Yifeng Liu
ABSTRACT
The introduction of artificial intelligence technology into judicial adjudication is of great significance. By using the intelligent case handling system to assist judges in handling cases, on the one hand, it can effectively alleviate the problem of many cases but few judges in Chinese courts, thereby improving judicial efficiency; on the other hand, judges can retrieve information about similar cases on the judgment document management platform. This can promote the unification of the law and protect the judges to exercise their discretion. However, the scope of use of artificial intelligence technology should be controlled in judicial judgments. Under the conditions of following the provisions of judicial judgments, based on China's national conditions and judicial practice experience, set up legal and reasonable regulations and procedures. Promote the combination of artificial intelligence "technology" and "people" in judicial trials to ensure the legal operation of the judicial intelligence process.
- Marvin Minsky:Computation:Finite and Infinite Machines,Prentice-Hall,1967:11-12Google Scholar
- Xin Li, Peiqi LIU, The Opportunities and Challenges of Legal Profession in Artificial Intelligence Age, Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), No. 2, 2020, page 77Google Scholar
- Chen Su, Tian He: "Report on the Development of Informatization of Chinese Courts", Social Science Literature Publication, 2020 edition, p. 12.Google Scholar
- Ruihua Chen: Recommendations on sentencing, published in "Politics and Law Forum", No. 2, 2011, page 14.Google Scholar
- Weimin Zuo: Judicial Practices of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence-How to Realize Judicial Cases and Judgments through Artificial Intelligence, China Law Review, Issue 2, 2018, p. 114Google Scholar
- Meng Huang and Junming Wu: "Judicial Application of Artificial Intelligence under the Judgment Threshold of Different Cases", published in "Journal of Chengdu Institute of Public Administration", Issue 5, 2020, pages 44-46.Google Scholar
- Jianlin Bian: "Opportunities and Challenges of China's Criminal Procedure System in the Era of Artificial Intelligence", published in "Jianghuai Forum", Issue 4, 2020, No. 152-1Google Scholar
- Kun Wu: "Information Philosophy-Theory, System, Method" , Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2005 edition, pp. 506-510.Google Scholar
- Weidong Chen: Re-discussion on the Theoretical Issues of the Leniency System for Plea and Punishment, published in Global Law Review, Issue 2, 2020, pp. 33-34.Google Scholar
- Weimin Zuo, Hotness and Coldness: Rethinking of Legal Artificial Intelligence in China, Global Law Review, No. 2, 2019, page 56Google Scholar
- On the Application of Artificial Intelligence Technology in the Field of Judicial Adjudication
Recommendations
The Legitimacy of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Decision Making: Chinese Experience
Since the birth of artificial intelligence, the discussion of the legitimacy of its application to judicial scenarios has never stopped. The domestic academic circles question the legality of artificial intelligence decision-making mainly embodies ...
Comments