skip to main content
10.1145/3501247.3531578acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebsciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Subgraph Representation Learning for Team Mining

Published:26 June 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Team mining is concerned with the identification of a group of experts that are able to collaborate with each other in order to collectively cover a set of required skills. This problem has mainly been addressed either through graph search, which looks for subgraphs that satisfy the skill requirements or through neural architectures that learn a mapping from the skill space to the expert space. An exact graph-based solution to this problem is intractable and its heuristic variants are only able to identify sub-optimal solutions. On the other hand, neural architecture-based solutions are prone to overfitting and simplistically reduce the problem of team formation to one of expert ranking. Our work in this paper proposes an unsupervised heterogeneous skip-gram-based subgraph mining approach that can learn representations for subgraphs in a collaboration network. Unlike previous work, the subgraph representations allow our method to mine teams that have past collaborative history and collectively cover the requested desirable skills. Through our experiments, we demonstrate that our proposed approach is able to outperform a host of state-of-the-art team mining techniques from both quantitative and qualitative perspectives.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

WS22_S3_131.mp4

mp4

493 MB

References

  1. Yoshua Bengio, Aaron Courville, and Pascal Vincent. 2013. Representation learning: A review and new perspectives. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 35, 8(2013), 1798–1828.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Spencer Bryson, Heidar Davoudi, Lukasz Golab, Mehdi Kargar, Yuliya Lytvyn, Piotr Mierzejewski, Jaroslaw Szlichta, and Morteza Zihayat. 2020. Robust keyword search in large attributed graphs. Inf. Retr. J. 23, 5 (2020), 502–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-020-09379-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Lu Chen, Chengfei Liu, Xiaochun Yang, Bin Wang, Jianxin Li, and Rui Zhou. 2016. Efficient Batch Processing for Multiple Keyword Queries on Graph Data. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2016, Indianapolis, IN, USA, October 24-28, 2016, Snehasis Mukhopadhyay, ChengXiang Zhai, Elisa Bertino, Fabio Crestani, Javed Mostafa, Jie Tang, Luo Si, Xiaofang Zhou, Yi Chang, Yunyao Li, and Parikshit Sondhi (Eds.). ACM, 1261–1270. https://doi.org/10.1145/2983323.2983806Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Lu Chen, Chengfei Liu, Rui Zhou, Jiajie Xu, Jeffrey Xu Yu, and Jianxin Li. 2020. Finding Effective Geo-social Group for Impromptu Activities with Diverse Demands. In KDD ’20: The 26th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Virtual Event, CA, USA, August 23-27, 2020, Rajesh Gupta, Yan Liu, Jiliang Tang, and B. Aditya Prakash (Eds.). ACM, 698–708. https://doi.org/10.1145/3394486.3403114Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Yuxiao Dong, Nitesh V Chawla, and Ananthram Swami. 2017. metapath2vec: Scalable representation learning for heterogeneous networks. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. 135–144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Yulu Du, Xiangwu Meng, Yujie Zhang, and Pengtao Lv. 2020. GERF: A Group Event Recommendation Framework Based on Learning-to-Rank. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 32, 4 (2020), 674–687. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2019.2893361Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Amin Milani Fard, Ebrahim Bagheri, and Ke Wang. 2019. Relationship Prediction in Dynamic Heterogeneous Information Networks. In Advances in Information Retrieval - 41st European Conference on IR Research, ECIR 2019, Cologne, Germany, April 14-18, 2019, Proceedings, Part I(Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 11437), Leif Azzopardi, Benno Stein, Norbert Fuhr, Philipp Mayr, Claudia Hauff, and Djoerd Hiemstra (Eds.). Springer, 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15712-8_2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Mehdi Kargar, Lukasz Golab, Divesh Srivastava, Jaroslaw Szlichta, and Morteza Zihayat. 2020. Effective Keyword Search over Weighted Graphs. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering early access (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2020.2985376Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Kargar, M. Zihayat, and A. An. 2013. Finding Affordable and Collaborative Teams from a Network of Experts. In SDM. 587–595.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Richard M. Karp. 1972. Reducibility Among Combinatorial Problems. In Proceedings of a symposium on the Complexity of Computer Computations. Plenum Press, New York, 85–103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Yehuda Koren. 2009. Collaborative filtering with temporal dynamics. In KDD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. T. Lappas, L. Liu, and E. Terzi. 2009. Finding a Team of Experts in Social Networks. In KDD. 467–476.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. T. Mikolov, I. Sutskever, K. Chen, G. S. Corrado, and J. Dean. 2013. Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality. In NIPS. 3111–3119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Radin Hamidi Rad, Ebrahim Bagheri, Mehdi Kargar, Divesh Srivastava, and Jaroslaw Szlichta. 2021. Retrieving Skill-Based Teams from Collaboration Networks. In SIGIR ’21: The 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Virtual Event, Canada, July 11-15, 2021, Fernando Diaz, Chirag Shah, Torsten Suel, Pablo Castells, Rosie Jones, and Tetsuya Sakai (Eds.). ACM, 2015–2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3404835.3463105Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. Sapienza, P. Goyal, and E. Ferrara. 2019. Deep Neural Networks for Optimal Team Composition. Frontiers in Big Data 2, 1 (2019), 1–13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Fabian Schliski, Jörg Schlötterer, and Michael Granitzer. 2020. Influence of Random Walk Parametrization on Graph Embeddings. In Advances in Information Retrieval - 42nd European Conference on IR Research, ECIR 2020, Lisbon, Portugal, April 14-17, 2020, Proceedings, Part II(Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 12036), Joemon M. Jose, Emine Yilmaz, João Magalhães, Pablo Castells, Nicola Ferro, Mário J. Silva, and Flávio Martins (Eds.). Springer, 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45442-5_8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Yizhou Sun and Jiawei Han. 2012. Mining Heterogeneous Information Networks: Principles and Methodologies. Morgan & Claypool Publishers. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00433ED1V01Y201207DMK005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Yizhou Sun, Jiawei Han, Xifeng Yan, Philip S. Yu, and Tianyi Wu. 2011. PathSim: Meta Path-Based Top-K Similarity Search in Heterogeneous Information Networks. Proc. VLDB Endow. 4, 11 (2011), 992–1003. http://www.vldb.org/pvldb/vol4/p992-sun.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Yahui Sun, Xiaokui Xiao, Bin Cui, Saman K. Halgamuge, Theodoros Lappas, and Jun Luo. 2021. Finding Group Steiner Trees in Graphs with both Vertex and Edge Weights. Proc. VLDB Endow. 14, 7 (2021), 1137–1149. http://www.vldb.org/pvldb/vol14/p1137-sun.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Chao-Yuan Wu, Amr Ahmed, Alex Beutel, Alexander J Smola, and How Jing. 2017. Recurrent recommender networks. In WSDM. 495–503.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Subgraph Representation Learning for Team Mining
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          WebSci '22: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Web Science Conference 2022
          June 2022
          479 pages
          ISBN:9781450391917
          DOI:10.1145/3501247

          Copyright © 2022 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 26 June 2022

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate218of875submissions,25%

          Upcoming Conference

          Websci '24
          16th ACM Web Science Conference
          May 21 - 24, 2024
          Stuttgart , Germany

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format