skip to main content
10.1145/3501247.3531581acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebsciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Narrative Building in Propaganda Networks on Indian Twitter

Published:26 June 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The misuse of social media platforms to influence public opinion through propaganda campaigns are a cause of rising concern globally. Particularly, countries like India, where politicians communicate with the public through unmediated, curated twitter feeds, have witnessed a significant surge in strategic online manipulation. In this paper, we study propaganda messaging on Indian Twitter during two politically polarizing events. We collect over 80M Hindi and English tweets from over 26k politicians and 6k influencers. Using a mixed-methods approach, we identify major propaganda narratives across all events. We further use a network causal inference based approach to isolate influential actors who play a significant role in propagating the identified narratives. We conclude by discussing how these opinion leaders and their information dissemination, are central to instigating and building propaganda campaigns on Twitter.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

WS22_S4_120.mp4

mp4

578.9 MB

References

  1. Mack Blackburn, Ning Yu, John Berrie, Brian Gordon, David Longfellow, William Tirrell, and Mark Williams. 2020. Corpus development for studying online disinformation campaign: a narrative+ stance approach. In Proceedings for the First International Workshop on Social Threats in Online Conversations: Understanding and Management. 41–47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Gillian Bolsover and Philip Howard. 2017. Computational propaganda and political big data: Moving toward a more critical research agenda., 273–276 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hadley Cantril. 1938. Propaganda analysis. The English Journal 27, 3 (1938), 217–221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Saloni Dash, Dibyendu Mishra, Gazal Shekhawat, and Joyojeet Pal. 2021. Divided We Rule: Influencer Polarization on Twitter During Political Crises in India. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.08361(2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Walter R Fisher. 1985. The narrative paradigm: An elaboration. Communications Monographs 52, 4 (1985), 347–367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Jeffry Halverson, Steven Corman, and H Lloyd Goodall. 2011. Master narratives of Islamist extremism. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Garth S Jowett and Victoria O’donnell. 2018. Propaganda & persuasion. Sage publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Sangeeta Mahapatra and Johannes Plagemann. 2019. Polarisation and politicisation: the social media strategies of Indian political parties. (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Giovanni Da San Martino, Stefano Cresci, Alberto Barrón-Cedeno, Seunghak Yu, Roberto Di Pietro, and Preslav Nakov. 2020. A survey on computational propaganda detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.08024(2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Leland McInnes and John Healy. 2017. Accelerated hierarchical density based clustering. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW). IEEE, 33–42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Leland McInnes, John Healy, and James Melville. 2020. UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction. arxiv:1802.03426 [stat.ML]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Anmol Panda, A’ndre Gonawela, Sreangsu Acharyya, Dibyendu Mishra, Mugdha Mohapatra, Ramgopal Chandrasekaran, and Joyojeet Pal. 2020. NivaDuck-A Scalable Pipeline to Build a Database of Political Twitter Handles for India and the United States. In International Conference on Social Media and Society. 200–209.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Anmol Panda, Ramaravind Kommiya Mothilal, Monojit Choudhury, Kalika Bali, and Joyojeet Pal. 2020. Topical Focus of Political Campaigns and its Impact: Findings from Politicians’ Hashtag Use during the 2019 Indian Elections. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW1(2020), 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ammar Rashed, Mucahid Kutlu, Kareem Darwish, Tamer Elsayed, and Cansın Bayrak. 2020. Embeddings-Based Clustering for Target Specific Stances: The Case of a Polarized Turkey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.09649(2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. 2020. Making monolingual sentence embeddings multilingual using knowledge distillation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.09813(2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Karishma Sharma, Emilio Ferrara, and Yan Liu. 2021. Characterizing Online Engagement with Disinformation and Conspiracies in the 2020 US Presidential Election. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.08319(2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Steven T. Smith, Edward K. Kao, Erika D. Mackin, Danelle C. Shah, Olga Simek, and Donald B. Rubin. 2021. Automatic detection of influential actors in disinformation networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, 4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2011216118 arXiv:https://www.pnas.org/content/118/4/e2011216118.full.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Douglas Wilbur. 2019. Understanding the Propagandist’s Narrative: Applying the Narrative Paradigm Theory to Peer-to-Peer Propaganda. SAGE Publications Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Yinfei Yang, Daniel Cer, Amin Ahmad, Mandy Guo, Jax Law, Noah Constant, Gustavo Hernandez Abrego, Steve Yuan, Chris Tar, Yun-Hsuan Sung, 2019. Multilingual universal sentence encoder for semantic retrieval. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.04307(2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Narrative Building in Propaganda Networks on Indian Twitter
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            WebSci '22: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Web Science Conference 2022
            June 2022
            479 pages
            ISBN:9781450391917
            DOI:10.1145/3501247

            Copyright © 2022 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 26 June 2022

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • short-paper
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate218of875submissions,25%

            Upcoming Conference

            Websci '24
            16th ACM Web Science Conference
            May 21 - 24, 2024
            Stuttgart , Germany

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format