skip to main content
10.1145/3498851.3499007acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Proof of Importance: A Consensus Algorithm for Importance Based on Dynamic Authorization

Published:11 April 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Proof of stake consensus algorithm (PoS) has the advantage of not requiring arithmetic power, however, the higher the stake, the more likely the node will get the right to account. As a result, the accounting nodes are highly deterministic and the rich get richer, once the node with the highest equity fails to account for the block properly. The rest of the nodes have to compete again for accounting rights, and the probability of system stagnation will increase sharply. To address these two shortcomings, a consensus algorithm based on dynamic delegation of proof of importance (DPoI) is proposed.The algorithm introduces an importance assessment scheme that calculates the importance ivlaue (iValue) of nodes in each round based on nodes aValue, iTrade, Ltime and Credit.Finally, the Fibonacci series is used to divide nodes with similar iValue into a group, and the group draws on the DPoS voting strategy ranking to act as alternative nodes, thus forming a disaster recovery scheme to effectively avoid system stagnation, which effectively enhances the security and stability of the blockchain system. The experimental results show that the speed of DPoI block out is about 6 times faster than PoI, which significantly improves the block out speed.

References

  1. [1]Yong Yuan,and Feiyue.Wang, 2016. Blockchain: the state of the art and future trends. Acta Automatica Sinica.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]Mingxiao D. Xiaofeng M. Zhe, Z. Xiangwei, W. and Qijun, C.2017.A review on consensus algorithm of blockchain,(2017)2567-2572.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]Yong Yuan., NI, X.C., ZENG, S.,2018. et al.:The development status and outlook of blockchain consensus algorithm[J]. Journal of Automation,(2018) 044(011):2011-2022Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]Xu,F., Yang,G.W., Ju,D.P.,2004. Design of Distributed Storage System on Peer-to-Peer Structure based on Peer-to-Peer [J]. Journal of Software,(2004), 15(002):268-277Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]Nakamoto S, 2009. :Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]Shao Q.F. Jin C. Q. and Zhang Z. ect, 2018. Blockchain technology: architecture and progress[J]. Chinese Journal of Computers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]Castro M. Liskov B., 2002. Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance and Proactive Recovery[J]. Acm Transactions on Computer Systems, (2002), 20(4): 398-461.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. [8]Garay J., Kiayias A., Leonardos N.,2015. The Bitcoin Backbone Protocol: Analysis and Applications[J]. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]Eyal I., The Miner’s Dilemma[J]. Computer Science, (2014)89-103.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]Li D.Q., 2007. Denial of Service Attacks [M]. Electronic Industry Press,(2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]July 2015 flood attack In: Bitcoin Wiki.x.https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/July_2015_flood_attack.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]Sapirshtein A., Sompolinsky Y. and Zohar A, 2016.Optimal selfish mining strategies in bitcoin. In: Proc. of the Financial Crypto.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]Zhou C.Z.,1993. The Fibonacci-Lucas sequence and its applications [M]. Hunan Science and Technology Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]Larimer D.,2018.Delegated proof-of-stake consensus.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WI-IAT '21: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology
    December 2021
    541 pages
    ISBN:9781450391870
    DOI:10.1145/3498851

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 11 April 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format