skip to main content
10.1145/3501709.3544297acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicerConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Research Proposal: Exploring Quantum Informatics for Middle School Students

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 August 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

New quantum technologies, such as quantum computers and quantum cryptography, have the potential to completely reshape both computer science, and society more broadly. We are at the early stages of this development and have, as computer science educators, the unique opportunity to help shape the future of quantum informatics and its education early on. To date, there is little research on quantum informatics from the perspective of computer science education. With my PhD research, I aim to contribute to shaping this new field of research. I will apply the method of educational reconstruction, to examine if, why and how quantum informatics could be taught to middle school students. Using a design-based approach, I will develop and empirically evaluate educational materials and an exemplary lessons-plan with middle school students. Finally, I want to define how teaching quantum informatics positions itself within computer science education.

References

  1. Allan Collins. 1992. Toward a Design Science of Education. In New Directions in Educational Technology, Eileen Scanlon and Tim O’Shea (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77750-9_2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Peter J. Denning and Craig H. Martell. 2015. Great Principles of Computing. The MIT Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ira Diethelm, Christina Dörge, Ana-Maria Mesaros, and Malte Dünnebier. 2011. Die Didaktische Rekonstruktion für den Informatikunterricht. In Informatik in Bildung und Beruf – INFOS 2011, Marco Thomas (Ed.). Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V., Bonn, 77–86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Diana Franklin, Jen Palmer, Woorin Jang, Elizabeth M. Lehman, Jasmine Marckwordt, Randall H. Landsberg, Alexandria Muller, and Danielle Harlow. 2020. Exploring Quantum Reversibility with Young Learners. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research(ICER ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1145/3372782.3406255Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Andreas Grillenberger, Mareen Przybylla, and Ralf Romeike. 2016. Bringing CS Innovations to the Classroom Using the Model of Educational Reconstruction. In Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Informatics in Schools: Situation, Evolution, and Perspectives, Andrej Brodnik and Françoise Tort (Eds.). Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 31–39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ulrich Kattmann, Reinders Duit, Harald Gropengiesser, and Michael Komorek. 1996. Educational Reconstruction – Bringing together Issues of scientific clarification and students‘ conceptions. In Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching. NAST, St.Louis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Tilman Michaeli, Stefan Seegerer, and Ralf Romeike. 2021. Quanteninformatik als Thema und Aufgabengebiet informatischer Bildung. In INFOS 2021 – 19. GI-Fachtagung Informatik und Schule, Ludger Humbert (Ed.). Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. National Q-12 Education Partnership. 2022. About Q2Work. Q2Work. Retrieved April 10, 2022 from https://q12education.org/aboutGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. QTEdu. 2021. Quantum Technology Education. QTEdu. Retrieved April 27, 2022 from https://qtedu.euGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. QubitXQubit. 2022. Quantum Camp for Middle School. QubitXQubit. Retrieved April 5, 2022 from https://www.qubitbyqubit.org/middle-school-campsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Andreas Schwill. 1997. Computer science education based on fundamental ideas. In Information Technology, Don Passey and Brian Samways (Eds.). Springer US, Boston, MA, 285–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35081-3_36Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Feng Wang and Michael J. Hannafin. 2005. Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development 53, 4 (Dec. 2005), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504682Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ICER '22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 2
    August 2022
    57 pages
    ISBN:9781450391955
    DOI:10.1145/3501709

    Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 7 August 2022

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • abstract
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate189of803submissions,24%

    Upcoming Conference

    ICER 2024
    ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
    August 13 - 15, 2024
    Melbourne , VIC , Australia
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)35
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format