skip to main content
10.1145/3494322.3494359acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiotConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Poster: Towards Explaining the Effects of Contextual Influences on Cyber-Physical Systems

Published:08 March 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The increasing complexity of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) increases the difficulty for users to understand their behavior. Using existing Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods, CPS can explain their behavior to the users. However, the input-output correlations used in XAI methods are not capable of explaining certain anomalies on CPS behavior caused by contextual influences (CIs) since they do not consider the context of the CPS. Some well-known techniques used for understanding such CIs on CPS are test chambers and the analysis of logged CPS data. However, test chambers are typically only available to the manufacturer of a CPS, thus not useful for understanding CIs on the shop floors. Data analysis methods focus on data correlations, which are insufficient to explain causal relationships without using expert (human) knowledge. Hence, we propose a context-aware log-based explanation system to explain the causal relationship between CIs and the behavior of a CPS. The proposed solution employs semantic technologies to access the context of the CPS. It demonstrates the causal relationship between the CPS and CIs through counterfactual explanation and abductive reasoning methods. The contextual explanations offered by the proposed system will assist users in visualizing diverse scenarios in order to improve the CPS’ behavior accordingly.

References

  1. Marcello Balduccini, Edward Griffor, Michael Huth, Claire Vishik, Martin Burns, and David Wollman. 2018. Ontology-based reasoning about the trustworthiness of cyber-physical systems. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Christian Beecks, Shreekantha Devasya, and Ruben Schlutter. 2019. Machine Learning for Enhanced Waste Quantity Reduction: Insights from the MONSOON Industry 4.0 Project.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Mathias Blumreiter, Joel Greenyer, Francisco Javier Chiyah Garcia, Verena Klös, Maike Schwammberger, Christoph Sommer, Andreas Vogelsang, and Andreas Wortmann. 2019. Towards self-explainable cyber-physical systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dieter Brughmans and David Martens. 2021. NICE: An Algorithm for Nearest Instance Counterfactual Explanations. (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Xiaojun Chen, Shengbin Jia, and Yang Xiang. 2020. A review: Knowledge reasoning over knowledge graph. Expert Systems with Applications 141 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Andrei Ciortea, Simon Mayer, Simon Bienz, Fabien Gandon, and Olivier Corby. 2020. Autonomous search in a social and ubiquitous Web. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing(2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Wang-Zhou Dai, Qiuling Xu, Yang Yu, and Zhi-Hua Zhou. 2019. Bridging machine learning and logical reasoning by abductive learning. (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Anind K Dey. 2001. Understanding and using context. Personal and ubiquitous computing 5 (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Lichen Fang, Yishu Yan, Ojaswi Agarwal, Shengyu Yao, Jonathan E Seppala, and Sung Hoon Kang. 2020. Effects of Environmental Temperature and Humidity on the Geometry and Strength of Polycarbonate Specimens Prepared by Fused Filament Fabrication. Materials 13(2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jerry Fowler and Willy Zwaenepoel. 1990. Causal distributed breakpoints. Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Andreas Holzinger, Georg Langs, Helmut Denk, Kurt Zatloukal, and Heimo Müller. 2019. Causability and explainability of artificial intelligence in medicine. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 9 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Mark T Keane, Eoin M Kenny, Eoin Delaney, and Barry Smyth. 2021. If Only We Had Better Counterfactual Explanations: Five Key Deficits to Rectify in the Evaluation of Counterfactual XAI Techniques. (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Felipe Lopez, Miguel Saez, Yuru Shao, Efe C Balta, James Moyne, Z Morley Mao, Kira Barton, and Dawn Tilbury. 2017. Categorization of anomalies in smart manufacturing systems to support the selection of detection mechanisms. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Scott M Lundberg and Su-In Lee. 2017. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30, I. Guyon, U. V. Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett(Eds.).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Christoph Molnar. 2019. Interpretable Machine Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ramaravind K Mothilal, Amit Sharma, and Chenhao Tan. 2020. Explaining machine learning classifiers through diverse counterfactual explanations. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Nathalia Nascimento, Paulo Alencar, Carlos Lucena, and Donald Cowan. 2018. A context-aware machine learning-based approach.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Leonard Petnga and Mark Austin. 2013. Ontologies of time and time-based reasoning for MBSE of cyber-physical systems. Procedia Computer Science 16 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. ”Why Should I Trust You?”: Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA, August 13-17, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Quentin Ricard and Philippe Owezarski. 2020. Ontology Based Anomaly Detection for Cellular Vehicular Communications. In 10th European Congress on Embedded Real Time Software and Systems (ERTS 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Jonathan G Richens, Ciarán M Lee, and Saurabh Johri. 2020. Improving the accuracy of medical diagnosis with causal machine learning. Nature communications 11(2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Nada Sahlab, Nasser Jazdi, and Michael Weyrich. 2020. Dynamic Context Modeling for Cyber-Physical Systems Applied to a Pill Dispenser.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Tunga Salthammer. 2009. Environmental test chambers and cells. Organic indoor air pollutants: occurrence, measurement, evaluation (2009).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Udo Schlegel, Hiba Arnout, Mennatallah El-Assady, Daniela Oelke, and Daniel A Keim. 2019. Towards a rigorous evaluation of XAI Methods on Time Series. (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Mukesh Singhal and Ajay Kshemkalyani. 1992. An efficient implementation of vector clocks. Inform. Process. Lett. 43 (1992).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Srikanth Thudumu, Philip Branch, Jiong Jin, and Jugdutt Jack Singh. 2020. A comprehensive survey of anomaly detection techniques for high dimensional big data. Journal of Big Data 7(2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Tom Weber and Stefan Wermter. 2020. Integrating Intrinsic and Extrinsic Explainability: The Relevance of Understanding Neural Networks for Human-Robot Interaction. (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Adam White and Artur d’Avila Garcez. 2019. Measurable counterfactual local explanations for any classifier. (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Poster: Towards Explaining the Effects of Contextual Influences on Cyber-Physical Systems
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            IoT '21: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on the Internet of Things
            November 2021
            233 pages
            ISBN:9781450385664
            DOI:10.1145/3494322

            Copyright © 2021 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 8 March 2022

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate28of84submissions,33%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)31
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format