Minghao Liu
ABSTRACT
Existing IP landmark mining technologies mainly focus on IPv4, and less attention is paid to the association between IPv4 and IPv6. The current IPv6 network has fewer reliable landmarks with limited accuracy, while the IPv4 network already has a large number of reliable landmarks. If IPv4 landmarks can be used in IPv6 landmark mining, the accuracy and efficiency of IPv6 landmark acquisition will be improved. To this end, this paper proposes an IPv6 landmark mining method based on domain name screening and IPv4-IPv6 connection. This method first uses the domain names of government agencies, top universities, and top websites as seed domain names, and continuously obtains a large number of domain names through web crawlers; then performs DNS resolution on the obtained domain names to obtain their corresponding IPv4 address and IPv6 address; and finally evaluate and analyze whether the two addresses are located in the same location, and determine whether to use it as an IPv6 landmark. This method successfully associates the IPv4 geolocation with the IPv6 geolocation, and uses the IPv4 landmarks to obtain and evaluate the IPv6 landmarks. Experimental results show that this method can obtain city-level IPv6 network landmarks more efficiently, and it also has a certain ability in street-level landmark mining.
- Wang Z., Feng J., Xing C., et al (2014). Research on the geolocation technology. Journal of Software, 25(7):1527--1540.Google Scholar
- Zhao F., Luo X., Liu F. (2016). Research on cyberspace surveying and mapping technology, Chinese Journal of Network and Information Security, 2(9):1--11.Google Scholar
- Wang S., Wang M. (2017). Next Generation Internet Based on IPv6, Information Technology, 6(10):121--121.Google Scholar
- Patricia Takako Endo, Djamel Fawzi Hadj Sadok (2010). Whois Based Geolocation: A Strategy to Geolocate Internet Hosts. Proceedings of the 24th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, 408--413.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yuval Shavitt, Noa Zilberman (2011). A Geolocation Databases Study. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 29(10): 2044--2056.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ingmar Poese, Steve Uhlig, Monamed Ali Kaafar, et al (2011). IP Geolocation Databases: Unreliable? ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 41(2): 53--56.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Han Li, Pei Zhang, Zhanfeng Wang, et al (2017). Changing IP Geolocation from Arbitrary Database Query Towards Multi-Databases Fusion. Proceeding of IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications, 1150--1157.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. S. Siwpersad, Bamba Gueye, Steve Uhlig (2008). Assessing the Geographic Resolution of Exhaustive Tabulation for Geolocating Internet Hosts. Proceeding of Springer-Verlag International Conference on Passive and Active Network Measurement, 11--20.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chuanxiong Guo, Yunxin Liu, Wenchao Shen, et al (2009). Mining the Web and the Internet for Accurate IP Address Geolocations. Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, 2841--2845.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Guang Zhu, Xiangyang Luo, Fenlin Liu, et al (2015). An Algorithm of City-Level Landmark Mining Based on Internet Forum. Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems, 294--301.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yong Wang, Daniel Burgener, Marcel Flores, et al (2011). Towards Street-Level Client-Independent IP Geolocation. Proceeding of USENIX Conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, 365--379.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- IPv6 Landmark Mining Based on Domain Name Screening and IPv4-IPv6 Connection
Recommendations
A Systematic Review of Transition from IPV4 To IPV6
ICEMIS'20: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Engineering & MIS 2020Personal computers (PC) and gadgets have recently become increasingly associated with the Internet. Internet Protocol (IP) has become the driving force for a decade for which devices and organizations tend to rely as a means of communication between ...
Measuring the IPv4-IPV6 IVI translation overhead
RACS '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Research in Applied Computation SymposiumWhile IPv6 deployment in the Internet continues to grow slowly at present, the imminent exhaustion of IPv4 addresses will encourage its increased use over the next several years. However, due to the predominance of IPv4 in the Internet, the transition ...
Bi-directional Mapping System as a New IPv4/IPv6 Translation Mechanism
UKSIM '08: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Computer Modeling and SimulationA new Internet protocol (IPv6) is being deployed with new features and improvements for the devices that are connected to the network. Unfortunately, the current Internet Protocol (IPv4) and the new Internet Protocol (IPv6) are incompatible with each ...
Comments