Douglas Zytko
Jane Im
ABSTRACT
Consent has become an important concept across multiple areas within HCI/CSCW, community advocacy work, and the tech industry, for understanding social computing problems and designing safe and agentic computer-mediated communication. Recent research has studied consent in various topics, such as online-to-offline interaction and harm, data privacy and security, research ethics, and human-robot interaction. The goal of this panel is to bring together researchers and practitioners to discuss how consent has been defined and studied within HCI and adjacent fields, and how cross-field discourse around consent can inform future work that pursues safe and equitable computing. We aim to introduce consent as a multifaceted research and design lens to the HCI and CSCW community and illuminate ways that consent can contribute to better understanding or re-imagination of contemporary research interests. Lastly, the panel aims to spark cross-field communication around consent to identify latent connections across research topics and foster synergistic collaborations.
- Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1301–1310.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Catherine Barwulor, Allison McDonald, Eszter Hargittai, and Elissa M Redmiles. 2021. “Disadvantaged in the American-dominated internet”: Sex, Work, and Technology. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–16.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ruha Benjamin. 2016. Informed Refusal: Toward a Justice-based Bioethics. Science, Technology, & Human Values (June 2016).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tracey Breeden. 2022. How Consent Creates Healthy Communication & Relationships. https://mtch.com/single-trust-and-safety/45Google Scholar
- Rachel Cummings, Gabriel Kaptchuk, and Elissa M. Redmiles. 2021. "I Need a Better Description": An Investigation Into User Expectations For Differential Privacy. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (Virtual Event, Republic of Korea) (CCS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3037–3052. https://doi.org/10.1145/3460120.3485252Google ScholarDigital Library
- Amy Adele Hasinoff. 2015. Sexting panic: Rethinking criminalization, privacy, and consent. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
- Jane Im, Jill Dimond, Melody Berton, Una Lee, Katherine Mustelier, Mark S. Ackerman, and Eric Gilbert. 2021. Yes: Affirmative Consent as a Theoretical Framework for Understanding and Imagining Social Platforms. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 403, 18 pages.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Haksoo Ko, John Leitner, Eunsoo Kim, and Jonggu Jeong. 2017. Structure and enforcement of data privacy law in South Korea. International Data Privacy Law(2017).Google Scholar
- Tahu Kukutai and John Taylor (Eds.). 2016. Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Toward an agenda. Vol. 38. ANU Press.Google Scholar
- Una Lee and Dann Toliver. 2017. Building Consentful Tech. (2017). http://www.consentfultech.io/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Building-Consentful-Tech.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Juniper Lovato, Antoine Allard, Randall Harp, and Laurent Hébert-Dufresne. 2020. Limits of individual consent and models of distributed consent in online social networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.16140(2020).Google Scholar
- Arunesh Mathur, Mihir Kshirsagar, and Jonathan Mayer. 2021. What makes a dark pattern... dark? Design attributes, normative considerations, and measurement methods. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–18.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Josef Nguyen and Bonnie Ruberg. 2020. Challenges of designing consent: Consent mechanics in video games as models for interactive user agency. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jonathan A Obar and Anne Oeldorf-Hirsch. 2020. The biggest lie on the internet: Ignoring the privacy policies and terms of service policies of social networking services. Information, Communication & Society 23, 1 (2020), 128–147.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Planned Parenthood. 2016. Understanding Consent is as Easy as FRIES. Planned Parenthood Tumblr. http://plannedparenthood. tumblr. com/post/148506806862/understanding-consent-is-as-easy-as-fries-consent(2016).Google Scholar
- Tawana Petty, Mariella Saba, Tamika Lewis, Seeta Peña Gangadharan, and Virginia Eubanks. 2018. Our data bodies: Reclaiming our data. June 15(2018), 37.Google Scholar
- Florian Schaub, Rebecca Balebako, and Lorrie Faith Cranor. 2017. Designing effective privacy notices and controls. IEEE Internet Computing 21, 3 (2017), 70–77.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel J Solove. 2013. Privacy self-management and the consent dilemma. Harvard Law Review 126(2013), 1880.Google Scholar
- Roseanna Sommers. 2019. Commonsense consent. Yale LJ 129(2019), 2232.Google Scholar
- Yolande Strengers, Jathan Sadowski, Zhuying Li, Anna Shimshak, and Florian ’Floyd’ Mueller. 2021. What Can HCI Learn from Sexual Consent? A Feminist Process of Embodied Consent for Interactions with Emerging Technologies. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 405, 13 pages.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sharifa Sultana, Mitrasree Deb, Ananya Bhattacharjee, Shaid Hasan, SM Raihanul Alam, Trishna Chakraborty, Prianka Roy, Samira Fairuz Ahmed, Aparna Moitra, M Ashraful Amin, 2021. ‘Unmochon’: A Tool to Combat Online Sexual Harassment over Facebook Messenger. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–18.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chris Verity, Donal Manning, and Angus Nicoll. 2002. Consent, confidentiality, and the threat to public health surveillanceCommentary: Don’t waive consent lightly—involve the public. BMJ 324, 7347 (2002), 1210–1213.Google Scholar
- Jonathan Zong. 2020. From Individual Consent to Collective Refusal: Changing Attitudes toward (Mis)Use of Personal Data. XRDS 27, 2 (dec 2020), 26–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3433140Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jonathan Zong and J Nathan Matias. 2022. Bartleby: Procedural and Substantive Ethics in the Design of Research Ethics Systems. Social Media+ Society 8, 1 (2022), 20563051221077021.Google Scholar
- Douglas Zytko, Nicholas Furlo, Bailey Carlin, and Matthew Archer. 2021. Computer-Mediated Consent to Sex: The Context of Tinder. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW1, Article 189 (apr 2021), 26 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449288Google ScholarDigital Library
- Douglas Zytko, Pamela J. Wisniewski, Shion Guha, Eric PS Baumer, and Min Kyung Lee. 2022. Participatory Design of AI Systems: Opportunities and Challenges Across Diverse Users, Relationships, and Application Domains. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. 1–4.Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Consent: A Research and Design Lens for Human-Computer Interaction
Recommendations
What Can HCI Learn from Sexual Consent?: A Feminist Process of Embodied Consent for Interactions with Emerging Technologies
CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsSexual consent has undergone a transformation toward an “enthusiastic” feminist model that emphasizes consent as an ongoing and voluntary process of negotiation and affirmation. This paper considers how such a model can advance understandings of consent ...
Dark Patterns and the Legal Requirements of Consent Banners: An Interaction Criticism Perspective
CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsUser engagement with data privacy and security through consent banners has become a ubiquitous part of interacting with internet services. While previous work has addressed consent banners from either interaction design, legal, and ethics-focused ...
The crisis of consent: how stronger legal protection may lead to weaker consent in data protection
In this article we examine the effectiveness of consent in data protection legislation. We argue that the current legal framework for consent, which has its basis in the idea of autonomous authorisation, does not work in practice. In practice the legal ...
Comments