Concepts to Guide the Design of Patient-Centred E-Health. Comput Supported Coop Work 2018; 27: 1181--1214.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Bødker S, Klokmose CN. Dynamics in artifact ecologies. In: Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 448--457.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Bødker S, Korsgaard H, Saad-Sulonen J. A Farmer, a Place and at least 20 Members- The Development of Artifact Ecologies in Volunteer-based Communities. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW '16. San Francisco, California, USA: ACM Press, pp. 1140--1154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Robertson T, Li J, O'Hara K, et al. Collaboration within different settings: a study of co-located and distributed multidisciplinary medical team meetings. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/collaboration-within-different-settings-a-study-of-co-located-and-distributed-multidisciplinary-medical-team-meetings/ (2010, accessed 4 February 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Simon P, Acker D. La place de la télémédecine dans l'organisation des soins. Rapport du Ministère de la Santé et des Sports, Direction de l'Hospitalisation et de l'Organisation des Soins. Novembre 2008.[En ligne].(consulté le 31 octobre 2014). 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Nicolini D. Practice Theory, Work, and Organization. An Introduction. OUP Oxford, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Esterle L, Mathieu-Fritz A. Teleconsultation in geriatrics: impact on professional practice. International journal of medical informatics 2013; 82: 684--695.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Mathieu-Fritz A, Esterle L. Les transformations des pratiques professionnelles lors des téléconsultations médicales. Revue francaise de sociologie 2013; Vol. 54: 303--329.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Goffman E. Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row, http://books.google.com/books?id=7oRqAAAAMAAJ (1974, accessed 4 February 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Stevanovic A, Beckers SK, Czaplik M, et al. Telemedical support for prehospital Emergency Medical Service (TEMS trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2017; 18: 43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Salles N. Impact de la télémédecine clinique sur les pratiques de soins en Ehpad. Revue Francophone de Cicatrisation 2017; 1: 19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Han D, Neustaedter C, Tan Z. Concerns of Primary Care Physicians for Video-Based Visits. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Honolulu HI USA: ACM, pp. 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Wolf CT, Blomberg JL. Making Sense of Enterprise Apps in Everyday Work Practices. Comput Supported Coop Work 2020; 29: 1--27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Iroju O, Soriyan A, Gambo I, et al. Interoperability in Healthcare: Benefits, Challenges and Resolutions. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies 2013; 3: 10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Gibbons P, Arzt N, Burke-Beebe S, et al. Coming to terms: scoping interoperability for health care. Health Level Seven EHR Interoperability Work Group, http://www.hln.com/assets/pdf/Coming -to-Terms-February-2007.pdf (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Bossen C, Pine KH, Cabitza F, et al. Data work in healthcare: An Introduction. Health Informatics J 2019; 25: 465--474.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Henderson A, Kyng M. There is no place like home - continuing design in use. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Mackay WE. Patterns of sharing customizable software. In: Proceedings of the 1990 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work - CSCW '90. Los Angeles, California, United States: ACM Press, pp. 209--221.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Trigg RH, Bødker S. From implementation to design: tailoring and the emergence of systematization in CSCW. In: Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 45--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Orlikowski WJ. Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations. Organization Science 2000; 11: 404--428.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Marcus GE. Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 1995; 24: 95--117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Corbin JM, Strauss A. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual Sociol 1990; 13: 3--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Star SL, Strauss A. Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 1999; 8: 9--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Viangteeravat T, Anyanwu MN, Nagisetty V, et al. Clinical data integration of distributed data sources using Health Level Seven (HL7) v3-RIM mapping. J Clin Bioinformatics 2011; 1: 32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Jackson SJ, Gillespie T, Payette S. The policy knot: re-integrating policy, practice and design in cscw studies of social computing. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 588--602.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Bansler JP, Kensing F. Information Infrastructures for Health Care: Connecting Practices Across Institutional and Professional Boundaries. Comput Supported Coop Work 2010; 19: 519--520.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Ellingsen G, Røed K. The Role of Integration in Health-Based Information Infrastructures. Comput Supported Coop Work 2010; 19: 557--584.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Considering the Artifact Ecology when Supporting the Evolution of Practices - Analyzing the Parallel Journeys of Two Teleconsultation Software in a General Hospital

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
        Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 6, Issue GROUP
        GROUP
        January 2022
        992 pages
        EISSN:2573-0142
        DOI:10.1145/3511803
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 14 January 2022
        Published in pacmhci Volume 6, Issue GROUP

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader