skip to main content
10.1145/3501409.3501508acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseitceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Calibration and 3D Reconstruction of TOF Camera Based on Marker

Authors Info & Claims
Published:31 December 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The pointcloud registration is the first step of 3D reconstruction. However, the classical iterative nearest point (ICP) algorithm and its variants have some problems, such as unable to deal with lowoverlapping pointcloud data, relying too much on normal vector, curvature and other features, and slow speed. To solve these problems, this paper proposes a multi-camera calibration algorithm based on marker. Firstly, Azure-Kinect devices from different perspectives detect the corners of the marker and identify the ID. After converting the 2D corners into 3D corresponding points, combined with the manually entered world coordinates, the rigid transformation parameters of the corresponding camera are calculated through Procrustes analysis to complete the global registration. Secondly, the local registration is performed by using the Colored-ICP algorithm to optimize the gap between adjacent view pointclouds. In order to intuitively perceive the quality of reconstructed model, Hololens2 is deployed for holographic display. The experimental results have shown that the proposed algorithm framework improves the accuracy and speed of 3D reconstruction, and simplifies the operation process of traditional offline calibration algorithm to a certain extent.

References

  1. Calibration of Depth Measurement Model for Kinect- Type 3D Vision Sensors[J]. Václav Skala - UNION Agency, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhang Z. A Flexible New Technique for Camera Calibration[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2000, 22(11):1330--1334.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J.-Y. Bouguet, "Camera calibration toolbox for matlab," 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. D. Stoyanov, "Camera calibration tools," Online Source, Updated Aug, vol. 24, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kuai Yangliu. Large-scale Calibration Method Utilizing Multiple Chessboards[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2016(007):39--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Wang anran, Hao xiangyang and Cheng chuanqi, A Multi-camera External Parameters Calibration Method Using Small Calibration Boards[J]. GEOMATICS & SPATIAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2019, v.42; No.242(06):232--235+239.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Li B, Heng L, Koser K, et al. A multiple-camera system calibration toolbox using a feature descriptor-based calibration pattern[C]// IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots & Systems. IEEE, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Alexiadis D S, Chatzitofis A, Zioulis N, et al. An Integrated Platform for Live 3D Human Reconstruction and Motion Capturing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2016:1--1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. G. Lowe. Object recognition from local scale-invariant features[C]. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Kerkyra, 1999, 2: 1150--1157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Schnemann P H. A generalized solution of the orthogonal procrustes problem[J]. Psychometrika, 1966, 31(1):1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Kowalski M, Naruniec J, Daniluk M. [IEEE 2015 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) - Lyon (2015.10.19-2015.10.22)] 2015 International Conference on 3D Vision - Livescan3D: A Fast and Inexpensive 3D Data Acquisition System for Multiple Kinect v2 Sensors[J]. 2015:318--325.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. T. Rybus, T. Barcinski, J. Lisowski, J. Nicolau-Kukli'nski, ' K. Seweryn, M. Ciesielska, K. Grassmann, J. Grygorczuk, M. Karczewski, M. Kowalski, et al. New planar air-bearing microgravity simulator for verification of space robotics numerical simulations and control algorithms. 12th ESA Symposium on Advanced Space Technologies in Robotics and Automation, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Park J, Zhou Q Y, Koltun V. Colored Point Cloud Registration Revisited[C]// IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE Computer Society, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Besl P J, Mckay H D. A method for registration of 3-D shapes[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, 1992, 14(2):239--256.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Chen Y, Medioni G. Object modeling by registration of multiple range images [J]. Image and Vision Computing, 1992, 10 (3): 1452155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Calibration and 3D Reconstruction of TOF Camera Based on Marker

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      EITCE '21: Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Conference on Electronic Information Technology and Computer Engineering
      October 2021
      1723 pages
      ISBN:9781450384322
      DOI:10.1145/3501409

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 31 December 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      EITCE '21 Paper Acceptance Rate294of531submissions,55%Overall Acceptance Rate508of972submissions,52%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader