skip to main content
10.1145/3495243.3560520acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

uGPS: design and field-tested seamless GNSS infrastructure in metro city

Published:14 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a uGPS (Underground GPS), which is the first SDR (Software Defined Radio)-based GNSS service to commodity GNSS receivers, including the latest iPhone, Android, and Car navigation. The uGPS is a system consisting of SDRs for GNSS signal generation, a GNSS D.O. for nano-second level timing synchronization's economic selection, fiber optic, and leaky feeder for a minimal environmental effect in tunnel environments. The proposed uGPS provides consistent 8 GPS satellites and 4 GLONASS satellites signal through a 1.5-kilometer-long tunnel. The uGPS equipped tunnel is highly compatible with commodity GNSS/GPS receivers. Therefore, it does not require any APP or special hardware. Our benchmark tested package was on top of the FPGA, in which modifications and upgrades were demonstrated via evaluation on three popular GNSS/GPS devices including Android phones, iPhones, and Car navigation systems. Further extensive evaluations demonstrated that the uGPS consistently achieved average location accuracy of 10 meters in 30~70km/h speed driving tests (without a map-matching algorithm), and a seamless handover between live GNSS and the uGPS system.

References

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 2022. Crustal Dynamics Data Information System. https://cddis.nasa.gov/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ehad Akeila, Zoran Salcic, and Akshya Swain. 2014. Reducing Low-Cost INS Error Accumulation in Distance Estimation Using Self-Resetting. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 63, 1 (2014), 177--184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Roshan Ayyalasomayajula, Deepak Vasisht, and Dinesh Bharadia. 2018. BLoc: CSI-based accurate localization for BLE tags. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies. 126--138.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Kai Borre, Dennis M Akos, Nicolaj Bertelsen, Peter Rinder, and Søren Holdt Jensen. 2007. A software-defined GPS and Galileo receiver: a single-frequency approach. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Federal Communications Commission. 1997. 15.209 Radiated emission limits; general requirements., 729--730 pages. https://bit.ly/3JJIryCFR2002title45vol1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Pablo Corbalán, Gian Pietro Picco, and Sameera Palipana. 2019. Chorus: UWB concurrent transmissions for GPS-like passive localization of countless targets. In 2019 18th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN). IEEE, 133--144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Rodrigo da Costa. 2022. EUSPA EO and GNSS Market Report. European Union Agency for the Space Programme (EUSPA) 1, 1 (2022), 1--216.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Soteris Demetriou, Puneet Jain, and Kyu-Han Kim. 2018. Codrive: Improving automobile positioning via collaborative driving. In IEEE INFOCOM 2018-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE, 72--80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. GPS for Land Surveyors. 2022. The Almanac, Time to First Fix and Satellite Health. https://www.e-education.psu.edu/geog862/node/1739Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. US Air Force. 2000. Interface Control Document (200) Revision C.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Furuno. 2022. Furuno timing Multi-GNSS modules and disciplined oscillators GF-8805. https://www.furuno.com/en/products/gnss-module/GF-8805#Freespace1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Tolga Goze, Ozgun Bayrak, Metin Barut, and M Oguz Sunay. 2008. Secure user-plane location (SUPL) architecture for assisted GPS (A-GPS). In 2008 4th Advanced Satellite Mobile Systems. IEEE, 229--234.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Werner Gurtner and Lou Estey. 2007. RINEX: The receiver independent exchange format version 2.11. (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. IDCITI. 2022. uGPS operation in Seoul Namsan tunnel #1. https://youtu.be/rdUeFSuzzOEGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Nabil Jardak and Nel Samama. 2009. Indoor positioning based on GPS-repeaters: performance enhancement using an open code loop architecture. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and electronic systems 45, 1 (2009), 347--359.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Chongwon Kim, Hyoungmin So, Taikjin Lee, and Changdon Kee. 2014. A pseudolite-based positioning system for legacy GNSS receivers. Sensors 14, 4 (2014), 6104--6123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. LS Cable & System Ltd. 2022. Leaky Cables. https://bit.ly/LS_cable_RF_FeederGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Andrew Mackey, Petros Spachos, and Konstantinos N Plataniotis. 2018. Enhanced indoor navigation system with beacons and kalman filters. In 2018 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP). IEEE, 947--950.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Microinfinity. 2022. Welcome to MICROINFINITY. http://minfinity.com/eng/page.php?Main=1&sub=3&tab=3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Vahideh Moghtadaiee, Andrew G Dempster, and Samsung Lim. 2011. Indoor localization using FM radio signals: A fingerprinting approach. In 2011 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation. IEEE, 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Viet Nguyen, Mohamed Ibrahim, Siddharth Rupavatharam, Minitha Jawahar, Marco Gruteser, and Richard Howard. 2018. Eyelight: Light-and-shadow-based occupancy estimation and room activity recognition. In IEEE INFOCOM 2018-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE, 351--359.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Haruhiko Niwa, Kenri Kodaka, Yoshihiro Sakamoto, Masaumi Otake, Seiji Kawaguchi, Kenjirou Fujii, Yuki Kanemori, and Shigeki Sugano. 2008. GPS-based indoor positioning system with multi-channel pseudolite. In 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 905--910.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. NovAtel. 2022. PwrPak7®. https://novatel.com/products/receivers/enclosures/pwrpak7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Nuand. 2022. bladeRF x40. https://www.nuand.com/product/bladerf-x40/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Russian Institute of Space Device Engineering. 2008. Global navigation satellite system GLONASS Interface Control Document, Navigational radiosignal in bands L1, L2 (Edition 5.1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. RF Optic. 2022. GPS Over Fiber Transmitter & Receiver. https://bit.ly/rf_optic_gps_over_fiberGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. OSQZSS. 2022. GPS SDR SIM. https://github.com/osqzss/gps-sdr-sim/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Alan Oxley. 2017. Uncertainties in GPS Positioning: A mathematical discourse. Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Kerem Ozsoy, Ayhan Bozkurt, and Ibrahim Tekin. 2013. Indoor positioning based on global positioning system signals. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 55, 5 (2013), 1091--1097.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Lisa Perdue. 2015. WHITE PAPERS: Testing GNSS Receivers to Harden Against Spoofing Attacks. https://bit.ly/orolia_gnss_spoofing_attackGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Manouchehr Rafie. 2022. 3dincites. https://bit.ly/3dincites202107Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Maurizio Rea, Traian Emanuel Abrudan, Domenico Giustiniano, Holger Claussen, and Veli-Matti Kolmonen. 2019. Smartphone positioning with radio measurements from a single wifi access point. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments And Technologies. 200--206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. International GNSS Service. 2022. Data. https://igs.org/data/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Sihua Shao, Abdallah Khreishah, and Issa Khalil. 2018. RETRO: Retroreflector based visible light indoor localization for real-time tracking of IoT devices. In IEEE INFOCOM 2018-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE, 1025--1033.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. ublox. 2022. u-center. https://www.u-blox.com/en/product/u-center#tab-product-descriptionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Alexandre Vervisch-Picois and Nel Samama. 2009. Interference mitigation in a repeater and pseudolite indoor positioning system. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing 3, 5 (2009), 810--820.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Waze. 2022. How Waze Beacons work. https://support.google.com/waze/partners/answer/9416071Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Yihong Wu, Fulin Tang, and Heping Li. 2018. Image-based camera localization: an overview. Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art 1, 1 (2018), 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Xilinx. 2012. Timing Closure User Guide., 67--72 pages. https://bit.ly/Xilinx_sw_manualGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Heng Zhang, Zhichao Zhang, Shunqing Zhang, Shugong Xu, and Shan Cao. 2019. Fingerprint-based Localization using Commercial LTE Signals: A Field-Trial Study. In 2019 IEEE 90th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2019-Fall). IEEE, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Weicheng Zhang, Zheng Yao, and Mingquan Lu. 2016. An improved pseudolite-based indoor positioning system compatible with gnss. In 2016 Fourth International Conference on Ubiquitous Positioning, Indoor Navigation and Location Based Services (UPINLBS). IEEE, 43--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. uGPS: design and field-tested seamless GNSS infrastructure in metro city

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        MobiCom '22: Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing And Networking
        October 2022
        932 pages
        ISBN:9781450391818
        DOI:10.1145/3495243

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 14 October 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate440of2,972submissions,15%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)132
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader