skip to main content
10.1145/3494193.3494230acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Interoperability skills and competencies - the drivers for digital growth in Public Administrations

Published:12 January 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The implementation of eGovernment in the Public Sector has numerous advantages for government and business sectors. Interoperability is crucial to streamline the digital solutions of public administrations. To enhance the digital transformation and implementation of eGovernment and to contribute to both interoperable cross-border and cross-sector public services, civil servants should possess the necessary required digital skills and competencies to carry out this process. An important milestone for eGovernment services is the establishment of the Interoperability Academy, funded by the ISA2 Programme of the European Commission (EC). Interoperability Academy provides eLearning courses on advanced digital skills with a focus on interoperability. The study on the European Framework for Interoperability Skills and Competences in the public sector (EFISC) defines the knowledge, skills, attitudes and competencies that can favor interoperability and could support civil servants in increasing their capabilities in relation to interoperability and digital work. However, it remains uncertain whether and how public administrations would be able to integrate the required skills and competencies described in the framework. Hence, this article presents an ongoing research with the aim to propose a methodology for investigating the application and effectiveness of the EFISC framework in public sector via a case study. This practical case study will support civil servants in increasing their digital skills capabilities in relation to interoperability and ensure the high reusability potential of EFISC.

References

  1. Van Laar, E., Van Deursen, A. J., Van Dijk, J. A., and De Haan, J. 2017. The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in human behavior, 72, 577-588.tul.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. European Commission. 2015. establishing a programme on interoperability solutions and common frameworks for European public administrations, businesses and citizens (ISA2 programme) as a means for modernising the public sector. Retrieved May 7, 2021 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1449478436536&uri=CELEX:32015D2240.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. European Commission. 2021. Digital Strategy Retrieved May 7, 2021 from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/digital-europe programme-proposed-eu75-billion-funding-2021-2027.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Deursen, Alexander J.A.M. and Van Dijk 2009. Improving digital skills for the use of online public information and services. Government Information Quarterly, 26. 333-340. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2008.11.002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Kalogirou, V., Stasis, A. and Charalabidis. Y. 2020. Adapting national interoperability frameworks beyond EIF 3.0: the case of Greece. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV 2020). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 234–243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3428502.3428536.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. European Commission. 2019. Improving digital skills in the public sector - ISA². Retrieved April 05, 2021 from https://ec.europa.eu/isa2/actions/improving-digital-skills-public-sector_en.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. European Commission 2021. Study on the development of a European framework for interoperability skills and competences in the public sector (EIFISC). Retrieved May 06, 2021 from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4e07a84f-abbf-11eb-927e-01aa75ed71a1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. European Commission 2017. The European Interoperability Framework-Implementation Strategy COM, 134 Annex II. Retrieved from: https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52017DC0134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. 2013. Distinct skill pathways to digital engagement. European Journal of Communication, 28(6), 696-713.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Chinn, D., Hieronimus, S., Kirchherr, J. and Klier, J. 2020. The future is now: closing the skills gap in Europe's public sector’, McKinsey & Company. Retrieved April 27, 2020 from https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-and-social-sector/our-insights/the-future-isnow-closing-the-skills gap-in-europes public-sector.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kalogirou, V. and Charalabidis, Y. 2019. The European union landscape on interoperability standardisation: status of European and national interoperability frameworks. In Enterprise Interoperability VIII. Springer, Cham, 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13693-2_30 .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Yin, R.K. 1984. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. In Sage: Newbury Park, CA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Siggelkow, N. 2007. Persuasion with case studies. AMJ, 50 (1), 20–24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Čirjevskis, A. 2019. The role of dynamic capabilities as drivers of business model innovation in mergers and acquisitions of technology-advanced firms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(1), 12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), 509-533.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Wagner, D., Wenzel, M., Wagner, H. T., and Koch, J. 2017. Sense, seize, reconfigure: online communities as strategic assets. Journal of Business Strategy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. European Commission 2020. Updated Learner Profiles and Learning Paths. Retrieved May 7, 2021 from https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/digital-skills-public-sector/solution/interoperability-academy/document/updated-learner-profiles-and learning-paths.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Guest, G., Bunce, A. and Johnson, L., 2006. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods, 18(1), pp.59-82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Haines, V., Kyriakopoulou, K. and Lawton, C., 2019. End user engagement with domestic hot water heating systems: Design implications for future thermal storage technologies. Energy Research & Social Science, 49, pp.74-81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Stary C., Weichhart G., and Kaar C. 2020. Design Science as Methodological Approach to Interoperability Engineering in Digital Production. In Debruyne C. ed. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2019 Workshops, Springer, Cham., vol 11878.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Interoperability skills and competencies - the drivers for digital growth in Public Administrations
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICEGOV '21: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
        October 2021
        557 pages
        ISBN:9781450390118
        DOI:10.1145/3494193

        Copyright © 2021 ACM

        Publication rights licensed to ACM. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 12 January 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate350of865submissions,40%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)44
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format