skip to main content
10.1145/3501409.3501528acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseitceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Network Anomaly Detection Method Based on Joint Optimization of GAN and Classifier in Few-shot Scenarios

Authors Info & Claims
Published:31 December 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Research into network anomaly detection methods in few-shot scenarios is of great practical significance, since there are relatively rare network anomaly events compared with normal ones. Sample augmentation based on GAN (Generative Adversarial network) has few requirements for domain knowledge and data types, and also has strong universality. In order to address the lack of guidance in hyperparameters optimizing for sample augmentation based on GAN, the joint optimization of GAN and classifier is introduced to realize the network anomaly sample augmentation and anomaly detection. Firstly, the network anomaly sample augmentation model and network anomaly detection classifier based on GAN are designed. Subsequently, hyperparameters trained with the sample augmentation model are optimized and selected according to the performance of the classifier on the augmented sample set. Finally, experiments are conducted on two types of datasets, namely network performance parameter characteristics and network traffic data characteristics. In accordance with the experimental results, the proposed sample augmentation method based on the joint optimization could effectively improve the accuracy of network anomaly detection in the few-shot scenarios.

References

  1. Xiao, S., Zhan, Y., Zhang, B. (2019) Event-triggered networked fault detection for positive Markovian systems. Signal Processing, 157: 161--169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Thaha, M., Riaz, A.S. (2017) An analysis of fault detection strategies in wireless sensor networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 78: 267--287.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Garshasbi, M.S. (2017) Fault localization based on combines active and passive measurements in computer networks by ant colony optimization. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 152: 205--212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Debashish, M., Bidyadhar, S., Raju, D. (2020) Real-time sensor fault detection in Tokamak using different machine learning algorithms. Fusion Engineering and Design, 151: 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Rumelhart, D., Hinton, G., Williams, R. (1986) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323: 533--536.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Bengio, Y., Lamblin, P., Dan, P. (2007) Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 19: 153--160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Dai, J., Wang, J., Zhu, Z. (2019) Anomaly detection of mechanical systems based on generative adversarial network and auto-encoder. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 40: 16--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Yan, K., Chong, A., Mo, Y. (2020) Generative Adversarial Network for Fault Detection Diagnosis of Chillers. Building and Environment, 8: 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhang, W., Li, X., Jia, X. (2020) Machinery fault diagnosis with imbalanced data using deep generative adversarial networks. Measurement, 152: 377--388.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Zhu, X., Zhang, P. (2020) Fault detection and diagnosis method for heterogeneous wireless network based on GAN. Journal on Communications, 41: 110--119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Network Anomaly Detection Method Based on Joint Optimization of GAN and Classifier in Few-shot Scenarios

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        EITCE '21: Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Conference on Electronic Information Technology and Computer Engineering
        October 2021
        1723 pages
        ISBN:9781450384322
        DOI:10.1145/3501409

        Copyright © 2021 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 31 December 2021

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        EITCE '21 Paper Acceptance Rate294of531submissions,55%Overall Acceptance Rate508of972submissions,52%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader