skip to main content
10.1145/3494583.3494618acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicibeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

How Does the Industrial Agglomeration Effect Affect Technological Innovation? A Moderated Mediation Model

Published:09 January 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Taking industrial agglomeration as the breakthrough point, this paper explores whether entrepreneurship can play a mediating role between agglomeration effect and enterprise technological innovation, puts forward a mediating model with moderating variables, and tests the moderating role of institutional environment in the whole process. Using survey data of 513 companies from Yangtze River delta, it demonstrates that industrial agglomeration effect is positively related to technological innovation and entrepreneurship plays a partial mediating role in this relationship. It also finds institutional environment plays a significant positive moderate role in the positive relationship of industrial agglomeration effect and entrepreneurship, entrepreneurship and technological innovation, and in the mediating effort of entrepreneurship.

References

  1. Zhou, M., and Li, Z.Z. 2011. Research on Innovative Capacity of High-tech Industry among Provinces in China: Based on the View Point of Industry Agglomeration. Science Research Management,32(1):15-28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Li, Q.X., Wang, Z.Y., and Gu, W.Z. 2020. Research on the Relationship between Industrial Agglomeration, Knowledge Spillover and Regional Innovation–Concurrent Analysis of the Role of Regional Knowledge Absorptive Capacity in Knowledge Spillover and Regional Innovation. Price: Theory & Practice, (7):170-173.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Yang, C., Huang, Q.H., and He, J. 2020. Agglomeration Externality, Innovation and Corporate Profitability of the Low-Medium Technology Industry. Science Research Management, 41(8):142-147.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Wennekers, A.R.M.,and Thurik, A.R.1999. Corruption and Capital Growth: Identification of Bribery by the Firm. International Journal of Economics and Management, 13(2):467-479.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Delgado, M., M. E. Porter, and S. Stern. 2010. Clusters and Entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Geography, 10:495-518.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Peter, F. Drucker. 1985. Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles. London: Heinemann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Wang, D.C., and Zhao, S.M. 2013. The Relationship between Entrepreneurship System and Corporate Entrepreneurship: Based on the Empirical Research of High-tech Enterprises in the Pearl River Delta. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 30(19):83-88.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Zahra S.A. 1991. Predictors and Financial Outcomes of Corporate Entrepreneurship: An Explorative Study. Journal of Business Venturing, 1991, 6(4): 259-285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Scott W.R. 1995. Institutions and Organizations. America: SAGE Publication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kostova T. 1997. Country Institutional Profiles: Concept and Measurement. Academy of Management, Best Paper Proceedings, 1997: 180-189.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hu, P., & Tian, Y. 2013. The Empirical Research on the Dimension of Industrial Cluster Agglomeration Effect. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 30(17):61-65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Zahra S.A., and Garvis, D.M. 2000. International Corporate Entrepreneurship and Firm Performance: The Moderating Effect of International Environmental Hostility. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(4/5): 469-492.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Dang X.H., and Sun, Y. l. 2013. Impact of Technological Innovation Network Position on Network Routines: Taking Interorganizational Trust as a Mediative Variable. Science Research Management, 34(4):1-8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jiang, C. Y., and Zhao, S.M. 2010. Regional Differences in the Institutional Environment of Corporate Entrepreneurship: An Empirical Study of 15 National High-tech Industrial Development Zones Enterprises. Economic Science, 6:101-114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICIBE '21: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Industrial and Business Engineering
    September 2021
    411 pages
    ISBN:9781450390644
    DOI:10.1145/3494583

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 9 January 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format