skip to main content
10.1145/3493700.3493733acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescomadConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

ComParE: A User Behavior Centric Framework for Personalized Recommendations in Skill Gaming Platforms

Published:08 January 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recommendation in outcome based platforms (eg. skill gaming, financial trading) where users get rewards based on their choices and the subsequent non-deterministic outcomes from such choices presents a unique set of challenges. Unlike other online services (e.g., e-commerce, social media), these platforms often see: (a) distinctive longitudinal behavior patterns in users’ transactions, (b) enormous content generated by the user interactions, (c) a dynamic interplay between the users’ transactional history and outcomes towards their future behavior, (d) ordinal nature of transaction elements. Motivated by these observations, we propose ComParE (Competing Parallel Networks with Expert Network), a novel personalized recommendation framework that: (i) exploits the distinct behavioral trends in the data, by training competing parallel networks as local experts, (ii) trains a global expert network to get the overall picture for the final prediction, and (iii) introduces custom loss functions to learn inherent ordering and interpretations of the classes being predicted. With the example of personalizing entry fee choices for the game of Rummy on the RummyCircle platform we show: (i) distinct and robust user Personas found based on historical entry fee selections; (ii) significant boosts in the entry fee predictions through ComParE with both neural networks and classical ML algorithms for local and global experts; (iii) substantial lifts over platform default as shown through offline analysis. ComParE significantly outperforms other baselines including well known deep learning models, as shown through offline experiments.

References

  1. Fabian Abel, Qi Gao, Geert-Jan Houben, and Ke Tao. 2011. Analyzing temporal dynamics in twitter profiles for personalized recommendations in the social web. In Proceedings of the 3rd international web science conference. 1–8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Sercan O Arik and Tomas Pfister. 2019. Tabnet: Attentive interpretable tabular learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.07442(2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Giuliano Arru, Davide Feltoni Gurini, Fabio Gasparetti, Alessandro Micarelli, and Giuseppe Sansonetti. 2013. Signal-based user recommendation on twitter. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web. 941–944.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Joydeep Banerjee, Gurulingesh Raravi, Manoj Gupta, Sindhu K Ernala, Shruti Kunde, and Koustuv Dasgupta. 2016. CAPReS: Context Aware Persona Based Recommendation for Shoppers.. In AAAI. 680–686.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Oren Barkan, Yonatan Fuchs, Avi Caciularu, and Noam Koenigstein. 2020. Explainable Recommendations via Attentive Multi-Persona Collaborative Filtering. In Fourteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 468–473.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Anand Bodas, Bhargav Upadhyay, Chetan Nadiger, and Sherine Abdelhak. 2018. Reinforcement learning for game personalization on edge devices. In 2018 International Conference on Information and Computer Technologies (ICICT). IEEE, 119–122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Elizabeth A Boyle, Thomas M Connolly, Thomas Hainey, and James M Boyle. 2012. Engagement in digital entertainment games: A systematic review. Computers in human behavior 28, 3 (2012), 771–780.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Donghui Cho. 2015. What influences people to purchase ingame mobile items?: Analysis of motivational drivers to use ingame mobile game items in the US. Michigan State University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Evangelia Christakopoulou and George Karypis. 2016. Local item-item models for top-n recommendation. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 67–74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Juho Hamari and Lauri Keronen. 2017. Why do people buy virtual goods: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior 71 (2017), 59–69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Stephen Karpinskyj, Fabio Zambetta, and Lawrence Cavedon. 2014. Video game personalisation techniques: A comprehensive survey. Entertainment Computing 5, 4 (2014), 211–218.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Guolin Ke, Jia Zhang, Zhenhui Xu, Jiang Bian, and Tie-Yan Liu. 2018. TabNN: A Universal Neural Network Solution for Tabular Data. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Piji Li, Zihao Wang, Lidong Bing, and Wai Lam. 2019. Persona-Aware Tips Generation. In The World Wide Web Conference. 1006–1016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Holin Lin and Chuen-Tsai Sun. 2007. Cash trade within the magic circle: free-to-play game challenges and massively multiplayer online game player responses.. In DiGRA Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Enrica Loria and Annapaola Marconi. 2018. Player Types and player behaviors: analyzing correlations in an on-the-field gamified system. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts. 531–538.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ding-Bang Luh, Elena Carolina Li, and Chia-Chen Dai. 2016. Game factors influencing players to continue playing online pets. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games 9, 3(2016), 267–276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Ben Marder, David Gattig, Emily Collins, Leyland Pitt, Jan Kietzmann, and Antonia Erz. 2019. The Avatar’s new clothes: Understanding why players purchase non-functional items in free-to-play games. Computers in Human Behavior 91 (2019), 72–83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Xia Ning and George Karypis. 2011. Slim: Sparse linear methods for top-n recommender systems. In 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining. IEEE, 497–506.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Genaína Nunes Rodrigues, Carlos Joel Tavares, Naiara Watanabe, Carina Alves, and Raian Ali. 2018. A persona-based modelling for contextual requirements. In International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality. Springer, 352–368.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Joni Salminen, Bernard J Jansen, Jisun An, Haewoon Kwak, and Soon-Gyo Jung. 2019. Automatic persona generation for online content creators: Conceptual rationale and a research agenda. In Personas-User focused design. Springer, 135–160.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Joni Salminen, Jukka Vahlo, Aki Koponen, Soon-Gyo Jung, Shammur A Chowdhury, and Bernard J Jansen. 2020. Designing Prototype Player Personas from a Game Preference Survey. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Valentino Servizi, Sokol Kosta, Allan Hammershøj, and Henning Olesen. 2018. A User Experience Model for Privacy and Context Aware Over-the-Top (OTT) TV Recommendations.. In CIKM Workshops.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ryutaro Tanno, Kai Arulkumaran, Daniel Alexander, Antonio Criminisi, and Aditya Nori. 2019. Adaptive neural trees. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 6166–6175.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Selen Turkay and Sonam Adinolf. 2015. The effects of customization on motivation in an extended study with a massively multiplayer online roleplaying game. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 9, 3(2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Daniel Gallego Vico, Gabriel Huecas, and J Salvachúa Rodríguez. 2012. Generating context-aware recommendations using banking data in a mobile recommender system. In ICDS 2012, The Sixth International Conference on Digital Society. 73–78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Su Xue, Meng Wu, John Kolen, Navid Aghdaie, and Kazi A Zaman. 2017. Dynamic difficulty adjustment for maximized engagement in digital games. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion. 465–471.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Jinsung Yoon, James Jordon, and Mihaela van der Schaar. 2018. INVASE: Instance-wise variable selection using neural networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Chang Zhou, Jinze Bai, Junshuai Song, Xiaofei Liu, Zhengchao Zhao, Xiusi Chen, and Jun Gao. 2017. Atrank: An attention-based user behavior modeling framework for recommendation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.06632(2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. ComParE: A User Behavior Centric Framework for Personalized Recommendations in Skill Gaming Platforms
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CODS-COMAD '22: Proceedings of the 5th Joint International Conference on Data Science & Management of Data (9th ACM IKDD CODS and 27th COMAD)
            January 2022
            357 pages

            Copyright © 2022 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 8 January 2022

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)33
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format