skip to main content
10.1145/3501409.3501697acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseitceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Intelligent maneuver decision method of unmanned aerial vehicle

Authors Info & Claims
Published:31 December 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

As the key link of airspace task execution, UAV maneuver decision-making is the core intelligence embodiment of UAV, which can best represent the intelligence of UAV "brain". This paper summarizes the intelligent maneuver decision-making methods of UAV. Firstly, the problem and application background of UAV intelligent maneuver decision-making are introduced. Then, the research status of maneuver decision-making methods at home and abroad is analyzed. Intelligent maneuver decision-making is divided into two aspects: maneuver decision-making based on game theory and artificial intelligence. Game theory focuses on differential game, matrix game and influence diagram, Artificial intelligence focuses on expert system, intelligent optimization theory and neural network. Finally, a new air combat intelligent maneuver decision-making method based on bird foraging search algorithm is designed and verified by simulation experiments. The summary of UAV intelligent maneuver decision-making methods will contribute to the innovative research in this field, so as to promote the rapid development of maneuver decision-making technology.

References

  1. Liu Y, Dai H, Wang Q, Shukla M K, Imran M. Unmanned aerial vehicle for internet of everything: Opportunities and challenges[J]. Computer Communications, 2020, 155: 66--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Eunest N, Cohen K, Kivelevitch E, et al. Genetic fuzzy trees and their application towards autonomous training and control of a squadron of unmanned combat aerial vehicles[J]. Unmanned Systems, 2015, 3(3): 185--204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Virtanen K, Karelahti J, Raivio T. Modeling air combat by a moving horizon influence diagram game[J]. Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics, 2006, 29(5): 1080--1091.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Reilly M B, Ventre L. Beyond video games: New artificial intelligence beats tactical experts in combat simulation[R]. Report at http://magazine.uc.edu/editors_picks/recent_ features/alpha.html, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Liu C, He J, Li Q, et al. An Air Combat Simulation System for Intelligent Decision-Making[C]. 2020 12th International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics (IHMSC), Hangzhou, China, 2020: 104--108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Yang Q, Zhang J, Shi G, Hu J, Wu Y. Maneuver decision of UAV in short-range air combat based on Deep Reinforcement Learning[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 363--378.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Huang C, Dong K, Huang H, Tang S, Zhang Z. Autonomous air combat maneuver decision using Bayesian inference and moving horizon optimization[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 29(1): 86--97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. James S M. Real-time maneuvering decisions for autonomous air combat [D]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institution of Technology, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Isaacs R. Differential Games: A Mathematical Theory with Applications to Warfare and Pursuit, Control and Optimization [M]. New York: Wiley, 1965.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Raivio T. Capture set computation of an optimally guided missile [J]. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2011, 24(6): 1167--1175.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Ehtamo H, Raivio T. On applied nonlinear and bilevel programming for pursuitevasion games [J]. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 2011, 108(1): 65--96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Lachner R, Breitner M, Pesch H. Three-dimensional air combat: Numerical solution of complex differential games [J]. Annals of the Internetional Society of Dynamic Games, volume 3: New Trends in Dynamic Games and Applications, 1993, 78(3): 443--463.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Austin F, Carbone G, Hinz H, Lewis M, Falco M. Game theory for automated maneuvering during air-to-air combat[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1990, 13(6): 1143--1149.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Liang D, Liu D. A novel risk decision making based on decision-theoretic rough sets under Hesitant Fuzzy information[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2015, 23(2): 237--247.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Fu L, Xie F, Wang D, Meng G. The overview for UAV air-combat decision method[C]. The 26th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (2014 CCDC), IEEE, 2014: 3380--3384.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Virtanen K, Raivio T, Hämäläinen R P. Modeling pilot's sequential maneuvering descisions by a multistage influence diagram[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2004, 36(4): 665--667.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Virtanen K, Karelahti J, Raivio T. Modeling air combat by a moving horizon influence diagram game [J]. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2006, 29(5): 1080--1091.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Burgin G H. The Adaptive Maneuvering Logic: Recent Developments [R]. JACC on June 17--19, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Burgin G H, Sidor L B. Rule-based air combat simulation [R]. Technical report, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, CR-4160, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Smith R E, Dike B A. Learning novel fighter combat maneuver rules via genetic algorithms [J]. International Journal of Expert Systems, 1995, 8(3): 247--276.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Smith R E, Dike B A, Mehra R K, et al. Classifier systems in combat: two-sided learning of maneuvers for advanced fighter aircraft [J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2000, 15(9): 421--437.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Nicholas E, Kelly C, Elad K, et al. Genetic fuzzy trees and their application towards autonomous training and control of a squadron of unmanned combat aerial vehicles [J]. Unmanned Systems, 2015, 3(3): 185--204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Roger W S, Alan E B. Neural network models of air combat maneuvering [D]. New Mexico: New Mexico State University, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Kawewong A, Honda Y, Tsyboyana M. Reasoning on the self-organizing incremental associative memory for online robot path planning [J]. IEICE Trans. On Information and Systems, 2010, 93(3): 569--592.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Tangruamsub S, Ka Wewong A, Tsuboyama M, Hasegawa O. Self-organizing incremental associative memory-based robat navigation [J]. IEICE Trans. On Information a Systems, 2012, 95(10): 2415--2425.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Intelligent maneuver decision method of unmanned aerial vehicle

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      EITCE '21: Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Conference on Electronic Information Technology and Computer Engineering
      October 2021
      1723 pages
      ISBN:9781450384322
      DOI:10.1145/3501409

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 31 December 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      EITCE '21 Paper Acceptance Rate294of531submissions,55%Overall Acceptance Rate508of972submissions,52%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)26
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader