skip to main content
10.1145/3494193.3494198acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Blockchain-based carbon trading mechanism to elevate governance and smartness

Published:12 January 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Climate change has negative effects on life on earth as well as the environment and economy. Harmful greenhouse gases, especially CO2, emitted from industrial processes executed by developed countries were identified as the primary reason behind climate change. The world recognized the risk of excessive CO2 emissions, therefore, the United Nations established the Kyoto protocol which aims at reducing the release of CO2 by monetizing its emissions. To achieve its goal, the Kyoto protocol established a carbon emission trading scheme to distribute and trade CO2 allowances among and between emitting participants. However, the carbon emission trading scheme fell short of its goal due to lack of integrity, governance, high intermediary cost and other security and technical issues revealing the need for a solution to elevate the scheme's operations. Meanwhile, blockchian emerged as a revolutionary way to operate business models due to its decentralization, security, traceability, immutability, and privacy. This study proposes an efficient and smart carbon emission trading system utilizing blockchain and smart contract. Our paper proposes a carbon emission trading system using Ethereum blockchain smart contract to automate trading Kyoto units between entities and reduce operations cost. The proposed system performs buyers registration and Kyoto units trading using Ether cryptocurrency for payment without intermediary but rather through smart contract and blockchain. The result is a robust and smart system that inherits blockchain features of trust, immutability, distribution, governance, and transparency.

References

  1. U. Unfccc, "Kyoto protocol reference manual on accounting of emissions and assigned amount," eSocialSciences, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. "What is the Kyoto Protocol?,." United Nations https://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol (accessed 2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. J. Abrell, "Regulating CO2 emissions of transportation in Europe: A CGE-analysis using market-based instruments," Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 235-239, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. R. W. Hahn and R. N. Stavins, "The effect of allowance allocations on cap-and-trade system performance," The Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 54, no. S4, pp. S267-S294, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. A. Rose, D. Wei, N. Miller, T. Vandyck, and C. Flachsland, "Policy brief—Achieving Paris climate agreement pledges: Alternative designs for linking emissions trading systems," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 170-182, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. K. Skene and A. Murray, Sustainable Economics: context, challenges and opportunities for the 21st-century practitioner. Routledge, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. W. Viriyasitavat and D. Hoonsopon, "Blockchain characteristics and consensus in modern business processes," Journal of Industrial Information Integration, vol. 13, pp. 32-39, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. A. R. Hevner, S. T. March, J. Park, and S. Ram, "Design science in information systems research," MIS quarterly, pp. 75-105, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. K. Peffers, T. Tuunanen, M. A. Rothenberger, and S. Chatterjee, "A design science research methodology for information systems research," Journal of management information systems, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 45-77, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. J. Ashley and M. S. Johnson, "Establishing a secure, transparent, and autonomous blockchain of custody for renewable energy credits and carbon credits," IEEE Engineering Management Review, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 100-102, 2018, doi: 10.1109/EMR.2018.2874967.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Q. Tang and L. M. Tang, "Toward a distributed carbon ledger for carbon emissions trading and accounting for corporate carbon management," Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 37-46, 2019, doi: 10.2308/jeta-52409.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. S. Hartmann and S. Thomas, "Applying Blockchain to the Australian Carbon Market," Economic Papers, 2019, doi: 10.1111/1759-3441.12266.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. W. Hua and H. Sun, "A Blockchain-Based Peer-to-Peer Trading Scheme Coupling Energy and Carbon Markets," in SEST 2019 - 2nd International Conference on Smart Energy Systems and Technologies, 2019, doi: 10.1109/SEST.2019.8849111. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85073343298&doi=10.1109%2fSEST.2019.8849111&partnerID=40&md5= a5e384c55ee1f8031ca01fff3fa38eeaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. K. N. Khaqqi, J. J. Sikorski, K. Hadinoto, and M. Kraft, "Incorporating seller/buyer reputation-based system in blockchain-enabled emission trading application," Applied Energy, vol. 209, pp. 8-19, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.070.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. X. Liang, X. Wang, Y. Du, and Y. Zeng, "Design of a double-blockchain structured carbon emission trading scheme with reputation," in Proceedings - 2019 34rd Youth Academic Annual Conference of Chinese Association of Automation, YAC 2019, 2019, pp. 464-467, doi: 10.1109/YAC.2019.8787720. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85071383344&doi= 10.1109%2fYAC.2019.8787720&partnerID=40&md5=72185f32749e1a759a920b9f52b3ceb6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Y. Pan , "Application of blockchain in carbon trading," in Energy Procedia, 2019, vol. 158, pp. 4286-4291, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.509. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85063885142&doi= 10.1016%2fj.egypro.2019.01.509&partnerID=40&md5=b9982e2e7d51990136f9ed6b071b31a9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. United Nations climate change. "Kyoto Protocol - Targets for the first commitment period." United Nations climate change. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-kyoto-protocol/what-is-the-kyoto-protocol/kyoto-protocol-targets-for-the-first-commitment-period (accessed 2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. N. C. a. N. S. German Federal Ministry for the Environment. "Kyoto Mechanisms,." https://www.bmu.de/en/topics/climate-energy/climate/international-climate-policy/kyoto-protocol/kyoto-mechanisms/ (accessed 2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. United Nation Convention on Climate Change. "Joint Implementation." https://unfccc.int/process/the-kyoto-protocol/mechanisms/joint-implementation (accessed.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. C. Luo, L. Xu, D. Li, and W. Wu, "Edge computing integrated with blockchain technologies," in Complexity and Approximation: Springer, 2020, pp. 268-288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Z. Zheng, S. Xie, H. Dai, X. Chen, and H. Wang, "An Overview of Blockchain Technology: Architecture, Consensus, and Future Trends," in 2017 IEEE International Congress on Big Data (BigData Congress), 25-30 June 2017 2017, pp. 557-564, doi: 10.1109/BigDataCongress.2017.85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. L. W. Cong and Z. He, "Blockchain Disruption and Smart Contracts," The Review of Financial Studies, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1754-1797, 9/4/2020 2019, doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhz007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. B. Fu, Z. Shu, and X. Liu, "Blockchain enhanced emission trading framework in fashion apparel manufacturing industry," Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 10, no. 4, 2018, doi: 10.3390/su10041105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. H. N. Dai, Z. Zheng, and Y. Zhang, "Blockchain for Internet of Things: A Survey," IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 8076-8094, 2019, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2019.2920987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. S. Tikhomirov, "Ethereum: state of knowledge and research perspectives," in International Symposium on Foundations and Practice of Security, 2017: Springer, pp. 206-221.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Remix. "Welcome to Remix's documentation!,." https://remix-ide.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ (accessed 2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Blockchain-based carbon trading mechanism to elevate governance and smartness
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ICEGOV '21: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
            October 2021
            557 pages
            ISBN:9781450390118
            DOI:10.1145/3494193

            Copyright © 2021 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 12 January 2022

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate350of865submissions,40%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format